Assessment of patient's peak skin dose during abdominopelvic embolization using radiochromic (Gafchromic) films

Retrospective Analysis of Doses Delivered during Embolization Procedures over the Last 10 Years

Background: This study aimed to retrospectively analyze dosimetric indicators recorded since 2012 for thoracic, abdominal or pelvic embolizations to evaluate the contribution of new tools and technologies in dose reduction. Methods: Dosimetric indicators (dose area product (DAP) and air kerma (AK)) from 1449 embolizations were retrospectively reviewed from August 2012 to March 2022. A total of 1089 embolizations were performed in an older fixed C-Arm system (A1), 222 in a newer fixed C-Arm system (A2) and 138 in a 4DCT system (A3). The embolization procedures were gathered to compare A1, A2 and A3. Results: DAP were significantly lower with A2 compared to A1 for all procedures (median −50% ± 5%, p < 0.05), except for uterine elective embolizations and gonadal vein embolization. The DAP values were significantly lower with A3 than with A1 (p < 0.001). CT scan was used for guidance in 90% of embolization procedures. Conclusions: The last C-Arm technology allowed a median reduction of 50% of the X-ray dose. The implementation of a CT scan inside the IR room allowed for more precise 3D-guidance with no increase of the dose delivered.

Institutional Diagnostic Reference Levels and Peak Skin Doses in selected diagnostic and therapeutic interventional radiology procedures

PURPOSE

Institutional (local) Diagnostic Reference Levels for Cerebral Angiography (CA), Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography (PTC), Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) and Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD) are reported in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data for air kerma-area product (P_KA), air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (K_a,r), fluoroscopy time (FT) and number of images (NI) as well as estimates of Peak Skin Dose (PSD) were collected for 142 patients. Therapeutic procedure complexity was also evaluated, in an attempt to incorporate it into the DRL analysis.

RESULTS

Local P_KA DRL values were 70, 34, 189 and 54 Gy.cm² for CA, PTC, TACE and PTBD respectively. The corresponding DRL values for K_a,r were 494, 194, 1186 and 400 mGy, for FT they were 9.2, 14.2, 27.5 and 22.9 min, for the NI they were 844, 32, 602 and 13 and for PSD they were 254, 256, 1598 and 540 mGy respectively. P_KA for medium complexity PTBD procedures was 2.5 times higher than for simple procedures. For TACE, the corresponding ratio was 1.6. PSD was estimated to be roughly 50% of recorded K_a,r for procedures in the head/neck region and 10% higher than recorded K_a,r for procedures in the body region. In only 5 cases the 2 Gy dose alarm threshold for skin deterministic effects was exceeded.

CONCLUSION

Procedure complexity can differentiate DRLs in Interventional Radiology procedures. PSD could be deduced with reasonable accuracy from values of K_a,r that are reported in every angiography system.

Calibration of Gafchromic XR-RV3 film under interventional radiology conditions

Introduction: The purpose of the study was the calibration of Gafchromic films in clinical interventional radiology conditions and the assessment of the influence of dose range, the shape of the fitting curve, and its practical application. The aim of the work was to show how practically perform calibration in a wide range of doses.

Material and methods: Gafchromic XR–RV3 films were included in the study. The calibration was performed for A and B film series separately. Doses from the range of 0 – 8 Gy were used. Film dosimeters were read out in reflective mode with a commercial flatbed scanner.

Results: Among various degrees of a polynomial function, the best fit, which fulfilled the chosen criterion of 95% agreement between measured and reconstructed doses and simple equation criterion, was observed for third-degree polynomial. The fitting curve where the dose is the function of optical density (logMPV) was demonstrated to be more precise than the fitting curve based on MPV only. To minimize the difference between dose absorbed by the film and dose reconstructed from the fitting curve below 5% it is necessary to divide the calibration range of 0 – 8 Gy into two subranges for use in interventional radiology. This difference was set at a maximum level of 3.8% and 1.9% for the lowand high-dose range, respectively. Each series of films may have a slightly different calibration curve, especially for the low dose range. A deviation of up to 36% between two batches of Gafchromic film was observed.

Conclusions: For the third-degree polynomial fitting function (one of the recommended in the literature) calibration should be done into low and high dose ranges and for each batch separately. A systematic error higher than 20% could be introduced when the fitting curve from one film batch is applied to the other film batch.

Recognition and management of dermatologic complications from interventional radiology procedures

A variety of dermatologic complications can occur after interventional radiology procedures, including fluoroscopy-induced radiation dermatitis, thermal skin injury from tumor ablation, non-target embolization to the skin, allergic reactions related to interventional radiology procedures, and dermatitis and infections at catheter sites. Yet, interventional radiologists typically lack training in dermatology. This review focuses on recognition of dermatologic complications and introduces basic principles for management of these complications. By taking a more active role in the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of dermatologic complications, interventional radiologists can improve the care for patients suffering iatrogenic skin inury.

Decreased operator X-ray exposure by optimized fluoroscopy during radiofrequency ablation of common atrial flutter

PURPOSE

To evaluate operator and patient irradiation during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of common atrial flutter (AF) using three different fluoroscopy settings.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A total of 38 patients who underwent RFA of AF with three different fluoroscopy settings (low dose, standard dose and collimated field) were included. Twelve patients (11 men, 1 woman; mean age, 67±12 [SD]years) were included in the low dose group (3.75 frames per second), 13 patients (13 men; mean age, 66±8 [SD]years) were included in the standard dose group (7.5 frames per second) and 13 patients (13 men; mean age, 71±12 [SD]years) were included in the collimated field group (7.5 frames per second). Operator and patient exposure were compared between groups.

RESULT

No differences in procedure time and radiation exposure were found between the three groups. In the low dose group, mean operator X-ray exposures of eye-lens (4.7±2.9 [SD]μSv/h; range: 0.9-10.5μSv/h), whole body (1.6±1.2 [SD]μSv/h; range 0.5-3.6μSv/h) and hand skin (11.1±10.8 [SD] μSv/h; range 2.4-35.4μSv/h) were significantly lower than those in the standard dose group (P<0.001). Significant patient dose reduction was found between low dose group (0.7±0.4 [SD]Gy/h; range: 0.3-0.9Gy/h) and standard (1.7±0.5 [SD]Gy/h; range: 0.8 to 3.9Gy/h) and collimated (1.8±0.5 [SD]Gy/h; range: 0.7-3.0Gy/h) groups (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The use of a low dose setting (3.75 f/s) during fluoroscopy dramatically reduces operator's irradiation during RFA of AF by a mean of 90%.