Can we assess healing of surgically treated long bone fractures on radiograph?

Experimental study on determining the degree of bone healing by wall thickness ratio analysis

To verify the reliability and accuracy of wall thickness ratio analysis to determine the degree of bone healing, fracture models were established with 6 beagles. X-ray, micro-CT, and CT scans were performed at 24 weeks. The healthy side and the affected side were used to simulate the three-dimensional geometric model after internal fixation, and the mesh was divided. The mean and median CT wall thickness values were obtained through the wall thickness analysis. X-ray, CT, micro-CT, and gross appearance were used to determine the degree of bone healing, which was compared with wall thickness analysis. There was a positive correlation between the average CT value and the median wall thickness. The correlation coefficient analysis of the median wall thickness ratio (R2) and healing index ratio (R3) showed a positive correlation. The results of the wall thickness ratio (R2) and the healing index ratio (R3) were used to determine bone healing, and the results were consistent with the results of the actual mechanical test and image analysis. The results of wall thickness ratio analysis were significantly correlated with the degree of bone healing. This method is simple, rapid, and practical to analyze and judge the degree of bone healing.

Radiographic Evaluation of Distal Radius Fracture Healing by Time: Orthopedist versus Qualitative Assessment of Image Processing

Distal radius fractures are among the most prevalent long-bone fractures in the body. Fracture healing assessment is based on clinical evaluation and radiological examinations. A lack of consensus exists regarding the radiographic criteria for fracture union. Our work examined the commonly used criteria for the assessment of fracture healing. Thirty-two patients, conservatively treated for distal radius fracture, participated in a prospective study. Enrolled patients followed protocol for 26 weeks. Four orthopedic surgeons with similar ranks were asked to evaluate three parameters of radiographic measurements for each set of radiographs, including callus formation, the presence of a fracture line, and bridging of fracture sites or sites of fracture edges in 70 radiographs. Ten patients were eligible for the study. The degree of agreement among surgeons was “good” (Cronbach’s alpha): callus formation—0.8, bridging of fracture sites—0.775, blurring of fracture line gap—0.795. A timeline based on the specific week and grading system was made. Radiographic detection of callus formation was seen after the second film, between 6 and 9 weeks, and an agreement among surgeons was achieved for more than half of the patients for the blurring of the fracture gap. The radiographic healing progression of the distal radius can be detected after 6 and 9 weeks in all three parameters with good agreement between different surgeons. A timeline graph such as the one that was made in this model can be used for the follow-up of patients’ fracture healing or early detection of non-union.

The orthopaedic surgeon's clinical and experimental experience affect methods used for the fracture healing assessment (FHA) - An International Survey

Detection of fracture healing (FH), which depends on assessment methods, is a crucial factor affecting treatment. The study aimed to examine orthopedic surgeons in terms of practical methods of fracture healing (FHA) assessment (physical, imaging, measurement, and laboratory) and to check whether surgeons participating in clinical and laboratory experiments or only clinical practitioners prefer different FHA methods. An International Survey on Fracture Healing Assessment Methods was developed and distributed through the Web-based survey portal. Ninety-three orthopedic surgeons, on average age 41.46 years, from 24 countries participated in the study. Thirty-one respondents (33.3%) reported dealing with fractures both in the clinic and in experimental studies, six (6.5%) reported dealing with fractures only in laboratory research work, and fifty-six (60.2%) indicated that they dealt with fractures only clinically. The survey's internal consistency was significantly high (Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.84 to 0.96). The majority of respondents (80.83%) use specific clinical criteria to define a fracture union. The FHA was mainly based on the physical examination and plain radiograms. Laboratory findings, patient-oriented outcomes scores, and quantitative methods are rarely used. Orthopaedic surgeons dealing with fractures both in the clinic and in laboratory fracture research studies are more likely to use more quantitative FHA methods. Future research is needed to improve the international standard of the FHA methods for use in research, clinical trials, and clinical practice. Using a quantitative, reliable, and standardized approach, including online support, can be valuable for increasing compliance in the orthopedic surgeon population, effectively improving the adherence of fracture healing assessment in clinical conditions, and improving early detection of fracture healing disorders, improving fracture efficiency treatment.

Weight-bearing cone-beam computed tomography in the foot and ankle specialty: where we are and where we are going - an update

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been applied in dentistry and medicine for nearly two decades. Its application in the foot and ankle specialty has grown exponentially in recent years. Weight-bearing CBCT allows clinicians to obtain weight-bearing images that can be viewed in all three planes and to construct three-dimensional models, similar to those constructed from traditional CT scans, as well as exposing patients to less radiation than do traditional CT scans. This technology has revolutionized diagnoses, improving the understanding of various lesions and surgical planning in the foot and ankle specialty. Ongoing studies of the use of weight-bearing CBCT in foot and ankle surgery are focused on fully automated and semi-automated three-dimensional measurements, as well as bone segmentation, mapping of the distances/orientation of the joints, and the production of customized implants. The aims of this review article are to show the evolution of this emerging tool in the foot and ankle specialty, to update those in related specialties on its use in current clinical practice, and to indicate where the research community is heading.

Imaging Modalities to Assess Fracture Healing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review discusses imaging modalities for fracture repair assessment, with an emphasis on pragmatic clinical and translational use, best practices for implementation, and challenges and opportunities for continuing research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Semiquantitative radiographic union scoring remains the clinical gold standard, but has questionable reliability as a surrogate indicator of structural bone healing, particularly in early-stage, complex, or compromised healing scenarios. Alternatively, computed tomography (CT) scanning enables quantitative assessment of callus morphometry and mechanics through the use of patient-specific finite-element models. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning and radiostereometric analysis (RSA) are also quantitative, but technically challenging. Nonionizing magnetic resonance (MR) and ultrasound imaging are of high interest, but require development to enable quantification of 3D mineralized structures. Emerging image-based methods for quantitative assessment of bone healing may transform clinical research design by displacing binary outcomes classification (union/nonunion) and ultimately enhance clinical care by enabling early nonunion detection.

Semi-quantitative CT assessment of fracture healing: How many and which CT reformats should be analyzed?

PURPOSE

To assess how many and which CT reformats of long bone non-unions should be analyzed to best approximate the analysis of a larger number of CT reformats obtained in the three orthogonal planes.

METHOD

We used 29 CT examinations of tibial or femoral non-unions to obtain 87 stacks of 7 CT reformats each in the coronal (n = 29), sagittal (n = 29) or transverse (n = 29) planes. Two independent radiologists scored two fracture sites on each CT reformat by using a Tomographic Union Score (TUS) (1: no callus, 2: non-bridging callus; 3: bridging immature callus; 4: bridging remodeled callus). The reference standard was the mean of the three TUS calculated from the cortical scores obtained on all the sagittal, coronal and transverse CT reformats. We determined the agreement (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between the reference standard and 33 models combining one to seven CT reformats from one to three planes. The three best models were compared following a resampling procedure by a Wilcoxon's signed rank test.

RESULTS

Three models combining two (mid-coronal and mid-sagittal), three (mid-coronal, mid-sagittal and mid-transverse) or four (two paramedian coronal and sagittal) CT reformats had the highest ICC (ICC ≥ 0.89) for both observers. After resampling, the model combining the two paramedian sagittal and coronal CT reformats statistically outperformed the two other models.

CONCLUSION

Semi-quantitative analysis of the two paramedian sagittal and coronal CT reformats is an acceptable alternative to the analysis of more numerous reformats.

Effects of short- and long-term administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on osteotomy healing in dogs

OBJECTIVE

To determine the influence of short-term administration of carprofen on bone healing in dogs.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled experimental study.

ANIMALS

Eighteen purpose-bred sexually mature hound dogs.

METHODS

Tibial osteotomies were performed, and dogs were divided into three groups: no carprofen (n = 6), 2-week administration of carprofen at 2.2 mg/kg twice daily (n = 6), and 8-week administration of carprofen at 2.2 mg/kg twice daily (n = 5). Bone healing was evaluated radiographically at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively. Postmortem, fracture healing was assessed via biomechanical testing (three-point bending), histological cartilage:callus ratio, and bone mineral density (BMD) with quantitative computed tomography.

RESULTS

No biomechanical difference was detected between dogs that received no carprofen and those that received 2 weeks of carprofen or between those that received 2 weeks vs 8 weeks of carprofen. Stiffness (P = .035) and maximum stress (P = .042) were higher in dogs that received no carprofen than in those that received 8 weeks of carprofen. Radiographic healing did not differ between dogs without carprofen and those with 2-week administration of carprofen (P = .9923). However, tibias of dogs without carprofen and those with 2-week administration of carprofen were more healed compared with those in the 8-week-carprofen group at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery (P = .0011). No treatment effect was detected by cartilage:callus ratio or BMD.

CONCLUSION

Long-term administration of carprofen had a negative effect on bone healing compared with short-term or no administration of carprofen.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be used cautiously in dogs at risk for delayed bone healing, and administration should be discontinued beyond the perioperative period in dogs with fractures or osteotomies.