1
|
Shiha MG, Sanders DS, Sidhu R. Road map to small bowel endoscopy quality indicators. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2024; 40:183-189. [PMID: 38190352 DOI: 10.1097/mog.0000000000000993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Quality indicators for upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy are well established and linked to patient outcomes. However, there is a perceived gap in the development and implementation of quality indicators for small bowel endoscopy. In this review, we aimed to discuss the development of quality indicators in small bowel endoscopy and their implementation in clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS The proposed quality indicators for small bowel endoscopy focus on process measures, which mainly evaluate the procedural aspects, rather than the outcomes or the overall patient experience. These quality indicators have rarely been studied in clinical practice, leading to a limited understanding of their applicability and impact on patient outcomes and experience. SUMMARY Real-world studies evaluating the quality indicators of small bowel endoscopy are warranted to establish an evidence-based framework for their practical application and effectiveness. Linking these indicators to relevant patient outcomes is crucial for their broader acceptance and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed G Shiha
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - David S Sanders
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shiha MG, Sidhu R, Lucaciu LA, Palmer-Jones C, Ayeboa-Sallah B, Lazaridis N, Eckersley R, Hiner GE, Maxfield D, Shaheen W, Abduljabbar D, Hussain MA, O'Hare R, Phull PS, Eccles J, Caddy GR, Butt MA, Kurup A, Chattree A, Hoare J, Jennings J, Longcroft-Wheaton G, Collins P, Humphries A, Murino A, Despott EJ, Sanders DS. Device-assisted enteroscopy performance measures in the United Kingdom: DEEP-UK quality improvement project. Endoscopy 2024; 56:174-181. [PMID: 37949103 DOI: 10.1055/a-2199-7155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) has become a well-established diagnostic and therapeutic tool for the management of small-bowel pathology. We aimed to evaluate the performance measures for DAE across the UK against the quality benchmarks proposed by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). METHODS We retrospectively collected data on patient demographics and DAE performance measures from electronic endoscopy records of consecutive patients who underwent DAE for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes across 12 enteroscopy centers in the UK between January 2017 and December 2022. RESULTS A total of 2005 DAE procedures were performed in 1663 patients (median age 60 years; 53% men). Almost all procedures (98.1%) were performed for appropriate indications. Double-balloon enteroscopy was used for most procedures (82.0%), followed by single-balloon enteroscopy (17.2%) and spiral enteroscopy (0.7%). The estimated depth of insertion was documented in 73.4% of procedures. The overall diagnostic yield was 70.0%. Therapeutic interventions were performed in 42.6% of procedures, with a success rate of 96.6%. Overall, 78.0% of detected lesions were marked with a tattoo. Patient comfort was significantly better with the use of deep sedation compared with conscious sedation (99.7% vs. 68.5%; P<0.001). Major adverse events occurred in only 0.6% of procedures. CONCLUSIONS Performance measures for DAE in the UK meet the ESGE quality benchmarks, with high diagnostic and therapeutic yields, and a low incidence of major adverse events. However, there is room for improvement in optimizing sedation practices, standardizing the depth of insertion documentation, and adopting marking techniques to aid in the follow-up of detected lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed G Shiha
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Laura A Lucaciu
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital, University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Christopher Palmer-Jones
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital, University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Benjamin Ayeboa-Sallah
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital, University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Nikolaos Lazaridis
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital, University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Robert Eckersley
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - George E Hiner
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Dominic Maxfield
- Department of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Walaa Shaheen
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Duaa Abduljabbar
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Muhammad A Hussain
- Directorates of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Rosie O'Hare
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Perminder S Phull
- Department of Digestive Disorders, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - John Eccles
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Grant R Caddy
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Mohammed A Butt
- Directorates of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Arun Kurup
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Amit Chattree
- Department of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Jonathan Hoare
- Department of Gastroenterology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Jason Jennings
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Paul Collins
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Adam Humphries
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Alberto Murino
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital, University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Edward J Despott
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital, University College London Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - David S Sanders
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fantasia S, Cortegoso Valdivia P, Kayali S, Koulaouzidis G, Pennazio M, Koulaouzidis A. The Role of Capsule Endoscopy in the Diagnosis and Management of Small Bowel Tumors: A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:262. [PMID: 38254753 PMCID: PMC10813471 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Small bowel tumors (SBT) are relatively rare, but have had a steadily increasing incidence in the last few decades. Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and device-assisted enteroscopy are the main endoscopic techniques for the study of the small bowel, the latter additionally providing sampling and therapeutic options, and hence acting complementary to SBCE in the diagnostic work-up. Although a single diagnostic modality is often insufficient in the setting of SBTs, SBCE is a fundamental tool to drive further management towards a definitive diagnosis. The aim of this paper is to provide a concise narrative review of the role of SBCE in the diagnosis and management of SBTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Fantasia
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (S.F.); (S.K.)
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy
| | - Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (S.F.); (S.K.)
| | - Stefano Kayali
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (S.F.); (S.K.)
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy
| | - George Koulaouzidis
- Department of Biochemical Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University, 70204 Szczecin, Poland;
| | - Marco Pennazio
- University Division of Gastroenterology, City of Health and Science University Hospital, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| | - Anastasios Koulaouzidis
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark;
- Department of Gastroenterology, OUH Svendborg Sygehus, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark
- Surgical Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Pomeranian Medical University, 70204 Szczecin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen Y, Wu G, Qu C, Ye Z, Kang Y, Tian X. A multifaceted comparative analysis of image and video technologies in gastrointestinal endoscope and their clinical applications. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1226748. [PMID: 37881626 PMCID: PMC10595015 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1226748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive exploration of endoscopic technologies in clinical applications across seven tables, each focusing on a unique facet of the medical field. The discourse begins with a detailed analysis of pediatric endoscopes, highlighting their diagnostic capabilities in various conditions. It then delves into the specifications and applications of globally recognized capsule endoscopy devices. Additionally, the paper incorporates an analysis of advanced imaging techniques, such as Narrow Band Imaging (NBI), Flexible Spectral Imaging Color Enhancement (FICE), and i-scan, which are increasingly being integrated into ultrathin gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopes. Factors like technological capabilities, light source, camera technology, and computational constraints are evaluated to understand their compatibility with these advanced imaging techniques, each offering unique advantages and challenges in clinical settings. NBI, for instance, is lauded for its user-friendly, real-time enhanced imaging capabilities, making it effective for early detection of conditions like colorectal cancer and Barrett's esophagus. Conversely, FICE and i-scan offer high customizability and are compatible with a broader range of endoscope models. The paper further delves into innovative advances in movement control for Nasojejunal (NJ) feeding tube endoscopy, elucidating the potential of AI and other novel strategies. A review of the technologies and methodologies enhancing endoscopic procedure control and diagnostic precision follows, emphasizing image and video technologies in pediatric endoscopy, capsule endoscopes, ultrathin endoscopes, and their clinical applications. Finally, a comparative analysis of leading real-time video monitoring endoscopes in clinical practices underscores the continuous advancements in the field of endoscopy, ensuring improved diagnostics and precision in surgical procedures. Collectively, the comparative analysis presented in this paper highlights the remarkable diversity and continuous evolution of endoscopic technologies, underlining their crucial role in diagnosing and treating an array of medical conditions, thereby fostering advancements in patient care and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Xin Tian
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Lishui, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Losurdo G, Di Leo M, Rizzi S, Lacavalla I, Celiberto F, Iannone A, Rendina M, Ierardi E, Iabichino G, De Luca L, Di Leo A. Familial intestinal polyposis and device assisted enteroscopy: where do we stand? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 17:811-816. [PMID: 37515779 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2242240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hereditary polyposis syndromes are a group of inherited disorders associated with a high risk of developing colorectal cancer. The best known ones are familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), Peutz-Jeghers (PJS), juvenile polyposis and Cowden syndromes, as well as conditions predisposing to cancer, such as Lynch syndrome. Some of them are characterized by an increased risk of small bowel polyps occurrence. AREAS COVERED Literature search in PubMed was performed in November 2022 and a narrative review was carried out. Since performing small bowel polypectomy is important in such patients, device assisted enteroscopy (DAE) is the key for this procedure. A screening strategy for small bowel polyps is recommended only for PJS. Guidelines endorse either magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) every 1-3 years, according to the phenotype of the disease. Enteroscopy should be considered for therapeutic purpose in patients with a positive VCE or MRI. DAE has a central role in the resection of polyps larger than mm or causing symptoms of subocclusion or intussusception. Both single (SBE) and double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) are indicated and able to resect polyps up to 6-10 cm. American guidelines have restricted the indications to small bowel enteroscopy only to FAP patients with grade IV Spiegelman. EXPERT OPINION Only some groups of patients (PJS, FAP with demonstrated small bowel polyp burden) may benefit from DAE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Losurdo
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Milena Di Leo
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, Milano, Italy
| | - Salvatore Rizzi
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Ilaria Lacavalla
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Celiberto
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea Iannone
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Maria Rendina
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Enzo Ierardi
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Luca De Luca
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, Milano, Italy
| | - Alfredo Di Leo
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Efficacy and safety of double- versus single-balloon retrograde enteroscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 35:365-370. [PMID: 36827530 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Data on the safety and efficacy of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) are conflicting. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of retrograde DBE to SBE. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent retrograde DBE or SBE at a large tertiary referral center from 2008 to December 2018. Outcomes assessed included technical success, diagnostic yield, therapeutics, depth of insertion, and procedural duration. RESULTS A total of 523 (403 DBE, 120 SBE) patients underwent retrograde enteroscopy during the study period. The mean age was 59.4 ± 17.24 and 59.57 ± 16.94 years in DBE and SBE groups, respectively. There was no difference in technical success (91.0% vs. 92.5%, P = 0.85), diagnostic yield (40.9% vs. 40.8%, P = 0.95), and therapeutics (17.1% vs. 19.1%, P = 0.61) between DBE and SBE. Compared to SBE, DBE had significantly shorter mean procedure time (26.5 ± 34.5 min vs. 34.8 ± 29.4 min, P = 0.01) and higher maximal depth of insertion from ileocecal valve (108.1 ± 84.1 cm vs. 73.3 ± 63.4 cm, P = 0.001). Safety events were rare and similar in both groups. CONCLUSION Retrograde DBE is associated with a significantly higher depth of insertion and shorter procedural duration, but similar diagnostic yield and technical success compared to SBE.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee HH, Kim JS, Goong HJ, Lee SH, Oh EH, Park J, Kim MC, Nam K, Yang YJ, Kim TJ, Nam SJ, Moon HS, Kim JH, Kim DH, Kim SE, Jeon SR, Myung SJ. [Use of Device-Assisted Enteroscopy in Small Bowel Disease: An Expert Consensus Statement by the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases]. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY = TAEHAN SOHWAGI HAKHOE CHI 2023; 81:1-16. [PMID: 36695062 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2022.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
The introduction of device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) in the beginning of the 21st century has revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the small intestine. In contrast to capsule endoscopy, the other main diagnostic modality of small bowel diseases, DAE has the unique advantages of allowing the observation of the region of interest in detail and enabling tissue acquisition and therapeutic intervention. As DAE becomes an essential procedure in daily clinical practice, there is an increasing need for correct guidelines on when and how it is to be performed and what technical factors should be taken into consideration. In response to these needs, the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases has developed an expert consensus statement on the performance of DAE by reviewing current evidence. This expert consensus statement particularly focuses on the indications, choice of insertion route, therapeutic intervention, complications, and relevant technical points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Hee Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Su Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeon Jeong Goong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Shin Hee Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Eun Hye Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea
| | - Jihye Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Cheol Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Kwangwoo Nam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Young Joo Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Tae Jun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Joo Nam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Hee Seok Moon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Duk Hwan Kim
- Digestive Disease Center, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Seong-Eun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Ran Jeon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Jae Myung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lee HH, Kim JS, Goong HJ, Lee SH, Oh EH, Park J, Kim MC, Nam K, Yang YJ, Kim TJ, Nam SJ, Moon HS, Kim JH, Kim DH, Kim SE, Jeon SR, Myung SJ. Use of device-assisted enteroscopy in small bowel disease: an expert consensus statement by the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases. Intest Res 2023; 21:3-19. [PMID: 36751042 PMCID: PMC9911273 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2022.00108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The introduction of device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) in the beginning of 21st century has revolutionized the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the small intestine. In contrast to capsule endoscopy, the other main diagnostic modality of the small bowel diseases, DAE has the unique advantages of observing the region of interest in detail and enabling tissue acquisition and therapeutic intervention. As DAE becomes an essential procedure in daily clinical practice, there is an increasing need for correct guidelines on when and how to perform it and what technical factors should be considered. In response to these needs, the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases developed an expert consensus statement on the performance of DAE by reviewing the current evidence. This expert consensus statement particularly focuses on the indications, choice of insertion route, therapeutic intervention, complications, and relevant technical points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Hee Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Su Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeon Jeong Goong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Shin Hee Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Eun Hye Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea
| | - Jihye Park
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Cheol Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Kwangwoo Nam
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Young Joo Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Tae Jun Kim
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Joo Nam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Hee Seok Moon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Duk Hwan Kim
- Digestive Disease Center, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Seong-Eun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Ran Jeon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea,Co-Correspondence to: Seong Ran Jeon, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, 59 Daesagwan-ro, Yongsan-Gu, Seoul 04401, Korea. Tel: +82-2-709-9202, Fax: +82-2-709-9581, E-mail:
| | - Seung-Jae Myung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea,Correspondence to Seung-Jae Myung, Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3010-3917, Fax: +82-2-476-0824, E-mail:
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
[Expert consensus on clinical application management of enteroscopy in children]. ZHONGGUO DANG DAI ER KE ZA ZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PEDIATRICS 2022; 24:1069-1077. [PMID: 36305105 PMCID: PMC9627999 DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2207148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Small bowel disease is one of the difficulties in the diagnosis and treatment of digestive system diseases, and limited examination techniques seriously restrict the diagnosis and treatment level of digestive tract diseases in children. With the wide clinical application of enteroscopy in pediatrics and the optimization of enteroscopy equipment and accessories, enteroscopy technique provides a new method for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric digestive tract diseases, but there are still many issues and challenges in the standardization of clinical operation and endoscopic treatment. In order to standardize the diagnosis and treatment techniques for enteroscopy in children and improve the diagnosis and treatment level of small bowel disease, the Subspecialty Group of Gastroenterology, the Society of Pediatrics, Chinese Medical Association organized experts to fully discuss and formulate the expert consensus on the clinical application management of enteroscopy in children, with reference to the latest advances in the application of enteroscopy in children.
Collapse
|
10
|
Efficacy and Safety of Exploring Deeper Sections of the Infrapapillary Area of the Duodenum by Using Sedative Esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2022; 2022:1381299. [PMID: 35935715 PMCID: PMC9348967 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1381299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Using conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) to evaluate the infrapapillary area is not feasible. The use of sedative EGD may enable endoscopists to investigate the infrapapillary condition of the duodenum. In this study, we aimed to evaluate lesions in the infrapapillary regions by using sedative EGD. Methods In this retrospective observational study, we used the data of patients who underwent sedative EGD examinations at a tertiary hospital in southern Taiwan. The endoscopists evaluated the esophagus, stomach, and proximal duodenum and then attempted to explore the infrapapillary portion of the duodenum as deeply as possible. We assessed the success rate for the exploration of infrapapillary areas. Furthermore, we analyzed specific clinical findings of sedative EGD examination. Results In total, 2973 patients underwent sedative EGD between November 1, 2010, and December 31, 2011. For 2632 of these patients, it was their first sedative EGD examination. In 2511 patients (95.4%), the exploration of the infrapapillary areas was successful. In approximately 10% of the patients, specific findings were detected over the infrapapillary region, and 7 of these patients exhibited clinically significant findings (i.e., gallbladder cancer with metastasis, periampullary Vater adenoma, natural killer cell enteropathy, villous adenoma with moderate dysplasia, infrapapillary duodenal adenoma with dysplasia, duodenal perforation with tumor-like formation, and follicular lymphoma). No patient experienced minor or major adverse reactions during the sedative EGD procedure. Conclusions The current study provided evidence that sedative EGD examination enables a safe, comfortable, and effective endoscopic examination of deeper sections of the duodenum to evaluate the papillary and infrapapillary regions.
Collapse
|
11
|
Noujaim MG, Parish A, Raines D, Gross SA, Cave D, Vance I, Beyer D, Liu D, Hoffman B, Lawrence Z, Castillo G, Pavri T, Niedzwiecki D, Wild D. Use, Yield, and Risk of Device-assisted Enteroscopy in the United States: Results From a Large Retrospective Multicenter Cohort. J Clin Gastroenterol 2021; 55:792-797. [PMID: 32947375 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since 2001, device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) has revolutionized the diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities for managing small bowel pathology. Though commonly performed, there have been no recent large studies to assess the use, yield, and risks of DAE and none that include all 3 DAE modalities. We hypothesized that DAE is safe with high diagnostic and therapeutic yields achieved within reasonable procedure duration and here we present a large retrospective multicenter US study evaluating the use, yield, and complications of DAE. METHODS After obtaining institutional review board approval, electronic records were used to identify all DAE's performed for luminal small bowel evaluation in adult patients at 4 US referral centers (Duke University Medical Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, and University of Massachusetts Medical Center) from January 1, 2014 to January 1, 2019. Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect and analyze a variety of procedure-related outcomes. Using the data pooled across centers, descriptive statistics were generated for the patient and procedure-related characteristics and outcomes; relationships between characteristics and outcomes were explored. RESULTS A total of 1787 DAE's were performed over this 5-year period (392 at Duke University Medical Center, 887 at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 312 at New York University Langone Medical Center, and 195 at University of Massachusetts Medical Center). Of these, there were 1017 (57%) double-balloon, 391 (29%) single-balloon, and 378 (21%) spiral enteroscopies. The mean age of patients undergoing DAE was 66 years and 53% of examinations were performed on women; 18% of patients in the cohort underwent >1 DAE over this time span. A total of 53% of examinations were performed for suspected small bowel bleeding, 31% were directly guided by video capsule endoscopy findings and 8% were performed for abnormal imaging. A total of 85% of examinations used an antegrade approach and DAE took a mean of 45 minutes to complete; 76% of examinations revealed abnormal findings, with vascular, inflammatory, and neoplastic findings seen in 49%, 17%, and 15% of the cohort, respectively. Older age was significantly associated with any abnormal finding, including arteriovenous malformations (P<0.0001); 50% of examinations included a therapeutic maneuver, most commonly argon plasma coagulation/cautery (43%). There were complications in 16 examinations (0.9%) including 2 perforations (0.1%), 6 cases with bleeding (0.3%) and 1 episode of pancreatitis (0.1%). CONCLUSIONS DAE is most commonly performed to evaluate suspected small bowel bleeding and is commonly directed by video capsule findings. DAE is safe, has a high diagnostic yield, with 76% of examinations showing abnormal findings, and frequently features therapeutic maneuvers. Advancing age is associated with abnormal findings on DAE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alice Parish
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Daniel Raines
- Division of Gastroenterology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Seth A Gross
- Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - David Cave
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Iris Vance
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center
| | - David Beyer
- Division of Gastroenterology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Diana Liu
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Benjamin Hoffman
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
| | - Zoe Lawrence
- Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Gabriel Castillo
- Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Tanya Pavri
- Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Daniel Wild
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Skamnelos A, Lazaridis N, Vlachou E, Koukias N, Apostolopoulos P, Murino A, Christodoulou D, Despott EJ. The role of small-bowel endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: an updated review on the state-of-the-art in 2021. Ann Gastroenterol 2021; 34:599-611. [PMID: 34475730 PMCID: PMC8375652 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2021.0652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The impact of small-bowel (SB) capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy on clinical practice, since their introduction 2 decades ago, has been remarkable. These disruptive technologies have transformed the investigation and management of SB pathology and now have a firmly established place in guidelines and clinical algorithms. Furthermore, recent years have witnessed innovations, driven by the demand of new goals in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), such as mucosal healing and evolving strategies based on tight monitoring and accelerated escalation of care. These developments in SB endoscopy have also been paralleled by refinement in dedicated radiological SB imaging technologies. This updated review highlights the current state of the art and more recent innovations with a focus on their role in IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandros Skamnelos
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Hampstead, London, United Kingdom (Alexandros Skamnelos, Nikolaos Lazaridis, Erasmia Vlachou, Nikolaos Koukias, Alberto Murino, Edward J. Despott).,Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece (Alexandros Skamnelos, Dimitrios Christodoulou)
| | - Nikolaos Lazaridis
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Hampstead, London, United Kingdom (Alexandros Skamnelos, Nikolaos Lazaridis, Erasmia Vlachou, Nikolaos Koukias, Alberto Murino, Edward J. Despott).,Genesis Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece (Nikolaos Lazaridis)
| | - Erasmia Vlachou
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Hampstead, London, United Kingdom (Alexandros Skamnelos, Nikolaos Lazaridis, Erasmia Vlachou, Nikolaos Koukias, Alberto Murino, Edward J. Despott).,Army Share Funds Hospital (NIMTS), Athens, Greece (Erasmia Vlachou, Periklis Apostolopoulos)
| | - Nikolaos Koukias
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Hampstead, London, United Kingdom (Alexandros Skamnelos, Nikolaos Lazaridis, Erasmia Vlachou, Nikolaos Koukias, Alberto Murino, Edward J. Despott).,Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece (Nikolaos Koukias)
| | - Periklis Apostolopoulos
- Army Share Funds Hospital (NIMTS), Athens, Greece (Erasmia Vlachou, Periklis Apostolopoulos)
| | - Alberto Murino
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Hampstead, London, United Kingdom (Alexandros Skamnelos, Nikolaos Lazaridis, Erasmia Vlachou, Nikolaos Koukias, Alberto Murino, Edward J. Despott)
| | - Dimitrios Christodoulou
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece (Alexandros Skamnelos, Dimitrios Christodoulou)
| | - Edward J Despott
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Hampstead, London, United Kingdom (Alexandros Skamnelos, Nikolaos Lazaridis, Erasmia Vlachou, Nikolaos Koukias, Alberto Murino, Edward J. Despott)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this study was to provide practical tips to readers on how to perform deep enteroscopy efficiently. RECENT FINDINGS Deep enteroscopy has revolutionized the diagnosis and management of small intestinal conditions in recent years. They are extremely valuable, but may be technically challenging to perform, regardless if it is double balloon enteroscopy, single balloon enteroscopy or spiral enteroscopy. The common issues to these procedures are repetitive motion, extended procedure duration and physical exertion during scope advancement. These situations may in turn lead to a variety of ergonomic issues that need to be addressed accordingly to prevent occupational injuries to the endoscopists and their assistants. Depending on the clinical indications, the technical approach and execution of these procedures may be carried out differently. Some guiding principles may be applied to make performing these procedures more smoothly, effectively and deeply. SUMMARY Careful planning and skilful manipulations are essential to performing an efficient and stress-free deep enteroscopy. There are many simple ways to improve on the ergonomics and performance of these procedures.
Collapse
|
14
|
Chen L, Jia L. Endoscopic management of multiple broken scalpel blades in the gastrointestinal tract: a case report. J Int Med Res 2021; 49:300060520982697. [PMID: 33459108 PMCID: PMC7816537 DOI: 10.1177/0300060520982697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The entry of multiple broken scalpel blades into the gastrointestinal tract with involvement of the stomach, ileum, and colon is rare; no such cases have been reported to date. Whether management of multiple sharp foreign bodies is more effective by endoscopy or surgery remains controversial in clinical practice. We herein describe a 23-year-old man with depression who was admitted to our department 36 hours after swallowing multiple scalpel blades. The patient reported abdominal pain and bloody vomit. A radiograph revealed irregular blade-shaped foreign bodies in the abdomen, and computed tomography confirmed foreign bodies in the stomach, mid-distal segment of the ileum, proximal segment of the ascending colon, liver area of the transverse colon, and lumen of the sigmoid colon. Surgery was immediately suggested as the first-choice treatment, but endoscopy was instead performed after a thorough multidisciplinary discussion. All broken scalpel blades were successfully removed with combined gastroscopy and colonoscopy, and the patient’s postoperative recovery was uneventful. This case demonstrates the vital importance of multidisciplinary management and endoscopy as an appropriate treatment approach even for multiple sharp foreign bodies in patients without perforation or peritonitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisheng Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Lingwei Jia
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cortegoso Valdivia P, Skonieczna-Żydecka K, Pennazio M, Rondonotti E, Marlicz W, Toth E, Koulaouzidis A. Capsule endoscopy transit-related indicators in choosing the insertion route for double-balloon enteroscopy: a systematic review. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E163-E170. [PMID: 33532554 PMCID: PMC7834922 DOI: 10.1055/a-1319-1452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims When capsule endoscopy (CE) detects a small bowel (SB) target lesion that may be manageable with enteroscopy, the selection of the insertion route is critical. Time- and progression-based CE indices have been proposed for localization of SB lesions. This systematic review analysed the role of CE transit indicators in choosing the insertion route for double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE). Methods A comprehensive literature search identified papers assessing the role of CE on the choice of the route selection for DBE. Data on CE, criteria for route selection, and DBE success parameters were retrieved and analyzed according to the PRISMA statement. Risk of bias was assessed through the STROBE assessment. The primary outcome evaluated was DBE success rate in reaching a SB lesion, measured as the ratio of positive initial DBE to the number of total DBE. Results Seven studies including 262 CEs requiring subsequent DBE were selected. Six studies used time-based indices and one used the PillCam Progress indicator. SB lesions were identified and insertion route was selected according to a specific cut-off, using fixed landmarks for defining SB transit except for one study in which the mouth-cecum transit was considered. DBE success rate was high in all studies, ranging from 78.3 % to 100 %. Six of seven studies were high quality. Conclusions The precise localization of SB lesions remains an open issue, and larger studies are required to determine the most accurate index for selecting the DBE insertion route. In the future, 3 D localization technologies and tracking systems will be essential to accomplish this tricky task.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Marco Pennazio
- University Division of Gastroenterology, City of Health and Science University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Wojciech Marlicz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Ervin Toth
- Department of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nardo GD, Esposito G, Ziparo C, Micheli F, Masoni L, Villa MP, Parisi P, Manca MB, Baccini F, Corleto VD. Enteroscopy in children and adults with inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:5944-5958. [PMID: 33132646 PMCID: PMC7584063 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i39.5944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Revised: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes Crohn’s disease (CD), ulcerative colitis and unclassified entities. CD commonly involves the terminal ileum and colon but at the time of diagnosis it can be confined to the small bowel (SB) in about 30% of the patients, especially in the young ones. Management of isolated SB-CD can be challenging and objective evaluation of the SB mucosa is essential in differentiating CD from other enteropathies to achieve therapeutic decisions and to plan the follow-up. The introduction of cross-sectional imaging techniques and capsule endoscopy (CE) have significantly expanded the ability to diagnose SB diseases providing a non-invasive test for the visualization of the entire SB mucosa. The main CE limitations are the low specificity, the lack of therapeutic capabilities and the impossibility to take biopsies. Device assisted enteroscopy (DAE) enables histological confirmation when traditional endoscopy, capsule endoscopy and cross-sectional imaging are inconclusive and also allows therapeutic interventions such as balloon stricture dilation, intralesional steroid injection, capsule retrieval and more recently stent insertion. In the current review we will discuss technical aspect, indications and safety profile of DAE in children and adults with IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Di Nardo
- Chair of Pediatrics, Pediatric Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, NESMOS Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Rome 00189, Lazio, Italy
| | - Gianluca Esposito
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant’ Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00189, Lazio, Italy
| | - Chiara Ziparo
- Chair of Pediatrics, Pediatric Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, NESMOS Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Rome 00189, Lazio, Italy
| | - Federica Micheli
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00189, Lazio, Italy
| | - Luigi Masoni
- Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Rome 00189, Lazio, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Villa
- Chair of Pediatrics, Pediatric Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, NESMOS Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Rome 00189, Lazio, Italy
| | - Pasquale Parisi
- Chair of Pediatrics, Pediatric Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, NESMOS Department, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Rome 00189, Lazio, Italy
| | - Maria Beatrice Manca
- Department of Clinical and Surgical Translational Medicine, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome 00189, Lazio, Italy
| | - Flavia Baccini
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00189, Lazio, Italy
| | - Vito Domenico Corleto
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant’ Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00189, Lazio, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pennazio M, Rondonotti E, Pellicano R, Cortegoso Valdivia P. Small bowel capsule endoscopy: where do we stand after 20 years of clinical use? Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino) 2020; 67:101-108. [PMID: 32677419 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5985.20.02745-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) was introduced into clinical practice almost 20 years ago and, nowadays, it is an essential tool for the study of the small bowel. SBCE allows a radiation-free examination of the entire mucosal surface of the small bowel with high-quality images, limited invasivity and a good safety profile. Nevertheless, the main limitation of SBCE is the lack of any possible direct therapeutic intervention. Indications for SBCE have evolved throughout the years, from "old" ones such as suspected small bowel bleeding (still the main indication for SBCE) to newer ones such as refractory celiac disease, hereditary polyposis syndromes and Crohn's disease. Thus, nowadays SBCE has a key role in the diagnostic algorithms in many conditions. Furthermore, the introduction in the SBCE field of cutting-edge technologies, as artificial intelligence systems, is likely to shorten the reading time making SBCE even more effective and easy to perform. Preliminary data are extremely promising and solid evidence is being gathered by current studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Pennazio
- University Division of Gastroenterology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy -
| | | | - Rinaldo Pellicano
- University Division of Gastroenterology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cortegoso Valdivia P, Rondonotti E, Pennazio M. Safety and efficacy of an enteroscopy-based approach in reducing the polyp burden in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: experience from a tertiary referral center. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 13:2631774520919369. [PMID: 32705081 PMCID: PMC7359414 DOI: 10.1177/2631774520919369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome develop hamartomatous polyps in the small bowel, possibly causing anemia, intussusception, and obstruction. We aimed to evaluate the impact of an enteroscopy-based approach, including both device-assisted and intraoperative enteroscopy, on the reduction of the polyp burden in a cohort of adult Peutz–Jeghers syndrome patients. Materials and methods: A retrospective study was conducted at Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza in Turin, Italy. Consecutive Peutz–Jeghers syndrome patients eligible for device-assisted or intraoperative enteroscopy, between January 2003 and November 2019, were included. Enteroscopy technical issues and complications were recorded. At the time of index enteroscopy, the patients’ clinical records were retrospectively reviewed, and clinical data were recorded until November 2019. Results: Overall, 24 patients were included. Before inclusion, 16/24 patients (66.7%) underwent small bowel surgery for polyp-related complications, 13 of which (81.2%) in an emergent setting. Two patients had a history of small bowel neoplasms. During the timeframe, 47 device-assisted enteroscopies and 9 intraoperative enteroscopies were performed, and 247 small bowel polyps were endoscopically removed. The overall complication rate was 12.8% (8.5% for device-assisted enteroscopy, 22.2% for intraoperative enteroscopy). The median observation time was 108 months: in this timeframe, two patients developed small bowel polyp-related complications requiring emergent surgery. No patients developed small bowel cancer, but nine extra-gastrointestinal neoplasms were recorded. Conclusion: An enteroscopy-based approach appears to be well tolerated and effective in decreasing polyp-related complications in Peutz–Jeghers syndrome patients, thus reducing the need for emergent surgery. Although the prevention of small bowel polyp-related complications remains the main goal in these patients, the high incidence of extra-gastrointestinal neoplasms appears to be a rising issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia
- University Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, City of Health and Science University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Marco Pennazio
- University Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, City of Health and Science University Hospital, Via Cavour 31, 10123 Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hakimian S, Patel K, Cave D. Sending in the ViCE Squad: Evaluation and Management of Patients with Small Intestinal Bleeding. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65:1307-1314. [PMID: 32162121 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06190-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Bleeding from the small intestine remains a clinically challenging diagnostic and therapeutic problem. It may be minor, requiring only supplemental iron treatment, to patients who have severe overt bleeding that requires multimodal intervention. This article provides an up-to-date review of the state-of-the-art of diagnosis and treatment of small intestinal bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahrad Hakimian
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, UMass Memorial Medical Center, 55 Lake Ave. N., Worcester, MA, 01655, USA
| | - Krunal Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, UMass Memorial Medical Center, 55 Lake Ave. N., Worcester, MA, 01655, USA
| | - David Cave
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, UMass Memorial Medical Center, 55 Lake Ave. N., Worcester, MA, 01655, USA.
| |
Collapse
|