1
|
Medyńska-Przęczek A, Stochel-Gaudyn A, Wędrychowicz A. Liver fibrosis assessment in pediatric population - can ultrasound elastography be an alternative method to liver biopsy? A systematic review. Adv Med Sci 2024; 69:8-20. [PMID: 38198895 DOI: 10.1016/j.advms.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Liver diseases of various etiologies are becoming increasingly common in the pediatric population. So far, the gold diagnostic standard in these disorders is liver biopsy. This procedure is invasive, painful and requires general anesthesia in this group of patients. Due to the continuous development of new research techniques, such as liver elastography, it is necessary to evaluate them in the context of their diagnostic usefulness. Ultrasound elastography, as a quick and effective method, is being used more and more often in the assessment and monitoring of liver dysfunction in both adults and children. There are several techniques of liver elastography, such as transient elastography, shear wave elastography consisting of various subtypes such as two-dimensional shear wave elastography, acoustic radiation force impulse and point shear wave elastography, which differ in terms of the measurement technique and the achieved results. The purpose of our review was to determine whether techniques of liver elastography could replace liver biopsy. Although now, based on the analyzed papers, elastography cannot replace liver biopsy, in our opinion, the role of this tool in monitoring pediatric patients with liver diseases will grow in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra Medyńska-Przęczek
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, 31-530, Poland.
| | - Anna Stochel-Gaudyn
- Department of Paediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Pediatric Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, 30-663, Poland
| | - Andrzej Wędrychowicz
- Department of Paediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Pediatric Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, 30-663, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Primavesi F, Maglione M, Cipriani F, Denecke T, Oberkofler CE, Starlinger P, Dasari BVM, Heil J, Sgarbura O, Søreide K, Diaz-Nieto R, Fondevila C, Frampton AE, Geisel D, Henninger B, Hessheimer AJ, Lesurtel M, Mole D, Öllinger R, Olthof P, Reiberger T, Schnitzbauer AA, Schwarz C, Sparrelid E, Stockmann M, Truant S, Aldrighetti L, Braunwarth E, D’Hondt M, DeOliveira ML, Erdmann J, Fuks D, Gruenberger T, Kaczirek K, Malik H, Öfner D, Rahbari NN, Göbel G, Siriwardena AK, Stättner S. E-AHPBA-ESSO-ESSR Innsbruck consensus guidelines for preoperative liver function assessment before hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1331-1347. [PMID: 37572099 PMCID: PMC10480040 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality after liver surgery. Standardized assessment of preoperative liver function is crucial to identify patients at risk. These European consensus guidelines provide guidance for preoperative patient assessment. METHODS A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus. The expert panel consisted of hepatobiliary surgeons, radiologists, nuclear medicine specialists, and hepatologists. The guideline process was supervised by a methodologist and reviewed by a patient representative. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. Evidence assessment and statement development followed Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. RESULTS Based on 271 publications covering 4 key areas, 21 statements (at least 85 per cent agreement) were produced (median level of evidence 2- to 2+). Only a few systematic reviews (2++) and one RCT (1+) were identified. Preoperative liver function assessment should be considered before complex resections, and in patients with suspected or known underlying liver disease, or chemotherapy-associated or drug-induced liver injury. Clinical assessment and blood-based scores reflecting liver function or portal hypertension (for example albumin/bilirubin, platelet count) aid in identifying risk of PHLF. Volumetry of the future liver remnant represents the foundation for assessment, and can be combined with indocyanine green clearance or LiMAx® according to local expertise and availability. Functional MRI and liver scintigraphy are alternatives, combining FLR volume and function in one examination. CONCLUSION These guidelines reflect established methods to assess preoperative liver function and PHLF risk, and have uncovered evidence gaps of interest for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Primavesi
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Centre for Hepatobiliary Surgery, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| | - Manuel Maglione
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Timm Denecke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Centre Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian E Oberkofler
- Swiss Hepatopancreatobiliary Transplant Centre, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Vivévis AG—Visceral, Tumour and Robotic Surgery, Clinic Hirslanden Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Starlinger
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Centre of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of Hepatobiliary–pancreatic and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jan Heil
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Olivia Sgarbura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, Université de Montpellier, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- Liver Surgery Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Adam E Frampton
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Unit, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
- Section of Oncology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Dominik Geisel
- Department of Radiology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Benjamin Henninger
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Amelia J Hessheimer
- General and Digestive Surgery Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | - Damian Mole
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pim Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas Reiberger
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III and CD-Lab for Portal Hypertension and Liver Fibrosis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas A Schnitzbauer
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christoph Schwarz
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery and Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Stockmann
- Department of Surgery, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Paul Gerhardt Stift, Lutherstadt Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Stéphanie Truant
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Lille, Lille University, Lille, France
- CANTHER Laboratory ‘Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies’ UMR-S1277, Team ‘Mucins, Cancer and Drug Resistance’, Lille, France
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Eva Braunwarth
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital Kortrijk, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Michelle L DeOliveira
- Swiss Hepatopancreatobiliary Transplant Centre, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Joris Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Endocrine Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Centre Hopital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Gruenberger
- Department of Surgery, Clinic Favoriten, Hepatopancreatobiliary Centre, Health Network Vienna and Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klaus Kaczirek
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hassan Malik
- Liver Surgery Unit, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dietmar Öfner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Nuh N Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Georg Göbel
- Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ajith K Siriwardena
- Regional Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Centre for Hepatobiliary Surgery, Vöcklabruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang Q, Wang A, Li Z, Sparrelid E, Brismar TB. Impact of sarcopenia on the future liver remnant growth after portal vein embolization and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in patients with liver cancer: A systematic review. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1064785. [PMID: 36505848 PMCID: PMC9730229 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1064785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The impact of sarcopenia on the future liver remnant (FLR) growth after portal vein occlusion, including portal vein embolization (PVE) and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has gained increasing interest. This systematic review aimed to explore whether sarcopenia was associated with insufficient FLR growth after PVE/ALPPS stage-1. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to 05 July 2022. Studies evaluating the influence of sarcopenia on FLR growth after PVE/ALPPS stage-1 in patients with liver cancer were included. A predefined table was used to extract information including the study and patient characteristics, sarcopenia measurement, FLR growth, post-treatment complications and post-hepatectomy liver failure, resection rate. Research quality was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results Five studies consisting of 609 patients were included in this study, with a sample size ranging from 42 to 306 (median: 90) patients. Only one study was multicenter research. The incidence of sarcopenia differed from 40% to 67% (median: 63%). Skeletal muscle index based on pretreatment computed tomography was the commonly used parameter for sarcopenia evaluation. All included studies showed that sarcopenia impaired the FLR growth after PVE/ALPPS stage-1. However, the association between sarcopenia and post-treatment complications, post-hepatectomy liver failure, and resection rate remains unclear. All studies showed moderate-to-high quality. Conclusions Sarcopenia seems to be prevalent in patients undergoing PVE/ALPPS and may be a risk factor for impaired liver growth after PVE/ALPPS stage-1 according to currently limited evidence. Systematic review registration https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY202280038.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Wang
- Division of Medical Imaging and Technology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anrong Wang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China,Department of Interventional Therapy, People’s Hospital of Dianjiang County, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhen Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People’s Hospital of Dianjiang County, Chongqing, China,*Correspondence: Zhen Li,
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Torkel B. Brismar
- Division of Medical Imaging and Technology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden,Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Soykan EA, Aarts BM, Lopez-Yurda M, Kuhlmann KFD, Erdmann JI, Kok N, van Lienden KP, Wilthagen EA, Beets-Tan RGH, van Delden OM, Gomez FM, Klompenhouwer EG. Predictive Factors for Hypertrophy of the Future Liver Remnant After Portal Vein Embolization: A Systematic Review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2021; 44:1355-1366. [PMID: 34142192 PMCID: PMC8382618 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-021-02877-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This systematic review was conducted to determine factors that are associated with the degree of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant following portal vein embolization. An extensive search on September 15, 2020, and subsequent literature screening resulted in the inclusion of forty-eight articles with 3368 patients in qualitative analysis, of which 18 studies were included in quantitative synthesis. Meta-analyses based on a limited number of studies showed an increase in hypertrophy response when additional embolization of segment 4 was performed (pooled difference of medians = − 3.47, 95% CI − 5.51 to − 1.43) and the use of N-butyl cyanoacrylate for portal vein embolization induced more hypertrophy than polyvinyl alcohol (pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.60, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.91). There was no indication of a difference in degree of hypertrophy between patients who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and those who did not receive pre-procedural systemic therapy (pooled SMD = − 0.37, 95% CI − 1.35 to 0.61), or between male and female patients (pooled SMD = 0.19, 95% CI − 0.12 to 0.50). The study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews on April 28, 2020 (CRD42020175708).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. A. Soykan
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B. M. Aarts
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. Lopez-Yurda
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K. F. D. Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. I. Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N. Kok
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K. P. van Lienden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E. A. Wilthagen
- Scientific Information Service, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. G. H. Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - O. M. van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F. M. Gomez
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Hospital Clinic Universitari de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E. G. Klompenhouwer
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|