Adult to adult living-related liver transplant: report on an initial experience in Italy

Evaluation of Preoperative and Postoperative S100β and NSE Levels in Liver Transplantation and Right Lobe Living-Donor Hepatectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate plasma neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100β levels in orthotopic liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 56 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation were divided into 3 groups. Healthy donors (group D), end-stage liver failure (ESLF) patients (recipient, group R), and ESLF patients diagnosed with hepatic encephalopathy (HE, group HE). Prognosis, preoperative routine laboratory findings, serum NSE, and S100β in samples obtained preoperation and first and sixth months postoperation were analyzed.

RESULTS

Serum NSE and S100β levels were significantly higher in ESLF patients compared to healthy donors, particularly during the preoperative period. There was a significant decrease in serum NSE and S100β in ESLF patients during the postoperative measurement periods compared to preoperative levels. Serum NSE and S100β levels measured at 3 different time points showed no significant difference between ESLF patients and ESLF patients with HE. However, the recent Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scores showed a significant correlation with serum NSE and S100β in ESLF patients diagnosed with HE. Serum NSE and S100β levels in healthy donors significantly increased within the first month following hepatectomy and decreased in the sixth month following surgery.

CONCLUSION

Although serum NSE and S100β levels significantly decreased with improved liver function in recipients following liver transplantation, there was no complete recovery within 6 months after surgery. The increase in serum levels of NSE and S100β in donors measured following hepatectomy was detected to remain slightly higher in the sixth postoperative months.

Intra-Operative Contrast Cholangiography in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: The ISMETT Experience

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the clinical impact of donor biliary anatomy discrepancies (DBAD) achieved by comparing pre-operative evaluation obtained with magnetic resonance (MR)/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) imaging, with intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) on the living related liver donor (LDLT) and recipient.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study included 97 consecutive adult-to-adult (A2A) LDLT performed in our hospital in the last 12 years. Donor sex and age, living donors with biliary and/or vascular anomalies, recipient age, sex, primary etiology, re-transplantation, Model of End-Stage Liver Disease score, co-morbidities, arterial and biliary recipient complications assessed on the basis of clinical follow-up were collected and analyzed for significance through the use of a multivariate linear regression model.

RESULTS

Biliary complications in the donor (DBC) were detected in 8 (8.2%) cases. Biliary complications in the recipients (RBC) were detected in 38 (39%) cases. DBADs were found in 32 (33%) cases and resulted strictly related to RBC (P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

After adjusting for co-variables, results of the linear regression analysis confirmed that DBAD is an independent predictor of RBC, but it is not significantly associated with vascular complications or patient survival. We showed that RBCs after LDLT were influenced by DBAD.

Impact of future remnant liver volume on post-hepatectomy regeneration in non-cirrhotic livers

Objective: The purpose of the study is to detect if some parameters can be considered as predictors of liver regeneration in two different patient populations composed of in living donors for adult to adult living donor liver transplant and patients with hepatic malignancies within a single institution.

Summary Background Data: Preoperative multi-detector computed tomography volumetry is an essential tool to assess the volume of the remnant liver.

Methods: A retrospective analysis from an ongoing clinical study on 100 liver resections, between 2004 and 2010. Seventy patients were right lobe living donors for liver transplantation and 30 patients were resected for treatment of tumors. Pre-surgical factors such as age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), original liver volume, future remnant liver volume (FRLV), spleen volume, liver function tests, creatinine, platelet count, steatosis, portal vein embolization, and number of resected segments were analyzed to evidence potential markers for liver regeneration.

Results: Follow-up period did not influence the amount of liver regenerated: the linear regression evidenced that there is no correlation between percentage of liver regeneration and time of follow-up (p = 0.88). The pre-surgical variables that resulted markers of liver regeneration include higher preoperative values of BMI (p = 0.01), bilirubin (p = 0.04), glucose (p = 0.05), and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (p = 0.014); the most important association was revealed regarding the lower FRLV (p < 0.0001) and percentage of liver regeneration. The stepwise regression revealed a strong impact of FRLV (p < 0.0001) on the other predictor variables.

Conclusion: Liver regeneration follows similar pathway in living donor and in patients resected for cancer. Small FRLV tends to regenerate more and faster, confirming that a larger resections may lead to a greater promotion of liver regeneration in patients with optimal conditions in terms of body habitus, preoperative liver function tests, and glucose level.

Early regeneration of the remnant liver volume after right hepatectomy for living donation: a multiple regression analysis

Early liver regeneration was studied in a series of 70 patients who underwent right hepatectomy for living donation between November 2004 and January 2010. Liver regeneration was evaluated with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) at a mean of 61.07 days after surgery. Presurgical variables [eg, age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), liver function tests, creatinine levels, platelet counts, international normalized ratio, and glucose levels] and variables detected with preoperative MDCT imaging [eg, main portal vein diameter, steatosis, original liver volume, and spleen volume (SV)] were investigated as potential predictors of liver regeneration. The future remnant liver volume (FRLV) was preoperatively calculated with a virtual surgical cut. Liver function tests and creatinine levels were recorded on the 30th postoperative day. In addition, the onset of postoperative complications occurring within 90 days of surgery was analyzed, and the complications were codified according to the 5 tiers of the Clavien-Dindo classification. In 26 of the 70 patients (37.14%), 100% or greater hepatic regeneration had occurred at 2 months. There was no association between the clinical outcome and the liver regeneration rate. A stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that a higher BMI (coefficient = 0.035, P < 0.0001) and preoperative parameters such as a smaller FRLV (coefficient = -0.002, P < 0.0001) and a greater SV/FRLV ratio (coefficient = 1.196, P < 0.0001) were predictors of greater liver regeneration.

Nutritional aspects in patient undergoing liver resection

In the past two decades, hepatic surgery has achieved important technical breakthroughs resulting in a drastic reduction of the onset of complications and in an improved post-resective survival. Pre-operative nutritional status is one of the key points for the success of a liver resection. Modern surgical achievement such as the development of living-related liver donation, and the possibility to perform more laparoscopic liver resection gave us the opportunity to extend post-operative protocol focused on early intestinal feeding to tumor patients. The aims of this review were to report the current status of the knowledge regarding nutritional aspects in liver resection patients.

Liver resections for liver transplantations

Split-Liver and living-related donor liver transplantation are the newest and both technically and ethically most challenging developments in liver transplantation and have contributed to a reduction in donor shortage. We report the technical aspects of surgical procedures performed to achieve a partial graft from a cadaveric and a live donor.

Liver transplantation for polycystic liver and massive hepatomegaly

Liver tumor and other benign liver diseases such as polycystic liver disease can cause massive hepatomegaly and may represent an indication for liver transplantation (LT) in some instances. In this setting, LT can be extremely difficult and challenging due to its decreased mobility and access to vascular supply. Benefit from either a right or a left partial liver resection during the transplant procedure has been advocated to safely accomplish the hepatectomy of the native liver. Although we believe that partial hepatectomy adds some risk to intra-operative bleeding, we alternatively advise a different approach. We have a successful experience with LT in 6 massive hepatomegaly patients due to giant liver lesions. All the transplant procedures were performed without intermediate partial liver resection, showing that selective use of veno-venous bypass can play a significant role in the treatment of massive hepatomegaly.

Gender-specific differences associated with living donor liver transplantation: a review study

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has developed into an important therapeutic option for liver diseases. For living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), gender-specific differences have been observed among both donors (two-thirds being women and one-third being men) and recipients (two-thirds being men and one-third being women). The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a gender disparity for LDLT. We contacted 89 national and international transplantation registries, single transplant centers, and coordinators. In addition, a sample of 274 articles dealing with LDLT and its outcomes was reviewed and compared with the registry data. The data included the gender of the donors and recipients, the country of transplantation, and the donor-recipient relationship. The investigation showed that overall there were slightly more men among the donors (53% male and 47% female). As for the recipients, 59% of the organs were distributed to males, and 41% were distributed to females. Differences in the gender distribution were observed with respect to individual countries. Worldwide, 80% of the donors were blood-related, 11% were not blood-related, and 9% were spouses. The data acquired from the publications were similar to the registry data. Our research has shown that there are hardly any registry data published, a lot of countries do not have national registries, or the access to these data is difficult. Even widely ranging published studies often do not give information on the gender distribution or the donor-recipient relationship. Further investigations are needed to understand the possible medical, psychosocial, or cultural reasons for gender distribution in LDLT and the differences in comparison with LDKT.

Complications of right lobe living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Right lobar living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been controversial because of donor deaths and widely variable reports of recipient and donor morbidity. Our aims were to ensure full disclosure to donors and recipients of the risks and benefits of this procedure in a large University center and to help explain reporting inconsistencies.

METHODS

The Clavien 5-tier grading system was applied retrospectively in 121 consecutive adult right lobe recipients and their donors. The incidence was determined of potentially (Grade III), actually (Grade IV), or ultimately fatal (Grade V) complications during the first post-transplant year. When patients had more than one complication, only the seminal one was counted, or the most serious one if complications occurred contemporaneously.

RESULTS

One year recipient/graft survival was 91%/84%. Within the year, 80 (66%) of the 121 recipients had Grade III (n=54) Grade IV (n=16), or Grade V (n=10) complications. The complications involved the graft's biliary tract (42% incidence), graft vasculature (15%), or non-graft locations (9%). Complications during the first year did not decline with increased team experience, and adversely affected survival out to 5 years. All 121 donors survive. However, 13 donors (10.7%) had Grade III (n=9) or IV (n=4) complications of which five were graft-related.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the satisfactory recipient and graft survival at our and selected other institutions, and although we have not had a donor mortality to date, the role of right lobar LDLT is not clear because of the recipient morbidity and risk to the donors.

Early graft dysfunction following adult-to-adult living-related liver transplantation: Predictive factors and outcomes

AIM: To describe a condition that we define as early graft dysfunction (EGD) which can be identified preoperatively.

METHODS: Small-for-size graft dysfunction following living-related liver transplantation (LRLT) is characterized by EGD when the graft-to-recipient body weight ratio (GRBWR) is below 0.8%. However, patients transplanted with GRBWR above 0.8% can develop dysfunction of the graft. In 73 recipients of LRLT (GRBWR > 0.8%), we identified 10 patients who developed EGD. The main measures of outcomes analyzed were overall mortality, number of re-transplants and length of stay in days (LOS). Furthermore we analyzed other clinical pre-transplant variables, intra-operative parameters and post transplant data.

RESULTS: A trend in favor of the non-EGD group (3-mo actuarial survival 98% vs 88%, P = 0.09; 3-mo graft mortality 4.7% vs 20%, P = 0.07) was observed as well as shorter LOS (13 d vs 41.5 d; P = 0.001) and smaller requirement of peri-operative Units of Plasma (4 vs 14; P = 0.036). Univariate analysis of pre-transplant variables identified platelet count, serum bilirubin, INR and Meld-Na score as predictors of EGD. In the multivariate analysis transplant Meld-Na score (P = 0.025, OR: 1.175) and pre-transplant platelet count (P = 0.043, OR: 0.956) were independently associated with EGD.

CONCLUSION: EGD can be identified preoperatively and is associated with increased morbidity after LRLT. A prompt recognition of EGD can trigger a timely treatment.

Different modalities of arterial reconstruction in hepatic retransplantation using right partial graft

Though split-liver and living-related transplantation are routinely performed, they are done almost exclusively for primary liver transplantation because of potential surgical difficulties. These difficulties are generally related to arterial revascularization, particularly if there is hepatic artery thrombosis. According to UNOS data, of the hepatic retransplantations performed between 1996 and 2007, only 8.7% were done using right or extended right grafts from deceased donors, and 14.3% using right grafts from live donors. Here we report our experience with 5 hepatic retransplantations in which right partial grafts resulting from conventional in situ splits, and one right lobe resulting from an adult-to-adult living-related transplant, were successfully used with different modalities of graft arterialization.

Technical aspects of living-related liver donation: single-center experience

Living-related donor liver transplantation is the newest and both technically and ethically most challenging evolution in liver transplantation and has contributed to reduction in donor shortage. We briefly report the technical aspects of surgical procedures performed to achieve a partial graft from a live donor. Eighty-four adult and two pediatric recipients underwent living-related donor liver transplantation at our center. There were no donor deaths, and all patients returned to their normal activities after the perioperative period. This single-center experience may contribute to refinement of the surgical technique required to improve the outcome of these complex operations.

Analysis of surgical and perioperative complications in seventy-five right hepatectomies for living donor liver transplantation

AIM: To present an analysis of the surgical and perioperative complications in a series of seventy-five right hepatectomies for living-donation (RHLD) performed in our center.

METHODS: From January 2002 to September 2007, we performed 75 RHLD, defined as removal of a portion of the liver corresponding to Couinaud segments 5-8, in order to obtain a graft for adult to adult living-related liver transplantation (ALRLT). Surgical complications were stratified according to the most recent version of the Clavien classification of postoperative surgical complications. The perioperative period was defined as within 90 d of surgery.

RESULTS: No living donor mortality was present in this series, no donor operation was aborted and no donors received any blood transfusion. Twenty-three (30.6%) living donors presented one or more episodes of complication in the perioperative period. Seven patients (9.33%) out of 75 developed biliary complications, which were the most common complications in our series.

CONCLUSION: The need to define, categorize and record complications when healthy individuals, such as living donors, undergo a major surgical procedure, such as a right hepatectomy, reflects the need for prompt and detailed reports of complications arising in this particular category of patient. Perioperative complications and post resection liver regeneration are not influenced by anatomic variations or patient demographic.

Critical use of extended criteria donor liver grafts in adult-to-adult whole liver transplantation: a single-center experience

This study presents our experience with the use of extended criteria donor (ECD) liver grafts. One hundred fifteen liver transplants were divided into 2 groups: standard (S) and nonstandard (NS). Fifty-eight patients in group S received a liver procured from an ideal donor, whereas 57 patients in group NS received an organ from an ECD. On the basis of the number of risk factors, patients were divided into 3 subgroups: the S group with 58 receiving a standard graft, the NS1 group with 44 receiving a graft with 1 or 2 risk factors, and the NS2 group with 13 receiving a graft with 3 to 4 risk factors. Patient survival was not different at 6, 12, and 24 months (P > 0.05), whereas graft survival was different (P = 0.0079). Both patient survival and graft survival were influenced by the cumulative number of risk factors. The univariate analysis of the donor risk factors detected hemodynamic factors as predictive of graft failure (P = 0.024) and death (P = 0.018). In the multivariate analysis, which was adjusted for recipient age and donor and recipient gender, hemodynamic risk factors and Model for End-Stage Liver. Disease score in the recipient were the only variables independently associated with graft failure (P = 0.006, P = 0.012, negatively). Finally, we observed a reduction of dropout from the list to 9% from 14.1% (P = 0.04) and of mortality on the list to 32.55% from 41.01% (P = 0.11). Critical use of ECD liver grafts allowed recipients in the waiting list to have a greater chance of being transplanted.

Experience of donation and quality of life in living kidney and liver donors

Italian guidelines on living donation demand that we ascertain the donor's free and informed consent. Assessments to do so have to be conducted by an independent 'third party' who has nothing to do with the medical team treating the recipient. From February 2002 to December 2006, the Veneto Regional Authority's Third Party Commission evaluated 201 living liver and kidney donors. A sample of these were contacted after their surgery to assess their living donation experience and quality of life (QoL); 81 were eligible for the assessment and 69 (85.2%) responded. All donors involved in the study completed an anonymous document that included the SF-36 and a questionnaire on their donation experience. The majority (96%) of the sample expressed a positive global opinion of the experience. We concluded that the donation had positive effects on their QoL and that family support had a fundamental influence on their general well-being, and their psychic balance in particular. Some crucial issues emerged, however, i.e. 11% of donors judged the information received before the operation inadequate, 17% reported a subjective perception of bodily changes after the operation and 14% were concerned about their current health: these findings emphasize the importance of informing potential donors thoroughly before they submit to surgery.