1
|
Li YY, Miao YS, Wang CF, Yan J, Zhou XJ, Chen YX, Li GH, Zhu L. Optimal dilation duration of 10 mm diameter balloons after limited endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep 2024; 14:971. [PMID: 38200057 PMCID: PMC10782008 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50949-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Limited endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) combined with endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) is widely used. However, the optimal duration of small balloon dilation in choledocholithiasis remains controversial. We aimed to determine the optimal duration for 10 mm diameter balloon dilation after limited EST in choledocholithiasis. In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 320 patients were randomly assigned to receive small balloon dilation (10 mm in diameter) for 1 min (n = 160) or 3 min (n = 160) after deep bile duct cannulation. No significant difference in success rate of stone extraction between the two groups was observed. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was higher in the 1 min group (10.6%) than in the 3 min group (4.4%) (P = 0.034). The logistic regression analysis showed that guidewire into the pancreatic duct, cannulation time > 5 min and 1 min balloon dilation were independent risk factors for PEP. There were no significant differences in other post-ERCP adverse events such as acute cholangitis, bleeding, perforation, etc. between the two groups. In conclusion, 3 min in duration was determined to be the optimal dilation condition for the removal of common bile duct stones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Yuan Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China
| | - Yin-Shui Miao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China
| | - Cai-Feng Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China
| | - Jing Yan
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China
| | - Xiao-Jiang Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China
| | - You-Xiang Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China
| | - Guo-Hua Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China.
| | - Liang Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330006, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Paspatis GA, Papastergiou V, Mpitouli A, Velegraki M, Nikolaou P, Fragkaki M, Voudoukis E, Theodoropoulou A, Chlouverakis G, Vardas E, Paraskeva KD. Distal Biliary Stent Migration in Patients with Irretrievable Bile Duct Stones: Long-Term Comparison Between Straight and Double-Pigtail Stents. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:4557-4564. [PMID: 35305168 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07461-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prolonged biliary stenting may be considered in high-risk patients with irretrievable bile duct stones (IBDS). Distal stent migration (DSM) is a known complication, although data beyond the recommended interval of temporary stenting (3-6 months) are lacking. We compared the long-term incidence of DSM between straight and double-pigtail stents in patients with IBDS. METHODS Consecutive patients with IBDS undergoing plastic biliary stenting (1/2009-12/2019) were retrospectively reviewed. DSM was confirmed on follow-up examination when the stent was no longer present at the papillary orifice nor fluoroscopically visible in the bile duct. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to determine estimates and predictors of DSM. RESULTS Overall, 618 biliary stenting procedures (410 patients) were included: 289 with a straight stent (group A) and 329 with a double-pigtail (group B). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the DSM rates were 8.4 and 14.6% at 6 months, 21.4 and 27.7% at 12 months, 27 and 43.5% at 18 months, and 37.2 and 60.4% at 24 months, for groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.004). Double-pigtail stents were at higher risk for DSM (HR = 7.38, p = 0.04), whereas an inverse correlation was noted with age (HR = 0.97, p = 0.0001). Considering only temporary stenting procedures (≤ 6 months; n = 297), the probability of DSM was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS In a setting of prolonged stenting for IBDS, the probability of DSM appears to be higher when a double-pigtail stent is used and in younger patients. A relative anti-migratory advantage of double-pigtail over straight stents appears negligible in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregorios A Paspatis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Benizelion" General Hospital, L. Knossou, 71409, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
| | - Vasilios Papastergiou
- Department of Gastroenterology, "Konstantopoulio-Patision" General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Afroditi Mpitouli
- Department of Gastroenterology, Benizelion" General Hospital, L. Knossou, 71409, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Magdalini Velegraki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Benizelion" General Hospital, L. Knossou, 71409, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Pinelopi Nikolaou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Benizelion" General Hospital, L. Knossou, 71409, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Maria Fragkaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Benizelion" General Hospital, L. Knossou, 71409, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Evangelos Voudoukis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Benizelion" General Hospital, L. Knossou, 71409, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Angeliki Theodoropoulou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Benizelion" General Hospital, L. Knossou, 71409, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Emmanouil Vardas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Benizelion" General Hospital, L. Knossou, 71409, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Phillpotts S, Webster G, Arvanitakis M. Endoscopic Management of Complex Biliary Stones. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32:477-492. [PMID: 35691692 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2022.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Complex biliary stones may be challenging to remove with standard endoscopic techniques. Factors contributing to complexity include large stone size (≥15 mm), multiple stones, high stone:distal duct ratio, stones above strictures and those in difficult anatomic position. In these cases, additional techniques may be needed, such as endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation, mechanical lithotripsy, cholangioscopic visually directed lithotripsy, and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. The choice of technique depends on local expertise and resources. Cases should be planned to identify the appropriate technique to avoid multiple procedures. This article describes the factors linked to difficulty and the steps to overcome them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Phillpotts
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals, 250 Euston Road, London, England
| | - George Webster
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals, 250 Euston Road, London, England.
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, Brussels 1070, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nakahara K, Michikawa Y, Suetani K, Sato J, Igarashi Y, Sekine A, Kobayashi S, Matsuda K, Otsubo T, Itoh F. Efficacy of endoscopic large balloon dilation extended for 2 minutes in bile duct stone removal: A multicenter retrospective study. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2021; 29:932-940. [PMID: 34329520 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE There is no evidence regarding the optimal balloon dilation time during endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD). The study aim was to evaluate the efficacy of 2-minute extended balloon dilation for EPLBD. METHODS Two hundred and five patients who underwent EPLBD during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for bile duct stones at three tertiary centers were included in the analysis. Clinical outcomes and the adverse events were compared between the 0-minute group (n = 94, balloon deflated immediately after waist disappearance) and the 2-minute group (n = 111, balloon dilation maintained for 2 minutes after waist disappearance). The risk factors of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) after EPLBD were assessed. RESULTS There were no significant differences in the stone removal rates and hospitalization periods between the two groups. However, the total ERCP procedure time was significantly shorter in the 2-minute group (40.6 vs 48.9 min, P = .03). The incidence of PEP was 7.4% in the 0-minute group and significantly lower at 0.9% in the 2-minute group (P = .04). Multivariate analysis identified without 2-minute extended EPLBD as a significant risk factor of PEP (OR: 9.9, P = .045). CONCLUSIONS Extension of EPLBD for 2 minutes helped prevent PEP and shortened the procedure time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazunari Nakahara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, St. Marianna University, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Yosuke Michikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, St. Marianna University, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Keigo Suetani
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Junya Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, St. Marianna University, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Yosuke Igarashi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Yokohama City Seibu Hospital, St. Marianna University, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Akihiro Sekine
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, St. Marianna University, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Shinjiro Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterogical and General Surgery, School of Medicine, St. Marianna University, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Koji Matsuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shizuoka Medical Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takehito Otsubo
- Department of Gastroenterogical and General Surgery, School of Medicine, St. Marianna University, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Fumio Itoh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, St. Marianna University, Kawasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dollhopf M, Schmetkamp H. Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones. Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino) 2021; 68:144-153. [PMID: 34142521 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5985.21.02876-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Common bile duct stones are a very frequent problem in the western world and endoscopic stone clearance is the method of choice for treatment. Despite its common use, endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones is not always trivial especially in cases involving large or multiple stones. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature review regarding different endoscopic techniques was performed for this article and a recommended therapeutic algorithm developed based on the guidelines of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the German Gastroenterological Society (DGVS). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS This review gives an overview of currently applied endoscopic techniques, their success and complication rates as well as alternative methods used for cases involving anatomic anomalies. The purpose of this review is to recommend a therapeutic algorithm for the treatment of difficult common bile duct stones. CONLCLUSIONS For the treatment of difficult common bile duct stones, combined sphincterotomy and endoscopic large balloon dilation should be first choice. Mechanical lithotripsy and cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy are close alternatives with nearly equal clearance rates and should be used if accessible. The insertion of a temporary plastic stent is a good choice to gain time to explore further treatment options. Enteroscopy-based ERCP, PTCS or EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy and stone treatment, while good alternatives for select cases involving anatomic anomalies, should be performed at specialised units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Dollhopf
- Endoscopy Section, Gastroenterology, München Klinik Neuperlach, Munich, Germany
| | - Henning Schmetkamp
- Endoscopy Section, Gastroenterology, München Klinik Neuperlach, Munich, Germany -
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rizzo GEM, Ferro G, Rizzo G, Carlo GD, Cantone A, Vita GGD, Sciumè C. Endoscopic Treatment of Iatrogenic Perforation of Sigmoid Diverticulum: A Case Report of Multidisciplinary Management. Clin Endosc 2021; 55:292-296. [PMID: 34092055 PMCID: PMC8995985 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2021.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Iatrogenic perforations are severe complications of gastrointestinal endoscopy; therefore, their management should be adequately planned. A 77-year-old man with a history of diverticulosis underwent a colonoscopy for anemia. During the procedure, an iatrogenic perforation occurred suddenly in the sigmoid colon, near a severe angle among the numerous diverticula. Through-the- scope clips were immediately applied to treat it and close mucosal edges. Laboratory tests showed increased inflammation and infection, and although there were no complaints of abdominal pain, the patient had an extremely distended abdomen. A multidisciplinary board began management based on a conservative approach. Pneumoperitoneum was treated with computed tomography-assisted drainage. After 72 hours, his intestinal canalization and laboratory tests were normal. Though this adverse event is rare, a multidisciplinary board should be promptly gathered upon occurrence, even if the patient appears clinically stable, to consider a conservative approach and avoid surgical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo
- Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion Sciences Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.,Section of Endoscopy, Department of General Surgery, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Agrigento, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Ferro
- Section of Endoscopy, Department of General Surgery, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Agrigento, Italy
| | - Giovanna Rizzo
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science, Palermo University Hospital, Palermo, Italy.,Section of Endoscopy, Department of General Surgery, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Agrigento, Italy
| | - Giovanni Di Carlo
- Section of Endoscopy, Department of General Surgery, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Agrigento, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cantone
- Section of Endoscopy, Department of General Surgery, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Agrigento, Italy
| | - Gaetano Giuseppe Di Vita
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science, Palermo University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Carmelo Sciumè
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science, Palermo University Hospital, Palermo, Italy.,Section of Endoscopy, Department of General Surgery, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Agrigento, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang L, Lu X, Huang X, Zou X, Wu L, Zhou Z, Wu D, Tang D, Chen D, Wan X, Zhu Z, Deng T, Shen L, Liu J, Zhu Y, Gong D, Chen D, Zhong Y, Liu F, Yu H. Intelligent difficulty scoring and assistance system for endoscopic extraction of common bile duct stones based on deep learning: multicenter study. Endoscopy 2021; 53:491-498. [PMID: 32838430 DOI: 10.1055/a-1244-5698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study aimed to construct an intelligent difficulty scoring and assistance system (DSAS) for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones. METHODS 1954 cholangiograms were collected from three hospitals for training and testing the DSAS. The D-LinkNet34 and U-Net were adopted to segment the CBD, stones, and duodenoscope. Based on the segmentation results, the stone size, distal CBD diameter, distal CBD arm, and distal CBD angulation were estimated. The performance of segmentation and estimation was assessed by mean intersection over union (mIoU) and average relative error. A technical difficulty scoring scale, which was used for assessing the technical difficulty of CBD stone removal, was developed and validated. We also analyzed the relationship between scores evaluated by the DSAS and clinical indicators including stone clearance rate and need for endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) and lithotripsy. RESULTS The mIoU values of the stone, CBD, and duodenoscope segmentation were 68.35 %, 86.42 %, and 95.85 %, respectively. The estimation performance of the DSAS was superior to nonexpert endoscopists. In addition, the technical difficulty scoring performance of the DSAS was more consistent with expert endoscopists than two nonexpert endoscopists. A DSAS assessment score ≥ 2 was correlated with lower stone clearance rates and more frequent EPLBD. CONCLUSIONS An intelligent DSAS based on deep learning was developed. The DSAS could assist endoscopists by automatically scoring the technical difficulty of CBD stone extraction, and guiding the choice of therapeutic approach and appropriate accessories during ERCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaoyan Lu
- State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping, and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xu Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaoping Zou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Lianlian Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhongyin Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Deqing Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tenth People Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dehua Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Dingyuan Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping, and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xinyue Wan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhongchao Zhu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Tao Deng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Lei Shen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Jun Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yijie Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Dexin Gong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Di Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yanfei Zhong
- State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping, and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Feng Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tenth People Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Honggang Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Key Laboratory of Hubei Province for Digestive System Disease, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang Q, Fu L, Wu T, Ding X. The ballooning time in endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for removal of bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e24735. [PMID: 33725940 PMCID: PMC7982145 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000024735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND So far, there was no consensus regarding balloon dilation time in endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD). Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the stone removal and overall complication rates of dilation of short and long duration with EPBD. METHODS The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Cochrane Library), Web of Science, EMBASE Databases, and PubMed were searched from their inception to December 1, 2019 for all articles regarding balloon dilation time in EPBD for removal of bile duct stones. The data were extracted and the methodology quality was assessed. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 software. RESULTS Four studies involving a total of 1553 patients were included, 918 in the short dilation group and 635 in the long dilation group. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the 2 different dilation groups in the complete stone removal in randomized controlled trails (RCTs) group (P = .10) and non-RCTs group (P = 0.45), mechanical lithotripsy requirement (RCTs: P = .92; non-RCTs: P = .47), pancreatitis (RCTs: P = .48; non-RCTs: P = .45), bleeding (RCTs: P = .95; non-RCTs: P = .60), infection of biliary (RCTs: P = .58; non-RCTs: P = .29), perforation (RCTs: P = .32; non-RCTs: P = .37). CONCLUSION This systematic review suggests that there no significant difference in the efficacy and safety of dilation of short and long duration for removal of bile duct stones with EPBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luyao Fu
- Department of Pathology, Luzhou People's Hospital, Luzhou, Sichuan Province
| | - Tao Wu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery
| | - Xiong Ding
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Meng W, Mu P, Li X. The effects of dilation with different sizes on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after small biliary sphincterotomy. TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2020; 31:729-730. [PMID: 33169713 DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2020.19576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wenbo Meng
- Department of Special Minimally Invasive Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China;Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province; Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Peilei Mu
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China;Department of Special Minimally Invasive Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China; Peilei Mu and Ping Yue contributed equally to this work
| | - Xun Li
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province; Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China;The Fifth Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Paspatis GA, Arvanitakis M, Dumonceau JM, Barthet M, Saunders B, Turino SY, Dhillon A, Fragaki M, Gonzalez JM, Repici A, van Wanrooij RLJ, van Hooft JE. Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement - Update 2020. Endoscopy 2020; 52:792-810. [PMID: 32781470 DOI: 10.1055/a-1222-3191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
1: ESGE recommends that each center implements a written policy regarding the management of iatrogenic perforations, including the definition of procedures that carry a higher risk of this complication. This policy should be shared with the radiologists and surgeons at each center. 2 : ESGE recommends that in the case of an endoscopically identified perforation, the endoscopist reports its size and location, with an image, and statement of the endoscopic treatment that has been applied. 3: ESGE recommends that symptoms or signs suggestive of iatrogenic perforation after an endoscopic procedure should be rapidly and carefully evaluated and documented with a computed tomography (CT) scan. 4 : ESGE recommends that endoscopic closure should be considered depending on the type of the iatrogenic perforation, its size, and the endoscopist expertise available at the center. Switch to carbon dioxide (CO2) endoscopic insufflation, diversion of digestive luminal content, and decompression of tension pneumoperitoneum or pneumothorax should also be performed. 5 : ESGE recommends that after endoscopic closure of an iatrogenic perforation, further management should be based on the estimated success of the endoscopic closure and on the general clinical condition of the patient. In the case of no or failed endoscopic closure of an iatrogenic perforation, and in patients whose clinical condition is deteriorating, hospitalization and surgical consultation are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregorios A Paspatis
- Gastroenterology Department, Venizelion General Hospital, Heraklion, Crete-Greece
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Erasme Hospital, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Marc Dumonceau
- Gastroenterology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium
| | | | - Brian Saunders
- St Mark's Hospital, Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, North West London Hospitals University Trust, Harrow, London, UK
| | | | - Angad Dhillon
- St Mark's Hospital, Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, North West London Hospitals University Trust, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Maria Fragaki
- Gastroenterology Department, Venizelion General Hospital, Heraklion, Crete-Greece
| | | | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy
| | - Roy L J van Wanrooij
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AG&M Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Meng W, Leung JW, Zhang K, Zhou W, Wang Z, Zhang L, Sun H, Xue P, Liu W, Wang Q, Zhang J, Wang X, Wang M, Shao Y, Cai K, Hou S, Li Q, Zhang L, Zhu K, Yue P, Wang H, Zhang M, Sun X, Yang Z, Tao J, Wen Z, Wang Q, Chen B, Shao Q, Zhao M, Zhang R, Jiang T, Liu K, Zhang L, Chen K, Zhu X, Zhang H, Miao L, Wang Z, Li J, Yan X, Wang F, Zhang L, Suzuki A, Tanaka K, Nur U, Weiderpass E, Li X. Optimal dilation time for combined small endoscopic sphincterotomy and balloon dilation for common bile duct stones: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4:425-434. [PMID: 31003961 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30075-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 02/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic sphincterotomy is the established treatment for common bile duct stones. Balloon dilation offers an alternative. Prolonged dilation (300 s) with a 10 mm diameter balloon decreases the occurrence of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We aimed to determine the optimal duration of dilation for combined endoscopic sphincterotomy and balloon dilation for the removal of common bile duct stones. METHODS We did a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial at 15 tertiary surgical centres in China. Eligible patients (≥18 years) with native papilla and common bile duct stones (≤1·5 cm in size and <2 cm in diameter) undergoing ERCP were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive balloon dilation for 0, 30, 60, 180, or 300 s after deep bile duct cannulation. Randomisation was done by an independent statistician using a computer-generated randomisation list with a block size of ten, stratified by centre. Patients and outcome assessors, but not endoscopists and investigators, were masked to treatment allocation. Balloon dilation was done with controlled radial expansion balloons according to common bile duct stone size. Stones were removed using stone retrieval balloons or baskets. The primary endpoint was overall frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis. The primary efficacy analysis and safety analyses were done in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients with successful cannulation, but excluded those who withdrew consent after randomisation. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02510495, and is complete. FINDINGS Between July 29, 2015, and Dec 1, 2017, 3721 consecutive patients with common bile duct stones were recruited, 1718 of whom were excluded. The remaining 2003 patients underwent a small (3-5 mm) endoscopic sphincterotomy. 83 patients withdrew consent after the ERCP procedure, thus 1920 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (0 s [n=371], 30 s [n=384], 60 s [n=388], 180 s [n=390], and 300 s [n=387]). Overall, post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 199 (10%) of 1920 patients (44 [12%] patients in the 0 s group, 28 [7%] in the 30 s group, 32 [8%] in the 60 s group, 36 [9%] in the 180 s group, and 59 [15%] in the 300 s group). Prolonged dilation (300 s) significantly increased the occurrence of post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with shorter balloon dilation (p=0·002). The frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis was significantly lower in the 30, 60, and 180 s groups than in the 300 s group (relative risk [RR] 0·48, 95% CI 0·31-0·73; p=0·0005 vs the 30 s group; 0·54, 0·36-0·81; p=0·003 vs the 60 s group; 0·61, 0·41-0·89; p=0·01 vs the 180 s group). The frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis was significantly higher in the 0 s group than the 30 s group (RR 1·62, 1·04-2·56; p=0·03). No difference in stone extraction (all ≥90%) was observed between groups. Following ERCP, 90 (5%) of 1920 patients had acute cholangitis, 14 (<1%) had acute cholecystitis, and five (<1%) had gastrointestinal bleeding, with no significant differences between groups. One (<1%) patient had Stapfer II perforation, which resolved spontaneously with conservative treatment. INTERPRETATION A balloon dilation time of 30 s for combined endoscopic sphincterotomy and balloon dilation reduced the frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis and was determined to be the optimum dilation time for the removal of common bile duct stones. FUNDING National Natural Science Foundation of China, Gansu Competitive Foundation Projects for Technology Development and Innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenbo Meng
- Department of Special Minimally Invasive Surgery, CHESS Center, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Joseph W Leung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Davis Medical Center and Sacramento Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Kai Zhang
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Wence Zhou
- Second Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Zhenyu Wang
- Second Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Leida Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Hao Sun
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Ping Xue
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Minimal Invasive Surgery Centre, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qi Wang
- Minimal Invasive Surgery Centre, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Jijun Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Sixth Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (General Hospital of TISCO), Taiyuan, China
| | - Xuefeng Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China
| | - Meng Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Yingmei Shao
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Hydatid, Digestive and Vascular Surgery Centre, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Echinococcosis and Liver Surgery Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Kailin Cai
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Senlin Hou
- Department of Biliopancreatic Endoscopic Surgery, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Qiyong Li
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, School of Medicine, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Fifth Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Kexiang Zhu
- Second Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ping Yue
- Department of Special Minimally Invasive Surgery, CHESS Center, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Haiping Wang
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ming Zhang
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Xiangyu Sun
- Centre of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhiqing Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jie Tao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zilong Wen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qunwei Wang
- Minimal Invasive Surgery Centre, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China; Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Bendong Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Quan Shao
- Department of General Surgery, Sixth Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (General Hospital of TISCO), Taiyuan, China
| | - Mingning Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Biliary Tract Disease Research, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruoyan Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Tiemin Jiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Hydatid, Digestive and Vascular Surgery Centre, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Echinococcosis and Liver Surgery Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Ke Liu
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lichao Zhang
- Department of Biliopancreatic Endoscopic Surgery, Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Kangjie Chen
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, School of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoliang Zhu
- Fifth Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hui Zhang
- Second Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Long Miao
- Second Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Zhengfeng Wang
- Second Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jiajia Li
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaowen Yan
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China
| | - Fangzhao Wang
- Second Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Lingen Zhang
- Second Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Azumi Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kiyohito Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ula Nur
- Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Qatar University Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | | | - Xun Li
- Fifth Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Haseeb A, Freeman ML. Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Treatment of Bile Duct Stones. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 17:221-230. [PMID: 30945095 DOI: 10.1007/s11938-019-00234-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review the current literature focusing on the indications, efficacy, and safety of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) and endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) in the treatment of bile duct stones. • EPBD without EST is associated with a higher risk of post-procedural pancreatitis and lower rate of stone clearance than EST alone. • EPBD without EST should be at least 2 min in duration, and placement of a pancreatic stent and other measures to reduce pancreatitis risk should be considered. • EPBD without EST is most useful to reduce risk of bleeding in patients with coagulopathy. • EPLBD combined with EST can be used as an alternative or adjunct to mechanical lithotripsy in the removal of large or difficult bile duct stones. • EPLBD combined with EST results in fewer complications than EST alone for removal of bile duct stones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Haseeb
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, MMC 36, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Martin L Freeman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, MMC 36, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hakuta R, Kawahata S, Kogure H, Nakai Y, Saito K, Saito T, Hamada T, Takahara N, Uchino R, Mizuno S, Tsujino T, Tada M, Sakamoto N, Isayama H, Koike K. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation both without sphincterotomy for removal of large bile duct stones: A propensity-matched analysis. Dig Endosc 2019; 31:59-68. [PMID: 29943385 DOI: 10.1111/den.13220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 06/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) without endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) may facilitate extraction of large bile duct stones through achieving adequate dilation of the ampulla. However, contrary to favorable long-term outcomes after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD), that of EPLBD without EST has been little investigated. Therefore, we conducted the current study to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes of EPLBD without EST and EPBD after removal of large bile duct stones (LBDS; ≥10 mm). METHODS This retrospective study included patients without a previous history of EST, EPBD or EPLBD who underwent EPLBD without EST or EPBD for removal of LBDS. Each patient in the EPLBD without EST group was matched to a patient in the EPBD group using propensity scores. RESULTS Forty-four patients in each group were matched for the analysis. Baseline characteristics were balanced after propensity matching. Rate of complete stone removal in a single session was higher (80% vs 16%, P < 0.001), number of ERCP sessions (1.3 ± 0.7 vs 2.4 ± 1.5, P < 0.001) and rate of lithotripsy use (30% vs 80%, P < 0.001) were smaller in the matched EPLBD without EST group. Contrary to null between-group differences in early adverse events (P = 0.99), a cumulative rate of late biliary complications was higher in the EPLBD without EST group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION EPLBD without EST showed higher efficacy for removal of LBDS but was associated with worse long-term outcomes when compared to EPBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryunosuke Hakuta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuhei Kawahata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Kogure
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kei Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomotaka Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Naminatsu Takahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rie Uchino
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Suguru Mizuno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Tsujino
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minoru Tada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoya Sakamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Koike
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Itoi T, Ryozawa S, Katanuma A, Okabe Y, Kato H, Horaguchi J, Tsuchiya T, Gotoda T, Fujita N, Yasuda K, Igarashi Y, Fujimoto K. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation. Dig Endosc 2018; 30:293-309. [PMID: 29411902 DOI: 10.1111/den.13029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2017] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society has developed the 'EPLBD Clinical Practice Guidelines' as fundamental guidelines based on new scientific techniques. EPLBD is a treatment method that has recently become widely used for choledocolithiasis. The evidence level in this field is usually low, and in many instances, the recommendation grading has to be determined on the basis of expert consensus. At this point, the guidelines are divided into the following six sections according to the 'EST Clinical Practice Guidelines': (i) Indications, (ii) procedures, (iii) special cases, (iv) procedure-related adverse events, (v) treatment outcomes, and (vi) postoperative follow up observation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takao Itoi
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shomei Ryozawa
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akio Katanuma
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Hironori Kato
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Horaguchi
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Takuji Gotoda
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naotaka Fujita
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenjiro Yasuda
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Paspatis GA, Paraskeva K, Vardas E, Papastergiou V, Tavernaraki A, Fragaki M, Theodoropoulou A, Chlouverakis G. Long-term recurrence of bile duct stones after endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with sphincterotomy: 4-year extended follow-up of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2016; 31:650-655. [PMID: 27317037 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5012-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2016] [Accepted: 05/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with biliary sphincterotomy (EPLBD + EBS) is safe and effective in patients with large common bile duct (CBD) stones. However, data on long-term outcomes after EPLBD + EBS remain limited. We sought to prospectively evaluate the long-term recurrence of CBD stones after EPLBD + EBS and to identify the associated factors. METHODS We conducted an extended follow-up of a previous randomized trial (2009-2011) comparing the outcomes of 30- versus 60-s large balloon dilation. A total of 106 trial participants undergoing successful CBD stone clearance by EPLBD + EBS were prospectively followed up for up to 4 years (range 19-48 months). Various risk factors were analysed to assess predictors of long-term recurrence of stones. RESULTS Recurrent CBD stones appeared in 8/106 (7.5 %) patients during a mean follow-up of 30.5 ± 5.5 months. The mean diameter of CBD was significantly higher in the recurrence versus non-recurrence group (2.0 ± 4.9 vs 1.6 ± 0.9 cm, p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis revealed that CBD diameter was the only predictor significantly associated with the long-term recurrence of stones (odds ratio 1.2, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS EPLBD + EBS is associated with a low rate of long-term CBD stone recurrence. However, the risk is significantly higher in patients with a more dilated CBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregorios A Paspatis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Benizelion General Hospital, L.Knossou, 71409, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
| | | | - Emmanouil Vardas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Benizelion General Hospital, L.Knossou, 71409, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Aikaterini Tavernaraki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Benizelion General Hospital, L.Knossou, 71409, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Maria Fragaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Benizelion General Hospital, L.Knossou, 71409, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Angeliki Theodoropoulou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Benizelion General Hospital, L.Knossou, 71409, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fusaroli P, Lisotti A, Syguda A, D'Ercole MC, Maimone A, Fabbri C, Cennamo V, Cecinato P, Cariani G, Caletti G. Reliability of endoscopic ultrasound in predicting the number and size of common bile duct stones before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Dig Liver Dis 2016; 48:277-82. [PMID: 26589108 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2015] [Revised: 10/01/2015] [Accepted: 10/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is accurate for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis; however, data are lacking regarding the prediction of stone number and size. AIMS To evaluate the concordance between EUS and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in stone number and size assessment. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing ERCP due to detection of choledocholithiasis by EUS. Concordance between EUS and ERCP was defined as difference in stone diameter <30% and perfect match in stone number. RESULTS Among 116 patients, 25% had sludge, 37.9% had single and 37.1% had multiple stones. Overall concordance was 62.9%. Sludge was correctly assessed in 85.7%, single stone in 81.3% and multiple stones in 45.1% (P=0.0001). EUS was accurate in 78.8% of patients who underwent both procedures in the same session, but only in 61.9% in those who underwent ERCP within 1 week. Multivariate analysis identified the single-session approach (odds ratio 2.894; P=0.035) and multiple stones (odds ratio 0.244; P=0.001) as independent predictors of concordance. CONCLUSIONS Concordance between EUS and ERCP was correlated to the single session approach and inversely correlated to the presence of multiple stones. EUS may predict potentially difficult ERCP allowing to plan the best treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna/Hospital of Imola, Italy.
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna/Hospital of Imola, Italy
| | - Arkadiusz Syguda
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna/Hospital of Imola, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina D'Ercole
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna/Hospital of Imola, Italy
| | - Antonella Maimone
- Gastrointestinal Unit, A.O. Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Cecinato
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Giulio Cariani
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Caletti
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna/Hospital of Imola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shim CS, Kim JW, Lee TY, Cheon YK. Is endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation safe for treating large CBD stones? Saudi J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:251-9. [PMID: 27488319 PMCID: PMC4991195 DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.187599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has been shown to be an effective technique for the removal of large or difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones, as an alternative to EST. Reviewing the literature published since 2003, it is understood that EPLBD has fewer associated overall complications than EST. Bleeding occurred less frequently with EPLBD than with EST. There was no significant difference in postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis or perforation. Recent accumulated results of EPLBD with or even without EST suggest that it is a safe and effective procedure for the removal of large or difficult bile duct stones without any additional risk of severe adverse events, when performed under appropriate guidelines. Since use of a larger balloon can tear the sphincter as well as the bile duct, possibly resulting in bleeding and perforation, a balloon size that is equal to or smaller in diameter than the diameter of the native distal bile duct is recommended. The maximum transverse diameter of the stone and the balloon-stone diameter ratio have a tendency to affect the success or failure of complete removal of stones by large balloon dilation to prevent adverse effects such as perforation and bleeding. One should take into account the size of the native bile duct, the size and burden of stones, the presence of stricture of distal bile duct, and the presence of the papilla in or adjacent to a diverticulum. Even though the results of EPLBD indicate that it is a relatively safe procedure in patients with common duct stones with a dilated CBD, the recommended guidelines should be followed strictly for the prevention of major adverse events such as bleeding and perforation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chan Sup Shim
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea,Address for correspondence: Prof. Chan Sup Shim, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, 120-1 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-729, Korea. E-mail:
| | - Ji Wan Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Yoon Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Koog Cheon
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kim TH, Kim JH, Seo DW, Lee DK, Reddy ND, Rerknimitr R, Ratanachu-Ek T, Khor CJL, Itoi T, Yasuda I, Isayama H, Lau JYW, Wang HP, Chan HH, Hu B, Kozarek RA, Baron TH. International consensus guidelines for endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83:37-47. [PMID: 26232360 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2015] [Accepted: 06/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Hyeon Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wonkwang University Hospital, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Hong Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Wan Seo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Ki Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nageshwar D Reddy
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Rungsun Rerknimitr
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Christopher J L Khor
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Health System, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Takao Itoi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Teikyo University Mizonokuchi Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - James Y W Lau
- Department of Surgery, Endoscopic Center, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Hsiu-Po Wang
- Endoscopic Division, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hoi-Hung Chan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Bing Hu
- Department of Endoscopy, Eastern Hepatobiliary Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Richard A Kozarek
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shavakhi A, Minakari M, Ardestani MHS, Sadeghizadeh A, Shavakhi S. A comparative study of one minute versus five seconds endoscopic biliary balloon dilation after small sphincterotomy in choleducolithiasis. Adv Biomed Res 2015; 4:28. [PMID: 25709993 PMCID: PMC4333434 DOI: 10.4103/2277-9175.150421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2013] [Accepted: 08/07/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Limited sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) is a low-risk method for the treatment of choleducolithiasis. Traditionally one minute ballooning time (BT) is applied; however, the effective BT is not clear. In this study, we compare five seconds and one minute ballooning time. Materials and Methods: In this single-blind, randomized, clinical trial 60 patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones documented in ultrasonography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), with no severe hepatic, biliary or systemic diseases, enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive EPBD with either five seconds (n = 31) or one minute (n = 29) ballooning time (BT) after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and small sphincterotomy. Then stones were retrieved with an extractor balloon. The patients were followed for 48 hours to check the possible complications. Results: Successful CBD stone removal was the same in the five-second and one-minute BT groups (93.5% vs. 96.6%; P = 0.594). Pancreatitis occurred in three (9.7%) patients in the five-second BT group and in six (20.7%) patients in the one-minute BT group (P = 0.233). No hemorrhage or perforation was noted. Conclusions: After a small sphincterotomy, EPBD in the five-second and one-minute BT groups had a similar efficacy. Small sphincterotomy combined with very short BT is a safe and effective method for CBD stone removal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Shavakhi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Mohammad Minakari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | | | - Atefeh Sadeghizadeh
- Department of Pediatrics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Sara Shavakhi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jang SI, Yun GW, Lee DK. Balloon dilation itself may not be a major determinant of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:16913-16924. [PMID: 25493004 PMCID: PMC4258560 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.16913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2014] [Revised: 08/02/2014] [Accepted: 09/16/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the essential first modality for common bile duct (CBD) stone therapy. The conventional endoscopic treatment for CBD stones is stone removal after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST). Stone removal after papillary stretching using balloon dilation instead of the conventional method has been widely adopted. There are many reports regarding endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) utilizing a small balloon (< 10 mm) instead of EST for the removal of small CBD stones. In contrast, two cases of mortality due to post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) were reported after an EPBD clinical trial in the Western world, and the psychological barrier caused by these incidences hinders the use of this technique in Western countries. Endoscopic papillar large balloon dilation (EPLBD), which is used to treat large CBD stones, was not widely adopted when first introduced due to concerns about perforation and severe pancreatitis from the use of a large balloon (12-20 mm). However, as experience with this procedure accumulates, the occurrence of PEP with EPLBD is confirmed to be much lower than with EPBD. This report reviews whether EPBD and EPLBD, two procedures that use balloon dilation but differ in terms of indications and concept, contribute to the occurrence of PEP.
Collapse
|
21
|
Teoh AYB, Lau JYW. Tips in biliary stone removal using endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2014; 22:E8-11. [PMID: 25366474 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh
- Department of Surgery; The Chinese University of Hong Kong; Prince of Wales Hospital; Shatin, New Territories Hong Kong SAR China
| | - James Yun Wong Lau
- Department of Surgery; The Chinese University of Hong Kong; Prince of Wales Hospital; Shatin, New Territories Hong Kong SAR China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rouquette O, Bommelaer G, Abergel A, Poincloux L. Large balloon dilation post endoscopic sphincterotomy in removal of difficult common bile duct stones: A literature review. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:7760-7766. [PMID: 24976713 PMCID: PMC4069304 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2013] [Revised: 01/17/2014] [Accepted: 03/13/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is the standard therapy in common bile duct (CBD) stones extraction. Large stones (≥ 12 mm) or multiple stones extraction may be challenging after ES alone. Endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by large balloon dilation (ESLBD) has been described as an alternative to ES in these indications. Efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness and technical aspects of the procedure have been here reviewed. PubMed and Google Scholar search resulted in forty-one articles dealing with CBD stone extraction with 12 mm or more dilation balloons after ES. ESLBD is at least as effective as ES, and reduces the need for additional mechanical lithotripsy. Adverse events rates are not statistically different after ESLBD compared to ES for pancreatitis, bleeding and perforation. However, particular attention should be paid in patients with CBD strictures, which is identified as a risk factor of perforation. ESLBD is slightly cost-effective compared to ES. A small sphincterotomy is usually performed, and may reduce bleeding rates compared to full sphincterotomy. Dilation is performed with 12-20 mm enteral balloons. Optimal inflation time is yet to be determined. The procedure can be performed safely even in patients with peri-ampullary diverticula and surgically altered anatomy. ESLBD is effective and safe in the removal of large CBD stones, however, small sphincterotomy might be preferred and CBD strictures should be considered as a relative contraindication.
Collapse
|
23
|
Kim JH, Yang MJ, Hwang JC, Yoo BM. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for the removal of bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19:8580-8594. [PMID: 24379575 PMCID: PMC3870503 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i46.8580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2013] [Revised: 09/17/2013] [Accepted: 10/18/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has been widely used as the alternative to EST along with endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy (EML) for the removal of large or difficult bile duct stones. Furthermore, EPLBD without EST was recently introduced as its simplified alternative technique. Thus, we systematically searched PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE, and analyzed all gathered data of EPLBD with and without EST, respectively, by using a single standardized definition, reviewing relevant literatures, published between 2003 and June 2013, where it was performed with large-diameter balloons (12-20 mm). The outcomes, including the initial success rate, the rate of needs for EML, and the overall success rate, and adverse events were assessed in each and compared between both of two procedures: “EPLBD with EST” and “EPLBD without EST”. A total of 2511 procedures from 30 published articles were included in EPLBD with EST, while a total of 413 procedures from 3 published articles were included in EPLBD without EST. In the results of outcomes, the overall success rate was 96.5% in EPLBD with EST and 97.2% in EPLBD without EST, showing no significant difference between both of them. The initial success rate (84.0% vs 76.2%, P < 0.001) and the success rate of EPLBD without EML (83.2% vs 76.7%, P = 0.001) was significantly higher, while the rate of use of EML was significantly lower (14.1% vs 21.6%, P < 0.001), in EPLBD with EST. The rate of overall adverse events, pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, other adverse events, surgery for adverse events, and fatal adverse events were 8.3%, 2.4%, 3.6%, 0.6%, 1.7%, 0.2% and 0.2% in EPLBD with EST and 7.0%, 3.9%, 1.9%, 0.5%, 0.7%, 0% and 0% in EPLBD without EST, respectively, showing no significant difference between both of them. In conclusion, recent accumulated results of EPLBD with or even without EST suggest that it is a safe and effective procedure for the removal of large or difficult bile duct stones without any additional risk of severe adverse events, when performed under appropriate guidelines.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Pancreatitis is one of the most common complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A variety of patient-related and procedure-related factors have been identified to risk-stratify patients. Several measures can be undertaken in order to decrease the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk groups. These measures include pancreatic duct stenting and rectal indomethacin, amongst others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Maranki
- Temple University School of Medicine, 3401 N. Broad St., Suite 830 Parkinson Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA,
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zippi M, De Felici I, Pica R, Traversa G, Occhigrossi G. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for difficult common bile duct stones: Our experience. World J Clin Cases 2013; 1:19-24. [PMID: 24303455 PMCID: PMC3845931 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v1.i1.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2012] [Revised: 02/12/2013] [Accepted: 03/23/2013] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) performed for common bile duct (CBD) stones.
METHODS: From a computer database, we retrospectively analyzed the data relating to EBD performed in patients at the gastrointestinal unit of the Sandro Pertini Hospital of Rome (small center with low case volume) who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for CBD from January 1, 2010 to February 29, 2012. All patients had a proven diagnosis of CBD stones studied with echography, RMN-cholangiography and, when necessary, with computed tomography of the abdomen (for example, in cases with pace-makers). Prophylactic therapies, with gabexate mesilate 24 h before the procedure and with an antibiotic (ceftriaxone 2 g) 1 h before, were administered in all patients. The duodenum was intubated with a side-viewing endoscope under deep sedation with intravenous midazolam and propofol. The patients were placed in the supine position in almost all cases. EBD of the ampulla was performed under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance with a balloon through the scope (Hercules, wireguided balloon®, Cook Ireland Ltd. and CRE®, Microvasive, Boston Scientific Co., Natick, MA, United States).
RESULTS: A total of 14 patients (9 female, 5 male; mean age of 73 years; range 57-82 years) were enrolled in the study, in whom a total of 15 EBDs were performed. All patients underwent minor endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) prior to the EBD. The size of balloon insufflation depended on stone size and CBD dilation and this was performed until it reached 16 mm in diameter. EBD was performed under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. The balloon was gradually filled with diluted contrast agent and was maintained inflated in position for 45 to 60 s before deflation and removal. The need for precutting the major papilla was 21.4%. In one patient (an 81-year-old), EBD was performed in a Billroth II. Periampullary diverticula were found only in a 74-year-old female. The adverse event related to the procedures (ERCP + ES) was only an intra procedural bleeding (6.6%) that occurred after ES and was treated immediately with adrenaline sclerotherapy. No postoperative complications were reported.
CONCLUSION: With the current endoscopic techniques, very few patients with choledocholithiasis require surgery. EBD is an efficacious and safe procedure.
Collapse
|