Management of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with chronic kidney disease: position statement of the joint committee of Italian association for the study of the liver (AISF), Italian society of internal medicine (SIMI), Italian society of infectious and tropical disease (SIMIT) and Italian society of nephrology (SIN)

Absence of Viral Replication Is Associated With Improved Outcome in Anti-HCV-Positive Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Presence of active hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may influence the outcome of patients treated for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although this issue has never been adequately assessed in a large series of patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the presence of active HCV affects the survival of patients treated for HCC.

METHODS

This study assessed the outcome of 3123 anti-HCV-positive patients with HCC, subdivided according to the presence of active HCV infection or previous sustained virological response (SVR). Comparisons were also carried out after propensity score matching (PSM) considering demographic, clinical and oncological characteristics.

RESULTS

The median overall survival from HCC treatment was longer in patients with SVR than in those with active HCV infection both before (n = 2118: 61.0 months [95% confidence internal (CI): 56.5-65.5] vs. n = 1005: 51.0 months [95% CI: 43.4-58.6]; p = 0.003) and after PSM (n = 1285: 60.0 months [95% CI: 55.3-64.7] vs. n = 926: 54.0 months [95% CI: 46.7-61.3]; p = 0.030). Active HCV infection was associated with a greater risk of mortality (hazard ratio: 1.22-1.27, p = 0.001) independently of liver- and tumour-related variables, and modality of HCC treatment. Death due to liver failure was more common in patients with active HCV infection (24.5% vs. 17.1%; p = 0.001), while non-liver-related causes of death were more common in patients with SVR (25.0% vs. 17.0%; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SVR is associated with a better outcome in patients undergoing HCC treatment, thus suggesting that these patients may benefit from antiviral therapy for HCV independently of cure of HCC.

EASL position paper on clinical follow-up after HCV cure

Following the advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can be cured in almost all infected patients. This has led to a number of clinical questions regarding the optimal management of the millions of patients cured of HCV. This position statement provides specific guidance on the appropriate follow-up after a sustained virological response in patients without advanced fibrosis, those with compensated advanced chronic liver disease, and those with decompensated cirrhosis. Guidance on hepatocellular carcinoma risk assessment and the management of extrahepatic manifestations of HCV is also provided. Finally, guidance is provided on the monitoring and treatment of reinfection in at-risk patients. The recommendations are based on the best available evidence and are intended to help healthcare professionals involved in the management of patients after treatment for HCV.

Pathological Consequences in Anti-HCV Antibody-Positive Organ Donation to an Anti-HCV Antibody-Negative Recipient

BACKGROUND

The need to expand the pool of available organs for transplantation has meant that the use of marginal organs is increasingly widespread. The advent of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has made it possible to consider the donation of organs from HCV-positive donors and even from viremic donors.

METHODS

In HCV-positive to HCV-negative antibody donor transplantation, the development of antibodies to HCV is uneven, depending on the organ transplanted and with differences in the time of appearance. Whether the subsequent disappearance is attributed to the development of antibodies or the transmission of immunity between donor and recipient remains unclear. In transplantation from an HCV-infected donor to a HCV-seronegative recipient, the administration of antiviral therapy to the recipient before transplantation or a few days after transplantation achieves sustained response in almost all cases. We wanted to deepen the argument by studying the data in the literature, focusing on kidney transplantation, considering that this could be of interest, particularly for possible long-term renal damage.

RESULTS

HCV infection both ongoing and previous, as well as the presence of HCV antibodies alone, can be responsible for kidney damage.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct-acting anti-HCV therapy has revolutionized the treatment of HCV disease and the therapeutic possibilities of transplantation. However, we believe it is useful to keep in mind the pathophysiology of HCV-related damage especially in patients with a long life expectancy, using all emerging strategies to minimize the risk of transmission of infection or development of viremia.

Position paper on liver and kidney diseases from the Italian Association for the Study of Liver (AISF), in collaboration with the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN)

Liver and kidney are strictly connected in a reciprocal manner, in both the physiological and pathological condition. The Italian Association for the Study of Liver, in collaboration with the Italian Society of Nephrology, with this position paper aims to provide an up-to-date overview on the principal relationships between these two important organs. A panel of well-recognized international expert hepatologists and nephrologists identified five relevant topics: 1) The diagnosis of kidney damage in patients with chronic liver disease; 2) Acute kidney injury in liver cirrhosis; 3) Association between chronic liver disease and chronic kidney disease; 4) Kidney damage according to different etiology of liver disease; 5) Polycystic kidney and liver disease. The discussion process started with a review of the literature relating to each of the five major topics and clinical questions and related statements were subsequently formulated. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were graded according to the GRADE system. The statements presented here highlight the importance of strong collaboration between hepatologists and nephrologists for the management of critically ill patients, such as those with combined liver and kidney impairment.