Quadruple therapy with lactoferrin for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomised, multicentre study

Novel Information Regarding the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVE

Helicobacter pylori infects at least 50% of the world's human population. The current study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy of triple versus quadruple therapy.

METHODS

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) consisting of triple and quadruple therapy were identified through electronic and manual searches in the national and international online databases (IsI, Magiran, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus). The random-effects model was applied to pool analysis. Funnel plots and the Egger test were used to examine publication bias.

RESULTS

After a detailed review of the selected articles, 80 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis; it was based on using triple and quadruple therapy as the first and second-line treatment. The results showed that quadruple therapy in the first-line treatment had a higher eradication rate than triple therapy. Overall, the eradication rate with triple therapy was 74% (95% CI, 71%-77%) for intention-totreat (ITT) analysis and 80% (95% CI, 77%-82%) for per-protocol (PP) analysis. Generally, the eradication rate with quadruple therapy was 82% (95% CI, 78.0%-86.0%) for ITT analysis and 85% (95% CI, 82.0%-89.0%) for PP analysis. The analysis also revealed that quadruple therapy was more effective for 7 or 10 days.

CONCLUSION

The current study results demonstrated that quadruple therapy has better effectiveness than triple therapy as the first-line treatment; however, in the second-line treatment, the effectiveness of quadruple and triple regimens is almost similar. The effectiveness of quadruple therapy in the Asian population was found to be slightly higher than that of triple therapy, while this difference was considerably higher in the European population.

Antimicrobial Effects of Lactoferrin against Helicobacter pylori Infection

Helicobacter (H.) pylori is the primary causative agent of various gastroduodenal diseases. H. pylori is an adapted microorganism that has evolved to survive in the acidic conditions of the human stomach, possessing a natural strategy for colonizing harsh environments. Despite the implementation of various eradication regimens worldwide, the eradication rate of H. pylori has decreased to less than 80% in recent years due to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains. This has posed a significant challenge in treating H. pylori infection, as antibiotic resistance and side effects have become increasingly problematic. Lactoferrin, a member of the transferrin family, is an iron-binding protein with antioxidant, antibacterial, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory properties that promote human health. The concentrations of lactoferrin in the gastric juice and mucosa significantly increase during H. pylori infection and are strongly correlated with the severity of gastric mucosal inflammation. Numerous researchers have studied the antimicrobial properties of lactoferrin both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, recent studies have investigated the addition of oral lactoferrin supplementation to H. pylori eradication therapy, even though monotherapy with lactoferrin does not eradicate the microorganism. In this article, we reviewed the survival strategy of H. pylori to evade the antimicrobial activity of human lactoferrin and explore the potential of lactoferrin in H. pylori eradication therapy.

Lactoferrin: An Effective Weapon in the Battle Against Bacterial Infections

The emergence of multidrug-resistant bacterial strains with respect to commercially available antimicrobial drugs has marked a watershed in treatment therapies to fight pathogens and has stimulated research on alternative remedies. Proteins of the innate immune system of mammals have been highlighted as potentially yielding possible treatment options for infections. Lactoferrin (Lf) is one of these proteins; interestingly, no resistance to it has been found. Lf is a conserved cationic nonheme glycoprotein that is abundant in milk and is also present in low quantities in mucosal secretions. Moreover, Lf is produced and secreted by the secondary granules of neutrophils at infection sites. Lf is a molecule of approximately 80 kDa that displays multiple functions, such as antimicrobial, anti-viral, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer actions. Lf can synergize with antibiotics, increasing its potency against bacteria. Lactoferricins (Lfcins) are peptides resulting from the N-terminal end of Lf by proteolytic cleavage with pepsin. They exhibit several anti-bacterial effects similar to those of the parental glycoprotein. Synthetic analog peptides exhibiting potent antimicrobial properties have been designed. The aim of this review is to update understanding of the structure and effects of Lf and Lfcins as anti-bacterial compounds, focusing on the mechanisms of action in bacteria and the use of Lf in treatment of infections in patients, including those studies where no significant differences were found. Lf could be an excellent option for prevention and treatment of bacterial diseases, mainly in combined therapies with antibiotics or other antimicrobials.

First-line therapies for H. pylori infection in Italy: a pooled-data analysis

Background: Curing H. pylori infection remains challenging, and the use of most effective first-line therapy represents a therapeutic cornerstone. To monitor the efficacy of first-line therapies in Italy, we designed a systematic review with pooled- data analysis of data published in the last 15 years. Methods: The search was focused on standard regimens and adult patients. Studies that included modified therapy regimens, pediatric patients, case series with less than 5 patients, and those in language other than English were excluded. Results: A total of 40 studies, with 74 therapeutic arms and 13,539 patients were evaluated. Among the 14-day triple therapies, the combination with proton pump inhibitor (PPI), clarithromycin and amoxicillin achieved the highest (77.9%) success rate, whilst the lowest success rate (62.7%) was observed following the 14-day PPI, clarithromycin and tinidazole regimen. The overall efficacy of triple therapies significantly decreased from 75.7% to 72.1% in the last decade. Sequential (88.3% on 3431 patients), concomitant (88.8% on 376 patients), and the bismuth-based quadruple therapy with three-in-one capsule, containing bismuth subcitrate potassium (140 mg), metronidazole (125 mg), tetracycline (125 mg) (90.4% on 999 patients) achieved similarly high eradication rates, but data on concomitant are still limited. The bismuth-based was associated with the higher (38.7%) incidence of side-effects. Conclusions: Data found that all triple therapies, irrespective of drug combination and therapy duration, should be abandoned in Italy due to their unacceptable low success rates. Monitoring the efficacy of standard first-line therapies in other countries could be clinically useful for both patients and clinicians.

Lactoferrin in the Prevention and Treatment of Intestinal Inflammatory Pathologies Associated with Colorectal Cancer Development

The connection between inflammation and cancer is well-established and supported by genetic, pharmacological and epidemiological data. The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, have been described as important promoters for colorectal cancer development. Risk factors include environmental and food-borne mutagens, dysbalance of intestinal microbiome composition and chronic intestinal inflammation, with loss of intestinal epithelial barrier and enhanced cell proliferation rate. Therapies aimed at shutting down mucosal inflammatory response represent the foundation for IBDs treatment. However, when applied for long periods, they can alter the immune system and promote microbiome dysbiosis and carcinogenesis. Therefore, it is imperative to find new safe substances acting as both potent anti-inflammatory and anti-pathogen agents. Lactoferrin (Lf), an iron-binding glycoprotein essential in innate immunity, is generally recognized as safe and used as food supplement due to its multifunctionality. Lf possesses a wide range of immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties against different aseptic and septic inflammatory pathologies, including IBDs. Moreover, Lf exerts anti-adhesive, anti-invasive and anti-survival activities against several microbial pathogens that colonize intestinal mucosa of IBDs patients. This review focuses on those activities of Lf potentially useful for the prevention/treatment of intestinal inflammatory pathologies associated with colorectal cancer development.

Bioactive properties of milk proteins in humans: A review

Many studies have demonstrated that milk protein consumption has benefits in terms of promoting human health. This review assesses the intervention studies which have evaluated potential health enhancing effects in humans following the ingestion of milk proteins. The impact of milk protein ingestion has been studied to asses their satiating, hypotensive, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antioxidant and insulinotropic properties as well as their impact on morphological modifications (e.g., muscle and fat mass) in humans. Consistent health promoting effects appear to have been observed in certain instances (i.e., muscle protein synthesis, insulinotropic and hypotensive activity). However, controversial outcomes have also been reported (i.e., antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anticancer and antioxidant properties). Several factors including interindividual differences, the timing of protein ingestion as well as the potency of the active components may explain these differences. In addition, processing conditions have been reported, in certain instances, to affect milk protein structure and therefore modify their bioactive potential. It is thought that the health promoting properties of milk proteins are linked to the release of bioactive peptides (BAPs) during gastrointestinal digestion. There is a need for further research to develop a more in-depth understanding on the possible mechanisms involved in the observed physiological effects. In addition, more carefully controlled and appropriately powered human intervention studies are required to demonstrate the health enhancing properties of milk proteins in humans.

Dietary amelioration of Helicobacter infection

We review herein the basis for using dietary components to treat and/or prevent Helicobacter pylori infection, with emphasis on (a) work reported in the last decade, (b) dietary components for which there is mechanism-based plausibility, and (c) components for which clinical results on H pylori amelioration are available. There is evidence that a diet-based treatment may reduce the levels and/or the virulence of H pylori colonization without completely eradicating the organism in treated individuals. This concept was endorsed a decade ago by the participants in a small international consensus conference held in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, and interest in such a diet-based approach has increased dramatically since then. This approach is attractive in terms of cost, treatment, tolerability, and cultural acceptability. This review, therefore, highlights specific foods, food components, and food products, grouped as follows: bee products (eg, honey and propolis); probiotics; dairy products; vegetables; fruits; oils; essential oils; and herbs, spices, and other plants. A discussion of the small number of clinical studies that are available is supplemented by supportive in vitro and animal studies. This very large body of in vitro and preclinical evidence must now be followed up with rationally designed, unambiguous human trials.

Efficacy of fermented milk and whey proteins in Helicobacter pylori eradication: A review

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication is considered a necessary step in the management of peptic ulcer disease, chronic gastritis, gastric adenocarcinoma and mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Standard triple therapy eradication regimens are inconvenient and achieve unpredictable and often poor results. Eradication rates are decreasing over time with increase in antibiotic resistance. Fermented milk and several of its component whey proteins have emerged as candidates for complementary therapy. In this context the current review seeks to summarize the current evidence available on their role in H. pylori eradication. Pertinent narrative/systematic reviews, clinical trials and laboratory studies on individual components including fermented milk, yogurt, whey proteins, lactoferrin, α-lactalbumin (α-LA), glycomacropeptide and immunoglobulin were comprehensively searched and retrieved from Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and abstracts/proceedings of conferences up to May 2013. A preponderance of the evidence available on fermented milk-based probiotic preparations and bovine lactoferrin suggests a beneficial effect in Helicobacter eradication. Evidence for α-LA and immunoglobulins is promising while that for glycomacropeptide is preliminary and requires substantiation. The magnitude of the potential benefit documented so far is small and the precise clinical settings are ill defined. This restricts the potential use of this group as a complementary therapy in a nutraceutical setting hinging on better patient acceptability/compliance. Further work is necessary to identify the optimal substrate, fermentation process, dose and the ideal clinical setting (prevention/treatment, first line therapy/recurrence, symptomatic/asymptomatic, gastritis/ulcer diseases etc.). The potential of this group in high antibiotic resistance or treatment failure settings presents interesting possibilities and deserves further exploration.

Lactoferrin

Lactoferrin is found in milk - human and animal. It has therapeutic potential as an iron supplement, against infection, inflammation and cancer.

The evidence is so far mainly laboratory and animal data, with a small number of human trials beginning to be published, to this point with mixed results. An example is its use as treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection.

Helicobacter pylori infection in clinical practice: probiotics and a combination of probiotics + lactoferrin improve compliance, but not eradication, in sequential therapy

BACKGROUND

Sequential therapy (ST) seems to offer higher success rates than triple therapy (TT) in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. However, from the standpoint of therapeutic compliance, there is no difference between the two treatments. Adjuvant treatment (especially with probiotics (PB) and lactoferrin (LF)) has often improved compliance and eradication rates in patients subjected to TT, while ST had never been used in association with adjuvants.

METHODS

Over a period of 2 years, we randomized and divided 227 consecutive adult patients with H. pylori infection into three groups. The patients were given ST with the addition of adjuvants, as follows: group A (ST + placebo), group B (ST + LF + PB), and group C (ST + PB). Our goal was to assess therapeutic compliance, so we prepared a questionnaire to help determine the severity of the side effects. We also determined the eradication rates for the groups.

RESULTS

Patients with ST + placebo had the worst compliance as compared with the other two groups in terms of the absence of symptoms (p < .001 between B and A; p = .001 between C and A) and the presence of intolerable symptoms (p = .016 between B and A; p = .046 between C and A). The differences between the values for the treated groups and those for the placebo group were statistically significant. On the other hand, there was no statistically significant difference in compliance between groups B and C. The eradication rate was similar for the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Probiotics associated with ST provide optimum therapeutic compliance compared with the placebo and, despite the need to take a larger number of tablets, they should be taken into consideration as an adjuvant to therapy for H. pylori infection. The addition of LF to the PB did not bring about any further improvements in compliance. As compared with the placebo, the eradication rate of ST did not improve by adding LF + PB or by using PB alone.

Unique host iron utilization mechanisms of Helicobacter pylori revealed with iron-deficient chemically defined media

Helicobacter pylori chronically infects the gastric mucosa, where it can be found free in mucus, attached to cells, and intracellularly. H. pylori requires iron for growth, but the sources of iron used in vivo are unclear. In previous studies, the inability to culture H. pylori without serum made it difficult to determine which host iron sources might be used by H. pylori. Using iron-deficient, chemically defined medium, we determined that H. pylori can bind and extract iron from hemoglobin, transferrin, and lactoferrin. H. pylori can use both bovine and human versions of both lactoferrin and transferrin, contrary to previous reports. Unlike other pathogens, H. pylori preferentially binds the iron-free forms of transferrin and lactoferrin, which limits its ability to extract iron from normal serum, which is not iron saturated. This novel strategy may have evolved to permit limited growth in host tissue during persistent colonization while excessive injury or iron depletion is prevented.

Meta-analysis: the effect of supplementation with lactoferrin on eradication rates and adverse events during Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence shown that lactoferrin could exert an antimicrobial effect against Helicobacter pylori both in vitro and in vivo models. To systematically evaluate whether adding lactoferrin to H. pylori eradication regimens could improve eradication rates and reduce side-effects during anti-H. pylori treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible articles were identified by searches of electronic databases. We included all randomized trials comparing lactoferrin supplementation to placebo or no treatment during anti-H. pylori regimens. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.0.10. Subanalysis/Sensitivity analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

We identified nine randomized trials (n = 1343). Pooled H. pylori eradication rates were 86.57% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 83.99-89.15%) and 74.44% (95% CI = 71.14-77.74%) for patients with or without lactoferrin by intention-to-treat analysis, respectively, the odds ratio (OR) was 2.26 (95% CI = 1.70-3.00); the occurrence of total side-effects was 9.05% (95% CI = 6.83-11.27%) and 16.28% (95% CI = 13.43%-19.13%) for groups with or without lactoferrin, especially for nausea, the summary OR was 0.15 (95% CI = 0.04-0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Our review suggests that supplementation with lactoferrin could be effective in increasing eradication rates of anti-H. pylori therapy, and could be considered helpful for patients with eradication failure. Furthermore, lactoferrin shows a positive impact on H. pylori therapy-related side-effects.

Meta-analysis: efficacy of bovine lactoferrin in Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND

Several randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) have sought to determine the efficacy of bovine lactoferrin in Helicobacter pylori eradication with equivocal results.

AIM

To evaluate the effect of bovine lactoferrin supplementation in H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

Electronic databases, reviews, bibliographies, abstracts and conference proceedings were searched. Included trials had to be randomized or quasi-randomized and controlled, using bovine lactoferrin in the intervention group, treating Helicobacter-infected subjects and evaluating eradication of H. pylori as an outcome.

RESULTS

The search identified five eligible RCTs (of 169). Data were available for 682 subjects (bovine lactoferrin group-n = 316; control group-n = 366). The pooled odds ratio (five studies) for eradication by intention-to-treat analysis was 2.22 (95% CI 1.44-3.44; P = 0.0003) using the fixed effects model (FEM) and 2.24 (95% CI 1.15-4.35; P = 0.0003) using the random effects model (REM) (Cochran's Q = 6.83; P = 0.145). The pooled risk difference was 0.11 (95% CI 0.05-0.16; P = 0.0001) by FEM (Cochran's Q = 6.67; P = 0.154) and 0.10 (95% CI 0.04-0.17; P = 0.0023) by REM. There was no significant difference in incidence of adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Bovine lactoferrin potentially improves H. pylori eradication rates without any impact on adverse effects, but available evidence is limited and further research is necessary to confirm the findings.

Meta-analysis on the efficacy of lactoferrin supplementation combined with standard treatment during Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy

AIM: To systematically evaluate whether adding lactoferrin to H pylori eradication regimens could improve eradication rates and reduce side effects during anti-H pylori treatment.

METHODS: Eligible articles were identified by searching electronic databases. We included all randomized trials comparing lactoferrin supplementation to placebo or no treatment during anti-H pylori regimens. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.0.10. Subanalysis/Sensitivity analysis was also performed.

RESULTS: We identified 9 randomized trials (n = 1343). Pooled H pylori eradication rates for patients with and without lactoferrin were 86.57% (95% CI: 83.99%-89.15%) and 74.44% (95% CI: 71.14%-77.74%) by intention-to-treat analysis, respectively, and the odds ratio (OR) was 2.26 (95% CI: 1.70-3.00); the occurrence of total side effects, especially nausea, for groups with or without lactoferrin were 9.05% (95% CI: 6.83%-11.27%) and 16.28% (95% CI: 13.43%-19.13%), respectively; the summary OR was 0.15 (95% CI: 0.04-0.54).

CONCLUSION: Our review suggests that supplementation with lactoferrin could be effective in increasing eradication rates of anti-H pylori therapy, and could be considered helpful for patients with eradication failure.

Lactoferrin and desferrioxamine are ineffective in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection and may enhance H. pylori growth and gastric inflammation in mice

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of bovine lactoferrin (BLf), recombinant human lactoferrin (rHLf) and desferrioxamine against Helicobacter pylori in vitro and in mice and also to determine whether BLf or rHLf alter gastric inflammation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In vitro: Broth dilution susceptibility tests were performed using different concentrations of desferrioxamine, BLf and rHLf. Murine trials: In the prevention trial, C57BL/6 female mice were treated with BLf or rHLF, and then infected with the SS1 strain of H. pylori. In the treatment trial, mice were gavaged with either BLf, rHLf or desferrioxamine. In addition, gastric myeloperoxidase activity (MPO) was measured to assess gastric inflammation. Desferoxamine was found to have a direct bactericidal effect, while BLf and rHLf only partially suppressed H. pylori growth in vitro. However, in both prevention and treatment trials all three forms of treatment failed to reduce H. pylori load in mice. Gastric MPO activity and H. pylori load were noted to be higher with lactoferrin treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study does not support the use of BLf or rHLF in the treatment of human H. pylori infection. Interestingly, H. pylori growth and gastric inflammation appear to be enhanced by lactoferrin treatment.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

The mouse model is ideal for testing novel H. pylori eradicating agents.

Emerging therapies for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infections

OBJECTIVE

To describe emerging therapies, such as levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, rifabutin, rifaximin, tinidazole, doxycycline, minocycline, lactoferrin, and plaunotol for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant information was identified through a search of MEDLINE (1966-July 2008), PubMed (1955-July 2008), American Search Premier (1975-July 2008), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1960-2008), Science Citation Index Expanded (1996-2008), Cochrane Databases (publications archived until July 2008), and various tertiary sources using the terms Helicobacter pylori, fluoroquinolones, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, rifabutin, rifaximin, lactoferrin, plaunotol, tinidazole, doxycycline, minocycline, faropenem, new treatments, refractory, and salvage alone or in combination.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant information was identified and selected based on clinical relevance and value of information. In vitro and in vivo data were included if available.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data exist supporting the use of levofloxacin or rifabutin as salvage therapies for H. pylori infection. Levofloxacin triple therapy has been recommended in the current treatment guideline, but more data are needed, especially from studies conducted in the US. A rifabutin-based regimen is better tolerated than conventional quadruple therapy, but its use is limited due to cost, hematologic adverse effects, drug interactions, and predicted development of resistance. Tinidazole appears to be an option, particularly as sequential therapy when combined with other agents; however, its use is limited by the high prevalence of nitroimidazole-resistant H. pylori strains in the US. Moxifloxacin data are limited. Data supporting the use of rifaximin, doxycycline, and minocycline are lacking or do not show benefit of these drugs over standard treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori infection remains one of the most significant infections worldwide, and treatment failure rate with the current standard therapy continues to rise. Other treatment options should be explored to meet the emerging challenge.

Helicobacter pylori: testing and treatment

Helicobacter pylori is an important pathogen worldwide. Accurate diagnosis and appropriate therapy is important in clinical practice. Invasive tests that accurately identify current infection include the biopsy urease test and histology. The best noninvasive tests for diagnosis include the urea breath test and stool antigen testing. Proton pump inhibitor therapy can lead to false-negative H. pylori test results, and treatment should be stopped for 1-2 weeks prior to testing if possible. In the setting of bleeding peptic ulcer disease, urea breath testing is recommended to rule out a false-negative biopsy test result if needed. The current recommendations for when to test for H. pylori vary around the world. Well-accepted indications include active and past ulcer disease, and gastric-mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. There is no universal agreement regarding whether all patients with functional dyspepsia should be tested and treated, although this is an evidence-based recommendation. There is also evidence that H. pylori eradication prevents peptic ulcer disease in those starting NSAIDs long term. Primary treatment remains triple therapy with 10-14 days probably being superior to shorter courses of therapy. Quadruple therapy is recommended if standard triple therapy fails. Salvage therapies with levofloxacin, rifabutin or furazolidone have been identified. Novel approaches to treatment include sequential therapy and use of adjuvants.

Helicobacter pylori eradication with either quadruple regimen with lactoferrin or levofloxacin-based triple therapy: a multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication rate following standard triple therapy is decreasing worldwide. A quadruple therapy with lactoferrin and a levofloxacin-based triple therapy has been found to achieve a very high (>90%) cure rate. This study aimed to confirm these encouraging results.

METHODS

This was a prospective, open-label, randomised, multicentre, Italian study enrolling consecutive H. pylori infected patients. The infection at entry was assessed by endoscopy and biopsies (histology plus rapid urease test) in all patients, whilst bacterial eradication was assessed by 13C-urea breath test 4-6 weeks after therapy ended. Patients were randomised to receive either a 7-day, triple therapy with rabeprazole 20mg o.d., levofloxacin 500 mg o.d., and amoxycillin 1g b.i.d. (4 tablets/day) or a 7-day quadruple therapy comprising of rabeprazole 20mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, tinidazole 500 mg plus bovine lactoferrin 200mg, all given twice daily (10 tablets/day).

RESULTS

Overall, 144 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. Following the triple therapy, H. pylori infection was cured in 49 out of 72 (68.1%; 95% CI=57-79) patients and in 49 out of 71 (69.1%; 95% CI=58-80) at intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, respectively. Following the quadruple regimen, the infection was cured in 52 out of 72 (72.2%; 95% CI=62-83) and in 52 out of 68 (76.5; 95% CI=66-87) patients at intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, respectively. No statistically significant difference emerged between the two therapy regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori eradication rate following both quadruple therapy with lactoferrin and a low-dose PPI, triple therapy with levofloxacin is disappointingly low.

A curcumin-based 1-week triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection: something to learn from failure?

BACKGROUND

Curcumin is the principal element of turmeric powder extracted from the root of Curcuma longa. Studies on curcumin have demonstrated some anti-Helicobacter pylori activity as well as immunomodulating properties. N-acetylcysteine and lactoferrin with their respective mucolytic and antibacterial activities might also be effective in H. pylori eradication therapy.

AIM

To determine if a 7-day non-antibiotic therapy comprised of curcumin, lactoferrin, N-acetylcysteine, and pantoprazole was effective for eradication of H. pylori infection and reduction of gastric inflammation, assessed by serum pepsinogens and relief of symptoms.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five consecutive H. pylori-positive patients (12 males, mean age 50 +/- 12 years, range 31-76) with functional dyspepsia were enrolled. Patients were administered for 7 days curcumin 30 mg b.i.d., bovine lactoferrin 100 mg b.i.d., N-acetylcysteine 600 mg b.i.d., and pantoprazole 20 mg b.i.d. H. pylori status and upper gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed by (13)C-urea breath test and a scale of upper gastrointestinal symptoms intensity (absent, mild, moderate, and severe), as well as a blood test for serum pepsinogens (sPGI, sPGII), gastrin-17 (G-17), and anti-H. pylori IgG (IgG-Hp) at baseline (T0) and after 2 months (T1).

RESULTS

Three of 25 patients (12%) were cured of H. pylori infection. A significant decrease in the overall severity of symptoms (T0: 6, interquartile range [IQR]: 4.5-8; T1: 2, IQR: 2-3; p < or = .001), and sPGII (T0: 16 microg/L, IQR: 13-22; T1: 10 microg/L, IQR: 8-16; p < or = .001) and sPGI (T0: 82 microg/L, IQR: 67-97; T1: 74 microg/L, IQR: 62-94; p = .02) levels were observed after 2 months of the treatment. IgG and G-17 values did not significantly decrease after 2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel therapy was not effective for H. pylori eradication. However, despite the bacterium persistence, significant improvement of dyspeptic symptoms and reduction of serologic signs of gastric inflammation were observed after 2 months at the end of the 7-day treatment schedule.

Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized prospective study of triple therapy versus triple therapy plus lactoferrin and probiotics

OBJECTIVES

Helicobacter pylori is causally associated with gastritis and peptic ulcer diseases. Recent data (meta-analysis) have demonstrated that triple therapy with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and a proton pump inhibitor has an eradication rate of only 74-76% and new therapeutic protocols may be necessary. The aim of this study was to examine whether adding bovine lactoferrin (bLf) and probiotics (Pbs) to the standard triple therapy for H. pylori infection could improve the eradication rate and reduce side effects.

METHODS

H. pylori infection was diagnosed in 206 patients: in 107 based on an upper endoscopy exam and a rapid urease test, and in 99 by means of the H. pylori stool antigen-test and the C(13) urea breath test (C(13) UBT). The patients were randomized into two groups: 101 patients (group A) underwent standard triple eradication therapy (esomeprazole, clarithromycin, amoxicillin), while 105 patients (group B) underwent a modified eradication therapy (standard triple eradication therapy plus bLf and Pb). Successful eradication therapy was defined as a negative C(13) UBT 8 wk after completion of the treatment. Results were evaluated by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis. Data were evaluated and considered positive when P<0.05.

RESULTS

At the end of the study 175/206 patients showed negative C(13) UBT results. According to intention-to-treat analysis, the infection was eradicated in 73/101 patients from Group A and in 93/105 from Group B. PP analysis showed 73/96 patients from Group A and 93/101 from Group B to have been successfully treated. More patients from group A than from group B reported side effects from their treatment (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study suggest that the addition of bLf and Pbs could improve the standard eradication therapy for H. pylori infection--bLf serving to increase the eradication rate and Pbs to reduce the side effects of antibiotic therapy.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori

Triple therapy, consisting of two antibiotics, clarithomycin and amoxicillin or metronidazole in combination with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) has become the first-line option for infection with Helicobacter pylori and has been recommended at several consensus conferences. In clinical practice, approximately 20% of patients will fail to obtain H. pylori eradication with the recommended treatment regimens. Major causes of treatment failure are insufficient patient compliance and antibiotic resistance. Because of antibiotic resistance, bismuth-based quadruple therapy has also become a first-line regimen in areas with exceedingly high rates of clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance, and is the preferred second-line option otherwise. Triple therapies based on levofloxacin and/or rifabutin mainly with combination of amoxicillin are options if multiple eradication failure occurs. However, following therapy failure beyond a second treatment attempt requires antibiotic resistance testing. New drugs and adjuvant agents have been reported but their efficacy needs further evaluation.

Effective regimens for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Successful Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy remains a challenge in medical practice. Currently, a proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy containing clarithromycin, amoxicillin or nitroimidazole for 7 days is the recommended first-line treatment approach with an expected eradication success rate of approximately 80%. As a second-line treatment option in the case of failure, a ranitidine bismuth citrate-based quadruple therapy is currently recommended curing another 80% of patients, leaving a subset of patients with persistent H. pylori infection. For these patients, promising rescue options have been evaluated including regimens that contain rifabutin, quinolones, furazolidone or high-dose amoxicillin. The role of susceptibility testing is still under discussion. It is not generally recommended prior to first-line treatment but guidelines propose a role for culture and antibiotic sensitivity testing after failure of the second attempt. Meanwhile, data on the geographic distribution of resistance pattern are available and may guide therapeutic decisions with regard to the combination of antibiotics chosen for the individual patients aiming at 100% cure rate in each individual patient.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

In clinical practice the recommended treatment regimens achieve only an 80%Helicobacter pylori eradication rate and this rate is lower in patients who have failed first-line treatment. The increasing indications for H. pylori treatment (idiopathic thrombocytopenia and iron deficiency anemia) and an increasing trend of antibiotic resistance (especially in southern Europe) emphasize the need for more effective H. pylori eradication. Smoking and a short duration of treatment, especially in patients with functional dyspepsia, are predictors of eradication failure. In first line, the best option remains the clarithromycin-based regimens but an extended treatment duration is now indicated. Following first-line treatment failure, 14-day proton pump inhibitor triple therapy employing alternative antibiotics or quadruple therapy could be used. Levofloxacin-based 10-day triple therapy seems to be an encouraging strategy following one or more eradication failures.

The treatment ofHelicobacterpyloriinfection: the changing picture of a still unresolved problem

More than 20 years from the discovery of Helicobacter pylori there is still a need to eradicate the bacterium. The efficacy of the current preferred first-line therapy--the triple regimen--has progressively decreased over the last 5 - 6 years, paralleling the progressive increase in the prevalence of resistant bacterial strains. Similarly, the quadruple therapy has progressively lost its importance as rescue therapy in some countries where bismuth is no longer available. A large number of studies investigating new combinations of drugs, new antibiotics and new regimens have been published in recent years. The most promising regimens--sequential therapy and triple therapy with lovofloxacin--have progressively gained importance but still need further confirmation of their efficacy before they can replace the old protocols in the everyday treatment of H. pylori infection.

Helicobacter pylori eradication with either 7-day or 10-day triple therapies, and with a 10-day sequential regimen

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication rates achieved by standard seven-day triple therapies are decreasing in several countries, while a novel 10-day sequential regimen has achieved a very high success rate. A longer 10-day triple therapy, similar to the sequential regimen, was tested to see whether it could achieve a better infection cure rate.

METHODS

Patients with nonulcer dyspepsia and H pylori infection were randomly assigned to one of the following three therapies: esomeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxycillin 1 g for seven days or 10 days, or a 10-day sequential regimen including esomeprazole 20 mg plus amoxycillin 1 g for five days and esomeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 500 mg for the remaining five days. All drugs were given twice daily. H pylori eradication was checked four to six weeks after treatment by using a 13C-urea breath test.

RESULTS

Overall, 213 patients were enrolled. H pylori eradication was achieved in 75.7% and 77.9%, in 81.7% and 84.1%, and in 94.4% and 97.1% of patients following seven-day or 10-day triple therapy and the 10-day sequential regimen, at intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, respectively. The eradication rate following the sequential regimen was higher than either seven-day (P=0.002) or 10-day triple therapy (P=0.02), while no significant difference emerged between the latter two regimens (P=0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-day sequential regimen was significantly more effective than both triple regimens, while 10-day triple therapy failed to significantly increase the H pylori eradication rate achieved by the standard seven-day regimen.

Helicobacter pylori diagnosis and management

H pylori is a global human pathogen and is the major cause of gastritis and the gastritis-associated diseases: gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, gastric cancer, and primary gastric B-cell lymphoma (MALToma). Although several reliable diagnostic tests are widely available, the ideal regimen for treating the infection re-mains to be established. The current first-line or legacy triple therapy regimens fail in 20% to 40% of patients. Causes of treatment failure include antibiotic resistance, poor compliance, short (7-10 days) duration of therapy, and drug-related side effects. Fourteen-day triple therapy has an approximately 12% better cure rate than does 7-day therapy; therefore, shorter durations can no longer be recommended. Recent studies confirmed older observations that the success rate of legacy triple regimens (PPI plus two antibiotics) can be improved if the duration is extended to 14 days or if a third antibiotic is given. Sequential therapy (PPI plus amoxicillin followed by a PPI plus clarithromycin plus metronidazole) requires further evaluation although the concept appears very promising and therapy should probably replace the legacy triple therapies. More studies are needed to examine doses, durations, and the need for sequential administration of the drugs, which extends the duration to 14 days. Nonetheless, sequential quadruple therapy probably should replace the legacy triple therapies. Classic quadruple therapy contains bismuth, a PPI, 1500 mg of metronidazole, and 1500 mg of tetracycline. It provides the highest average eradication rates and in many regions should be considered as the initial approach. Confirmation of eradication using noninvasive diagnostic tests, such as a urea breath test or stool antigen assay, is now the standard of care. The diagnosis of latent or symptomatic H pylori like the diagnosis of latent or symptomatic syphilis, always should prompt treatment. Because of decreasing cure rates, new and improved therapies are needed.

Bovine lactoferrin for Helicobacter pylori eradication: an open, randomized, multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Cure rates for eradication of Helicobacter pylori appear to be decreasing, thus more effective therapies must be identified.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of bovine lactoferrin in the treatment of H. pylori infection.

METHODS

In a multicentered prospective study, 402 (mean age 52.4, range 19-84 years) H. pylori-positive patients were assigned to one of three regimens: group A - esomeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.d. for 7 days; group B - lactoferrin 200 mg b.d. for 7 days followed by the same schedule of group A; group C - esomeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.d. plus lactoferrin 200 mg b.d. for 7 days.

RESULTS

Of the 402 patients, 389 completed the study. Six patients were discontinued due to side effects, one patient in group B died and six patients were lost to follow up. The eradication rate (intention-to-treat analysis) was 77% in group A (105/136), 73% in group B (97/132) and 90% in group C (120/134) (chi(2)-test P < 0.01). The incidence of side effects was 9.5% in group A, 9% in group B and 8.2% in group C (chi(2)-test P = 0.1).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that bovine lactoferrin is an effective adjuvant to 7-day triple therapy for eradication of H. pylori infection.