Ceftazidime-avibactam, Meropenem-vaborbactam, and Imipenem-relebactam Activities against Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacterales from United States Medical Centers (2018–2022)

In vitro activity and genomic characterization of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical blood culture isolates resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam: an Italian nationwide multicentre observational study (2022-23)

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam and comparators against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) clinical isolates collected from a multicentre study in Italy (2022-23) and genomic characterization of the molecular mechanisms causing resistance.

METHODS

Consecutive KPC-Kp isolates from blood cultures (n = 264) were collected from 14 hospital centres in the period 2022-23. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using broth microdilution. WGS was used to investigate KPC-Kp strains resistant to the new approved β-lactam/β-lactam inhibitor combinations (BLICs).

RESULTS

Overall, meropenem/vaborbactam (95.1% susceptible by EUCAST and 93.9% susceptible by CLSI; MIC50 = 0.5 mg/L; MIC90 = 4 mg/L) and imipenem/relebactam (97% susceptible by EUCAST and 92.8% susceptible by CLSI; MIC50 = 0.25 mg/L; MIC90 = 0.5 mg/L) showed similar activity, followed by ceftazidime/avibactam (93.9% susceptible by both EUCAST and CLSI; MIC50 = 2 mg/L; MIC90 = 8 mg/L). Ten out of 13 (76.9%) KPC-Kp resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam carried a blaKPC variant including blaKPC-31, blaKPC-205, blaKPC-203 and blaKPC-93. Among KPC-Kp resistant to meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam, 90.9% (10/11) and 80% (4/5) harboured a WT carbapenemase (i.e. blaKPC-2 or blaKPC-3), respectively. All strains resistant to meropenem/vaborbactam and/or imipenem/relebactam carried truncated OmpK35 and/or mutated (ins135GD) OmpK36.

CONCLUSIONS

New BLICs were shown to be the most widely active therapeutic option against KPC-Kp clinical isolates collected in Italy. Ceftazidime/avibactam resistance is mainly driven by the expression of KPC variants, whereas the loss of function of the OmpK35 and OmpK36 porins appears to play a key but not exclusive role in the development of meropenem/vaborbactam and/or imipenem/relebactam resistance.

A comparison of two MALDI-TOF MS based assays for the detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacterales

Carbapenem resistant (CRE) and carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales (CPE) in particular, represent a major threat for healthcare systems worldwide. Rapid, reliable, and easy to perform assays are required to enable targeted and effective therapy. MALDI-TOF MS based carbapenemase diagnostics has potential advantages over molecular and phenotypic sensitivity tests, especially in terms of time to result. So far, only one mass spectrometry (MS)-based carbapenemase test system is commercially available for routine use. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the established system to a novel MS-based test to identify CPE isolates. Forty consecutive CRE isolates (70% CPEs) were pre-screened for carbapenemase activity by routine laboratory methods. Isolates then were tested using the to date only IVD CE certified MALDI-TOF MS carbapenemase detection assay (MBT STAR-Carba IVD Kit; Bruker Daltonics) and a novel test designed for the recently launched EXS2600 MALDI-TOF MS system (Carbapenemase Activity Kit; Zybio). Valid results were obtained for 93% and 85% isolates by the Bruker and the Zybio assay, respectively. Sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values were 92%, 91%, 96%, and 83% for the Bruker assay and 96%, 64%, 85%, and 88% for the Zybio assay. There are notable differences concerning the handling of the assays. In summary, both systems featured high sensitivities for the detection of carbapenemases, but the Bruker assay yielded less false-positive results. There are advantages and disadvantages concerning the handling for each system, but both proved to be suitable for the use in a routine laboratory.

Susceptibility evaluation of novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from bloodstream infections in hospitalized patients in Brazil

INTRODUCTION

Novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor (BIBLI) combinations are commercially available and have been used for treating carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections. Continuous surveillance of susceptibility profiles and resistance mechanism identification are necessary to monitor the evolution of resistance within these agents.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the susceptibility rates of ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam in CRKP isolated from patients with bloodstream infections who underwent screening for a randomized clinical trial in Brazil.

METHODS

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for meropenem, ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam using the gradient diffusion strip method. Carbapenemase genes were detected by multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing isolates showing resistance to any BLBLI and New Delhi Metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM)-producing isolates with susceptibility to any BLBLI isolates were further submitted for whole-genome sequencing.

RESULTS

From a total of 69 CRKP isolates, 39 were positive for blaKPC, 19 for blaNDM and 11 for blaKPC and blaNDM. KPC-producing isolates demonstrated susceptibility rates above 94 % for all BLBLIs. Two isolates with resistance to meropenem/vaborbactam demonstrated a Gly and Asp duplication at the porin OmpK36 as well as a truncated OmpK35. All NDM-producing isolates, including KPC and NDM coproducers, demonstrated susceptibility rates to ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam of 0 %, 9.1-21.1 % and 9.1-26.3 %, respectively. Five NDM-producing isolates that presented susceptibility to BLBLIs also had porin alterations CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that, although high susceptibility rates to BLBLIs were found, KPC-2 isolates were able to demonstrate resistance probably as a result of porin mutations. Additionally, NDM-1 isolates showed susceptibility to BLBLIs in vitro.

Activity of Aztreonam/Avibactam and Recently Approved β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Intensive Care Unit and Non-Intensive Care Unit Patients

We evaluated the activities of aztreonam/avibactam and recently approved β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLICs) to compare the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients. Clinical isolates (1/patient) were consecutively collected from 72 United States medical centres in 2020-2022 and susceptibility tested by broth microdilution. The results for 5421 isolates from ICU patients were analysed and compared to those for 20,649 isolates from non-ICU patients. Isolates from ventilator-associated pneumonia patients were analysed separately. Aztreonam/avibactam inhibited 100.0%/>99.9% Enterobacterales and 100.0%/98.3% of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) from ICU/non-ICU patients at ≤8 mg/L, respectively. The CRE susceptibility rates were 88.5%/82.9% for ceftazidime/avibactam, 82.1%/81.2% for meropenem/vaborbactam, and 78.2%/72.6% for imipenem/relebactam among ICU/non-ICU isolates. Among the P. aeruginosa isolates from ICU/non-ICU patients, the susceptibility rates were 96.3%/97.6% for ceftazidime/avibactam, 97.2/98.4% for ceftolozane/tazobactam, 97.1%/98.0% for imipenem/relebactam, 77.8%/84.6% for piperacillin/tazobactam, and 76.9%/85.8% for meropenem; aztreonam/avibactam inhibited 78.0%/81.9% of P. aeruginosa at ≤8 mg/L. In summary, lower susceptibility rates were observed among ICU than non-ICU isolates. Aztreonam/avibactam exhibited potent in vitro activity and broad-spectrum activity against Enterobacterales from ICU and non-ICU patients, including CRE and isolates non-susceptible to newer BLICs. Against P. aeruginosa, aztreonam/avibactam showed a spectrum of activity comparable to that of piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, and ceftazidime.

Antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against KPC-2-producing Enterobacterales: a cross-combination and dose-escalation titration study with relebactam and vaborbactam

With the introduction of ceftazidime-avibactam worldwide, the antimicrobial activity of new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs) needs to be investigated. From January 2020 to June 2023, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacterales were collected. With a broth microdilution test of new BL/BLIs, cross-activity test with nine combinations of BLs and new BLIs and dose-escalation titration test for non-susceptible isolates were conducted to investigate inhibitory activities of new BLIs. A total of 188 isolates was collected and most isolates (186/188, 98.9%) carried the KPC-2 gene exclusively, while two isolates (1.1%) co-harbored NDM-1. Among the 186 KPC-2-producing isolates, 184 (98.9%) were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, 173 (93.0%) to imipenem-relebactam, and 184 (98.9%) to meropenem-vaborbactam. All isolates non-susceptible to imipenem-relebactam or meropenem-vaborbactam became susceptible when avibactam replaced relebactam or vaborbactam, with 7 of 11 (63.6%) imipenem-relebactam non-susceptible isolates and both (100.0%) of the meropenem-vaborbactam non-susceptible isolates. When the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of BLs were compared using log2 scales, combinations with avibactam showed statistically significant efficacy in lowering MICs compared to relebactam and vaborbactam (all P < 0.05). In the dose-escalation test of new BLIs, increasing dose of all new BLIs corresponded to increased susceptibility to BLs. Ceftazidime-avibactam exhibited excellent susceptibility against KPC-2-producing Enterobacterales unless co-harboring metallo-β-lactamase. The cross-combination test against non-susceptible isolates suggests that the inhibitory activity of avibactam was superior to those of relebactam or vaborbactam. Increasing the dose of new BLIs produced increased susceptibility to BLs, suggesting that high-concentration regimen need to be developed.

IMPORTANCE

This study investigated 188 Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-2-producing Enterobacterales collected from January 2020 to June 2023 in a tertiary care hospital of Korea. Most isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam (98.9%) and meropenem-vaborbactam (98.9%), while susceptibility to imipenem-relebactam was lower (93.0%). The cross-combination test using nine combinations of the individual β-lactams (BLs) and new β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) showed that the inhibitory activity of avibactam was significantly superior to relebactam or vaborbactam when the Log2 MIC of BLs were compared for each combination with BLIs (all P < 0.05). The dose-escalation test of new BLIs demonstrated that increasing doses of new BLIs corresponded to increased susceptibility to BLs. Taken together, this study illustrates the excellent activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against KPC-2-producing Enterobacterales and suggests further investigation into high-concentration regimens for potentially non-susceptible clinical isolates.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against gram-negative bacteria in patients with bacteremia and skin and soft-tissue infections in Colombia 2019-2021

OBJECTIVES

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is an option for infections caused by MDR gram-negative bacilli. In this study, we aimed to analyze the in vitro antimicrobial activity of CAZ-AVI and other antimicrobial agents against gram-negative bacilli that were collected in Colombia between 2019 and 2021 from patients with bacteremia and skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs).

METHODS

A total of 600 Enterobacterales and 259 P. aeruginosa strains were analyzed. The phenotypic resistance of isolates, particularly non-susceptibility to meropenem, multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates, and difficult-to-treat (DTR) P. aeruginosa, was evaluated according to CLSI breakpoints.

RESULTS

Enterobacterales had the most susceptibility to CAZ-AVI (96.5 %) and tigecycline (95 %). Tigecycline and CAZ-AVI were the antimicrobial agents with the most in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). CAZ-AVI was the antimicrobial treatment with the most activity against P. aeruginosa.

CONCLUSIONS

Tigecycline and CAZ-AVI were the antimicrobial agents with the most activity against CRE and MDR Enterobacterales. For P. aeruginosa, CAZ-AVI was the antimicrobial treatment with the most in vitro activity.

Activity of aztreonam-avibactam against Enterobacterales resistant to recently approved beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations collected in Europe, Latin America, and the Asia-Pacific Region (2020-2022)

BACKGROUND

Aztreonam-avibactam is under clinical development for treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), especially those resistant to recently approved β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLICs).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a large collection of CRE isolates, including those non-susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and/or imipenem-relebactam.

METHODS

Overall, 24 580 Enterobacterales isolates were consecutively collected (1/patient) in 2020-2022 from 64 medical centres located in Western Europe (W-EU), Eastern Europe (E-EU), Latin America (LATAM), and the Asia-Pacific region (APAC). Of those, 1016 (4.1%) were CRE. Isolates were susceptibility tested by broth microdilution. CRE isolates were screened for carbapenemase genes by whole genome sequencing.

RESULTS

Aztreonam-avibactam inhibited 99.6% of CREs at ≤8 mg/L. Ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam were active against 64.6%, 57.4%, and 50.7% of CRE isolates, respectively; most of the non-susceptible isolates carried metallo-beta-lactamases. Aztreonam-avibactam was active against ≥98.9% of isolates non-susceptible to these BLICs. The activity of these BLICs varied by region, with highest susceptibility rates observed in W-EU (76.9% for ceftazidime-avibactam, 72.5% for meropenem-vaborbactam, 63.8% for imipenem-relebactam) and the lowest susceptibility rates identified in the APAC region (39.9% for ceftazidime-avibactam, 37.8% for meropenem-vaborbactam, and 27.5% for imipenem-relebactam). The most common carbapenemase types overall were KPC (44.6% of CREs), NDM (29.9%), and OXA-48-like (16.0%). KPC predominated in LATAM (64.1% of CREs in the region) and W-EU (61.1%). MBL occurrence was highest in APAC (59.5% of CREs in the region), followed by LATAM (34.0%), E-EU (28.9%), and W-EU (23.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Aztreonam-avibactam demonstrated potent activity against CRE isolates resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and/or imipenem-relebactam independent of the carbapenemase produced.

In Vitro Activity of "Old" and "New" Antimicrobials against the Klebsiella pneumoniae Complex

The Klebsiella pneumoniae complex is a commonly isolated bacteria in human infections. These opportunistic pathogens pose a serious threat to public health due to their potential transmission to the human population. Resistance to carbapenems is a significant antimicrobial resistance mechanism, leading to limited therapeutic options. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of fosfomycin, colistin, ceftazidime-avibactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam against multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae complex strains. This study involved 160 strains of Gram-negative rods, comprising 138 K. pneumoniae and 22 K. variicola. The minimal inhibitory concentration of fosfomycin was estimated using the agar dilution method, and for colistin, the microdilution method was employed. Susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam was determined using the gradient strip method. All analyzed K. pneumoniae complex isolates produced extended-spectrum β-lactamases, and 60.0% exhibited carbapenemases. The majority of the analyzed strains were susceptible to fosfomycin and colistin (62.5%). Among pandrug-resistant K. pneumoniae complex isolates, the highest susceptibility was observed with colistin (43.9%). Fosfomycin demonstrated good activity against ESβLs- and VIM-positive isolates from this complex. Colistin also exhibited satisfactory in vitro activity against VIM- and KPC-positive isolates from the K. pneumoniae complex. Ceftazidime-avibactam displayed good activity against K. pneumoniae complex strains producing ESβLs, KPC, and OXA enzymes. Additionally, meropenem-vaborbactam showed satisfactory in vitro activity against ESβLs- and KPC-positive isolates from this complex.

Worldwide trend discovery of structural and functional relationship of metallo-β-lactamase for structure-based drug design: A bibliometric evaluation and patent analysis

Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) is an enzyme produced by clinically important bacteria that can inactivate many commonly used antibiotics, making them a significant concern in treating bacterial infections and the risk of having high antibiotic resistance issues among the community. This review presents a bibliometric and patent analysis of MBL worldwide research trend based on the Scopus and World Intellectual Property Organization databases in 2013-2022. Based on the keywords related to MBL in the article title, abstract, and keywords, 592 research articles were retrieved for further analysis using various tools such as Microsoft Excel to determine the frequency analysis, VOSviewer for bibliometric networks visualization, and Harzing's Publish or Perish for citation metrics analysis. Standard bibliometric parameters were analysed to evaluate the field's research trend, such as the growth of publications, topographical distribution, top subject area, most relevant journal, top cited documents, most relevant authors, and keyword trend analysis. Within 10 years, MBL discovery has shown a steady and continuous growth of interest among the community of researchers. United States of America, China, and the United Kingdom are the top 3 countries contribute high productivity to the field. The patent analysis also shows several impactful filed patents, indicating the significance of development research on the structural and functional relationship of MBL for an effective structure-based drug design (SBDD). Developing new MBL inhibitors using SBDD could help address the research gap and provide new successful therapeutic options for treating MBL-producing bacterial infections.

Reviewing novel treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a major threat to global health and hospital-onset CRE infections have risen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Novel antimicrobials are now available for the treatment of CRE infections. There remains an urgent need for new antimicrobials for CRE, especially for those producing metallo-β-lactamases.

AREAS COVERED

This article discusses previously published research supporting currently available novel antimicrobials for the treatment of CRE infections. Newer compounds currently being evaluated in clinical trials are covered. A literature search was conducted in PubMed over all available dates for relevant published papers and conference abstracts with the search terms, 'CRE,' 'carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales,' 'β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor,' 'KPC,' 'NDM,' 'metallo-β-lactamase,' 'ceftazidime-avibactam,' 'meropenem-vaborbactam,' 'imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam,' 'cefiderocol,' 'eravacycline,' 'plazomicin,' 'taniborbactam,' 'zidebactam,' and 'nacubactam.'

EXPERT OPINION

Novel antimicrobials for CRE infections have been developed, most notably the β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, though treatment options for infections with metallo-β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales remain few and have limitations. Development of antibiotics with activity against metallo-β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales is eagerly awaited, and there are promising new compounds in clinical trials. Finally, more clinical research is needed to optimize and individualize treatment approaches, which will help guide antimicrobial stewardship initiatives aimed at reducing the spread of CRE and development of further resistance.

Real-world in vitro activity of newer antibiotics against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including carbapenem-non-susceptible and multidrug-resistant isolates: a multicenter analysis

IMPORTANCE

Newer antibiotics against Gram-negative pathogens provide important treatment options, especially for antibiotic-resistant bacteria, but little is known about their use during routine clinical care. To use these agents appropriately, clinicians need to have access to timely susceptibility data. We evaluated 27,531 facility-reported susceptibility results from the BD Insights Research Database to gain a better understanding of real-world testing practices and susceptibility rates for six newer antibiotics. Escherichia coli was the most frequently tested potential pathogen, and ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam had the greatest numbers of susceptibility results. For cefiderocol, eravacycline, imipenem-relabactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam, susceptibility data were available for fewer than 2% of isolates. Susceptibility comparisons should be considered with caution. Ceftazidime-avibactam had the highest susceptibility rates for Enterobacterales while cefiderocol had the highest susceptibility rates for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. New antibiotics have the potential to improve the management of Gram-negative infections, but their use may be hampered by the absence of susceptibility data.

Approaches to Testing Novel β-Lactam and β-Lactam Combination Agents in the Clinical Laboratory

The rapid emergence of multi-drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens has driven the introduction of novel β-lactam combination agents (BLCs) to the antibiotic market: ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol, and sulbactam-durlobactam. These agents are equipped with innovative mechanisms that confer broad Gram-negative activity, notably against certain challenging carbapenemases. While their introduction offers a beacon of hope, clinical microbiology laboratories must navigate the complexities of susceptibility testing for these agents due to their diverse activity profiles against specific β-lactamases and the possibility of acquired resistance mechanisms in some bacterial isolates. This review explores the complexities of these novel antimicrobial agents detailing the intricacies of their application, providing guidance on the nuances of susceptibility testing, interpretation, and result reporting in clinical microbiology laboratories.

Activity of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against serine carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is complex and multifaceted. While the novel β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam inhibit serine-based β-lactamases, the comparative potency of the novel β-lactam (BL)/BLI combinations against serine carbapenemase-producing P. aeruginosa is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftazidime, imipenem/relebactam, imipenem, meropenem/vaborbactam and meropenem against serine β-lactamase-producing P. aeruginosa.

METHODS

Carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa were collated through the Enhancing Rational Antimicrobials against Carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (ERACE-PA) Global Surveillance. Isolates positive for serine-based carbapenemases were assessed. MICs were determined by broth microdilution to each novel BL/BLI and BL alone.

RESULTS

GES was the most common carbapenemase identified (n = 59) followed by KPC (n = 8). Ceftazidime/avibactam had MIC50/MIC90 values of 4/8 mg/L and 91% of isolates were susceptible. Conversely, ceftazidime alone was active against only 3% of isolates. The MIC50/MIC90 of imipenem/relebactam were 16/>16 mg/L and 13% of all isolates were defined as susceptible. Of the KPC-producing isolates, 38% were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam, compared with 0% to imipenem. The meropenem/vaborbactam MIC50/MIC90 were >16/>16 mg/L, and 6% of isolates were susceptible, which was similar to meropenem alone (MIC50/90, >8/>8 mg/L; 3% susceptible) suggesting the addition of vaborbactam cannot overcome co-expressed, non-enzymatic resistance mechanisms.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the novel BL/BLIs, ceftazidime/avibactam displayed better in vitro activity and thus is a rational treatment option for serine carbapenemase-harbouring P. aeruginosa. While imipenem/relebactam displayed some activity, particularly against isolates with blaKPC, meropenem/vaborbactam exhibited poor activity, with MICs similar to meropenem alone.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Trends of Proteeae Isolates From a Tertiary-Care Hospital in Western Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

The tribe Proteeae comprises Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella species. TheseGram-negative rods are of concern in that they are involved in diverse human infections, particularly in hospital settings. In the last two decades, there has been a sharp increase in infections by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Proteeae. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to: (i) assess the prevalence of infections caused by tribe Proteeae, (ii)determine the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of the test isolates, and (iii) identify the underlying risk factors for acquisition of infection by MDR strains.

METHODS

During the period from January 2019 to December 2020, we conducted a retrospective review of the electronic medical and laboratory records of adult patients who received care at our institution. In addition, we analyzed the risk factors associated with acquisition of infections by members of the tribe Proteeae using univariate and multivariate regression models.

RESULTS

Overall 403 adult patients (average age 59.69 ± 20.33 years) were enrolled into this study (196 males; 48.6%, and 207 females; 51.4%). Proteus mirabilis was the leading pathogen (70.7%; n=285), followed by Morganella morganii (20.1%; n=81), and Providencia species (9.2%; n=37). Most of the isolates were recovered from urine (59.3%; n=239), followed by wound swabs (23.1%; n=93), with the least from blood samples (1.7%; n=7). Out of 403 Proteeae isolates, 27.3% (n=110) were found to be extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producers, whereas 18.4% (n=74) were MDR. Patient's age, concomitant diabetes mellitus (DM), and long hospital stays were independently associated with infection by MDR strains.

CONCLUSION

Infections by MDR Proteeae are leading causes for morbidity in our tertiary-care facility. Strict adherence to infection control precautions, as well as effective implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs, are crucial to overcome these superbugs.

Characterization of Carbapenemase- and ESBL-Producing Gram-Negative Bacilli Isolated from Patients with Urinary Tract and Bloodstream Infections

A total of 199 Gram-negative bacterial isolates from urinary tract infections and 162 from bloodstream infections were collected from 12 healthcare systems throughout the United States between May 2021 and August 2022. The isolates, phenotypically non-susceptible to 2nd or 3rd generation cephalosporins or carbapenems, were characterized through antimicrobial susceptibility testing and whole genome sequence analysis to obtain a broad snapshot of beta-lactamase-mediated resistance among these two sample types. Overall, 23 different carbapenemase genes were detected among 13 species (20.5% of isolates). The blaKPC-3 and blaKPC-2 subtypes were the most common carbapenemase genes identified, followed by blaNDM and the co-carriage of two different blaOXA carbapenemases by Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. All carbapenemase-producing A. baumannii isolates were mCIM negative. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes were identified in 66.2% of isolates; blaCTX-M-15 was the most common. AmpC genes, both plasmid and chromosomal, were detected in 33.2% of isolates. Importantly, 2.8%, 8.3%, and 22.2% of blaKPC-positive organisms were susceptible to ertapenem, imipenem, and meropenem, respectively. The correlation between broth microdilution and disk diffusion results was high for most drugs except cefepime, where the detection of resistance was statistically lower by disk diffusion. Thus, there were gaps in the accuracy of susceptibility testing for some mechanisms of resistance.

The Effectiveness of Imipenem-Relebactam against Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistant Variants of the KPC-2 β-Lactamase

BACKGROUND

Ceftazidime-avibactam was approved by the FDA to treat infections caused by Enterobacterales carrying bla_KPC-2. However, variants of KPC-2 with amino acid substitutions at position 179 have emerged and confer resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam.

METHODS

The activity of imipenem-relebactam was assessed against a panel of 19 KPC-2 D179 variants. KPC-2 and the D179N and D179Y variants were purified for biochemical analyses. Molecular models were constructed with imipenem to assess differences in kinetic profiles.

RESULTS

All strains were susceptible to imipenem-relebactam, but resistant to ceftazidime (19/19) and ceftazidime-avibactam (18/19). KPC-2 and the D179N variant hydrolyzed imipenem, but the D179N variant's rate was much slower. The D179Y variant was unable to turnover imipenem. All three β-lactamases hydrolyzed ceftazidime at varying rates. The acylation rate of relebactam for the D179N variant was ~2.5× lower than KPC-2. Poor catalytic turnover by the D179Y variant precluded the determination of inhibitory kinetic parameters. Acyl-complexes with imipenem and ceftazidime were less prevalent with the D179N variant compared to the D179Y variant, supporting the kinetic observations that the D179Y variant was not as active as the D179N variant. Relebactam was slower to form an acyl-complex with the D179Y variant compared to avibactam. The D179Y model with imipenem revealed that the catalytic water molecule was shifted, and the carbonyl of imipenem was not within the oxyanion hole. Conversely in the D179N model, imipenem was oriented favorably for deacylation.

CONCLUSIONS

Imipenem-relebactam overcame the resistance of the D179 variants, suggesting that this combination will be active against clinical isolates harboring these derivatives of KPC-2.