Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal oncology imaging: A critical review of current applications

Advancing musculoskeletal tumor diagnosis: Automated segmentation and predictive classification using deep learning and radiomics

OBJECTIVES

Musculoskeletal (MSK) tumors, given their high mortality rate and heterogeneity, necessitate precise examination and diagnosis to guide clinical treatment effectively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is pivotal in detecting MSK tumors, as it offers exceptional image contrast between bone and soft tissue. This study aims to enhance the speed of detection and the diagnostic accuracy of MSK tumors through automated segmentation and grading utilizing MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The research included 170 patients (mean age, 58 years ±12 (standard deviation), 84 men) with MSK lesions, who underwent MRI scans from April 2021 to May 2023. We proposed a deep learning (DL) segmentation model MSAPN based on multi-scale attention and pixel-level reconstruction, and compared it with existing algorithms. Using MSAPN-segmented lesions to extract their radiomic features for the benign and malignant classification of tumors.

RESULTS

Compared to the most advanced segmentation algorithms, MSAPN demonstrates better performance. The Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) are 0.871 and 0.815 in the testing set and independent validation set, respectively. The radiomics model for classifying benign and malignant lesions achieves an accuracy of 0.890. Moreover, there is no statistically significant difference between the radiomics model based on manual segmentation and MSAPN segmentation.

CONCLUSION

This research contributes to the advancement of MSK tumor diagnosis through automated segmentation and predictive classification. The integration of DL algorithms and radiomics shows promising results, and the visualization analysis of feature maps enhances clinical interpretability.

Recommender-based bone tumour classification with radiographs-a link to the past

OBJECTIVES

To develop an algorithm to link undiagnosed patients to previous patient histories based on radiographs, and simultaneous classification of multiple bone tumours to enable early and specific diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this retrospective study, data from 2000 to 2021 were curated from our database by two orthopaedic surgeons, a radiologist and a data scientist. Patients with complete clinical and pre-therapy radiographic data were eligible. To ensure feasibility, the ten most frequent primary tumour entities, confirmed histologically or by tumour board decision, were included. We implemented a ResNet and transformer model to establish baseline results. Our method extracts image features using deep learning and then clusters the k most similar images to the target image using a hash-based nearest-neighbour recommender approach that performs simultaneous classification by majority voting. The results were evaluated with precision-at-k, accuracy, precision and recall. Discrete parameters were described by incidence and percentage ratios. For continuous parameters, based on a normality test, respective statistical measures were calculated.

RESULTS

Included were data from 809 patients (1792 radiographs; mean age 33.73 ± 18.65, range 3-89 years; 443 men), with Osteochondroma (28.31%) and Ewing sarcoma (1.11%) as the most and least common entities, respectively. The dataset was split into training (80%) and test subsets (20%). For k = 3, our model achieved the highest mean accuracy, precision and recall (92.86%, 92.86% and 34.08%), significantly outperforming state-of-the-art models (54.10%, 55.57%, 19.85% and 62.80%, 61.33%, 23.05%).

CONCLUSION

Our novel approach surpasses current models in tumour classification and links to past patient data, leveraging expert insights.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The proposed algorithm could serve as a vital support tool for clinicians and general practitioners with limited experience in bone tumour classification by identifying similar cases and classifying bone tumour entities.

KEY POINTS

• Addressed accurate bone tumour classification using radiographic features. • Model achieved 92.86%, 92.86% and 34.08% mean accuracy, precision and recall, respectively, significantly surpassing state-of-the-art models. • Enhanced diagnosis by integrating prior expert patient assessments.

Artificial Intelligence in Bone Metastasis Imaging: Recent Progresses from Diagnosis to Treatment - A Narrative Review

The introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) represents an actual revolution in the radiological field, including bone lesion imaging. Bone lesions are often detected both in healthy and oncological patients and the differential diagnosis can be challenging but decisive, because it affects the diagnostic and therapeutic process, especially in case of metastases. Several studies have already demonstrated how the integration of AI-based tools in the current clinical workflow could bring benefits to patients and to healthcare workers. AI technologies could help radiologists in early bone metastases detection, increasing the diagnostic accuracy and reducing the overdiagnosis and the number of unnecessary deeper investigations. In addition, radiomics and radiogenomics approaches could go beyond the qualitative features, visible to the human eyes, extrapolating cancer genomic and behavior information from imaging, in order to plan a targeted and personalized treatment. In this article, we want to provide a comprehensive summary of the most promising AI applications in bone metastasis imaging and their role from diagnosis to treatment and prognosis, including the analysis of future challenges and new perspectives.

Radiomics and artificial intelligence for soft-tissue sarcomas: Current status and perspectives

This article proposes a summary of the current status of the research regarding the use of radiomics and artificial intelligence to improve the radiological assessment of patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS), a heterogeneous group of rare and ubiquitous mesenchymal malignancies. After a first part explaining the principle of radiomics approaches, from raw image post-processing to extraction of radiomics features mined with unsupervised and supervised machine-learning algorithms, and the current research involving deep learning algorithms in STS, especially convolutional neural networks, this review details their main research developments since the formalisation of 'radiomics' in oncologic imaging in 2010. This review focuses on CT and MRI and does not involve ultrasonography. Radiomics and deep radiomics have been successfully applied to develop predictive models to discriminate between benign soft-tissue tumors and STS, to predict the histologic grade (i.e., the most important prognostic marker of STS), the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, and the patients' survivals and probability for presenting distant metastases. The main findings, limitations and expectations are discussed for each of these outcomes. Overall, after a first decade of publications emphasizing the potential of radiomics through retrospective proof-of-concept studies, almost all positive but with heterogeneous and often non-replicable methods, radiomics is now at a turning point in order to provide robust demonstrations of its clinical impact through open-science, independent databases, and application of good and standardized practices in radiomics such as those provided by the Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative, without forgetting innovative research paths involving other '-omics' data to better understand the relationships between imaging of STS, gene-expression profiles and tumor microenvironment.

Initial Evaluation of Focal Bone Lesions: How Do We Do It?

Focal bone lesions are frequent, and management greatly depends on the characteristics of their images. After briefly discussing the required work-up, we analyze the most relevant imaging signs for assessing potential aggressiveness. We also describe the imaging aspects of the various types of lesion matrices and their clinical implications.

A deep learning model for the diagnosis of sacroiliitis according to Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria with magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a deep learning model to detect bone marrow edema (BME) in sacroiliac joints and predict the MRI Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) definition of active sacroiliitis in patients with chronic inflammatory back pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MRI examinations of patients from the French prospective multicenter DESIR cohort (DEvenir des Spondyloarthropathies Indifférenciées Récentes) were used for training, validation and testing. Patients with inflammatory back pain lasting three months to three years were recruited. Test datasets were from MRI follow-ups at five years and ten years. The model was evaluated using an external test dataset from the ASAS cohort. A neuronal network classifier (mask-RCNN) was trained and evaluated for sacroiliac joints detection and BME classification. Diagnostic capabilities of the model to predict ASAS MRI active sacroiliitis (BME in at least two half-slices) were assessed using Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC. The gold standard was experts' majority decision.

RESULTS

A total of 256 patients with 362 MRI examinations from the DESIR cohort were included, with 27% meeting the ASAS definition for experts. A total of 178 MRI examinations were used for the training set, 25 for the validation set and 159 for the evaluation set. MCCs for DESIR baseline, 5-years, and 10-years follow-up were 0.90 (n = 53), 0.64 (n = 70), and 0.61 (n = 36), respectively. AUCs for predicting ASAS MRI were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93-1), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.79-1), and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.62-1), respectively. The ASAS external validation cohort included 47 patients (mean age 36 ± 10 [SD] years; women, 51%) with 19% meeting the ASAS definition. MCC was 0.62, sensitivity 56% (95% CI: 42-70), specificity 100% (95% CI: 100-100) and AUC 0.76 (95% CI: 0.57-0.95).

CONCLUSION

The deep learning model achieves performance close to those of experts for BME detection in sacroiliac joints and determination of active sacroiliitis according to the ASAS definition.

Automatic deep learning-based assessment of spinopelvic coronal and sagittal alignment

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI) solution for estimating coronal and sagittal spinopelvic alignment on conventional uniplanar two-dimensional whole-spine radiograph.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 100 patients (35 men, 65 women) with a median age of 14 years (IQR: 13, 15.25; age range: 3-64 years) who underwent conventional uniplanar two-dimensional whole-spine radiograph in standing position between January and July 2022. Ten most commonly used spinopelvic coronal and sagittal parameters were retrospectively measured without AI by a junior radiologist and approved or adjusted by a senior musculoskeletal radiologist to reach final measurements. Final measurements were used as the ground truth to assess AI performance for each parameter. AI performances were estimated using mean absolute errors (MAE), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCs), and accuracy for selected clinically relevant thresholds. Readers visually classified AI outputs to assess reliability at a patient-level.

RESULTS

AI solution showed excellent consistency without bias in coronal (ICCs ≥ 0.95; MAE ≤ 2.9° or 1.97 mm) and sagittal (ICCs ≥ 0.85; MAE ≤ 4.4° or 2.7 mm) spinopelvic evaluation, except for kyphosis (ICC = 0.58; MAE = 8.7°). AI accuracy to classify low Cobb angle, severe scoliosis or frontal pelvic asymmetry was 91% (95% CI: 85-96), 99% (95% CI: 97-100) and 94% (95% CI: 89-98), respectively. Overall, AI provided reliable measurements in 72/100 patients (72%).

CONCLUSION

The AI solution used in this study for combined coronal and sagittal spinopelvic balance assessment provides results consistent with those of a senior musculoskeletal radiologist, and shows potential benefit for reducing workload in future routine implementation.

Soft-tissue sarcoma in adults: Imaging appearances, pitfalls and diagnostic algorithms

This article provides an overview of the current knowledge regarding diagnostic imaging of patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, which is a heterogeneous group of rare mesenchymal malignancies. After an initial contextualization, diagnostic flow-chart based on initial radiological findings of soft-tissue masses (with specific focus on adipocytic soft-tissue tumors [STTs], hemorragic STTs and retroperitoneal STTs) are provided considering relevant results from novel researches, guidelines, and experts' viewpoints, with the aim to help radiologists and clinicians in their practice. Particularly, the central place of sarcoma reference centers in the diagnostic and therapeutic management is highlighted, as well as the pivotal role that radiologists should play to correctly identify patients with soft-tissue sarcoma at the initial stage of the disease. Indications and methods for performing imaging-guided biopsies are also discussed, as well as clues to improve soft-tissue sarcoma grading with conventional and quantitative imaging.