Conversion to the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan CMV Test for management of CMV disease in transplant recipients

Relationship of Ganciclovir Therapeutic Drug Monitoring with Clinical Efficacy and Patient Safety

The clinical utility of ganciclovir therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is unknown. We retrospectively analyzed adult patients treated for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection with ganciclovir with TDM between 2005 and 2015. The primary outcome was an association between ganciclovir TDM and clinical efficacy endpoints within 30 days, defined by viral load and symptomatology. Secondary outcomes included safety endpoints, evaluated within 7 days of the last administered dose of ganciclovir. Of 175 patients evaluated, 82 patients with CMV infection were included in our analysis with a median (interquartile range) baseline CMV viral load of 5,500 (3,000 to 15,200) copies/ml. The majority achieved undetectable or reduced CMV viral load below the lower limit of quantification (74.4%) with improvement in symptomatology (70.7%) at 30 days. Among patients with detectable CMV viremia at 30 days, the viral load had declined to a median of 1,000 (1,000 to 3,090) copies/ml. We did not observe significant associations between the efficacy outcomes and ganciclovir trough (P = 0.20 and P = 0.20, respectively) or peak concentrations (P = 0.14 and P = 0.14, respectively). Similarly, there was no significant association between ganciclovir trough or peak concentrations and safety endpoints, including leukopenia (P = 0.48 and P = 0.69), neutropenia (P = 0.59 and P = 0.69), thrombocytopenia (P = 0.29 and P = 0.37), anemia (P = 0.51 and P = 0.35), nephrotoxicity (P = 0.41 and P = 0.57), and neurotoxicity (P = 0.22 and P = 0.48). We did not observe any associations between ganciclovir TDM and clinical efficacy or safety endpoints. Routine ganciclovir TDM may be of limited value. Future studies may be warranted to identify specific populations with unpredictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics profiles in whom ganciclovir TDM may be of benefit.

Cytomegalovirus viraemia and mortality in renal transplant recipients in the era of antiviral prophylaxis. Lessons from the western Australian experience

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) establishes a lifelong infection that is efficiently controlled by the immune system; this infection can be reactivated in case of immunosuppression such as following solid organ transplantation. CMV viraemia has been associated with CMV disease, as well as increased mortality and allograft failure. Prophylactic antiviral medication is routinely given to renal transplant recipients, but reactivation during and following cessation of antiviral prophylaxis is known to occur. The aims of this study were to assess the incidence, timing and impact of CMV viraemia in renal transplant recipients and to determine the level of viraemia associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

Methods

Data from all adult (18 years and over) Western Australian renal transplant recipients transplanted between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2012 were obtained from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant registry and were supplemented with data obtained from clinical records. Potential risk factors for detectable CMV viraemia (≥600 copies/ml) and all-cause mortality were assessed using univariable analysis and Cox Proportional Hazards Regression.

Results

There were 438 transplants performed on 435 recipients. The following factors increased the risk of CMV viraemia with viral loads ≥600 copies/ml: Donor positive/Recipient negative status; receiving a graft from a deceased donor; and receiving a graft from a donor aged 60 years and over. CMV viraemia with viral loads ≥656 copies/ml was a risk factor for death following renal transplantation, as was being aged 65 years and above at transplant, being Aboriginal and having vascular disease. Importantly 37% of the episodes of CMV viraemia with viral loads ≥656 copies/ml occurred while the patients were expected to be on CMV prophylaxis.

Conclusions

CMV viraemia (≥656 copies/ml) was associated with all-cause mortality in multivariable analysis, and CMV viraemia at ≥656 copies/ml commonly occurred during the period when renal transplant recipients were expected to be on antiviral prophylaxis. A greater vigilance in monitoring CMV levels if antiviral prophylaxis is stopped prematurely or poor patient compliance is suspected could protect some renal transplant recipients from adverse outcomes such as premature mortality.

Molecular and Culture-Based Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Testing for the Diagnosis of Cytomegalovirus Pneumonitis

Background.  Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, with CMV pneumonitis among the most severe manifestations of infection. Although bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples are frequently tested for CMV, the clinical utility of such testing remains uncertain. Methods.  Retrospective analysis of adult patients undergoing BAL testing via CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR), shell vial culture, and conventional viral culture between August 2008 and May 2011 was performed. Cytomegalovirus diagnostic methods were compared with a comprehensive definition of CMV pneumonitis that takes into account signs and symptoms, underlying host immunodeficiency, radiographic findings, and laboratory results. Results.  Seven hundred five patients underwent 1077 bronchoscopy episodes with 1090 BAL specimens sent for CMV testing. Cytomegalovirus-positive patients were more likely to be hematopoietic cell transplant recipients (26% vs 8%, P < .0001) and less likely to have an underlying condition not typically associated with lung disease (3% vs 20%, P < .0001). Histopathology was performed in only 17.3% of CMV-positive bronchoscopy episodes. When CMV diagnostic methods were evaluated against the comprehensive definition, the sensitivity and specificity of PCR, shell vial culture, and conventional culture were 91.3% and 94.6%, 54.4% and 97.4%, and 28.3% and 96.5%, respectively. Compared with culture, PCR provided significantly higher sensitivity and negative predictive value (P ≤ .001), without significantly lower positive predictive value. Cytomegalovirus quantitation did not improve test performance, resulting in a receiver operating characteristic curve with an area under the curve of 0.53. Conclusions.  Cytomegalovirus PCR combined with a comprehensive clinical definition provides a pragmatic approach for the diagnosis of CMV pneumonitis.

Risk factors for cytomegalovirus reactivation after liver transplantation: can pre-transplant cytomegalovirus antibody titers predict outcome?

Despite preexisting cytomegalovirus (CMV) immunity, CMV-seropositive liver transplantation (LT) patients remain at risk of CMV infection. We hypothesized that the pre-transplant CMV antibody titer correlates with the risk of CMV reactivation. We conducted a retrospective study of CMV-seropositive LT recipients who did not receive anti-CMV prophylaxis from 2007 to 2013. The pre-transplant CMV immunoglobulin G (IgG) titer, which was measured with an enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay, was assessed as a risk factor for CMV reactivation with multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. The population consisted of 225 CMV-seropositive LT patients with a median age of 57 years (interquartile range, 47-62 years). The CMV titer distributions were as follows: <60 (40%) and ≥60 AU/mL (60%). The Kaplan-Meier estimates for CMV infection were 17% at 3 months, 18% at 6 months, and 19% at 12 months after transplantation. In a univariate analysis, a marginally significant increased risk of CMV infection was seen in LT recipients with a pre-transplant CMV IgG titer<60 AU/mL versus ≥60 AU/mL [hazard ratio (HR), 1.79; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.98-3.28 (P=0.06)]. This risk was statistically significant in the subgroup of recipients who received allografts from CMV-seropositive donors [HR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.15-4.26 (P=0.02)]. In a multivariate analysis, a pre-transplant CMV IgG titer<60 AU/mL was significantly associated with CMV infection [HR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.60-6.03 (P<0.001)]. The other risk factors were high body mass index, donor CMV seropositivity, prolonged cold ischemic time, use of an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist for induction therapy, and high numbers of post-transplant infections. A lower pre-transplant CMV antibody titer is significantly associated with CMV infection after LT. Quantitative measurement of CMV-specific humoral immunity may have a potential role in improving the CMV prevention strategy in CMV-seropositive LT recipients.

Monitoring of cytomegalovirus viral loads by two molecular assays in whole-blood and plasma samples from hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral loads in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are typically monitored using quantitative molecular assays. The Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan CMV test (Cobas CMV) has recently been cleared by the FDA for the monitoring of CMV viral loads in plasma samples from transplant patients. In this study, we compare and correlate the viral loads obtained by a laboratory-developed test (LC CMV) (using Roche analyte-specific reagents [ASR] on the LightCycler 2.0) on whole-blood specimens with those obtained on corresponding plasma and whole-blood specimens by the Cobas CMV assay. Testing was performed on 773 archived patient specimens. The strength of the agreement was good for the two assays performed on whole blood (κ=0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.7) and moderate when the tests were performed on different sample types (κ=0.54; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.62 for the LC CMV whole blood [WB] assay versus Cobas plasma [PL], and κ=0.57; 95% CI, 0.5 to 0.65 for the Cobas WB assay versus Cobas PL), although the difference was not statistically significant. Using a combination gold standard (i.e., a true positive was a specimen that was positive by two or more methods), the sensitivity and specificity of the assays were 78.8% and 99.3% for the LC CMV assay, 85.2% and 98.1% for the Cobas CMV WB assay, and 100% and 90.5% for Cobas CMV PL assay, respectively. A comparison of the CMV viral load trends in both plasma and whole blood from a few patients with multiple positive successive samples showed similar slopes, with differences in the slope ranging from 0.01 to 0.22. However, the absolute value for individual viral load differed markedly with whole-blood viral loads, being on average 0.5- to 1.22-log higher than those in plasma. The Cobas CMV assay provides a valid option for the monitoring of viral loads in transplant patients. Due to its increased sensitivity, the detection of CMV DNA in patients with low viral loads (i.e., those below limit of quantification [LOQ]) is increased with the Cobas CMV assay in plasma specimens. Longitudinal prospective studies will be needed to examine the clinical significance of these low-level viral loads.

Quantification of cytomegalovirus viral load

Cytomegalovirus (CMV), a member of the Herpesviridae family, is worldwide distributed. After the primary infection, CMV induces a latent infection with possible reactivation(s). It is responsible for severe to life-threatening diseases in immunocompromised patients and in foetuses and newborns of infected mothers. For monitoring CMV load, classical techniques based on rapid culture or pp65 antigenemia are progressively replaced by quantitative nuclear acid tests (QNAT), easier to implement and standardize. A large variety of QNAT are available from laboratory-developed assays to fully-automated commercial tests. The indications of CMV quantification include CMV infection during pregnancy and in newborns, and viral surveillance of grafted and non-grafted immunocompromised patients, patients with bowel inflammatory diseases and those hospitalised in intensive care unit. A close cooperation between virologists and clinicians is essential for optimizing the benefit of CMV DNA monitoring.