Prediction of response to infliximab in Crohn's disease

Predictors of Primary Response to Biologic Treatment [Anti-TNF, Vedolizumab, and Ustekinumab] in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Basic Science to Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD]-ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease-are commonly treated with biologic drugs. However, only approximately two-thirds of patients have an initial response to these therapies. Personalised medicine has the potential to optimise efficacy, decrease the risk of adverse drug events, and reduce costs by establishing the most suitable therapy for a selected patient.

AIM

The present study reviews the potential predictors of short-term primary response to biologic treatment, including not only anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] agents [such as infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, and golimumab] but also vedolizumab and ustekinumab.

METHODS

We performed a systematic bibliographical search to identify studies investigating predictive factors of response to biologic therapy.

RESULTS

For anti-TNF agents, most of the evaluated factors have not demonstrated usefulness, and many others are still controversial. Thus, only a few factors may have a potential role in the prediction of the response, including disease behaviour/phenotype, disease severity, C-reactive protein, albumin, cytokine expression in serum, previous anti-TNF therapy, some proteomic markers, and some colorectal mucosa markers. For vedolizumab, the availability of useful predictive markers seems to be even lower, with only some factors showing a limited value, such as the expression of α4β7 integrin in blood, the faecal microbiota, some proteomic markers, and some colorectal mucosa markers. Finally, in the case of ustekinumab, no predictive factor has been reported yet to be helpful in clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

In summary, currently no single marker fulfils all criteria for being an appropriate prognostic indicator of response to any biologic treatment in IBD.

Big data in IBD: a look into the future

Big data methodologies, made possible with the increasing generation and availability of digital data and enhanced analytical capabilities, have produced new insights to improve outcomes in many disciplines. Application of big data in the health-care sector is in its early stages, although the potential for leveraging underutilized data to gain a better understanding of disease and improve quality of care is enormous. Owing to the intrinsic characteristics of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the management dilemmas that it imposes, the implementation of big data research strategies not only can complement current research efforts but also could represent the only way to disentangle the complexity of the disease. In this Review, we explore important potential applications of big data in IBD research, including predictive models of disease course and response to therapy, characterization of disease heterogeneity, drug safety and development, precision medicine and cost-effectiveness of care. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of potential data sources that big data analytics could draw from in the field of IBD, including electronic health records, clinical trial data, e-health applications and genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic and microbiomic data.

Biomarkers in Search of Precision Medicine in IBD

The completion of the human genome project in 2003 represented a major scientific landmark, ushering in a new era with hopes and expectations of fresh insights into disease mechanisms and treatments. In inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), many important discoveries soon followed, notably the identification of >200 genetic susceptibility loci and characterization of the gut microbiome. As "big data", driven by advances in technology, becomes increasingly available and affordable, individuals with IBD and clinicians alike yearn for tangible outcomes from the promise of "precision medicine"-precise diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment. Here, we provide a commentary on the prospects and challenges of precision medicine and biomarkers in IBD. We focus on the three key areas where precision IBD will have the most impact: (1) disease susceptibility, activity, and behavior; (2) prediction of drug response and adverse effects; and (3) identification of subphenotypic mechanisms to facilitate drug discovery and selection of new treatments in IBD.

Predicting response to Anti-TNF Agents for the treatment of crohn's disease

The arrival of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents has led to a dramatic improvement in the care of patients with Crohn's disease. Since these medications do not work in everyone, and are associated with rare, but serious side effects, we want to selectively treat patients who have the highest chance of responding. A number of variables have been studied to determine their association with response to anti-TNF agents. Clinical parameters include patient characteristics, smoking status and disease phenotype, and biologic markers include C-reactive protein, serum TNF levels and immune responses to microbial antigens. More recently, research has focused on genetics to identify polymorphisms associated with treatment response. Results from individual studies of these factors have not yet allowed for solid clinical applicability. However, further work in this area along with multivariate clinical prediction modeling may soon allow us to deliver 'personalized medicine' by predicting individualized treatment response in patients with Crohn's disease.

TNF-α blocking therapy in chronic inflammatory bowel disease

A TNF-α-blokkolók bevezetése drámai változást jelentett a kezelésre refrakter IBD-ben szenvedő betegek ellátásában. Az infliximab és adalimumab is bizonyítottan hatékony a közepesen súlyos-súlyos fokú CD-, valamint az infliximab UC-remisszió indukciójában és fenntartásában, bár refrakter CD esetében a betegek 20–30, UC-ben 30–40%-a ezen terápiás eljárásokra sem reagál. A két hasonló támadáspontú szert összehasonlító vizsgálatra nem került sor, és a tanulmányok direkt összevetése nem megbízható, azonban az általános állásfoglalás alapján lényeges különbség a vegyületek hatékonyságában nincs.

Is the efficacy of successful infliximab induction therapy maintained for one year lasting without retreatment in different behavior types of Crohn's disease?

The high cost of infliximab inhibits the regular retreatment of all patients in Hungary with Crohn's disease (CD) after beneficial induction therapy. This study is set out to evaluate the medium-term efficacy of induction therapy with infliximab without retreatment in CD patients with chronic activity and/or fistulae refractory to conventional therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective 1-year review was undertaken of all CD patients with successfully induced remission or fistula closure with 3 infusions of infliximab. Infliximab was administered in a dose of 5 mg/kg 3 times, in weeks 0, 2 and 6. Clinical remission was defined as symptom resolution and an estimated Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <150 and complete fistula closure. We evaluated the clinical response, the estimated CDAI, the number of draining fistulae, the dosages of steroid and immunosuppressive drugs at 6 and 12 months after the last infusion, and the needs for hospitalization and surgical intervention during this period. Breslow (Generalized Wilcoxon) test was used as the statistical method.

RESULTS

The data of the 50 patients (19 luminal, 31 fistulizing disease; average age 29. 3 [13-59] years, disease localization: 23 colon, 13 ileum, 13 ileocolon, 1 duodenum) were suitable for analysis. Infliximab induction therapy without retreatment resulted in a beneficial effect lasting for at least 1 year in 22 of the 50 patients (44%). 11 of the 19 patients (57.9%) with luminal disease remained in steroid-free complete remission, while the fistulae persisted closed in only 11 of the 31 patients (35.5%) (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Infliximab induction therapy alone may result in sustained remission mainly in patients with luminal disease. These results suggest the need for maintenance therapy with infliximab after successful therapy induction in patients with fistulae, while luminal CD patients could possibly participate in regular retreatment only if needed. If these data are confirmed, this modification of the therapeutic procedure could well increase the cost-effectiveness of infliximab.

'Clean' or 'Dirty' – Just How Selective Do Drugs Need To Be?

Chemotherapy has developed largely on the basis of searching for chemicals with selective toxicity, targeting a specific step or receptor in a disease process without negatively impacting on normal physiology. The desire for ‘clean’ drugs that act on a single target and thus avoid side effects has led to ever-increasing timeframes for introducing new drugs to humans. This has led to reappraisal of how selective drugs need to be. Examples here of compounds from common drug classes (kinase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, G protein coupled receptors ligands, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, statins, antibodies) highlight current debate on the merits of target selectivity versus target promiscuity in the development of drugs for inflammation, cancer, cardiovascular, central nervous system and infectious diseases.