1
|
Gómez Villagrá M, de Frías CP, Martinez-Acitores de la Mata D, Alonso-Sierra M, Alonso-Lazaro N, Caballero N, Sanchez Ceballos F, Compañy L, Egea Valenzuela J, Esteban P, Farráis S, Fernández-Urién I, Galvez C, García A, García Lledó J, González Suárez B, Jiménez-García VA, Lujan-Sanchís M, Mateos Muñoz B, Romero-Mascarell C, San Juan Acosta M, Valdivielso Cortázar E, Giordano A, Carretero C. A comprehensive examination of small-bowel capsule endoscopy in Spanish centers to meet European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy standards. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12:E344-E351. [PMID: 38481597 PMCID: PMC10932730 DOI: 10.1055/a-2252-8946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims In 2019, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) created a working group to develop technical and quality standards for small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) to improve the daily practice of endoscopy services. They developed 10 quality parameters, which have yet to be tested in a real-life setting. Our study aimed to evaluate the accomplishment of the quality standards in SBCE established by the ESGE in several Spanish centers. Materials and methods An online survey of 11 multiple-choice questions related to the ESGE performance measures was sent to Spanish centers with experience in SBCE. In order to participate and obtain reliable data, at least 100 questionnaires had to be answered per center because that is the minimum number established by ESGE. Results 20 centers participated in the study, compiling 2049 SBCEs for the analysis. Only one of 10 performance measures (cecal visualization) reached the minimum standard established by the ESGE. In five of 10 performance measures (Indication, lesion detection rate, terminology, and retention rate) the minimum standard was nearly achieved. Conclusions Our study is the first multicenter study regarding SBCE quality performance measures in a real setting. Our results show that the minimum standard is hardly reached in most procedures, which calls into question their clinical applicability in real life. We suggest performing similar studies in other countries to evaluate whether there is a need for quality improvement programs or a need to reevaluate the minimum and target values published so far.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Noelia Alonso-Lazaro
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Research Group, IIS Hospital La Fe, Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Noemí Caballero
- Gastroenterology/Endoscopy, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | | | - Luis Compañy
- Endoscopy Unit, Hospital General Universitari d'Alacant, Alicante, Spain
| | - Juan Egea Valenzuela
- Unidad de Gestion Clinica de Digestivo, Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Spain
| | - Pilar Esteban
- Gastroenterology, HU Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
| | - Sergio Farráis
- Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Consuelo Galvez
- Gastroenterology, Hospital Clinic Universitari de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Almudena García
- Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Marisol Lujan-Sanchís
- Gastroenterology, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Mileidis San Juan Acosta
- Dept. of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | | | - Antonio Giordano
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Quality of endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer in Italy: A national survey. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:1410-1418. [PMID: 35753948 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major healthcare problem all over the world and screening is effective in reducing mortality and increasing survival. Since colonoscopy has a central role in faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based CRC screening and surveillance, consistent quality measures are essential to ensure quality and outcomes. Nevertheless, screening modalities in clinical practice may differ according to the centers experience and the local availability of instrumentation and devices. AIMS to assess the quality of endoscopic screening for CRC and adherence to international guidelines across Gastroenterology Departments in Italy. METHODS All members of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE) were invited to answer a web-based survey. RESULTS Data from 64 hospitals from 17 Italian regions were analyzed. 32/64 (50.0%) were from northern, 12/64 (18.75%) from central and 20/64 (31.25%) from southern Italy. Each center is equipped with a median of 5.0 (3.5-7.0) endoscopists involved in CRC screening, 71.4% of which are gastroenterologists. After a positive FIT, most centers (93.8%) schedule a colonoscopy within 3 months. High-definition video endoscopy is routinely performed in 68.8% and chromoendoscopy in 53.1% of centers. Withdrawal time is ≥6 min in 79.9% and cecal intubation rate is ≥90% in 94.4% of departments. Finally, in 92.7% of centers adenoma detection rate (ADR) overcome the minimum standard of 25%. Analyzing the data by regional areas, a significant higher number of median endoscopic examinations/year (6500 vs 4000 and 3000, respectively, p = 0.024) and of endoscopists per center (6.5 vs 5.0 and 3.5, respectively, p < 0.001) has been registered in the northern compared to central-southern centers. CONCLUSIONS Data from this survey show adequacy and good quality of endoscopic screening for CRC in Italy, highlighting, at the same time, relevant deficiencies and a discrepancy in procedural attitudes between the different centers. These findings call for a urgent action to overcome the shortcomings, refine and homogenize the behaviour of all screening centers in the national territory and improve the outcomes.
Collapse
|
3
|
Lazaridis LD, Tziatzios G, Toth E, Beaumont H, Dray X, Eliakim R, Ellul P, Fernandez-Urien I, Keuchel M, Panter S, Rondonotti E, Rosa B, Spada C, Jover R, Bhandari P, Triantafyllou K, Koulaouzidis A. Implementation of European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recommendations for small-bowel capsule endoscopy into clinical practice: Results of an official ESGE survey. Endoscopy 2021; 53:970-980. [PMID: 34320664 DOI: 10.1055/a-1541-2938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to document international practices in small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE), measuring adherence to European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) technical and clinical recommendations. METHODS Participants reached through the ESGE contact list completed a 52-item web-based survey. RESULTS 217 responded from 47 countries (176 and 41, respectively, from countries with or without a national society affiliated to ESGE). Of respondents, 45 % had undergone formal SBCE training. Among SBCE procedures, 91 % were performed with an ESGE recommended indication, obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), iron-deficiency anemia (IDA), and suspected/established Crohn's disease being the commonest and with higher rates of positive findings (49.4 %, 38.2 % and 53.5 %, respectively). A watchful waiting strategy after a negative SBCE for OGIB or IDA was preferred by 46.7 % and 70.3 %, respectively. SBCE was a second-line exam for evaluation of extent of new Crohn's disease for 62.2 % of respondents. Endoscopists adhered to varying extents to ESGE technical recommendations regarding bowel preparation ( > 60 %), use in those with pacemaker holders (62.5 %), patency capsule use (51.2 %), and use of a validated scale for bowel preparation assessment (13.3 %). Of the respondents, 67 % read and interpreted the exams themselves and 84 % classified exams findings as relevant or irrelevant. Two thirds anticipated future increase in SBCE demand. Inability to obtain tissue (78.3 %) and high cost (68.1 %) were regarded as the main limitations, and implementation of artificial intelligence as the top development priority (56.2 %). CONCLUSIONS To some extent, endoscopists follow ESGE guidelines on using SBCE in clinical practice. However, variations in practice have been identified, whose implications require further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lazaros-Dimitrios Lazaridis
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ervin Toth
- Department of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Hanneke Beaumont
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Xavier Dray
- Sorbonne University, Center for Digestive Endoscopy, Hôpital Saint Antoine, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Rami Eliakim
- Sheba Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Pierre Ellul
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, Malta
| | | | - Martin Keuchel
- Clinic for Internal Medicine, Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simon Panter
- Department of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside District Hospital, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, South Shields, UK
| | | | - Bruno Rosa
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Rodrigo Jover
- Servicio de Medicina Digestiva. Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Anastasios Koulaouzidis
- Pomeranian Medical University, Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, Szczecin, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kozarek R. Underutilization of societal guidelines: occasional or widespread? Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E986-E988. [PMID: 34222617 PMCID: PMC8211483 DOI: 10.1055/a-1399-8891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Kozarek
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rondonotti E, Spada C, Cadoni S, Cannizzaro R, Calabrese C, de Franchis R, Elli L, Girelli CM, Hassan C, Marmo R, Riccioni ME, Oliva S, Scarpulla G, Soncini M, Vecchi M, Pennazio M. Quality performance measures for small capsule endoscopy: Are the ESGE quality standards met? Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E122-E129. [PMID: 33532548 PMCID: PMC7834698 DOI: 10.1055/a-1319-0742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) recently issued a quality performance measures document for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). The aim of this nationwide survey was to explore SBCE practice with ESGE quality measures as a benchmark. Patients and methods A dedicated per-center semi-quantitative questionnaire based on ESGE performance measures for SBCE was created by a group of SBCE experts. One-hundred-eighty-one centers were invited to participate and were asked to calculate performance measures for SBCE performed in 2018. Data were compared with 10 ESGE quality standards for both key and minor performance measures. Results Ninety-one centers (50.3 %) participated in the data collection. Overall in the last 5 years (2014-2018), 26,615 SBCEs were performed, 5917 of which were done in 2018. Eighty percent or more of the participating centers reached the minimum standard established by the ESGE Small Bowel Working Group (ESBWG) for four performance measures (indications for SBCE, complete small bowel evaluation, diagnostic yield and retention rate). Conversely, compliance with six minimum standards established by ESBWG concerning adequate bowel preparation, patient selection, timing of SBCE in overt bleeding, appropriate reporting, reading protocols and referral to device-assisted enteroscopy was met by only 15.5 %, 10.9 %, 31.1 %, 67.7 %, 53.4 %, and 32.2 % of centers, respectively. Conclusions The present survey shows significant variability across SBCE centers; only four (4/10: 40 %) SBCE procedural minimum standards were met by a relevant proportion of the centers ( ≥ 80 %). Our data should help in identifying target areas for quality improvement programs in SBCE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Rondonotti
- Unità Operativa Complessa di Gastroenterologia, Ospedale Valduce, Como, Italy
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Unità Operativa di Endoscopia Digestiva, Università Cattolica, Rome, Italy,Unità Operativa di Endoscopia Digestiva, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sergio Cadoni
- Unità Operativa di Endoscopia Digestiva, Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico, Iglesias, Italy
| | - Renato Cannizzaro
- Struttura Operativa Complessa di Gastroenterologia Oncologica, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Carlo Calabrese
- Unità Operativa Malattia Infiammatorie Croniche Intestinali, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia (DIMEC), Ospedale S. Orsola-Malpighi Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Luca Elli
- Unità Operativa Complessa di Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia-Centro per la Prevenzione e Diagnosi della Malattia Celiaca, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Maria Girelli
- Unità Di Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva, Ospedale di Busto Arsizio, Busto Arsizio, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Unità Operativa di Endoscopia Digestiva, Ospedale Nuovo Regina, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Marmo
- Unità Operativa di Gastroenterologia, Ospedale Curto, Polla, Italy
| | - Maria Elena Riccioni
- Unità Operativa di Endoscopia Digestiva, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Oliva
- Unità Operativa di Gastroenterologia e Epatologia Pediatrica, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Scarpulla
- Unità Operativa di Gastroenterologia, Ospedale M. Raimondi, San Cataldo, Italy
| | - Marco Soncini
- Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Ospedale Alessandro Manzoni, Lecco, Italy
| | - Maurizio Vecchi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Università degli Studi di Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Pennazio
- Divisione di Gastroenterologia U, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cannizzaro R. Colorectal cancer screening in Italy: A survey of gastroenterologists' clinical practices. Dig Liver Dis 2020; 52:931-935. [PMID: 32616464 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Cannizzaro
- Oncological Gastroenterology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Via Franco Gallini 2, 33081 Aviano, PN, Italy.
| | -
- Oncological Gastroenterology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Via Franco Gallini 2, 33081 Aviano, PN, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pennazio M, Rondonotti E, Pellicano R, Cortegoso Valdivia P. Small bowel capsule endoscopy: where do we stand after 20 years of clinical use? Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino) 2020; 67:101-108. [PMID: 32677419 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5985.20.02745-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) was introduced into clinical practice almost 20 years ago and, nowadays, it is an essential tool for the study of the small bowel. SBCE allows a radiation-free examination of the entire mucosal surface of the small bowel with high-quality images, limited invasivity and a good safety profile. Nevertheless, the main limitation of SBCE is the lack of any possible direct therapeutic intervention. Indications for SBCE have evolved throughout the years, from "old" ones such as suspected small bowel bleeding (still the main indication for SBCE) to newer ones such as refractory celiac disease, hereditary polyposis syndromes and Crohn's disease. Thus, nowadays SBCE has a key role in the diagnostic algorithms in many conditions. Furthermore, the introduction in the SBCE field of cutting-edge technologies, as artificial intelligence systems, is likely to shorten the reading time making SBCE even more effective and easy to perform. Preliminary data are extremely promising and solid evidence is being gathered by current studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Pennazio
- University Division of Gastroenterology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy -
| | | | - Rinaldo Pellicano
- University Division of Gastroenterology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Conte D, Triantafyllou K. Small bowel capsule endoscopy: It's time for quality assurance. Dig Liver Dis 2019; 51:824-825. [PMID: 31014941 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Revised: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Conte
- University of Milan, Medical School, Milan, Italy.
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine - Propaedeutic Research Institute and Diabetes Center, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|