Vedolizumab as the first line of biologic therapy for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease - a systematic review with meta-analysis

Real-life treatment persistence and treatment outcomes of Finnish patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving vedolizumab as first-line biological treatment

Purpose

To analyze treatment persistence and treatment outcomes of vedolizumab as first-line biological treatment in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in a Finnish real-world setting.

Methods

Observational, retrospective, multi-center chart review study that included adult CD and UC patients initiating vedolizumab as first-line biological treatment between 2014 and 2020.

Results

The cohort consisted of 54 CD and 69 UC patients. At month 12, treatment persistence was 84.9 % in CD and 64.7 % in UC. Most vedolizumab discontinuations (CD, n = 11; UC, n = 26) were due to inefficacy. Discontinuations due to adverse events were rare (n < 5). Efficacy improvements were observed in treatment persistent patients at 12 months vs. baseline in the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (CD, 1.8 vs. 3.9, p = 0.001), Partial Mayo Score (UC, 1.0 vs. 4.9, p < 0.001), Physician's Global Assessment (CD, 0.9 vs. 1.8, p < 0.001; UC, 0.4 vs. 2.1, p < 0.001), along with positive endoscopic and biochemical outcomes. Clinical remission was 90.9 % vs. 63.0 % for CD, and 81.6 % vs. 12.3 % for UC, while corticosteroid use was 15.9 % vs. 53.7 % for CD, and 14.6 % vs. 92.8 % for UC at 12 months and baseline, respectively.

Conclusion

Vedolizumab was associated with improvements in efficacy, endoscopic activity, biochemical parameters, and decreased corticosteroid burden when used as a first-line biological treatment.

Real-World Effectiveness of Vedolizumab vs Anti-TNF in Biologic-naïve Crohn's Disease Patients: A 2-year Propensity-score-adjusted Analysis from the VEDOIBD-Study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this observational, real-world evidence, modified intention-to-treat (mITT) study based on prospectively collected data from the VEDOIBD registry was to compare the effectiveness of vedolizumab (VEDO) vs antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) in biologic-naïve Crohn's disease (CD) patients.

METHODS

Between 2017 and 2020, 557 CD patients starting therapy with VEDO or anti-TNF were consecutively enrolled in 45 IBD centers across Germany. Per study protocol, the analysis excluded biologic-experienced patients and those with a missing Harvey-Bradshaw Index score, resulting in a final sample of 327 biologic-naïve CD patients. Clinical remission was measured using the Harvey-Bradshaw Index at the end of induction therapy and after 1 and 2 years. Switching to a different therapy was considered an outcome failure. Propensity score adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to correct for confounding.

RESULTS

The effectiveness of both VEDO (n = 86) and anti-TNF (n = 241) was remarkably high for induction treatment, but VEDO performed significantly less well than anti-TNF (clinical remission: 56.3% vs 73.9%, P < .05). In contrast, clinical remission after 2 years was significantly better for VEDO compared with anti-TNF (74.2% vs 44.7%; P < .05; odds ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.94). Remarkably, only 17% of patients switched from VEDO to another biologic vs 44% who received anti-TNF.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this prospective, 2-year, real-world evidence study suggest that the choice of VEDO led to higher remission rates after 2 years compared with anti-TNF. This could support the role of VEDO as a first-line biologic therapy in CD.

Predictive, preventive and personalised approach as a conceptual and technological innovation in primary and secondary care of inflammatory bowel disease benefiting affected individuals and populations

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a global health burden which carries lifelong morbidity affecting all age groups in populations with the disease-specific peak of the age groups ranging between 15 and 35 years, which are of great economic importance for the society. An accelerating incidence of IBD is reported for newly industrialised countries, whereas stabilising incidence but increasing prevalence is typical for countries with a Westernised lifestyle, such as the European area and the USA. Although the aetiology of IBD is largely unknown, the interplay between the genetic, environmental, immunological, and microbial components is decisive for the disease manifestation, course, severity and individual outcomes. Contextually, the creation of an individualised patient profile is crucial for the cost-effective disease management in primary and secondary care of IBD. The proposed pathomechanisms include intestinal pathoflora and dysbiosis, chronic inflammation and mitochondrial impairments, amongst others, which collectively may reveal individual molecular signatures defining IBD subtypes and leading to clinical phenotypes, patient stratification and cost-effective protection against health-to-disease transition and treatments tailored to individualised patient profiles-all the pillars of an advanced 3PM approach. The paradigm change from reactive medical services to predictive diagnostics, cost-effective targeted prevention and treatments tailored to individualised patient profiles in overall IBD management holds a promise to meet patient needs in primary and secondary care, to increase the life-quality of affected individuals and to improve health economy in the area of IBD management. This article analyses current achievements and provides the roadmap for future developments in the area in the context of 3P medicine benefiting society at large.

Immunogenicity and Loss of Effectiveness of Biologic Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Due to Anti-Drug Antibody Development

Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience a loss of effectiveness to biologic therapy (i.e., anti-TNF therapy, etc.). Therefore, in addition to the adverse effects of the treatment, these patients also face failure to achieve and maintain remission. Immunogenicity, the process of production of antibodies to biological agents, is fundamental to the evolution of loss of response to treatment in IBD patients. The presence of these antibodies in patients is linked to decreased serum drug levels and inhibited biological activity. However, immunogenicity rates exhibit significant variability across inflammatory disease states, immunoassay formats, and time periods. In this review, we aimed to elucidate the immunogenicity and immune mechanisms of antibody formation to biologics, the loss of therapy response, clinical results of biological treatment for IBD from systematic reviews and meta-analyses, as well as to summarize the most recent strategies for overcoming immunogenicity and approaches for managing treatment failure in IBD.

Clinical use of biologics for Crohn's disease in adults: lessons learned from real-world studies

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic armamentarium for managing Crohn's disease (CD) has expanded significantly in recent decades. Several biologics with three different mechanisms of action [anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, anti-integrin α4β7, and anti-IL 12/23] are currently available to manage CD.

AREA COVERED

This narrative review aims to summarize the most significant efficacy and safety data on the use of infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) for the treatment of CD obtained from studies conducted in the real world (RW), compared to the results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

EXPERT OPINION

RW studies reported that biologic agents included in this analysis have higher remission rates and lower adverse event rates than findings from RCTs for treating patients with CD. All biological agents have proven effective and safe in RW studies, even when using biosimilars or switching to subcutaneous administration of the molecules for which they are available. Finally, anti-TNF-α agents, particularly IFX, have a higher rate of adverse events (AEs) than VDZ and UST. Therefore, patients at higher risk of AEs may benefit from other biologics than anti-TNF-α. However, further long-term RW studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab and Vedolizumab in Treating Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

Background

Numerous patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) do not respond to conventional or biological therapy. Adalimumab (ADA) and vedolizumab (VDZ), according to certain research, may be a useful alternative treatment for these people. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of using ADA and VDZ to treat moderate to severe IBD: Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).

Methods

We searched PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Clinicaltrials.gov, and WHO trials registry (ICTRP). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ADA or VDZ with placebo in participants with active CD or UC were included. The primary outcomes were the clinical response and remission at induction and maintenance phases and mucosal healing. The secondary outcome was the incidence of profound negative events. The research used Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 3 (Biostat Inc., USA).

Results

Eighteen RCTs were incorporated, in which 11 studies described the usefulness and safeness of ADA or VDZ in CD patients, and seven studies investigated the efficacy and safety of ADA or VDZ in UC patients. The meta-analysis revealed that both ADA and VDZ treatments were superior to placebo for producing clinical remission and eliciting clinical response at induction and maintenance phases in individuals with moderately to severely active CD or UC. Interestingly, we found that ADA was superior to VDZ as first-line treatment for patients with CD, but not UC.

Conclusion

ADA and VDZ are effective and safe in CD and UC patients. However, RCTs of a larger number of patients are still required for better assessing the safety profile of ADA and VDZ.

Highly multiplexed spatial analysis identifies tissue-resident memory T cells as drivers of ulcerative and immune checkpoint inhibitor colitis

Colitis is a prevalent adverse event associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with similarities to inflammatory bowel disease. Incomplete mechanistic understanding of ICI colitis curtails evidence-based treatment. Given the often-overlooked connection between tissue architecture and mucosal immune cell function, we here applied imaging mass cytometry (IMC) to gain spatial proteomic insight in ICI colitis in comparison to ulcerative colitis (UC). Using a cell segmentation pipeline that simultaneously utilizes high-resolution nuclear imaging and high-multiplexity IMC, we show that intra-epithelial CD8+ T cells are significantly more abundant (and numerically dominant) in anti-PD-1 ± anti-CTLA-4-induced colitis compared to anti-CTLA-4-induced colitis and UC. We identified activated, cycling CD8+ tissue-resident memory T(RM) cells at the lamina propria-epithelial interface as drivers of cytotoxicity in ICI colitis and UC. Moreover, we found that combined ICI-induced colitis featured highest granzyme B levels both in tissue and serum. Together, these data reinforce CD8+ TRM cells as potentially targetable drivers of ICI colitis.

Vedolizumab in Mild-to-Moderate Crohn's Disease Patients Naïve to Biological Therapy: A Multicentric Observational Study

Background

In real-world experience, the number of patients using vedolizumab as first-line biological therapy was low. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in mild-to-moderate Crohn's disease (CD) biologic-naïve patients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective multicentric cohort study with patients who had clinical activity scores (Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI]) measured at baseline and weeks 12, 26, 52, as well as at the last follow-up. Clinical response was defined as a reduction ≥3 in HBI, whereas clinical remission as HBI ≤4. Mucosal healing was defined as the complete absence of ulcers in control colonoscopies. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess the persistence with vedolizumab.

Results

From a total of 66 patients, 53% (35/66) reached clinical remission at week 12. This percentage increased to 69.7% (46/66) at week 26, and 78.8% (52/66) at week 52. Mucosal healing was achieved in 62.3% (33/53) of patients. Vedolizumab was well tolerated, and most adverse events were minor. During vedolizumab treatment, 3/66 patients underwent surgery.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab as a first-line biological agent in patients with mild-to-moderate CD.

Anti-TNF Agents and New Biological Agents (Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab) in the Prevention and Treatment of Postoperative Recurrence After Surgery in Crohn's Disease

Surgery for Crohn's disease (CD) is not curative, as postoperative recurrence (POR) after ileocolonic resection is the rule in the absence of prophylactic treatment. In the present article, we critically review available data on the role of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents and new biologics (including vedolizumab and ustekinumab) in the prevention and treatment of POR after surgery in CD. Several studies (summarised in various meta-analyses) have confirmed the efficacy of anti-TNFs in the prevention of POR. We identified 37 studies, including 1863 CD patients, with mean endoscopic POR at 6-12 months of 29%. Only few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have directly compared thiopurines and anti-TNFs, with controversial results, although the superiority of the latter is supported by several meta-analyses. Infliximab and adalimumab seem equally effective. The combination of anti-TNFs and immunosuppressives should be considered in patients previously exposed to anti-TNFs. Several studies have shown that anti-TNFs remain an effective option to prevent POR also in patients with anti-TNF failure before surgery. In fact, the use of the same anti-TNF before and after surgery might be effective for the prevention of POR. Prophylactic anti-TNF treatment, once started, should be continued long term. Anti-TNFs are also effective for the treatment of established POR. Retreatment with anti-TNFs for POR is a valid strategy even after their preoperative failure. In six studies (including 156 patients) evaluating vedolizumab, mean endoscopic POR at 6-12 months was 41%. The non-randomised comparison of anti-TNFs and vedolizumab has provided controversial results. One placebo-controlled RCT confirmed that vedolizumab is quite effective in preventing POR in CD patients with increased risk of recurrence. Seven studies (including 162 patients) evaluated ustekinumab, with a mean endoscopic POR at 6-12 months of 41%. The comparative efficacy of ustekinumab and anti-TNFs is still unclear. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab seem to be equally effective, although the experience is very limited. In conclusion, to date, anti-TNFs are the most effective agents in preventing and treating POR in CD. Anti-TNFs remain an effective option to prevent POR also in patients with anti-TNF failure before surgery. Vedolizumab seems to be quite effective in the prevention of POR in patients with increased risk of recurrence. Ustekinumab is probably also effective in the postoperative setting, although the comparative efficacy with anti-TNFs or vedolizumab is still unclear.

Clinical profiles and outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis receiving standard and higher-than-standard doses of vedolizumab: findings from a real-world study in Europe

OBJECTIVE

Vedolizumab is an antibody targeting α4β7 integrin used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Patients are commonly prescribed higher-than-standard doses if treatment response is inadequate, but little is known about the drivers and impact of increased dosing. Our objective was to use real-world data to describe vedolizumab dosages in current clinical practice, patient characteristics, physicians' reasons for prescribing vedolizumab, and physician treatment satisfaction.

METHODS

Data were derived from the Adelphi Real World UC vedolizumab Chart Review, a cross-sectional survey of gastroenterologists and their UC patients, conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom between December 2022 and March 2023. Gastroenterologists provided data on patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment and vedolizumab dosage history, reasons for dose choice, and treatment satisfaction.

RESULTS

Data were returned on 448 patients by 112 gastroenterologists. Overall, 83.5% of patients were on a standard vedolizumab dose and 10.3% were on a higher-than-standard dose. The worsening of symptoms was the most cited reason for higher doses. Most reported symptoms at survey were fatigue, abdominal distention or pain, diarrhea, and bowel urgency, with the latter particularly in higher-than-standard dose patients. Patients on higher-than-standard dose had high rates of mild (37.0%) or moderate (26.1%) disease, and low rates of remission (33.8%). Physicians were dissatisfied with treatment control for 2.7% of standard and 26.1% of higher-than-standard dose patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 10% of patients were receiving a higher-than-standard dose of vedolizumab, but despite this were found to have suboptimal clinical outcomes and low physician satisfaction.

Effectiveness and Safety of Vedolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Many observational studies on the use of vedolizumab [VDZ] in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC] have been published in the past few years. We aimed to comprehensively summarise its effectiveness and safety by pooling data only from observational studies.

METHODS

PubMed/Medline and Embase were systematically searched for observational studies on patients with CD and UC treated with VDZ through December 2021. The rates of clinical remission and overall adverse events were the primary outcomes. The rates of steroid-free clinical remission, clinical response, mucosal healing, C-reactive protein normalisation, loss of response, VDZ dose escalation, colectomy, serious adverse events, infections, and malignancies were considered as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

In all, 88 studies comprising 25 678 patients [13 663 with CD and 12 015 with UC] met the inclusion criteria. In patients with CD, the pooled estimate rates of clinical remission were 36% at induction and 39% at maintenance. In patients with UC, the pooled estimate rates of clinical remission were 40% at induction and 45% at maintenance. The pooled estimate of incidence rate of adverse events was 34.6 per 100 person-years. At multivariable meta-regression analysis, studies with increased male proportion were independently associated with higher rates of clinical remission and steroid-free clinical remission at both induction and maintenance, and clinical response at maintenance in patients with CD. Studies with increased disease duration were independently associated with higher mucosal healing rates at maintenance in patients with UC.

CONCLUSIONS

Observational studies demonstrated extensively the effectiveness of VDZ, with a reassuring safety profile.

An update on the safety of long-term vedolizumab use in inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Vedolizumab (Entyvio) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that disrupts the interaction between α4β7 integrin on circulating T-lymphocytes and MAdCAM-1 on the vascular endothelium to prevent their egress to sites of gut inflammation. It has proven therapeutic efficacy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and pouchitis.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review assesses the safety profile of vedolizumab from the registration trial programs, open-label extension studies, observational real-world data, and pooled safety analyses. This includes an evaluation of the long-term overall safety in special populations typically underrepresented in clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Vedolizumab is an effective therapy for inflammatory bowel disease with a well-established safety profile. No unexpected long-term safety signals have been identified. Safety data in pregnancy, in pediatric and elderly populations, in patients undergoing surgery, and in patients with a prior history of cancer are reassuring. Due to its safety merits, we propose that vedolizumab is an excellent candidate for advanced combination treatment with an anti-cytokine approach using another biologic or novel small molecule inhibitor. This is important in patients with medically refractory IBD, in patients at high risk of developing disease-related complications, or in patients with concomitant uncontrolled immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

Gut Microbiome and Metabonomic Profile Predict Early Remission to Anti-Integrin Therapy in Patients with Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have low response rates to anti-integrin medications, necessitating the identification of noninvasive biomarkers for predicting remission to anti-integrin therapy. In this study, patients with moderate to severe UC commencing anti-integrin therapy (n = 29), inactive to mild UC patients (n = 13), and healthy controls (n = 11) were selected. Besides clinical evaluation, fecal samples were collected at baseline and week 14 from moderate to severe UC patients. The clinical remission was defined based on the Mayo score. Fecal samples were assessed with 16S rRNA gene sequencing, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). We identified that Verrucomicrobiota was significantly more abundant in the remission group (P < 0.001) than that of nonremission group at phylum level for patients commencing vedolizumab. GC-MS analysis revealed that the concentrations of butyric acid (P = 0.024) and isobutyric acid (P = 0.042) were significantly higher in the remission group compared to the nonremission group at baseline. Finally, the combination of Verrucomicrobiota, butyric acid, and isobutyric acid improved the diagnosis of early remission to anti-integrin therapy (area under the concentration-time curve = 0.961). We identified significantly higher phylum level diversity of Verrucomicrobiota in remission than the nonremission groups at baseline. Notably, the combination of gut microbiome and metabonomic profiles improved the diagnosis of early remission to anti-integrin therapy. IMPORTANCE It is reported that patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have low response rates to anti-integrin medications in the latest VARSITY study. Therefore, our primary goals were to discover differences in the gut microbiome and metabonomics patterns between early remission and nonremission patients and to explore the diagnostic value in predicting clinical remission to anti-integrin therapy accurately. In this study, we found that Verrucomicrobiota was significantly more abundant in the remission group (P < 0.001) than that of nonremission group at phylum level for patients commencing vedolizumab. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis revealed that the concentrations of butyric acid (P = 0.024) and isobutyric acid (P = 0.042) were significantly higher in the remission group compared with the nonremission group at baseline. Notably, the combination of Verrucomicrobiota, butyric acid, and isobutyric acid improved the diagnosis of early remission to anti-integrin therapy (area under the concentration-time curve = 0.961).

Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab for ulcerative colitis: a single-center retrospective real-world study in China

Introduction: The effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) against ulcerative colitis (UC) have been validated in several randomized controlled trials and real-world studies in Western countries. However, there are few studies on VDZ in Asia, and the follow-up period for these studies is generally short. Therefore, this study evaluates the long-term effectiveness and safety of VDZ in Chinese patients with UC. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with moderate to severe UC treated with VDZ between September 2019 and April 2022 at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine Zhejiang University. Clinical response and remission were assessed using the patient reported outcomes and the partial Mayo Score, and mucosal remission and healing were assessed using the Mayo Endoscopy Score. The primary endpoint was defined as clinical remission at week 14, and secondary endpoints included clinical response and steroid-free clinical remission at week 14, clinical response, clinical remission, and steroid-free clinical remission at week 52, and mucosal remission and healing at weeks 14 ± 8 and 52 ± 8. Results: Overall, 64 patients with moderate to severe UC were enrolled. The clinical response, clinical remission, and steroid-free clinical remission rates at week 14 were 73.4% (47/64), 65.6% (42/64), and 54.7% (35/64), respectively. Mucosal remission and healing rates at week 14 ± 8 were 64.7% (22/34) and 38.2% (13/34), respectively. A total of 48 patients were treated with VDZ for 52 weeks. Based on intention-to-treat analysis, the clinical response, clinical remission, and steroid-free clinical remission rates at week 52 were 68.8% (44/64), 64.1% (41/64), and 64.1% (41/64), respectively. Mucosal remission and healing rates at week 52 ± 8 were 70.6% (12/17) and 35.3% (6/17), respectively. During the follow-up period, the most common adverse event was skin rash (6/64). No cases of acute infusion reactions, delayed allergic reactions, new hepatitis B infections, active tuberculosis, or malignant tumors were reported. Conclusion: In this single-center retrospective real-world study, the effectiveness of long-term use of VDZ for Chinese patients with UC was similar to the outcomes previously reported in other geographical regions and populations; no new safety signals were found compared with other registered studies.

Vedolizumab for acute gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and efficacy of vedolizumab for the prophylaxis and treatment of gastrointestinal involvement of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (GI-aGVHD).

METHODS

Literature search within PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for observational studies and clinical trials that evaluated the effect of vedolizumab on GI-aGVHD was done through 17 May 2022. A bivariate and random-effect meta-analysis derived the pooled observational percentages and pooled risk ratios (RRs) from baseline of primary endpoints including overall response, complete response, mortality, and adverse events.

RESULTS

There was a total of 122 participants in eight eligible studies, including one study on the prophylactic use of vedolizumab and seven studies on vedolizumab for the treatment of GI-aGVHD. Of seven studies that reported details on baseline grades of GI-aGVHD, a total of 47 patients (47.95%) were of stage 4, 31 patients (31.63%) were of stage 3, 10 patients (10.2%) were of stage 2, and 10 patients (10.2%) were of stage 1. The use of vedolizumab for the treatment of GI-aGVHD yielded a significantly improved objective response rate (ORR) at 14 days (pooled ORR = 60.53%, pooled RR = 14.14, 95% CI: 2.95-67.71), 28 days (pooled ORR = 50%, RR = 7.36, 95% CI = 2.14-25.37), and 12 months (pooled ORR = 76.92%, RR = 13.66, 95% CI = 3.5-53.35) from baseline. Likewise, the use of vedolizumab was followed by a significantly improved complete response (CR) at 12 months (pooled CR = 27.27%, RR = 5.50, 95% CI = 1.01-29.95), yet the CR at 14 days and 28 days did not reach statistical significance. Fifty-seven out of 87 (pooled overall survival, OS = 34.5%) and 46 out of 65 (pooled OS = 29.2%) patients expired at 6 and 12 months after the use of vedolizumab, respectively. Prophylactic use of vedolizumab was not associated with any specific type of reported adverse events, while patients with GI-aGVHD on vedolizumab presented with significantly increased risks of adverse events including infections (RR = 7.55) and impaired metabolism or nutritional complications (RR = 9.00). All analyses were of a low heterogeneity (all I-squares = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Vedolizumab was safe and effective for the prophylaxis and management of early grade GI-aGVHD. More clinical evidence is warranted to validate these findings.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=345584, identifier CRD42022345584.

Vedolizumab as the First-Line of Biologicals for Pediatric Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

PURPOSE

Vedolizumab (VDZ) was reported to be effective as a first-line biological in adult ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of VDZ as the first-line biological in pediatric refractory UC.

METHODS

We retrospectively extracted data from pediatric patients with UC who received first-line VDZ. The following were recorded: baseline characteristics; clinical activity of intestinal disease, levels of fecal calprotectin (FC), C-reactive protein, and serum amyloid A; and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Clinical effectiveness, biochemical remission, and safety of VDZ were also investigated.

FINDINGS

Eight patients were identified (median age, 12 years). FC levels were abnormal in all cases and were remarkably elevated in 3 patients. C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate values were abnormal in 2, 4, and 5 patients, respectively. According to the pediatric UC activity index score, 1, 5, and 2 patients had mild, moderate, and severe disease. Fourteen weeks after VDZ administration, 5 patients achieved remission, and 3 remained in remission until week 52. Of the 3 patients who did not reach remission in week 14, two achieved remission by week 52. In week 52, five of the eight patients continued receiving VDZ and maintained remission. All patients achieved clinical remission without corticosteroid use. No adverse events were observed in any patient.

IMPLICATIONS

VDZ may serve as a safe and effective first-line biological option for treating pediatric patients with UC. FC levels before VDZ administration may be predictive of long-term remission.