Quick, safe and effective repair of EUS-related duodenal perforation using over-the-scope clip system (with video)

Successful closure of a duodenal perforation caused by endoscopic ultrasound with an over-the-scope clip: a case report and literature review

Duodenal perforation is a rare but severe complication during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and typically requires surgical intervention. With the widespread clinical use of over-the-scope clips (OTSCs), we aimed to evaluate their efficacy and safety for the closure of a duodenal perforation caused by EUS-FNA. A 79-year-old woman underwent EUS-FNA for a suspected low-density nodule in the head of the pancreas. However, duodenal perforation occurred during EUS-FNA. To minimize the patient's pain postoperatively compared with surgical intervention, we used an OTSC to close the perforation immediately and administered drug treatment for 2 weeks. The patient was discharged after complete recovery. OTSC is considered an effective and safe choice for closing a perforation at the upper corner of the duodenal bulb without surgical intervention.

Over-the-Scope Clip in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Leaks and Perforations

While perforations, postoperative fistulas, and leaks have traditionally led to surgical or interventional radiology consultation for management, the introduction of the over-the-scope clip has allowed increased therapeutic possibilities for endoscopists. While primarily limited to case reports and series, the over-the-scope clip successfully manages gastrointestinal bleeding, perforations, as well as postoperative leaks and fistulas. Retrospective studies have demonstrated a relatively high success rate and a low complication rate. Given the similarity to variceal banding equipment, the learning curve with the over-the-scope clip is rapid. However, given the higher risk of procedures involving the use of the over-the-scope clip, it is essential to obtain the scope in a stable position and grasp sufficient tissue with the cap using a grasping tool and/or suction. From our experience, while closure may be successful in lesions sized up to 3 cm, successful outcomes are obtained for lesions sized <1 cm. Ultimately, given the limited available data, prospective randomized trials are needed to better evaluate the utility of the over-the-scope clip in various clinical scenarios, including fistula and perforation management.

Successful endoscopic closure with endoscopic clips for endoscopic ultrasound related large duodenal perforation

Objectives: Duodenal perforation as a complication of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration may progress to acute peritonitis and septic shock. Open surgery, the standard treatment, can be avoided by performing closure during endoscopy using endoscopic clips.

Patient: A 77-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with salivary gland swelling. She had elevated hepatobiliary enzymes and jaundice. Computed tomography (CT) revealed pancreatic head swelling and bile duct dilation. Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed a hypoechoic mass in the pancreatic head. The pancreatic head mass was punctured twice using a 22-gauge Franchine-type puncture needle at the duodenal bulb. The endoscope was advanced to the descending part of the duodenum, and part of the superior duodenal angle was perforated (diameter approximately 15 mm) with the endoscope. The duodenal mucosa around the perforation was immediately closed using endoscopic clips.

Results: Abdominal CT showed gas in the peritoneal and retroperitoneal spaces. The patient experienced abdominal pain and fever and was treated with fasting and antibiotics. The gas gradually decreased, symptoms improved, and she was discharged 18 days after the perforation. Histopathologically, the pancreatic tissue was consistent as autoimmune pancreatitis.

Conclusion: Endoscopic closure using endoscopic clips may be a better therapeutic option for duodenal perforation caused by endoscopy.

The Efficacy of Over-the-Scope Clip Closure for Gastrointestinal Iatrogenic Perforation During Endoscopic Ultrasound and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Pancreaticobiliary Diseases

BACKGROUND

Intestinal perforation is a severe adverse event during pancreaticobiliary endoscopy. The use of over-the-scope clip (OTSC) has recently increased; however, the efficacy of OTSC during pancreaticobiliary endoscopy has not been well studied.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of OTSC for the closure of gastrointestinal iatrogenic perforation during pancreaticobiliary endoscopy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study conducted at 3 tertiary care centers. The inclusion criteria were patients who had gastrointestinal perforation during endoscopic procedures for pancreaticobiliary diseases and underwent perforation closure using OTSC. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate. Secondary outcomes were technical success rates, adverse event rates, and the duration until the start of oral intake after OTSC.

RESULTS

Ten patients were treated by OTSC from January 2013 to December 2017. In 2 out of 10, the perforations could not be closed completely. In the remaining 8, perforations were closed completely, but intestinal obstruction caused by OTSC occurred in 1 patient. The clinical success rate was 80% (8/10). The technical and adverse event rates were 80% (8/10) and 10% (1/10), respectively. A median resumption timing of oral intake was 5 days (range, 3 to 10 d).

CONCLUSION

OTSC is considered as effective management for perforations during pancreaticobiliary endoscopy, although careful consideration is required for the indication of OTSC.

Quality in pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: what's new in 2020?

Quality assessment and improvement of an endoscopic service has emerged as a basic component of everyday gastrointestinal endoscopy. In order to ensure a high level of quality, a series of actions must be adopted when performing an endoscopic examination. Nonetheless, quality still remains a qualitative parameter; thus, implementation of specific indicators of quality is warranted. Irrespective of the nature of the endoscopic procedure, quality indicators usually refer to either structural properties of an endoscopy unit (e.g., examination availability), procedural factors (e.g., diagnostic accuracy), or patient outcomes (e.g., occurrence of an adverse event related to performance of an endoscopic procedure). Moreover, they are usually classified into 3 distinct sections, according to the phase of the procedure they relate to: i.e., before, during, and after the examination. The aim of this review is to present measures that need to be adopted in order to reach an optimal quality level during an endoscopic ultrasound examination and to provide up-to-date data regarding the respective quality indicators implicated.