Polymyxin B broth disk elution: a feasible and accurate methodology to determine polymyxin B susceptibility in Enterobacterales

Challenges in the Detection of Polymyxin Resistance: From Today to the Future

Antimicrobial resistance is known to be one of the greatest global threats to human health, and is one of the main causes of death worldwide. In this scenario, polymyxins are last-resort antibiotics to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Currently, the reference test to evaluate the susceptibility of isolates to polymyxins is the broth microdilution method; however, this technique has numerous complications and challenges for use in laboratory routines. Several phenotypic methods have been reported as being promising for implementation in routine diagnostics, including the BMD commercial test, rapid polymyxin NP test, polymyxin elution test, culture medium with polymyxins, and the Polymyxin Drop Test, which require materials for use in routines and must be easy to perform. Furthermore, Sensititre®, molecular tests, MALDI-TOF MS, and Raman spectroscopy present reliable results, but the equipment is not found in most microbiology laboratories. In this context, this review discusses the main laboratory methodologies that allow the detection of resistance to polymyxins, elucidating the challenges and perspectives.

Detection of polymyxins resistance among Enterobacterales: evaluation of available methods and proposal of a new rapid and feasible methodology

BACKGROUND

Fast and accurate detection of polymyxins resistance is necessary as they remain the last resources to treat infections caused by Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in many regions. We evaluated the rapid colorimetric polymyxin B elution (RCPE) and developed its miniaturized version, RCPE microelution (RCPEm), aiming to detect polymyxins resistance among Enterobacterales.

METHODS

The methodologies consist of exposing the bacterial population in a solution (NP solution) where polymyxin B disks were previously eluted to obtain a concentration of 2 µg/mL for RCPE and 3 µg/mL for RCPEm.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-seven Enterobacterales were evaluated, 90 (33.7%) resistant to polymyxin B by broth microdilution. It was observed 0.6% of major error (ME) by RCPE, with a specificity of 99.4%. The miniaturized version (RCPEm) presented the same ME and specificity values, but slightly higher sensitivity (97.8% vs. 95.6%) with 2.2% of very major error (VME).

CONCLUSIONS

RCPE and RCPEm proved to be useful alternatives to determine polymyxin B susceptibility in clinical microbiology laboratories, presenting low cost, being easy to perform, and demanding short incubation time.

Assessing Clinical Potential of Old Antibiotics against Severe Infections by Multi-Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Using In Silico Modelling

In the light of increasing antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative bacteria and the lack of new more potent antimicrobial agents, new strategies have been explored. Old antibiotics, such as colistin, temocillin, fosfomycin, mecillinam, nitrofurantoin, minocycline, and chloramphenicol, have attracted the attention since they often exhibit in vitro activity against multi-drug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. The current review provides a summary of the in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics and PK/PD characteristics of old antibiotics. In silico modelling was then performed using Monte Carlo simulation in order to combine all preclinical data with human pharmacokinetics and determine the probability of target (1-log kill in thigh/lung infection animal models) attainment (PTA) of different dosing regimens. The potential of clinical efficacy of a drug against severe infections by MDR gram-negative bacteria was considered when PTA was >95% at the epidemiological cutoff values of corresponding species. In vitro potent activity against MDR gram-negative pathogens has been shown for colistin, polymyxin B, temocillin (against E. coli and K. pneumoniae), fosfomycin (against E. coli), mecillinam (against E. coli), minocycline (against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii), and chloramphenicol (against E. coli) with ECOFF or MIC90 ≤ 16 mg/L. When preclinical PK/PD targets were combined with human pharmacokinetics, Monte Carlo analysis showed that among the old antibiotics analyzed, there is clinical potential for polymyxin B against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and A. baumannii; for temocillin against K. pneumoniae and E. coli; for fosfomycin against E. coli and K. pneumoniae; and for mecillinam against E. coli. Clinical studies are needed to verify the potential of those antibiotics to effectively treat infections by multi-drug resistant gram-negative bacteria.

Evaluation of phenotypic methods for detection of polymyxin B-resistant bacteria

Determination of sensitivity to polymyxins has always been a challenge, especially in clinical laboratory routines. This study evaluated two rapid, simple, and inexpensive phenotypic methods to test polymyxin B (PMB) susceptibility in Enterobacterales and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli. One hundred isolates were used in the tests. The isolates were collected in three hospitals in southern and southeastern Brazil from 1995 to 2019. We compared broth microdilution (reference method) with the broth disk elution test and modified drop test, using polymyxin B -disk or PMB -powder in 2 concentrations (12 and 16 μg/ml). For the broth disk elution and modified drop test with the concentration of 12 μg/ml, categorical agreement values exceeded 90%. The modified drop test with a concentration of 12 μg/ml and broth disk elution may be excellent for initial screening of polymyxin-resistance in laboratory routines. Moreover, these methods are simple and use inexpensive supplies, and may optimize therapeutic decisions.

Polymyxin resistance in Enterobacterales: overview and epidemiology in the Americas

The worldwide spread of carbapenem- and polymyxin-resistant Enterobacterales represents an urgent public-health threat. However, for most countries in the Americas, the available data are limited, although Latin America has been suggested as a silent spreading reservoir for isolates carrying plasmid-mediated polymyxin resistance mechanisms. This work provides an overall update on polymyxin and polymyxin resistance and focuses on uses, availability and susceptibility testing. Moreover, a comprehensive review of the current polymyxin resistance epidemiology in the Americas is provided. We found that reports in the English and Spanish literature show widespread carbapenemase-producing and colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in the Americas determined by the clonal expansion of the pandemic clone ST258 and mgrB-mediated colistin resistance. In addition, widespread IncI2 and IncX4 plasmids carrying mcr-1 in Escherichia coli come mainly from human sources; however, plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in the Americas is underreported in the veterinary sector. These findings demonstrate the urgent need for the implementation of polymyxin resistance surveillance in Enterobacterales as well as appropriate regulatory measures for antimicrobial use in veterinary medicine.

Performance of different methods for testing polymyxin B: comparison of broth microdilution, agar dilution and MIC test strip in mcr-1 positive and negative Escherichia coli

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing with the last-resort antibiotics polymyxins (polymyxin B and colistin) is associated with several methodological issues. Currently, broth microdilution (BMD) is recommended for colistin and polymyxin B. BMD is laborious and the utility of alternative methods needs to be evaluated for polymyxin B susceptibility testing. In this study, using BMD as a reference method, the performance of agar dilution (AD) and MIC test strips (MTS) were evaluated in polymyxin B susceptibility testing. BMD, AD and MTS were used to determine MICs of 193 clinical isolates of Escherichia coli. Seventy-nine were positive for the polymyxin resistance gene mcr-1. Method performances were evaluated based on pair-wise agreements with the reference method (BMD) and statistical testing. AD and MTS showed an unacceptable number of very major errors (VMEs) compared with BMD, 9·3 and 10·7%, respectively. The essential agreement (EA) was low for AD (49·7%), but high for MTS (97·8%). However, statistical testing showed that MTS tended to yield a one-step lower MIC (P < 0·01) compared with BMD. The discordances observed with MTS and AD in comparison with BMD for polymyxin B susceptibility testing for E. coli suggest their inapplicability in routine testing. A large number of isolates clustered around the susceptibility breakpoint (2-4 mg l^-1 ) and several mcr-1 positive isolates (17%) were determined as susceptible with BMD. A screening breakpoint for mcr-1 of 2 mg l^-1 should also be considered.