The wide phenotypic and genetic spectrum of ABCB4 gene deficiency: A case series

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on genetic cholestatic liver diseases

Genetic cholestatic liver diseases are caused by (often rare) mutations in a multitude of different genes. While these diseases differ in pathobiology, clinical presentation and prognosis, they do have several commonalities due to their cholestatic nature. These Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) offer a general approach to genetic testing and management of cholestatic pruritus, while exploring diagnostic and treatment approaches for a subset of genetic cholestatic liver diseases in depth. An expert panel appointed by the European Association for the Study of the Liver has created recommendations regarding diagnosis and treatment, based on the best evidence currently available in the fields of paediatric and adult hepatology, as well as genetics. The management of these diseases generally takes place in a tertiary referral centre, in order to provide up-to-date approaches and expertise. These CPGs are intended to support hepatologists (for paediatric and adult patients), residents and other healthcare professionals involved in the management of these patients with concrete recommendations based on currently available evidence or, if not available, on expert opinion.

Searching for low phospholipid associated cholelithiasis among patients with post-cholecystectomy biliary pain

INTRODUCTION

Low phospholipid associated cholelithiasis (LPAC) is associated with variants of the adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette subfamily B, member 4 (ABCB4) gene and is characterized by reduced phosphatidylcholine secretion into bile, impairing the formation of micelles and thus exposing bile ducts to toxic bile acids and increasing cholesterol saturation. LPAC is present in 1% of patients with gallstones and post-cholecystectomy pain is common in this group. LPAC is an under-appreciated cause of post-cholecystectomy pain. The aim of this study is to assess a cohort of patients with post-cholecystectomy pain to identify those with clinical features suggesting that further investigations for LPAC would be beneficial.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of the first 2 years of post-operative follow-up for all patients under 40 years of age undergoing cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones at a tertiary centre between January 2016 and December 2017.

RESULTS

258 patients under the age of 40 underwent a cholecystectomy. 50 patients (19.4%) reported abdominal pain post-cholecystectomy. Five patients (1.9%) fulfilled the criteria for suspected LPAC. Family history of gallstones was documented in 33 of 258 (12.8%) of cases. Obstetric history was obtained in 69 of 197 (35%) female patients. None of the five patients identified above who satisfied the criteria of LPAC had the diagnosis of LPAC considered by their treating clinicians.

CONCLUSION

LPAC is an under-recognized cause of post-cholecystectomy pain. Treatment can avoid long-term symptoms and complications. Clinicians should take a family history and obstetric history to alert them to the diagnosis of LPAC.

Clinical outcomes of ABCB4 heterozygosity in infants and children with cholestatic liver disease

OBJECTIVES

Biallelic variants in the adenosine triphosphate binding cassette subfamily B member 4 (ABCB4) gene which encodes the multidrug resistance 3 protein (MDR3) leads to progressive familiar intrahepatic cholestasis type 3. However, monoallelic variants are increasingly recognized as contributing to liver disease in adults. Our aim was to describe the clinical characteristics of MDR3 heterozygous variants in a large cohort of infants and children with cholestatic liver disease.

METHODS

The clinical and genotypic data on pediatric patients seen at King's College Hospital, London, between 2004 and 2022 and found to harbour heterozygous variants in ABCB4 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients amongst 1568 tested were identified with a monoallelic variant (5.9%). The most common presenting problem was conjugated hyperbilirubinemia (n = 46; 50%) followed by cholelithiasis (n = 12; 13%) and cholestatic hepatitis (n = 10; 11%). The median values of liver biochemistry at presentation were: GGT 105 IU/L and total bilirubin 86 µmol/L. Thirty-two genetic variants were identified including 22 missense (69%), 4 deletions (13%), 5 splice site (16%) and 1 termination (3%). At a median follow up of 1 year there was resolution of liver disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Rare variants in ABCB4 were found amongst infants and children with cholestatic liver disease. The presenting problems were variable and abnormalities tended to normalize over time. Those with severe mutations could develop liver disease later in life when exposed to further insult and should be counseled appropriately.

Influence of the Bile Acid Transporter Genes ABCB4, ABCB8, and ABCB11 and the Farnesoid X Receptor on the Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid in Patients with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

The prevalence of NAFLD and NASH is increasing worldwide, and there is no approved medical treatment until now. Evidence has emerged that interfering with bile acid metabolism may lead to improvement in NASH. In this study, 28 patients with elevated cholestatic liver function tests (especially GGT) were screened for bile acid gene polymorphisms and treated with UDCA. All patients had a bile acid gene polymorphism in ABCB4 or ABCB11. Treatment with UDCA for 12 months significantly reduced GGT in all patients and ALT in homozygous patients. No difference in fibrosis was observed using FIb-4, NFS, and transient elastography (TE). PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 were the most common NASH-associated polymorphisms, and patients with TM6SF2 showed a significant reduction in GGT and ALT with the administration of UDCA. In conclusion, NASH patients with elevated GGT should be screened for bile acid gene polymorphisms, as UDCA therapy may improve liver function tests. However, no difference in clinical outcomes, such as progression to cirrhosis, has been observed using non-invasive tests (NITs).

Molecular and Clinical Links between Drug-Induced Cholestasis and Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis

Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury (iDILI) represents an actual health challenge, accounting for more than 40% of hepatitis cases in adults over 50 years and more than 50% of acute fulminant hepatic failure cases. In addition, approximately 30% of iDILI are cholestatic (drug-induced cholestasis (DIC)). The liver's metabolism and clearance of lipophilic drugs depend on their emission into the bile. Therefore, many medications cause cholestasis through their interaction with hepatic transporters. The main canalicular efflux transport proteins include: 1. the bile salt export pump (BSEP) protein (ABCB11); 2. the multidrug resistance protein-2 (MRP2, ABCC2) regulating the bile salts' independent flow by excretion of glutathione; 3. the multidrug resistance-1 protein (MDR1, ABCB1) that transports organic cations; 4. the multidrug resistance-3 protein (MDR3, ABCB4). Two of the most known proteins involved in bile acids' (BAs) metabolism and transport are BSEP and MDR3. BSEP inhibition by drugs leads to reduced BAs' secretion and their retention within hepatocytes, exiting in cholestasis, while mutations in the ABCB4 gene expose the biliary epithelium to the injurious detergent actions of BAs, thus increasing susceptibility to DIC. Herein, we review the leading molecular pathways behind the DIC, the links with the other clinical forms of familial intrahepatic cholestasis, and, finally, the main cholestasis-inducing drugs.