Tacrolimus induction followed by maintenance monotherapy is useful in selected patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis refractory to prior treatment

Tremor Induced by Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, or Everolimus: A Review of the Literature

Calcineurin inhibitors such as cyclosporine and tacrolimus are immunosuppressant drugs that are known to induce tremors. Non-calcineurin inhibitors such as sirolimus and everolimus have also reportedly been accompanied by tremors, albeit less likely. However, the prevalence rates reported in the literature are notably wide, and the risk profiles for these drug-induced tremors are less understood. We searched PubMed to extract data on the risk of tremors with these drugs when prescribed for various transplant and non-transplant indications. We ascertained whether the risk of drug-induced tremor is influenced by the underlying diagnosis, dosing formulations, drug concentrations, and blood monitoring. We extracted data on treatment strategies and outcomes for tremors. Articles were primarily screened based on English language publications, abstracts, and studies with n ≥ 5, which included case series, retrospective studies, case-controlled studies, and prospective studies. We found 81 eligible studies comprising 33 cyclosporine, 43 tacrolimus, 6 sirolimus, and 1 everolimus that discussed tremor as an adverse event. In the pooled analysis of studies with n > 100, the incidence of tremor was 17% with cyclosporine, 21.5% with tacrolimus, and 7.8% with sirolimus and everolimus together. Regarding the underlying diagnosis, tremor was more frequently reported in kidney transplant (cyclosporine 28%, tacrolimus 30.1%) and bone marrow transplant (cyclosporine 40%, tacrolimus 41.9%) patients compared with liver transplant (cyclosporine 9%, tacrolimus 11.5%) and nontransplant indications (cyclosporine 21.5%, tacrolimus 11.3%). Most studies did not report whether the risk of tremors correlated with drug concentrations in the blood. The prevalence of tremors when using the twice-daily formulation of tacrolimus was nearly the same as the once-daily formulation (17% vs 18%). Data on individual-level risk factors for tremors were lacking. Except for three studies that found some benefit to maintaining magnesium levels, there were minimal data on treatments and outcomes. A large body of data supports a substantive and wide prevalence of tremor resulting from tacrolimus use followed by cyclosporine, especially in patients receiving a kidney transplant. However, there is little reporting on the patient-related risk factors for tremor, risk relationship with drug concentrations, treatment strategies, and outcomes.

Efficacy of Switching to Adalimumab for Maintenance of Remission Following Induction Therapy with Tacrolimus in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus (TAC) effectively induces remission in refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). However, TAC therapy usually lasts for 3 months. Although azathioprine (AZA) is often used in maintenance therapy, the relapse rate remains high. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of adalimumab (ADA) for remission maintenance in patients with UC after induction therapy with TAC.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe UC who achieved clinical remission after 3 months of TAC therapy with endoscopic non-mucosal healing (Cohort A). After TAC discontinuation, the remission maintenance rate up to 1 year after starting ADA therapy was examined. We retrospectively enrolled patients with UC treated with TAC (Cohort B). Among patients in clinical remission after TAC treatment for 3 months, those who received AZA as remission maintenance therapy after TAC discontinuation constituted the AZA group. Patients in Cohort A who received ADA and AZA as remission maintenance therapy after TAC discontinuation constituted the ADA + AZA group. We compared the remission maintenance rates in the AZA and ADA + AZA groups for up to 5 years after TAC discontinuation.

RESULTS

In Cohort A, of the 46 patients with UC treated with TAC, 17 were eligible for analysis after receiving ADA as remission maintenance therapy. A notable 88.2% (15/17) were still in remission 1 year after starting ADA. The ADA + AZA group (n = 16) exhibited a significantly higher relapse-free rate than the AZA group (n = 26) (p < 0.05; log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

switching to ADA for remission maintenance in patients with refractory UC who achieved clinical remission with TAC is clinically useful.

Comparison between mono-tacrolimus and mono-glucocorticoid in the treatment of myasthenia gravis

OBJECTIVE

Use of tacrolimus in mild to moderate myasthenia gravis (MG) is generally limited to glucocorticoid-refractory cases; the advantage of mono-tacrolimus over mono-glucocorticoids is unknown.

METHODS

We included mild to moderate MG patients treated with mono-tacrolimus (mono-TAC) or mono-glucocorticoids (mono-GC). The correlation between the immunotherapy options and the treatment efficacy and side effects were examined in 1:1 propensity-score matching. The main outcome was time to minimal manifestations status or better (MMS or better). Secondary outcomes include time to relapse, the mean changes in Myasthenia Gravis-specific Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores and the rate of adverse events.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics showed no difference between matched groups (49 matched pairs). There were no differences in median time to MMS or better between the mono-TAC group and mono-GC group (5.1 vs. 2.8 months: unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.46-1.16; p = 0.180), as well as in median time to relapse (data unavailable for the mono-TAC group since 44 of 49 [89.8%] participants remained in MMS or better; 39.7 months in mono-GC group: unadjusted HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.23-1.97; p = 0.464). Changes in MG-ADL scores between the two groups were similar (mean differences, 0.3; 95% CI, -0.4 to 1.0; p = 0.462). The rate of adverse events was lower in the mono-TAC group compared to the mono-GC group (24.5% vs. 55.1%, p = 0.002).

INTERPRETATION

Mono-tacrolimus performs superior tolerability with non-inferior efficacy compared to mono-glucocorticoids in mild to moderate myasthenia gravis patients who refuse or have a contraindication to glucocorticoids.

Thiopurine naivety at tacrolimus induction is a predictor of long-term remission in patients with intractable ulcerative colitis who responded to tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

The short-term efficacy of tacrolimus (Tac) for steroid-dependent and steroid-resistant refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) has been demonstrated; however, its long-term outcomes have not been well documented. Thus, this study aimed to clarify the long-term outcomes of patients who achieved Tac-induced remission and identify its predictors.

METHODS

This study included patients with moderate-to-severe active UC who started receiving Tac at our hospital between July 2004 and December 2016. Short-term treatment response was assessed using the Lichtiger index 3 months after starting Tac, and responding patients were further followed up to assess long-term outcomes. The primary endpoint was the relapse-free survival after Tac-induced remission, and the secondary endpoint was the identification of factors associated with relapse after Tac-induced remission.

RESULTS

The cumulative relapse-free survival rate at 10 years after Tac-induced remission was 33.2%. Multivariate analysis revealed that being thiopurine naïve at Tac induction was associated with the absence of relapse (hazard ratio: 0.45; 95% confidence interval: 0.22-0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-third of patients who achieved Tac-induced remission maintained long-term remission. Being thiopurine naïve at Tac induction was a predictor of the absence of relapse.

Tacrolimus as rescue therapy for steroid-dependent/steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: Experience from tertiary referral center in India

INTRODUCTION

Between 20% and 40% of patients with severe ulcerative colitis (UC) are either steroid-refractory UC (SRUC) or steroid-dependent UC (SDUC). Tacrolimus is an oral and relatively inexpensive drug, which has been extensively used in Japan for steroid-refractory and steroid-dependent disease.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with SDUC/SRUC were treated with tacrolimus 0.05-0.1 mg/kg in this prospective study. Clinical Mayo score (CMS) and UC Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) were evaluated prior to starting the drug and subsequently after 8 weeks. 5-Aminosalicylic acid agents (5-ASA) and immunomodulators were continued if the patients were previously on these drugs. Clinical response at 8 weeks was defined as decrease in CMS by at least 3 points. Clinical remission was defined as CMS ≤2 and combined remission as CMS≤2 with UCEIS <3.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (29 males) with a mean age of 35.1± 12.8 years with predominantly E3 disease (71%) were prospectively evaluated in this study. SDUC and SRUC were diagnosed in 31 and 21 patients, respectively. Seven failed treatment within 8 weeks, four were subjected to surgery, and 3 were switched to infliximab. Forty-two patients continued tacrolimus for 8 weeks. Mean CMS and UCEIS prior to starting tacrolimus were 6 ± 1.1 and 4.8 ± 1.1, respectively. At 8 weeks, median CMS and UCEIS decreased to 2.6 ± 1.7 and 2.7 ± 1.3, respectively. Clinical response was documented in 29 patients (56%) at week 8 whereas clinical remission was seen in 25 patients (48%). Combined clinical and endoscopic remissions were seen in 18 patients (35%). Except for a single  patient who developed reversible renal dysfunction, no other adverse event was  observed.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that tacrolimus is effective in inducing a clinical response in 56% of patients with SDUC and SRUC. In view of its low cost and safety profile, it may be considered first-line therapy for SDUC/SRUC.

Tacrolimus as Single-Agent Immunotherapy and Minimal Manifestation Status in Nonthymoma Myasthenia Gravis

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is a second-line immunosuppressant in myasthenia gravis (MG) therapy, which is mainly used in combination with corticosteroids to reduce steroid dose and maintain the effect of immunotherapy. However, few studies have focused on the effect of tacrolimus as single-agent immunotherapy on achieving minimal manifestation status (MMS). Thus, this study is aimed at exploring the efficacy and influencing factors of tacrolimus as single-agent immunotherapy in MG.

METHODS

Clinical data of 75 nonthymoma MG patients treated with tacrolimus single-agent as initial immunotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America postintervention status. Clinical factors affecting the achievement of MMS and treatment reactivity of different MG subtypes were determined by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Tacrolimus was generally safe, with only two patients (2.7%) switching medications due to side effects. 32% of patients had improved symptoms after 1 month of treatment. 69.2% of patients achieved MMS or better after one year. The age < 39 years old, QMG score < 11 points, and AChR - Ab titer < 8.07 nmol/L were indicative of a favorable response, which was independent of gender, course of the disease. As for MG subtypes, ocular and seronegative MG showed better treatment sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus as single-agent immunotherapy takes effect quickly and can effectively enable nonthymoma MG patients to achieve MMS. Tacrolimus can be used alone for the initial immunotherapy of MG patients, especially for young, mild, and low antibody titer patients.

ECCO Topical Review: Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic disease with variable degrees of extent, severity, and activity. A proportion of patients will have disease that is refractory to licensed therapies, resulting in significant impairment in quality of life. The treatment of these patients involves a systematic approach by the entire multidisciplinary team, with particular consideration given to medical options including unlicensed therapies, surgical interventions, and dietetic and psychological support. The purpose of this review is to guide clinicians through this process and provide an accurate summary of the available evidence for different strategies.

The Optimal Dose of Tacrolimus in Combination Therapy with an Anti-TNFα Antibody in a Mouse Colitis Model

An attempt to use combination therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) antibodies and tacrolimus (TAC) has been tried to induce remission in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the optimal dose of TAC in combination therapy with anti-TNFα antibodies (TAC + anti-TNFα therapy) remains unclear. We examined the efficacy of various doses of TAC + anti-TNFα therapy in a mouse colitis model. Dextran sulfate sodium induced colitis model mice were divided into an anti-TNFα antibody monotherapy group and the groups that received various doses of TAC + anti-TNFα therapy. The nuclear factor expression of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1) in the nuclei and the mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines were assessed by immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR, respectively. The serum anti-TNFα antibody concentration was measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The colon length and histological severity were significantly improved in the groups that received any dose of TAC + anti-TNFα therapy. The nuclear expression of NFATc1 was inversely proportional to the administered doses of TAC. The expression levels of inflammatory cytokines tended to decrease in proportion to the dose of TAC. The serum concentration of anti-TNFα antibodies in the high-dose TAC + anti-TNFα therapy was significantly higher than those in the other groups. Low-dose TAC exerted its immunosuppressive effect on T-cells, and additionally, high-dose TAC maintained the serum anti-TNFα antibody concentration. When administered in combination with anti-TNFα antibodies, the dose of TAC should be adjusted according to the disease severity.

Tacrolimus Therapy in Steroid-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis: A Review

Inflammatory bowel diseases are known for a chronic inflammatory process of the gastrointestinal tract and include Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (UC). Patients who are dependent on or resistant to corticosteroids account for about 20% of severe UC patients. Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor that has recently been used in the treatment of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. Tacrolimus has been demonstrated to have remarkable therapeutic efficacy in UC patients, without increased risk of severe adverse effects such as induction of remission and maintenance therapy. This article reviews the mechanism of action, pharmacogenetics, efficacy, and safety of tacrolimus for patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis.

Advances in research of tacrolimus for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Traditional drugs for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) include aminosalicylic acid preparations, glucocorticoids, and immunosuppressive agents such as thiopurine and cyclosporine. In recent ten years, the application of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs has greatly improved the clinical remission of patients with IBD, but there are still some problems, such as no response, intolerance, and recurrence after withdrawal. In recent years, tacrolimus, as a new powerful immunosuppressive agent, has been used as a second-line therapeutic drug for IBD. At present, the tacrolimus induced short-term remission effect in IBD is relatively obvious, and it has been gradually used for treatment of IBD refractory to traditional drugs or anti-TNF drugs. A few studies have found that tacrolimus can be used safely for a long time under proper monitoring. However, there is little evidence of long-term efficacy and safety. In this paper, we review the latest advances in the treatment of IBD with tacrolimus and make a comparison with anti-TNF drugs.

Rapid attainment of target trough concentrations of tacrolimus for early improvement of clinical symptoms in patients with ulcerative colitis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The target trough concentration of tacrolimus for ulcerative colitis is recommended to be 10-15 ng/mL in the initial two weeks and 5-10 ng/mL in the later phase. However, the effectiveness of rapid attainment of these target trough concentrations of tacrolimus in patients with ulcerative colitis is still unclear. In the present study, we evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of rapid attainment of target trough concentrations of tacrolimus in patients with ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

A prospective cohort was conducted at Gifu University Hospital in Gifu, Japan. Hospitalized patients who received tacrolimus for the treatment of ulcerative colitis between April 2009 and March 2017 were enrolled. Since June 2011, the initial loading dose of tacrolimus increased from 0.05 to 0.1-0.2 mg/kg/d, and the maintenance dose to achieve the target trough concentration was determined to be 12.5 ng/mL by proportional calculation with measured blood concentration. The period required to attain target trough concentration and the clinical efficacy before and after dosage modification was compared.

RESULTS

The initial dose after dosage modification was significantly increased compared to that before dosage modification (0.10 [0.04-0.22], median [range] mg/kg/d vs 0.05 [0.03-0.05] mg/kg/d, P < 0.001). The period required to attain a target trough concentration over 10 ng/mL was significantly shortened by dosage modification (6 [4-14] days before dosage modification vs 4.5 [2-8] days after modification, P = 0.048). Further, stool frequency score was significantly improved after dosage modification, without affecting the incidence of adverse events.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that rapid attainment of the target trough concentration of tacrolimus improves clinical symptoms in patients with ulcerative colitis.

EFFICACY OF TACROLIMUS FOR INDUCTION OF REMISSION IN PATIENTS WITH MODERATE-TO-SEVERE ULCERATIVE COLITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that shows that calcineurin inhibitors may be useful for the treatment of severe ulcerative colitis. However, evidence regarding the efficacy of tacrolimus for remission induction in this setting is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a systematic review on the existing evidence regarding the clinical efficacy of tacrolimus for the induction of remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

A literature search was undertaken from 1966 to August 2016 using MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and the Cochrane Library. The following MeSH terms were used: "Inflammatory Bowel Diseases" or "Ulcerative Colitis" and "Calcineurin Inhibitors" or "Tacrolimus" or "FK506". Studies performed in adult ulcerative colitis patients that evaluated the clinical efficacy of tacrolimus for the induction of remission were considered for revision. A meta-analysis was performed with those included studies that were also placebo-controlled and randomized. Clinical response as well as clinical remission and mucosal healing were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 755 references were identified, from which 22 studies were finally included. Only two of them were randomized, placebo-controlled trials. A total of 172 patients were evaluated. A significantly lower risk of failure in clinical response was found for tacrolimus versus placebo [RR 0.58 (0.45-0.73)]; moreover, a lower risk of failure in the induction of remission was also found versus placebo [RR 0.91 (0.82-1)].

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus seems to be a valid therapeutic alternative for the induction of remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

D-limonene exhibits anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties in an ulcerative colitis rat model via regulation of iNOS, COX-2, PGE2 and ERK signaling pathways

D-limonene has been demonstrated to have important immunomodulatory properties, including antitumor effects, and may alleviate asthma and allergies. In the present study, the anti‑inflammatory effects of D‑limonene were investigated in an ulcerative colitis (UC) rat model. Healthy male Sprague‑Dawley rats were randomly divided into control, untreated UC, and treatment with 50 or 100 mg/kg D‑limonene UC groups. In UC rats, disease activity and colonic mucosa damage were significantly reduced by the anti‑inflammatory effects of D‑limonene, via suppression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)‑2 and ‑9 gene expression. In addition, treatment with D‑limonene significantly increased antioxidant, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase‑2 (COX‑2) protein expression levels in UC rats. A decrease in prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production, transforming growth factor‑β (TGF‑β) gene expression and an increase phosphorylated‑extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 expression levelswere observed in UC rats treated with D‑limonene. In conclusion, D‑limonene reduced MMP‑2 and ‑9 mRNA expression levels via regulation of the iNOS, COX‑2, PGE2, TGF‑β and ERK1/2 signaling pathways in a UC rat model, indicating its potential antioxidant and anti‑inflammatory properties.

Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy and safety between tacrolimus and infliximab for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: a single center experience

OBJECTIVE

Both tacrolimus (Tac) and infliximab (IFX) are effective for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of both drugs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 46 patients with moderate-to-severe UC who were treated either by Tac (n = 21) or IFX (n = 25). We compared the remission and response rates for 10 weeks between the two groups. In patients who achieved a clinical response, the subsequent relapse rate was compared. The overall adverse events were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The remission and response rates at week 10 did not differ between patients treated with Tac (67% and 86%, respectively) and patients treated with IFX (76% and 92%, respectively). Among 41 patients showing a clinical response, eight of 23 patients treated with IFX and eight of 18 patients treated with Tac showed a subsequent relapse. The risk of relapse was not different between the two groups. While no serious adverse events were observed, the incidence of adverse events was higher in patients treated with Tac than in those treated with IFX.

CONCLUSION

Tac and IFX may be equally efficacious for the induction and maintenance of remission in patients with UC while minor adverse events are more frequent with the former treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus Therapy for Active Ulcerative Colitis; A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Approximately 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis [UC] experience a severe flare requiring steroid therapy to avoid colectomy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of tacrolimus as a rescue therapy for active UC.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for relevant studies assessing the efficacy of tacrolimus for active UC. Outcomes included short- and long-term clinical response, colectomy free rates, and rate of adverse events in randomised controlled trials [RCTs] and observational studies.

RESULTS

Two RCTs comparing high trough concentration [10-15ng/ml] versus placebo [n = 103] and 23 observational studies [n = 831] were identified. Clinical response at 2 weeks was significantly higher with tacrolimus compared with placebo (risk ratio [RR] = 4.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.09-10.17, p = 0.15 x 10(-3)] among RCTs. Rates of clinical response at 1 and 3 months were 0.73 [95% CI = 0.64-0.81] and 0.76 [95% CI = 0.59-0.87], and colectomy-free rates remained high at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months [0.86, 0.84, 0.78, and 0.69, respectively] among observational studies. Among RCTs, adverse events were more frequent compared with placebo [RR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.20-3.37, p = 0.83 x 10(-2)], but there was no difference in severe adverse events [RR = 3.15, 95% CI = 0.14-72.9, p = 0.47]. Severe adverse events were rare among observational studies [0.11, 95% CI = 0.06-0.20].

CONCLUSIONS

In the present meta-analysis, tacrolimus was associated with high clinical response and colectomy-free rates without increased risk of severe adverse events for active UC.

Tacrolimus for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis

Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor used for the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). Two randomized controlled trials and a number of retrospective studies have assessed the therapeutic effect of tacrolimus in UC patients. These studies showed that tacrolimus has excellent short-term efficacy in corticosteroid-refractory patients, with the rates of clinical response ranging from 61% to 96%. However, the long-term prognosis of patients treated with tacrolimus is disappointing, and almost 50% of patients eventually underwent colectomy in long-term follow-up. Tacrolimus can achieve mucosal healing in 40-50% of patients, and this is associated with a favorable long-term prognosis. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antibodies are another therapeutic option in corticosteroid-refractory patients. A prospective head-to-head comparative study of tacrolimus and infliximab is currently being performed to determine which treatment is more effective in corticosteroid-refractory patients. Several retrospective studies have demonstrated that switching between tacrolimus and anti-TNF-α antibody therapy was effective in patients who were refractory to one of the treatments. Most adverse events of tacrolimus are mild; however, opportunistic infections, especially pneumocystis pneumonia, are the most important adverse events, and these should be carefully considered during treatment. Several issues on tacrolimus treatment in UC patients remain unsolved (e.g., use of tacrolimus as remission maintenance therapy). Further controlled studies are needed to optimize the use of tacrolimus for the treatment of UC.