Computed tomography features of acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas

A narrative review on rare types of pancreatic cancer: should they be treated as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas?

Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest malignancies in humans and it is expected to play a bigger part in cancer burden in the years to come. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents 85% of all primary pancreatic malignancies. Recently, much attention has been given to PDAC, with significant advances in the understanding of the mechanisms underpinning disease initiation and progression, along with noticeable improvements in overall survival in both localized and metastatic settings. However, given their rarity, rare histological subtypes of pancreatic cancer have been underappreciated and are frequently treated as PDAC, even though they might present non-overlapping molecular alterations and clinical behavior. While some of these rare histological subtypes are true variants of PDAC that should be treated likewise, others represent separate clinicopathological entities, warranting a different therapeutic approach. In this review, we highlight clinical, pathological, and molecular aspects of rare histological types of pancreatic cancer, along with the currently available data to guide treatment decisions.

Abdominal metastases from Merkel cell carcinoma: Prevalence and presentation on CT examination in 111 patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to report the prevalence and imaging features of abdominal metastases from Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) on computed tomography (CT) examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 111 patients with MCC from two institutions were initially identified. Of these, 27 patients (27/111; 24.3%) had abdominal metastases from MCC present on CT examination. There were 19 men and 8 women with a mean age of 75  ± 10.8 (SD) years (age range: 46-92 years). CT examinations were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists and analyzed quantitatively for the number and dimensions of abdominal metastases from MCC and qualitatively in terms of location, margins, contours, homogeneity, patterns of enhancement, vascular involvement and extension of metastases from MCC.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (15/27; 56%) had abdominal metastatic disease at initial diagnosis and twelve (12/27; 44%) developed abdominal metastases during the course of the disease. The mean number of locations of abdominal metastases was 2.1 ± 1.12 (SD) (range: 1-5). Abdominal metastases involved abdominal lymph nodes (16/27; 59%), adrenal glands/kidneys/retroperitoneum (14/27; 52%), mesentery/peritoneum (13/27; 48%), liver (7/27; 26%) and pancreas (7/27; 26%). Vascular involvement was found in association with peritoneal/mesenteric metastases in 6/13 (46%) patients with intraperitoneal metastases or in association with abdominal lymph nodes in 4/16 (25%) patients. Ureteral encasement and/or dilatation was found in 4/14 (28%) patients with retroperitoneal metastases and 3/16 (19%) patients with abdominal lymph nodes. Metastases to the liver, pancreas, peritoneum, retroperitoneum and adrenal glands displayed internal enhancement during the arterial phase in 1/2 (50%), 4/5 (80%), 4/7 (57%) and 5/8 (62%) patients for whom arterial phase was available, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Metastases from MCC have a prevalence of 24.3% on CT examination and may involve a variety of abdominal organs, mainly lymph nodes, peritoneal and retroperitoneal structures, but also the liver and pancreas. CT features of abdominal metastases from MCC include hypervascularity during the arterial phase of enhancement and eventually vascular and ureteral involvement.

Primary extra-pancreatic pancreatic-type acinar cell carcinoma in the right perinephric space: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Primary extra-pancreatic pancreatic-type acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy, and has only been reported in the gastrointestinal tract, liver, and lymph nodes until now. Extra-pancreatic pancreatic-type ACC in the perinephric space has not been reported. Herein, we report the first case of ACC in the perinephric space and describe its clinical and imaging features, which should be considered when differentiating perinephric space neoplasms.

CASE SUMMARY

A 48-year-old man with a 5-year history of hypertension was incidentally found to have an asymptomatic right retroperitoneal mass during a routine health check-up. Laboratory tests were normal. Abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed an oval hypervascular mass with a central scar and enhanced capsule in the right perinephric space. After surgical resection of the neoplasm, the diagnosis was primary extra-pancreatic pancreatic-type ACC. The patient was alive without recurrence or metastasis during a 15-mo follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of an extra-pancreatic ACC in right perinephric space, which should be considered as a possible diagnosis in perinephric tumors.

Utility of CT to Differentiate Pancreatic Parenchymal Metastasis from Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Simple Summary

The purpose of this retrospective study was to report the computed tomography (CT) features of pancreatic parenchymal metastasis (PPM) and identify CT features that may help discriminate between PPM and PDAC. At multivariable analysis, well-defined margins (OR, 6.64; 95% CI: 1.47–29.93; p = 0.014), maximal enhancement during arterial phase (OR, 6.15; 95% CI: 1.13–33.51; p = 0.036), no vessel involvement (OR, 7.19; 95% CI: 1.51–34.14) and no Wirsung duct dilatation (OR, 10.63; 95% CI: 2.27–49.91) were independently associated with PPM. A nomogram based on CT features identified at multivariable analysis yielded an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85–0.98) for the diagnosis of PPM vs. PDAC.

Abstract

Purpose: To report the computed tomography (CT) features of pancreatic parenchymal metastasis (PPM) and identify CT features that may help discriminate between PPM and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Materials and methods: Thirty-four patients (24 men, 12 women; mean age, 63.3 ± 10.2 [SD] years) with CT and histopathologically proven PPM were analyzed by two independent readers and compared to 34 patients with PDAC. Diagnosis performances of each variable for the diagnosis of PPM against PDAC were calculated. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. A nomogram was developed to diagnose PPM against PDAC. Results: PPM mostly presented as single (34/34; 100%), enhancing (34/34; 100%), solid (27/34; 79%) pancreatic lesion without visible associated lymph nodes (24/34; 71%) and no Wirsung duct enlargement (29/34; 85%). At multivariable analysis, well-defined margins (OR, 6.64; 95% CI: 1.47–29.93; p = 0.014), maximal enhancement during arterial phase (OR, 6.15; 95% CI: 1.13–33.51; p = 0.036), no vessel involvement (OR, 7.19; 95% CI: 1.512–34.14) and no Wirsung duct dilatation (OR, 10.63; 95% CI: 2.27–49.91) were independently associated with PPM. The nomogram yielded an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85–0.98) for the diagnosis of PPM vs. PDAC. Conclusion: CT findings may help discriminate between PPM and PDAC.

CT and MRI of pancreatic tumors: an update in the era of radiomics

Radiomics is a relatively new approach for image analysis. As a part of radiomics, texture analysis, which consists in extracting a great amount of quantitative data from original images, can be used to identify specific features that can help determining the actual nature of a pancreatic lesion and providing other information such as resectability, tumor grade, tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy or survival after surgery. In this review, the basic of radiomics, recent developments and the results of texture analysis using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the field of pancreatic tumors are presented. Future applications of radiomics, such as artificial intelligence, are discussed.