Endoscopic instillation of indigo carmine dye with acetic acid enables the visualization of distinct margin of superficial gastric lesion; Usefulness in endoscopic treatment and diagnosis of gastric cancer

Comparison Trial between I-SCAN-Optical Enhancement and Chromoendoscopy for Evaluating the Horizontal Margins of Gastric Epithelial Neoplasms

Background/Aims

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a widely used treatment for gastric epithelial neoplasms. Accurate delineation of the horizontal margins is necessary for the complete resection of gastric epithelial neoplasms. Recently, image-enhanced endoscopy has been used to evaluate horizontal margins of gastric epithelial neoplasms. The aim of this study was to investigate whether I-SCAN-optical enhancement (I-SCAN-OE) is superior to chromoendoscopy in evaluating the horizontal margin of gastric epithelial neoplasms.

Methods

This was a multicenter, prospective, and randomized trial. The participants were divided into two groups: I-SCAN-OE and chromoendoscopy. For both groups, we first evaluated the horizontal margins of early gastric cancer or high-grade dysplasia using white-light imaging, and then evaluated, the horizontal margins using I-SCAN-OE or chromoendoscopy. We devised a unique scoring method based on the pathological results obtained after endoscopic submucosal dissection to accurately evaluate the horizontal margins of gastric epithelial neoplasms. The delineation scores of both groups were compared, as were the ratios of positive/negative horizontal margins.

Results

In total, 124 patients were evaluated for gastric epithelial neoplasms, of whom 112 were enrolled in the study. A total of 112 patients participated in the study, and 56 were assigned to each group (1:1). There was no statistically significant difference in the delineation scores between the groups (chromoendoscopy, 7.80±1.94; I-SCAN-OE, 8.23±2.24; p=0.342).

Conclusions

I-SCAN-OE did not show superiority over chromoendoscopy in delineating horizontal margins of gastric epithelial neoplasms.

Association between mucin phenotype and lesion border detection using acetic acid-indigo carmine chromoendoscopy in early gastric cancers

BACKGROUND

For successful treatment of early gastric cancers (EGCs), it is crucial to define the horizontal border of the lesion with high accuracy. Acetic acid-indigo carmine (AI) chromoendoscopy has been used to determine the horizontal border in EGCs, but this technique is less potent in certain situations. Mucin phenotype in gastric cancers refers to biological differences in precursor lesions and differences in histopathologic findings, and it might affect AI chromoendoscopy findings. We aimed to investigate the association between mucin phenotype and AI chromoendoscopy findings in EGCs.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 126 lesions in 126 patients with endoscopically diagnosed EGCs. Conventional endoscopy and AI chromoendoscopy findings of these lesions before treatment were prospectively analyzed. The border distinction between the lesion and surrounding mucosa was classified as distinct or indistinct on conventional endoscopy and AI chromoendoscopy, respectively. Mucin phenotypes were classified as gastric, intestinal, gastrointestinal, or null type by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The lesion borders were distinct in 46.8% (59/126) of the lesions assessed using conventional endoscopy and in 73.0% (92/126) of those assessed with AI chromoendoscopy (p < 0.001). The border distinction rate of differentiated-type cancers on AI chromoendoscopy was significantly higher than that on conventional endoscopy (66/71 [93.0%] vs. 34/71 [47.9%], p < 0.001), but the border distinction rate of undifferentiated-type cancers on AI chromoendoscopy was not different from that on conventional endoscopy (26/55 [47.3%] vs. 25/55 [45.5%], p = 0.848). Compared with conventional endoscopy, AI chromoendoscopy identified borders in a significantly higher percentage of gastric, intestinal, and gastrointestinal mucin types; however, there was no difference in AI chromoendoscopy findings according to the mucin phenotype (p = 0.271).

CONCLUSION

AI chromoendoscopy was effective in horizontal border delineation in differentiated-type EGCs, but not in undifferentiated-type EGCs. Mucin phenotype had no effect on border distinction using AI chromoendoscopy.

Systematic Endoscopic Approach to Early Gastric Cancer in Clinical Practice

Early gastric cancers (EGCs) are defined as gastric cancers confined to the mucosa or submucosa, regardless of regional lymph node metastasis. The proportion of EGCs has been increasing due to the increase in screening endoscopy for gastric cancers; therefore, the paradigm shift from surgical resection to endoscopic resection as a treatment modality for selected EGCs is accelerating. For successful endoscopic resection of EGCs, it is important to detect EGCs at an early stage and to accurately predict the histological type, depth of invasion, and horizontal margins of the tumor. The diagnostic process of EGCs can be divided into three steps: presence diagnosis, qualitative diagnosis, and quantitative diagnosis. The presence diagnosis of EGCs is mainly based on two endoscopic findings: a well-demarcated lesion and irregularity in the color/surface pattern. Qualitative diagnosis refers to the prediction of histological type, which is mainly possible based on the macroscopic shape and color of the lesion. Quantitative diagnosis of EGCs consists of predicting the depth of invasion by detailed examination of the macroscopic morphology and determining horizontal margins using chromoendoscopy. Although advanced diagnostic modalities, such as endosonography or magnifying endoscopy, are helpful for the qualitative and quantitative diagnosis of EGCs, these modalities are not available in most hospitals. Therefore, it is still very important to evaluate EGCs systematically during conventional endoscopy for successful endoscopic treatment.

A deep learning method for delineating early gastric cancer resection margin under chromoendoscopy and white light endoscopy

BACKGROUND

Accurate delineation of cancer margins is critical for endoscopic curative resection. This study aimed to train and validate real-time fully convolutional networks for delineating the resection margin of early gastric cancer (EGC) under indigo carmine chromoendoscopy (CE) or white light endoscopy (WLE), and evaluated its performance and that of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI).

METHODS

We collected CE and WLE images of EGC lesions to train fully convolutional networks ENDOANGEL. ENDOANGEL was tested both on stationary images and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) videos. The accuracy and reliability of ENDOANGEL and NBI-dependent delineation were further evaluated by a novel endoscopy-pathology point-to-point marking.

RESULTS

ENDOANGEL had an accuracy of 85.7% in the CE images and 88.9% in the WLE images under an overlap ratio threshold of 0.60 in comparison with the manual markers labeled by the experts. In the ESD videos, the resection margins predicted by ENDOANGEL covered all areas of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and cancers. The minimum distance between the margins predicted by ENDOANGEL and the histological cancer boundary was 3.44 ± 1.45 mm which outperformed the resection margin based on ME-NBI.

CONCLUSIONS

ENDOANGEL has the potential to assist endoscopists in delineating the resection extent of EGC under CE or WLE during ESD.

Useful condition of chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine and acetic acid for identifying a demarcation line prior to endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

Background

Identifying a precise demarcation line (DL) is indispensable for pathological complete en bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC). We evaluated the useful condition of chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine and acetic acid for marking dots around lesions before ESD for EGC.

Methods

We examined 98 consecutive patients with 109 intramucosal EGCs (mean diameter, 17.8 ± 12.4 mm; main histologic type, 96 intestinal and 13 diffuse) resected by en bloc ESD after chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine and acetic acid between December 2012 and February 2014. The DL was identified by this technique just before ESD (mean chromoendoscopy observation time, 71.6 s); subsequently, marking dots were placed around the EGC. EGCs were classified into two groups: useful for identifying the DL or useless. Clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were evaluated in each group.

Results

Forty-two of the 109 cases (38.5 %) were determined useful for chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine and acetic acid. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression showed that macroscopic type (protruded or flat elevated-type) and atrophic border (the oral side of tumor) were independently associated with the usefulness of chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine and acetic acid for identifying the DL of EGCs (P < 0.05). The histologically positive horizontal margin after ESD was 0 % (0/42) in useful cases, and 7.5 % (5/67) in useless cases.

Conclusions

Before ESD, chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine and acetic acid can be used for creating precise markings in protruded or flat elevated-type EGC or at the atrophic border on the oral side of EGCs.

[Usefulness of systematic chromoendoscopy with a double dye staining technique for the detection of dysplasia in patients with premalignant gastric lesions]

INTRODUCTION

Premalignant gastric lesions have an increased risk to develop gastric cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of systematic endoscopy that includes chromoendoscopy with a double dye staining technique for the detection of dysplasia in patients with premalignant gastric lesions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This longitudinal, prospective study was performed in patients with gastric atrophy, intestinal metaplasia or dysplasia who were referred for endoscopy less than 6 months after the initial diagnosis. The second endoscopy was performed in three phases: phase 1, exhaustive and systematic review of the mucosa with photographic documentation and biopsies of suspicious areas; phase 2, chromoendoscopy with a double dye staining technique using acetic acid 1.2% and indigo carmine 0.5%; phase 3, topographic mapping and random biopsies.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were included. Nine (18%) had atrophic gastritis, 38 (76%) had intestinal metaplasia, and 3 (6%) had low-grade dysplasia. Systematic endoscopy with chromoendoscopy using a double dye staining technique detected more patients with dysplasia (9 versus 3, p<.05), and a larger number of biopsies with the diagnosis of dysplasia were obtained. This occurred for visible (6 vs. 0, p<.05) and non-visible lesions (6 vs. 3, p=NS). In one patient, initial low-grade dysplasia was not detected again in the systematic endoscopy, giving a global endoscopic performance for the detection of lesions of 92%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with premalignant gastric lesions have synchronous lesions with greater histological severity, which are detected when systematic endoscopy is conducted with indigo carmine dye added to acetic acid.

Intramucosal Signet Ring Cell Gastric Cancer Diagnosed 15 Months after the Initial Endoscopic Examination

The size and shape of intramucosal signet ring gastric cancer in this case remained endoscopically unchanged for 15 months. Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy was performed, and immunohistochemical analysis revealed Ki-67 and p53 mutations to be negative in this case. Signet ring gastric cancer has long been thought to confer a worse prognosis than other forms of gastric cancer; however, our case did not progress to advanced gastric cancer for 15 months.

Risk factors for local recurrence in patients with positive lateral resection margins after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

With the widespread use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC), the number of cases with incomplete resection due to positive lateral resection margins (LM+) is increasing. Local recurrence, which occurs frequently in LM+ cases, is an important issue. This study aimed to clarify the clinicopathological factors related to tumor recurrence in LM+ cases after ESD for EGC.

METHODS

From January 2005 to December 2012, a total of 1,083 patients with EGC underwent ESD at our hospital. Of these, cases with a pathological diagnosis of LM+ were included in this study. Patients with positive vertical resection margins, those who underwent surgical resection immediately or were followed up for less than 6 months after ESD, were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 55 LM+ cases after ESD for EGC were enrolled. Incorrect delineation of a lesion that extended pathologically beyond the ESD marking dots was the main cause of LM+. Local recurrence was found in 20 (36.4 %) patients (median follow-up period, 23 months). Local recurrence rates related to LM+ length were as follows: 7/29 (24.1 %) in 2 mm, 6/16 (37.5 %) in 4 mm, 1/3 (33.3 %) in 6 mm, 4/5 (80 %) in 8 mm, and 2/2 (100 %) in ≥ 10 mm. In multivariate analysis, tumor size > 2 cm (OR 4.48, 95 % CI 1.18-16.99, p = 0.027), and LM+ length > 6 mm (OR 7.65, 95 % CI 1.15-50.70, p = 0.035) were independent risk factors for tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSION

To decrease the risk of LM+, it is highly important to accurately delineate the lateral margins during ESD; when the final histopathological result is LM+, cases with LM+ length >6 mm or tumor size > 2 cm should be considered for additional surgical resection or re-ESD because of a high risk of tumor recurrence.

Application of endoscopy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the most common cancer of the gastrointestinal tract, whose incidence and mortality are always high. Endoscopy and pathological examination are the most basic ways to diagnose this malignancy, but the rate of its early diagnosis was very low. In recent years, the emergence of chromoendoscopy, magnification endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography, narrow band imaging endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging endoscopy and confocal laser endomicroscopy has significantly improved the detection of gastric cancer, and these new techniques play an important role in the diagnosis of this disease. Here we summarize the application of endoscopy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Frozen Section Biopsy to Evaluation of Obscure Lateral Resection Margins during Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer

Purpose

To determine the diagnostic utility of a frozen section biopsy in patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric neoplasms with obscure margins even with chromoendoscopy using acetic acid and indigo carmine (AI chromoendoscopy).

Materials and Methods

The lateral spread of early gastric neoplasms was unclear even following AI chromoendoscopy in 38 patients who underwent ESD between June 2007 and May 2011. Frozen section biopsies were obtained by agreement of the degree of lateral spread between two endoscopists. Thus, frozen section biopsies were obtained from 23 patients (FBx group) and not in the other 15 patients (AI group).

Results

No significant differences were observed for size, histology, invasive depth, and location of lesions between the AI and FBx groups. No false positive or false negative results were observed in the frozen section diagnoses. Adenocarcinoma was revealed in three patients and tubular adenoma in one, thereby changing the delineation of lesion extent and achieving free lateral margins. The rates of free lateral resection margins and curative resection were significantly higher in the FBx group than those in the AI group.

Conclusions

Frozen section biopsy can help endoscopists perform more safe and accurate ESD in patients with early gastric neoplasm.

Acetic acid-indigo carmine chromoendoscopy for delineating early gastric cancers: its usefulness according to histological type

Background

Endoscopic treatments, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and laparoscopic gastrectomy, are increasingly used to treat a subset of patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). To achieve successful outcomes, it is very important to accurately determine the lateral extent of the tumor. Therefore, we investigated the diagnostic performance of chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine dye added to acetic acid (AI chromoendoscopy) in delineating differentiated or undifferentiated adenocarcinomas in patients with EGC.

Methods

We prospectively included 151 lesions of 141 patients that had an endoscopic diagnosis of EGC. All the lesions were examined by conventional endoscopy and AI chromoendoscopy before ESD or laparoscopic gastrectomy. The border clarification between the lesion and the normal mucosa was classified as distinct or indistinct before and after AI chromoendoscopy.

Results

The borders of the lesions were distinct in 66.9% (101/151) with conventional endoscopy and in 84.1% (127/151) with AI chromoendoscopy (P < 0.001). Compared with conventional endoscopy, AI chromoendoscopy clarified the border in a significantly higher percentage of differentiated adenocarcinomas (74/108 [68.5%] vs 97/108 [89.8%], respectively, P < 0.001). However, the border clarification rate for undifferentiated adenocarcinomas did not differ between conventional endoscopy and AI chromoendoscopy (27/43 [62.8%] vs 30/43 [70.0%], respectively, P = 0.494).

Conclusions

AI chromoendoscopy is useful in determining the lateral extent of EGCs. However, its usefulness is reduced in undifferentiated adenocarcinomas.

Gastric oncology: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As the field of endoscopy progresses, new tools and techniques continue to be developed for gastroenterology in general and gastrointestinal oncology in particular. Some of these include enhancements in diagnostic optics such as chromoendoscopy, magnification endoscopy, and confocal laser endomicroscopy. Others include advanced therapeutics such as endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection. In this review, we will update the reader on these latest of technologies, their benefits and risks, as well as their role in evaluating, staging, and treating gastric neoplasms, especially gastric adenocarcinoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and primary gastric lymphoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Noteworthy studies in this review indicate that in properly selected patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, endoscopic submucosal dissection is a viable alternative to gastric resection with 100% 5-year survival rates; in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors, imatinib can provide effective treatment with reasonable outcome; and in patients with low grade mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, eradication therapy with antibiotics is curative with a very low recurrence rate.

SUMMARY

The advances discussed in this review have significantly improved the care we can offer our patients in gastric oncology. With continued advancement in the field, it will be crucial to continue to study outcomes and safety of these techniques and to develop structured training for those looking to perform these procedures.

Chromoendoscopy

Chromoendoscopy involves the use of stains or dyes during endoscopy to improve the visualization and characterization of the gastrointestinal mucosa. Its main clinical application is the detection of dysplasia or early cancer of the gastrointestinal tract in individuals with pre-malignant conditions or hereditary and environmental factors that predispose them to cancer. The utility of chromoendoscopy has been mostly studied in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, Barrett's esophagus, gastric cancer, colorectal polyps, and chronic ulcerative colitis. Although chromoendoscopy has been shown to be feasible and safe, several limitations have prevented its widespread use in endoscopy. Despite this, chromoendoscopy remains a useful adjunct to standard white light endoscopy in the visualization of mucosal lesions, which may potentially improve tissue diagnosis and impact patient care.

Chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye added to acetic acid in the diagnosis of gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Conventional endoscopy and chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye are usually performed for recognizing adequate tumor-negative lateral margins for successful endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasia. However, chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye added to acetic acid has not been used for this purpose.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to compare the diagnostic performance of chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye added to acetic acid with that of conventional endoscopy and chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye or acetic acid alone.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Social Insurance Funabashi Central Hospital.

PATIENTS

Forty-seven consecutive patients (53 lesions) with early gastric cancer and gastric adenomas who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) from April 2006 to July 2007 were studied.

INTERVENTIONS

All the lesions were examined by the endoscopic modalities before ESD, and the resected specimens were analyzed histopathologically.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Two endoscopists independently evaluated the diagnostic performance of each image in terms of recognition of tumor borders with reference to macroscopic and histopathologic findings of resected specimens. We also conducted a substudy to assess interobserver variability.

RESULTS

There was good interobserver agreement between the 2 endoscopists in this study (kappa index = 0.764). The diagnostic performance of chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye added to acetic acid was significantly greater than that of any of the other modalities (vs each: P < .005).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic performance of chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye added to acetic acid was better compared with conventional endoscopy and chromoendoscopy by using only indigo carmine dye or acetic acid. The applicability of this method for gastric neoplasia merits further investigation.