Reflux symptoms in professional opera soloists

Reflux Disease in Singers: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) features in singers.

METHODS

According to the PRISMA statements, two investigators searched the literature related to the prevalence of symptoms, findings, and clinical therapeutic outcomes of reflux in singers through a PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library systematic review.

RESULTS

Of the 91 identified studies, 18 publications met the inclusion criteria, accounting for 2288 singers and 1398 controls, respectively. There were 1243 (54.3%) professional singers, 450 (19.7%) amateurs, 329 (14.4%) singing students, and 102 (4.5%) singing teachers. The LPRD diagnosis and findings were based on objective evaluations in 2/18 studies. According to validated and unvalidated patient-reported outcome questionnaires, reflux symptoms have been found in 25.0% to 65% of singers, with a RSI > 13 in 25.0%-33.9% of cases. The prevalence of LPRD signs ranged from 18.1% to 73.4% of singers without voice complaints and 18.1%-73.4% of singers with voice complaints at the time of the evaluation. No study investigated the pretreatment to post treatment changes in symptoms, findings, and voice outcome. Substantial heterogeneity was found between studies for reflux diagnosis, symptom and sign evaluations, singer profiles (musical styles, voice range), and association outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of symptoms and findings attributed to LPRD can be high in singer populations. However, the nonspecificity of symptoms and findings, the lack of objective reflux testing, and the heterogeneity in the singer profile limit the drawing of valid conclusions for the prevalence of LPRD. Based on the findings collected in this systematic review, the authors proposed a semistructured questionnaire, including key points for primary singer evaluation.

Prevalence of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms, Dysphonia, and Vocal Tract Discomfort in Amateur Choir Singers

INTRODUCTION

Vocal tract discomfort (VTD), dysphonia, and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms are complaints frequently reported by amateur singers. There are two aims of this study. The first is to evaluate the prevalence of these symptoms using validated questionnaires. The second is to correlate singing-related variables with the questionnaire responses.

METHODS

A total of 392 amateur choir singers (ACS) and 514 control subjects completed an online survey divided into four parts: (1) clinical and demographic characteristics, (2) training in singing and singing experience, (3) history of gastroesophageal reflux disease and LPR symptoms, (4) validated questionnaires. Specifically, the reflux symptom index (RSI), the vocal tract discomfort scale (VTDS), and the voice symptom scale (VoiSS) were included to analyze the actual burden related to LPR symptoms, VTD, and dysphonia.

RESULTS

ACS demonstrated a healthier lifestyle and a lower prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in comparison with control subjects. ACS scored significantly higher in VTDS and VoiSS than control subjects, while no differences in the RSI results were found. Significant correlations among the questionnaires' results were demonstrated. Occasional professional singing was the variable influencing VTDS and VoiSS results the most.

CONCLUSION

ACS do not evidently manifest a higher impairment connected to LPR (RSI score), while they do report higher levels of voice (VoiSS score) and vocal tract (VTDS score) impairments, in comparison with control subjects. The relevant correlations among the PRO measures suggest that LPR symptoms, VTD, and dysphonia are related to each other. Given the relevant repercussion on the severity of VTD and dysphonia, providers should specifically ask about occasional professional singing when treating amateur singers.

Voice and Lifestyle Behaviors of Student Singers: Impact of History Gathering Method on Self-Reported Data

OBJECTIVES

This study described voice use and lifestyle information about student singers with a focus on describing differences in self-reported information at study intake compared to data from 21 consecutive days of a voice Log.

METHODS

Twenty-seven student singers estimated voice and lifestyle behaviors at study initiation including daily speaking time, singing/performance time, vocal warm-up, and cool-down minutes; fluid intake; perceived effort when talking, and when singing, among other items. These same parameters were tracked for 21 consecutive days in a voice log kept by the singer at home. Study intake data was compared to the median estimates from the 21-day voice log on each variable using nonparametric statistics.

RESULTS

Student singers reported warming up the voice regularly at study intake (100%), but several logged ≥ 7 days out of 21 without warming up even though all days had singing minutes. Less than half reported voice cool downs at intake, and even fewer logged minutes of cool down in the daily tracking. High occupational voice demands not involving singing were reported by 37%. Large percentages of students reported frustration (63%), worry/anxiety (41%), and depression (26%) regarding their voice in the prior 2 weeks. Estimates at study intake statistically overestimated daily speaking minutes, effort during singing and number of nights eating within 2 hours of sleep compared to the 3-week log.

CONCLUSION

Student singers reported several voice use and behavior items that could impact vocal health. Additionally, how the information was obtained (intake estimate vs. daily log) did alter what was reported for some parameters.

Voice and Lifestyle Behaviors of Student Actors: Impact of History Gathering Method on Self-Reported Data

OBJECTIVES

This study described voice use and lifestyle information about student actors and assessed whether different information is reported at study intake compared to data extracted from a 3-week voice Log.

METHODS

Twenty-five student actors estimated 14 voice and life style parameters at the start of the study. These included daily speaking time, performance time, vocal warm-up, and cool-down time; intake of water, caffeine, and alcohol; perceived voice effort (speaking and performance), among other items. The same parameters were tracked by the actor for 21 consecutive days. Nonparametric statistical comparisons of the estimates at intake to the median estimate from 21 days were applied.

RESULTS

Student actors reported frequent yelling (48%), frustration, anxiety, and depression about their voice (52%, 48%, and 16%), issues with breath support (56%), vocal fatigue (36%), and mild-moderate effort in the speaking (24%) and performance voice (70%). Estimates at study intake statistically overestimated daily speaking, performance, and vocal warm-up time compared to the 3-week Log. Intake reporting underestimated perceived effort in the speaking voice. Intake reporting of vocal fatigue and voice quality did not closely correspond to the Log data.

CONCLUSION

Student actors reported a number of voice use and lifestyle behaviors that may increase their risk for voice problems. Additionally, the method of soliciting the history altered the information reported by the students for several parameters. The findings highlight the need to develop history gathering or other methods that optimize accuracy and reliability of the information sought.