MDCT and MR imaging of the jejunum

Clinical value of miR-135 and miR-20a combined with multi-detector computed tomography in the diagnosis of gastric cancer

Background

To study the clinical value of miR-135 and miR-20a combined with multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in the diagnosis of gastric cancer (GC).

Method

A total of 146 patients with GC admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to June 2019 were selected and enrolled in the GC group. Another 103 patients with gastritis received in the same period were selected for the non-GC group. Besides, 95 healthy subjects who received physical examination in our hospital were selected into the healthy control group. Real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to detect the expression of serum miR-135 and miR-20a for each group. MDCT was used for detecting the clinical staging map of the enrolled patients. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between serum miR-135 and miR-20a in patients with GC. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to analyze value of miR-135 and miR-20a in the diagnosis of GC.

Results

Compared with non-GC group and healthy control group, the levels of serum miR-135 and miR-20a increased significantly in the GC group, while no significant difference was found between non-GC group and healthy control group (P > 0.05). Analysis of the relationship with clinical characteristics showed that the expression of serum miR-135 and miR-20a in the GC group was significantly correlated with the progression of GC, TNM stage, degrees of differentiation, status of lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis (P < 0.01). Pearson’s correlation analysis results showed positive correlations between miR-135 and miR-20a (r = 0.634, P = 0.000). The ROC analysis results showed that the optimal diagnostic values of miR-135 and miR-20a for GC were 7.56 and 5.82 respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.873 and 0.793 respectively. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was 0.811-0.935 and 0.697-0.890 respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of miR-135 and miR-20a combined with MDCT in the diagnosis of GC were 90.41% and 93.20% respectively. The sensitivity of combined use was significantly higher than that of single detection (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

There are high expression levels of serum miR-135 and miR-20a in patients with GC. A combined detection of miR-135 and miR-20a with MDCT can improve the diagnostic sensitivity of GC and improve the accuracy of the final diagnosis. Therefore, multiple combined detection is valuable in the diagnosis of GC.

The effect of without using anisodamine during CT enterography on image quality, diagnostic performance and latent side effects

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether no anisodamine injection before CTE was feasible without impairing image quality and diagnostic performance.

MATERIALS

The change of mural thickness and luminal diameter were compared between using and no using anisodamine. The diagnostic performance of small-bowel disease was analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

No motion artifact was detected in two groups. There was no significant difference regarding the change of luminal diameter and mural thickness (all P>0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of small-bowel disease was no significant difference (P=0.63).

CONCLUSION

Lack of anisodamine injection before CTE did not impair image quality and diagnostic performance compared with CTEs performed with anisodamine injection.

Mass-forming lesions of the duodenum: A pictorial review

Recent advances in imaging have resulted in marked changes in the investigation of the duodenum, which still remains primarily evaluated with videoendoscopy. However, improvements in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging have made detection and characterization of duodenal mass-forming abnormalities easier. The goal of this pictorial review was to illustrate the most common conditions of the duodenum that present as mass-forming lesions with a specific emphasis on CT and MR imaging. MR imaging used in conjunction with duodenal distension appears as a second line imaging modality for the characterization of duodenal mass-forming lesions. CT remains the first line imaging modality for the detection and characterization of a wide range of duodenal mass-forming lesions.

Prenatal diagnosis of bowel malposition using T2-weighted fetal MRI sequences

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to investigate the capability of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in revealing fetal bowel malposition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All fetal MRI examinations (excluding central nervous system MRI examinations) performed in our department from January 2005 to January 2014 were retrospectively studied by 2 independent observers for situs, stomach and jejunum location on T2-weighted images. Patients data were also reviewed for results of ultrasound examinations, MRI indication, and gestational age. Abnormally positioned jejunums were classified into 3 groups: intrathoracic (A), extra-fetal (B) and abnormal intra-fetal (C). Prenatal data were compared to postnatal imaging, surgery or autopsy findings that served as standard of reference.

RESULTS

A total of 709 fetal MRI examinations were analyzed. In 64 fetus (9%), the jejunum was not present in the left subgastric area on T2-weighted MR images. In these 64 fetuses, proximal jejunum was intrathoracic (41/64, 64%, group A), extra-fetal (11/64, 17%, group B), or intra-abdominal but abnormally positioned (12/64, 19%, group C). Interobserver agreement was 100%. All diagnoses for fetuses in groups A and B (52 cases) were confirmed postnatally (41 cases) or at autopsy (11 cases). In group C, bowel malposition was suspected after ultrasound in only 2/12 fetuses (16.6%); it was confirmed postnatally in 1 fetus but not confirmed in the remaining one. In the 10 remaining fetuses (83%), malposition was confirmed postnatally although not initially suspected.

CONCLUSION

T2-weighted fetal MR images are useful for the prenatal diagnosis of bowel malposition, even when they are unsuspected on ultrasound examination.

Small-Bowel Neoplasms: Role of MRI Enteroclysis

Small-bowel neoplasms are the 3%–6% of all gastrointestinal tract neoplasms. Due to the rarity of these lesions, the low index of clinical suspicion, and the inadequate radiologic examinations or incorrect interpretation of radiologic findings, a delay in diagnosis of 6–8 months from the first symptoms often occurs. Even if conventional enteroclysis and capsule endoscopy are the most common procedures used to accurately depict the bowel lumen and mucosal surface, their use in evaluating the mural and extramural extents of small-bowel tumors is limited. Instead multidetector computed tomographic enteroclysis and magnetic resonance enteroclysis have the potential to simultaneously depict intraluminal, mural, and extraintestinal abnormalities. In particular MR enteroclysis has an excellent soft tissue contrast resolution and multiplanar imaging capability. It can provide anatomic, functional, and real time information without the need of ionizing radiation. MR findings, appearances of the lesions, combined with the contrast-enhancement behavior and characteristic of the stenosis are important to differentiate small-bowel neoplasm from other nonneoplastic diseases.