1
|
Miftode IL, Vâță A, Miftode RȘ, Parângă T, Luca MC, Manciuc C, Țimpău AS, Radu V, Roșu MF, Stămăteanu LO, Leca D, Anton-Păduraru DT, Miftode EG. The Impact of Urinary Catheterization on the Antibiotic Susceptibility of ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales: A Challenging Duo. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:462. [PMID: 38786190 PMCID: PMC11117663 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13050462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is currently a growing concern among healthcare providers, underscoring the importance of describing the regional susceptibility profile for common microorganisms that are associated with urinary tract infections (UTIs). This knowledge serves as the foundation for proper empirical therapeutic recommendations tailored to local susceptibility patterns. RESULTS We found a high prevalence of ESBL-producing strains (36.9%), with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. being the most prevalent isolated bacteria. Among the catheterized patients, Klebsiella spp. emerged as the primary etiology, with a significant correlation between catheterization and Proteus spp. (p = 0.02) and Providencia stuartii (p < 0.0001). We observed significant correlations between urinary catheterization and older age (68.9 ± 13.7 years vs. 64.2 ± 18.1 years in non-catheterized patients, p = 0.026) and with the presence of an isolate with extensive drug resistance (p < 0.0001) or even pandrug resistance (p < 0.0001). Susceptibility rates significantly decreased for almost all the tested antibiotics during the study period. Notably, susceptibility was markedly lower among catheterized patients, with the most pronounced differences observed for carbapenems (59.6% versus 83.4%, p < 0.0001) and aminoglycosides (37.1% versus 46.9%, p = 0.0001). MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective study analyzing the susceptibility profiles of 724 extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales isolated from urine cultures. Our focus was on highlighting susceptibility profiles among isolates associated with urinary catheterization and assessing the shifts in the susceptibility rates over time. CONCLUSIONS The constant rise in AMR rates among Enterobacterales presents significant challenges in treating severe infections, particularly among urinary catheterized patients. This trend leaves clinicians with limited or no effective treatment options. Consequently, the development and implementation of personalized treatment protocols are imperative to ensure efficient empirical therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ionela-Larisa Miftode
- Department of Infectious Diseases (Internal Medicine II), Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (I.-L.M.); (A.V.); (T.P.); (M.C.L.); (C.M.); (L.O.S.); (D.L.); (E.G.M.)
- St. Parascheva Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, 700116 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Andrei Vâță
- Department of Infectious Diseases (Internal Medicine II), Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (I.-L.M.); (A.V.); (T.P.); (M.C.L.); (C.M.); (L.O.S.); (D.L.); (E.G.M.)
- St. Parascheva Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, 700116 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Radu-Ștefan Miftode
- Department of Internal Medicine I (Cardiology), Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Tudorița Parângă
- Department of Infectious Diseases (Internal Medicine II), Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (I.-L.M.); (A.V.); (T.P.); (M.C.L.); (C.M.); (L.O.S.); (D.L.); (E.G.M.)
- St. Parascheva Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, 700116 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Mihaela Cătălina Luca
- Department of Infectious Diseases (Internal Medicine II), Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (I.-L.M.); (A.V.); (T.P.); (M.C.L.); (C.M.); (L.O.S.); (D.L.); (E.G.M.)
- St. Parascheva Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, 700116 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Carmen Manciuc
- Department of Infectious Diseases (Internal Medicine II), Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (I.-L.M.); (A.V.); (T.P.); (M.C.L.); (C.M.); (L.O.S.); (D.L.); (E.G.M.)
- St. Parascheva Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, 700116 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Amalia Stefana Țimpău
- Department of Internal Medicine I (Cardiology), Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Viorel Radu
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania
| | - Manuel Florin Roșu
- St. Parascheva Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, 700116 Iasi, Romania;
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Infectious Diseases Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iasi, Romania
| | - Lidia Oana Stămăteanu
- Department of Infectious Diseases (Internal Medicine II), Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (I.-L.M.); (A.V.); (T.P.); (M.C.L.); (C.M.); (L.O.S.); (D.L.); (E.G.M.)
- St. Parascheva Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, 700116 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Daniela Leca
- Department of Infectious Diseases (Internal Medicine II), Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (I.-L.M.); (A.V.); (T.P.); (M.C.L.); (C.M.); (L.O.S.); (D.L.); (E.G.M.)
- St. Parascheva Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, 700116 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Dana Teodora Anton-Păduraru
- Department of Mother and Child Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Egidia Gabriela Miftode
- Department of Infectious Diseases (Internal Medicine II), Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Gr. T. Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (I.-L.M.); (A.V.); (T.P.); (M.C.L.); (C.M.); (L.O.S.); (D.L.); (E.G.M.)
- St. Parascheva Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases, 700116 Iasi, Romania;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Salam ME, Jeffres M, Molina KC, Miller MA, Huang M, Fish DN. Evaluation of Oral Amoxicillin/Clavulanate for Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Ceftriaxone Non-Susceptible Enterobacterales. PHARMACY 2024; 12:60. [PMID: 38668086 PMCID: PMC11054542 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy12020060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common infections and are frequently caused by Gram-negative organisms. The rise of resistant isolates has prompted evaluation of alternative therapies, including amoxicillin-clavulanate which has potent activity against Ambler class A enzymes. This study sought to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients with ceftriaxone non-susceptible UTIs receiving amoxicillin-clavulanate or standard of care (SOC). This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of adult patients with urinary tract infections caused by a ceftriaxone non-susceptible pathogen who received amoxicillin-clavulanate or SOC. The primary outcome was clinical failure at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included time to failure, isolation of a resistant organism, and hospital length of stay. Fifty-nine patients met study inclusion: 26 received amoxicillin/clavulanate and 33 received SOC. Amoxicillin-clavulanate recipients did not have higher failure rates compared to SOC recipients. For patients requiring hospital admission, hospital length of stay was numerically shorter with amoxicillin-clavulanate. The frequency of amoxicillin-clavulanate and carbapenem-resistant organisms did not differ significantly between groups. Amoxicillin-clavulanate may be a useful alternative therapy for the treatment of ceftriaxone non-susceptible Enterobacterales UTIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madison E. Salam
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; (M.E.S.); (M.J.)
- Department of Pharmacy, UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Meghan Jeffres
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; (M.E.S.); (M.J.)
- Department of Pharmacy, UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Kyle C. Molina
- Department of Pharmacy, Scripps Health, La Jolla, CA 92121, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Matthew A. Miller
- Department of Pharmacy, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA;
| | - Misha Huang
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA;
- Department of Medicine–Infectious Diseases, UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Douglas N. Fish
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; (M.E.S.); (M.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maveke SM, Aboge GO, Kanja LW, Mainga AO, Gachau N, Muchira BW, Moriasi GA. Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Clinical Isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Two Kenyan Facilities: A National Referral and a Level Five Hospital. Int J Microbiol 2024; 2024:7463899. [PMID: 38384586 PMCID: PMC10881238 DOI: 10.1155/2024/7463899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and multidrug resistance (MDR) among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, especially through the production of extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), limits therapeutic options and poses a significant public health threat. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the phenotypic and genetic determinants of antimicrobial resistance of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from patient samples in two Kenyan Hospitals. Methods We collected 138 E. coli and 127 K. pneumoniae isolates from various clinical specimens at the two health facilities from January 2020 to February 2021. The isolates' ESBL production and antibiotic susceptibility were phenotypically confirmed using a standard procedure. Molecular analysis was done through conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with appropriate primers for gadA, rpoB, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaOXA, blaCTX-M-group-1, blaCTX-M-group-2, blaCTX-M-group-9, and blaCTX-M-group-8/25 genes, sequencing and BLASTn analysis. Results Most E. coli (82.6%) and K. pneumoniae (92.9%) isolates were ESBL producers, with the highest resistance was against ceftriaxone (69.6% among E. coli and 91.3% among K. pneumoniae) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (70.9% among K. pneumoniae). The frequency of MDR was 39.9% among E. coli and 13.4% among K. pneumoniae isolates. The commonest MDR phenotypes among the E. coli isolates were CRO-FEP-AZM-LVX and CRO-AZM-LVX, while the FOX-CRO-AMC-MI-TGC-FM, FOX-CRO-FEP-AMC-TZP-AZM-LVX-MI and CRO-AMC-TZP-AZM-MI were the most frequent among K. pneumoniae isolates. Notably, the FOX-CRO-FEP-AMC-TZP-AZM-LVX-MI phenotype was observed in ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative K. pneumoniae isolates. The most frequent ESBL genes were blaTEM (42%), blaSHV (40.6%), and blaOXA (36.2%) among E. coli, and blaTEM (89%), blaSHV (82.7%), blaOXA (76.4%), and blaCTX-M-group-1 (72.5%) were most frequent ESBL genes among K. pneumoniae isolates. The blaSHV and blaOXA and blaTEM genotypes were predominantly associated with FOX-CRO-FEP-MEM and CRO-FEP multidrug resistance (MDR) and CRO antimicrobial resistance (AMR) phenotypes, among E. coli isolates from Embu Level V (16.7%) and Kenyatta National Hospital (7.0%), respectively. Conclusions The high proportion of ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates increases the utilization of last-resort antibiotics, jeopardizing antimicrobial chemotherapy. Furthermore, the antimicrobial resistance patterns exhibited towards extended-spectrum cephalosporins, beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, fluoroquinolones, and macrolides show the risk of co-resistance associated with ESBL-producing isolates responsible for MDR. Hence, there is a need for regular surveillance and implementation of infection prevention and control strategies and antimicrobial stewardship programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia M. Maveke
- Department of Public Health, Pharmacology, and Toxicology, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053-00625, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Gabriel O. Aboge
- Department of Public Health, Pharmacology, and Toxicology, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053-00625, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Laetitia W. Kanja
- Department of Public Health, Pharmacology, and Toxicology, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053-00625, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Alfred O. Mainga
- Department of Public Health, Pharmacology, and Toxicology, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053-00625, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Naftaly Gachau
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology, Kenyatta National Hospital, P.O. Box 20723-00202, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Beatrice W. Muchira
- Department of Public Health, Pharmacology, and Toxicology, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 29053-00625, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Gervason A. Moriasi
- Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Biotechnology, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844-00100-GPO, Nairobi, Kenya
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Mount Kenya University, P.O. Box 342-01000, Thika, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Djordjevic SP, Jarocki VM, Seemann T, Cummins ML, Watt AE, Drigo B, Wyrsch ER, Reid CJ, Donner E, Howden BP. Genomic surveillance for antimicrobial resistance - a One Health perspective. Nat Rev Genet 2024; 25:142-157. [PMID: 37749210 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-023-00649-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) - the ability of microorganisms to adapt and survive under diverse chemical selection pressures - is influenced by complex interactions between humans, companion and food-producing animals, wildlife, insects and the environment. To understand and manage the threat posed to health (human, animal, plant and environmental) and security (food and water security and biosecurity), a multifaceted 'One Health' approach to AMR surveillance is required. Genomic technologies have enabled monitoring of the mobilization, persistence and abundance of AMR genes and mutations within and between microbial populations. Their adoption has also allowed source-tracing of AMR pathogens and modelling of AMR evolution and transmission. Here, we highlight recent advances in genomic AMR surveillance and the relative strengths of different technologies for AMR surveillance and research. We showcase recent insights derived from One Health genomic surveillance and consider the challenges to broader adoption both in developed and in lower- and middle-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven P Djordjevic
- Australian Institute for Microbiology and Infection, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
- Australian Centre for Genomic Epidemiological Microbiology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Veronica M Jarocki
- Australian Institute for Microbiology and Infection, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Australian Centre for Genomic Epidemiological Microbiology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Torsten Seemann
- Centre for Pathogen Genomics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Microbiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne at the Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Max L Cummins
- Australian Institute for Microbiology and Infection, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Australian Centre for Genomic Epidemiological Microbiology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anne E Watt
- Microbiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne at the Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Barbara Drigo
- UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ethan R Wyrsch
- Australian Institute for Microbiology and Infection, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Australian Centre for Genomic Epidemiological Microbiology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cameron J Reid
- Australian Institute for Microbiology and Infection, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Australian Centre for Genomic Epidemiological Microbiology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Erica Donner
- Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Cooperative Research Centre for Solving Antimicrobial Resistance in Agribusiness, Food, and Environments (CRC SAAFE), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Benjamin P Howden
- Centre for Pathogen Genomics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Microbiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne at the Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Walkty A, Karlowsky JA, Lagace-Wiens P, Baxter MR, Adam HJ, Zhanel GG. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacterial pathogens recovered from the urine of patients at Canadian hospitals from 2009 to 2020. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2022; 4:dlac122. [PMID: 36466136 PMCID: PMC9710733 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To investigate in vitro susceptibility patterns of bacterial pathogens recovered from the urine of outpatients (isolates from outpatient clinics or emergency departments) and hospital inpatients across Canada from 2009 to 2020 as part of the CANWARD study. Methods Canadian hospital microbiology laboratories submitted bacterial pathogens cultured from urine to the CANWARD study coordinating laboratory on an annual basis (January 2009 to December 2020). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by CLSI broth microdilution, with MICs interpreted by current CLSI breakpoints. Results In total, 4644 urinary pathogens were included in this study. Escherichia coli was recovered most frequently (53.3% of all isolates), followed by Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Together, these six species accounted for 84.2% of study isolates. Nitrofurantoin demonstrated excellent in vitro activity versus E. coli, with 97.6% of outpatient and 96.1% of inpatient isolates remaining susceptible. In contrast, E. coli susceptibility rates were lower for ciprofloxacin (outpatient 79.5%, inpatient 65.9%) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (outpatient 75.2%, inpatient 73.5%). The percentage of E. coli isolates that were phenotypically positive for ESBL production significantly increased from 4.2% (2009-11) to 11.3% (2018-20). A similar although less pronounced temporal trend was observed with ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae. Conclusions E. coli was the pathogen most frequently recovered from the urine of Canadian patients, and the proportion of isolates that were ESBL producers increased over time. Susceptibility data presented here suggest that ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole may be suboptimal for the empirical treatment of complicated urinary infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Walkty
- Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, 502 Basic Medical Sciences Building, 745 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg R3E 0J9, Manitoba, Canada,Shared Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - James A Karlowsky
- Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, 502 Basic Medical Sciences Building, 745 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg R3E 0J9, Manitoba, Canada,Shared Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Philippe Lagace-Wiens
- Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, 502 Basic Medical Sciences Building, 745 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg R3E 0J9, Manitoba, Canada,Shared Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Melanie R Baxter
- Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, 502 Basic Medical Sciences Building, 745 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg R3E 0J9, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Heather J Adam
- Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, 502 Basic Medical Sciences Building, 745 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg R3E 0J9, Manitoba, Canada,Shared Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Walkty AJ, Karlowsky JA, Baxter MR, Lagace-Wiens PRS, Adam HJ, Zhanel GG. In vitro activity of sulopenem against 1880 bacterial pathogens isolated from Canadian patients with urinary tract infections (CANWARD, 2014-21). J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77:3414-3420. [PMID: 36177825 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There are limited oral antimicrobial options for the treatment of urinary infections caused by ESBL-producing and MDR Enterobacterales. Sulopenem is an investigational thiopenem antimicrobial that is being developed as both an oral and IV formulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of sulopenem versus bacterial pathogens recovered from the urine of patients admitted to or assessed at hospitals across Canada (CANWARD). MATERIALS AND METHODS The in vitro activity of sulopenem and clinically relevant comparators was determined for 1880 Gram-negative and Gram-positive urinary isolates obtained as part of the CANWARD study (2014 to 2021) using the CLSI broth microdilution method. RESULTS Sulopenem demonstrated excellent in vitro activity versus members of the Enterobacterales, with MIC90 values ranging from 0.06 to 0.5 mg/L for all species tested. Over 90% of ESBL-producing, AmpC-producing and MDR (not susceptible to ≥1 antimicrobial from ≥3 classes) Escherichia coli were inhibited by ≤0.25 mg/L of sulopenem. Sulopenem had an identical MIC90 to meropenem for ESBL-producing and MDR E. coli. The MIC90 of sulopenem and meropenem versus MSSA was 0.25 mg/L. Sulopenem was not active in vitro versus Pseudomonas aeruginosa (similar to ertapenem), and it demonstrated poor activity versus Enterococcus faecalis (similar to meropenem). CONCLUSIONS Sulopenem demonstrated excellent in vitro activity versus bacterial pathogens recovered from the urine of Canadian patients. These data suggest that sulopenem may have a role in the treatment of urinary infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant Enterobacterales, but additional clinical studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Walkty
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.,Shared Health, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - James A Karlowsky
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.,Shared Health, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Melanie R Baxter
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Philippe R S Lagace-Wiens
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.,Shared Health, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Heather J Adam
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.,Shared Health, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - George G Zhanel
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|