Endoscopic ultrasonography in chronic asymptomatic pancreatic hyperenzymemia: The more we see, the less we know

Association between chronic asymptomatic pancreatic hyperenzymemia and pancreatic ductal anomalies: a magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography study

PURPOSE

Elucidating the association between pancreatic ductal anomalies and chronic asymptomatic pancreatic hyperenzymemia using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, retrospective, case-control study. The healthy community group comprised 554 subjects who participated in a paid, whole-body health checkup program. The patient group comprised 14 subjects with idiopathic pancreatic hyperamylasemia or hyperlipasemia. All subjects underwent magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. The clinical features and incidence rates of pancreatic ductal anomalies were then compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Compared to the healthy community group, the patient group was significantly more likely to be ≥ age 65 (71.4% of patient group vs. 22.1% of healthy community group), have a history of diabetes mellitus (21.4% vs. 5.4%) or hypertension (35.7% vs. 11.4%), and to have pancreas divisum (21.4% vs. 2.7%), meandering main pancreatic duct (21.4% vs. 4.1%), Wirsungocele (14.3% vs. 1.1%), or dilated main pancreatic duct (14.3% vs. 2.3%). Multivariate analysis found that age ≥ 65 (odds ratio 8.76), presence of pancreas divisum (odds ratio 13.2), meandering main pancreatic duct (odds ratio 8.95), and Wirsungocele (odds ratio 17.6) were independent factors significantly associated with chronic asymptomatic pancreatic hyperenzymemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreas divisum, meandering main pancreatic duct, and Wirsungocele were independently associated with chronic asymptomatic pancreatic hyperenzymemia.

Chronic Asymptomatic Pancreatic Hyperenzymemia: A Long-term Follow-up

OBJECTIVES

Chronic asymptomatic pancreatic hyperenzymemia (CAPH) was described as a benign disease. However, we already described clinically relevant findings requiring surgery or follow-up in half of the subjects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of CAPH in terms of symptoms and evolution toward chronic pancreatitis.

METHODS

Subjects previously enrolled in the first phase of the study (from 2005 to 2010) were reinvestigated from December 2013 to January 2017 with a phone call ± magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with secretin stimulation.

RESULTS

A total of 133 subjects were eligible for the follow-up study (75 males, 58 females; age, 48.4 [standard deviation {SD}, 14] years); 24 (18%) of them dropped out. During a mean follow-up of 9.3 (SD, 5.2) years after the first diagnosis of CAPH, no episode of acute pancreatitis or abdominal pain was reported. Sixty-three subjects (58%) of 109 underwent magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with secretin stimulation with a mean follow-up of 5.7 [SD, 3.1] years (range, 1-11 years). Secretin stimulation-MRCP resulted unchanged in 54 (90%) of 60 subjects, worsened in 3 (5%) and improved in 3 (5%). Two subjects died from causes unrelated to pancreatic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Excluding subjects with a pancreatic disease at index magnetic resonance imaging, CAPH is a benign condition.

Chronic Asymptomatic Pancreatic Hyperenzymemia (CAPH): Meta-analysis of pancreatic findings at second-level imaging

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Data estimating the prevalence of significant findings during the investigation of patients with Chronic Asymptomatic Pancreatic Hyperenzymemia (CAPH) are scanty and heterogeneous, and the diagnostic approach is therefore uncertain. The aim of this study was to meta-analyze pancreatic abnormalities detected at second-level imaging in patients with CAPH.

METHODS

Pubmed database was searched until September 2018 for articles evaluating CAPH patients through MRI-Cholangio-Pancreatography with/without secretin (MRCP or s-MRCP) or Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS). The methodology was developed from PRISMA checklist. Pooled prevalences of pancreatic findings were calculated, with subgroup analyses according to imaging modality. Quality of the studies, publication bias and heterogeneity were analyzed.

RESULTS

In 8 articles describing 521 patients with CAPH, pooled prevalence of normal imaging was 56.6% [95%CI (CI) 41.9-70.2; I² = 88.6%). Prevalences of neoplasia, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cysts and benign abnormalities were 2.2% [CI1.2-4.1; I² = 0%], 16.2% [CI10.2-24.8; I² = 71.5%], 12.8% [CI8.2-19.3; I² = 64.7%] and 17.2% [CI11.9-24.2; I² = 71.5%] respectively. In sub-analyses, EUS and s-CPRM were less frequently normal and diagnosed more "early" chronic pancreatitis, while neoplastic lesions were still rare.

CONCLUSIONS

In CAPH patients, second-level pancreatic imaging is normal in 56% of the cases, neoplastic lesions are rare and the rate of pancreatic cysts is similar to that seen as incidental findings. More than one third of patients are diagnosed with abnormalities whose prognostic significance is uncertain. Despite the superior sensitivity of EUS or s-CPRM, the less costly/invasive and more available contrast-enhanced MRCP does not seem to miss relevant findings in this setting.