Radio-histological correlations of subtle sonography images

The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in breast ductal abnormalities

BACKGROUND

Ductal lesions are an important, often overlooked, and poorly understood issue in breast imaging, which have a risk of underlying malignancy ranging from 5 to 23%. Ultrasonography (US), which has largely replaced galactography or ductography, has become an important imaging method to assess patients with ductal lesions. However, it is difficult to distinguish benign from malignant ductal abnormalities only by ultrasonography, most of which are recommended to be at least in subcategory 4A; these require biopsy according to the ACR BI-RADS®atlas 5th Edition-breast ultrasound. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been shown to be valuable for differentiating benign from malignant tumors, but its value is unclear in breast ductal lesions. Therefore, the purposes of this study were to explore the characteristics of malignant ductal abnormalities on US and CEUS imaging and the diagnostic value of CEUS in breast ductal abnormalities.

METHODS

Overall, 82 patients with 82 suspicious ductal lesions were recruited for this prospective study. They were divided into benign and malignant groups according to the pathological results. Morphologic features and quantitative parameters of US and CEUS were analyzed by comparison and multivariate logistic regression to determine the independent risk factors. The diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Shape, margin, inner echo, size, microcalcification and blood flow classification on US, wash-in time, enhancement intensity, enhancement mode, enhancement scope, blood perfusion defects, peripheral high enhancement and boundary on CEUS were identified as features correlated with malignant ductal lesions. However, multivariate logistic regression showed that only microcalcification (OR = 8.96, P = 0.047) and enhancement scope (enlarged, OR = 27.42, P = 0.018) were independent risk factors for predicting malignant ductal lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and area under the ROC curve of microcalcifications combined with an enlarged enhancement scope were 0.895, 0.886, 0.872, 0.907, 0.890, and 0.92, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Microcalcification and enlarged enhancement scope are independent factors for predicting malignant ductal lesions. The combined diagnosis can greatly improve the diagnostic performance, indicating that CEUS can be useful in the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions to formulate more appropriate management for ductal lesions.

Using the Superb Microvascular Imaging Method in the Distinction of Intraductal Papilloma and Duct Ectasia With Secretion

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the diagnostic value of a Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI; Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) Doppler examination for distinguishing intraductal papilloma (IDP) from duct ectasia with secretion in lesions smaller than 1 cm compared to color Doppler imaging (CDI) and power Doppler imaging (PDI).

METHODS

Fifty-nine lesions were evaluated by grayscale ultrasound, CDI, PDI, and SMI. Biopsied tissue samples were analyzed. Ultrasound evaluations and Doppler examinations were performed with a Toshiba Aplio 500 device. The lesions were divided into 2 groups, secretion and IDP, according to the pathologic results. Color Doppler imaging, PDI, and SMI data were compared statistically to investigate their diagnostic values.

RESULTS

Of the 59 lesions, 22 were secretion, and 37 were IDP. The mean diameters ± SDs were 4.7 ± 0.6 mm in the secretion group and 4.9 ± 0.8 mm in the IDP group (P = .315). There was no significant difference in grayscale ultrasound features such as shape or margin between the groups (P > .05). No significant difference was found between the groups in CDI or PDI characteristics (P > .999; P = .702, respectively). The color SMI evaluation results showed no vascularity in 18 (81.8%) lesions in the secretion group. Vascularity was detected in 32 patients (86.5%) in the IDP group. In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the areas under the curve were calculated as 0.842 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.728-0.925) for SMI, 0.522 (95% CI, 0.388-0.654) for PDI, and 0.518 (95% CI, 0.384-0.650) for CDI.

CONCLUSIONS

Superb Microvascular Imaging is more accurate and has more diagnostic ability than CDI or PDI in distinguishing small IDPs from duct ectasia with secretion because of its ability to visualize slow flow speeds of vascular structures.

Evaluation of Mesenteric Lymph Nodes in a Pediatric Population with Mesenteric Lymphadenitis Using Superb Microvascular Imaging

Background

This study aimed to evaluate superb microvascular imaging (SMI) as an adjunctive imaging method to evaluate mesenteric lymph nodes in children with mesenteric lymphadenitis compared with healthy children.

Material/Methods

A retrospective study compared children with mesenteric lymphadenitis (n=27) and healthy children (n=30). Lymph node size was determined using grayscale ultrasonography and parameters of lymph node vascularity were compared using color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and SMI. The diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US), US combined with SMI, and US combined with CDFI were compared.

Results

Lymph nodes from children with mesenteric lymphadenitis (n=77) and normal lymph nodes (n=84) were evaluated by SMI, which showed that the least diameter of lymph nodes in cases of mesenteric lymphadenitis was 0.58±0.15 mm and of normal mesenteric lymph nodes was 0.47±0.08 mm (p<0.001). SMI identified 92.6% of abnormal mesenteric lymph nodes while CDFI detected 85.2%. US combined with SMI had the highest sensitivity (81.5%), and specificity (78.9%) compared with US alone (sensitivity, 63.0%; specificity, 64.9%), and compared with US combined with CDFI (sensitivity, 74.1%; specificity, 75.4%). US combined with SMI and US combined with CDFI achieved the same specificity (76.7%), which was higher than that of US alone (66.7%).

Conclusions

SMI was superior to color Doppler flow imaging in evaluating the microvasculature in lymphadenopathy in mesenteric lymphadenitis. SMI may be used as an adjunct to grayscale ultrasonography to assist in identifying mesenteric lymphadenopathy in pediatric patients.