Histological healing beyond endoscopic healing in ulcerative colitis: Shall we target the "ultra-deep" remission?

Histological inflammatory activity can predict endoscopic relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis who have achieved mucosal healing

BACKGROUND AIMS

Current therapeutic goals in ulcerative colitis (UC) include clinical and endoscopic remission, named mucosal healing (MH). Despite MH, a proportion of patients suffer a clinical relapse, which has been related to histological inflammation. We aimed to identify which histopathological features or histopathological index cut-off was associated with endoscopic relapse (ER) in UC patients with MH.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of UC patients who underwent surveillance colonoscopy showing complete MH (endoscopic Mayo subscore=0) with random biopsies, and at least one more endoscopy along the follow-up. After a consensus meeting, expert pathologist performed histological assessment according to Simplified Geboes Score (SGS), Nancy Index (NI) and Robarts Histopathological Index (RHI). Other histopathological features were also evaluated. Patients were followed until ER or last endoscopy performed showing persistence of MH.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients (150 colonoscopies) were included. After mean follow-up of 31.2 months (SD 21.7), 33 patients (34.7%) suffered ER. Neutrophils in lamina propria (OR 2.6; P = 0.037), within the epithelium (OR 2.6; P = 0.03), SGS ≥3.1 (OR 2.6; P = 0.037), NI ≥2 (OR 2.6; P = 0.03) and RHI ≥5 (OR 2.6; P = 0.037) were associated with ER in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, eosinophils in the lamina propria (HR 2.5; P = 0.01) and clinical remission<12 months (HR 3.2; P = 0.002) were associated with ER.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathological findings in UC patients who have achieved endoscopic MH may predict ER. Standardized histopathology reports according to the presence of neutrophils, eosinophils or to defined cut-off of validated histopathologic indexes may represent a useful tool to predict ER and should be considered at therapeutic and surveillance decision process.

Improved monitoring of inflammatory activity in patients with ulcerative colitis by combination of faecal tests for haemoglobin and calprotectin

Faecal calprotectin (FC) tests and faecal immunological tests (FIT) for haemoglobin have been used to monitor disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) but used alone they have some limitation concerning the predictive ability. We aimed to test if an FC test used in combination with FIT could improve the predictive ability. Consecutive out-patients with UC (n = 93) who were admitted for colonoscopy completed a single faecal sample before the start of bowel preparation. A quantitative CALPRO^® calprotectin ELISA test and a qualitative FIT (cut-off < 40 ng/mL) were analyzed. An estimated Mayo score and a score of histological inflammation was performed blinded to the result of the faecal tests. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value for endoscopic inflammation (Mayo score > 1) was for FIT 85%, 83%, 96%, 57% and for FC > 186 µg/g 73%, 87%, 87%, 54%. Corresponding results for FIT*FC > 186 µg/g (at least one test positive) were 92%, 69%, 97%, 43%. For detecting moderate/severe histological inflammation the results were for FIT 69%, 79%, 92%, 43%, for FC > 75 µg/g 95%, 62%, 98%, 41%, and for FIT*FC > 75 µg/g 100%, 60%, 100%, 36%. None of the markers alone or in combination were useful to predict deep remission (Mayo score = 0 and no histological inflammation). We conclude that using the combination of an FC test and FIT shows minor improvement in predictive ability for inflammatory activity and remission in patients with UC.

Colorectal cancer prevention in patients with ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis is characterized by chronic inflammation, which may lead to the accumulation of high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines within the colonic mucosa, and thus to dysplastic lesions and cancer. Although the trend is decreasing, ulcerative colitis patients still have a 2.4 fold higher risk of colorectal cancer compared to the general population. The key task is to control colonic inflammation, and a rapid step-up approach while closely monitoring intestinal inflammation are recommented. Surveillance colonoscopy program demonstrated its efficacy for reducing the incidence of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis. The impact of medication on the reduction of colorectal cancer risk was hardly investigated and it remains unclear whether they have intrinsic anti-neoplastic properties or only downregulate inflammatory pathways. Several studies showed a decreased risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis patients treated with 5-aminosalicylic acid and chemoprevention with mesalamine compounds is currently recommended. The current level of evidence is too low for thiopurines and anti-TNFα agents. Large, prospective cohort studies are ongoing and are likely to bring new findings about the impact of drugs on colorectal cancer risk in the current era of biologics.