1
|
Fantasia S, Cortegoso Valdivia P, Kayali S, Koulaouzidis G, Pennazio M, Koulaouzidis A. The Role of Capsule Endoscopy in the Diagnosis and Management of Small Bowel Tumors: A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:262. [PMID: 38254753 PMCID: PMC10813471 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Small bowel tumors (SBT) are relatively rare, but have had a steadily increasing incidence in the last few decades. Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and device-assisted enteroscopy are the main endoscopic techniques for the study of the small bowel, the latter additionally providing sampling and therapeutic options, and hence acting complementary to SBCE in the diagnostic work-up. Although a single diagnostic modality is often insufficient in the setting of SBTs, SBCE is a fundamental tool to drive further management towards a definitive diagnosis. The aim of this paper is to provide a concise narrative review of the role of SBCE in the diagnosis and management of SBTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Fantasia
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (S.F.); (S.K.)
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy
| | - Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (S.F.); (S.K.)
| | - Stefano Kayali
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (S.F.); (S.K.)
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy
| | - George Koulaouzidis
- Department of Biochemical Sciences, Pomeranian Medical University, 70204 Szczecin, Poland;
| | - Marco Pennazio
- University Division of Gastroenterology, City of Health and Science University Hospital, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| | - Anastasios Koulaouzidis
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark;
- Department of Gastroenterology, OUH Svendborg Sygehus, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark
- Surgical Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Pomeranian Medical University, 70204 Szczecin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chetcuti Zammit S, Yadav A, McNamara D, Bojorquez A, Carretero-Ribón C, Keuchel M, Baltes P, Margalit-Yehuda R, Kopylov U, Sidhu R, Marmo C, Riccioni ME, Dray X, Leenhardt R, Rondonotti E, Giulia S, Micallef K, Ellul P. Where does capsule endoscopy fit in the diagnostic algorithm of small bowel intussusception? Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:1719-1724. [PMID: 37394371 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The investigation of small bowel (SB) intussusception is variable, reflecting the lack of existing standards. The aim of this study was to understand the role of small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) to investigate this pathology. METHODOLOGY This was a retrospective multi-centre study. Patients with intussusception on SBCE and those where SBCE was carried out due to findings of intussusception on radiological investigations were included. Relevant information was collected. RESULTS Ninety-five patients (median age 39+/-SD19.1 years, IQR 30) were included. Radiological investigations were carried out in 71 patients (74.7%) prior to SBCE with intussusception being present in 60 patients on radiological investigations (84.5%). Thirty patients (42.2%) had intussusception on radiological investigations followed by a normal SBCE. Ten patients (14.1%) had findings of intussusception on radiological investigations, a normal SBCE and repeat radiological investigations that were also normal. Abnormal findings were noted on SBCE that could explain intussusception on imaging in (16 patients) 22.5% of patients. Five patients (5.3%) underwent radiological investigations and SBCE to investigate coeliac disease and intussusception. None had associated malignancy. Four patients (4.2%) underwent SBCE to investigate familial polyposis syndromes and went on to SB enteroscopy and surgery accordingly. Most patients (n = 14; 14.8%) with intussusception on initial SBCE (without prior radiological imaging) had suspected SB bleeding (n = 10, 10.5%). Four patients (4.2%) had additional findings of a mass on CT scan and went on to have surgery. CONCLUSION SBCE should be used to complement radiology when investigating intussusception. It is a safe non-invasive test that will minimise unnecessary surgery. Additional radiological investigations following a negative SBCE in cases of intussusception noted on initial radiological investigations are unlikely to yield positive findings. Radiological investigations following intussusception noted on SBCE in case of patients presenting with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, may yield additional findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aman Yadav
- TAGG Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Deirdre McNamara
- TAGG Research Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Alejandro Bojorquez
- Departamento de Digestivo, Unidad de Endoscopia, Unidad de Prevención de Tumores Digestivos, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Cristina Carretero-Ribón
- Departamento de Digestivo, Unidad de Endoscopia, Unidad de Prevención de Tumores Digestivos, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Martin Keuchel
- Clinic for Internal Medicine, Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf, Hamburg, Germany; Clinic for Gastroenterology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter Baltes
- Clinic for Internal Medicine, Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf, Hamburg, Germany; Clinic for Gastroenterology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Uri Kopylov
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Academic Unit of gastroenterology, Sheffield teaching hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Dept of Infection, Immunity and cardiovascular disease, University of Sheffield
| | - Clelia Marmo
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Elena Riccioni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Xavier Dray
- Sorbonne Université, Centre d'Endoscopie Digestive, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Romain Leenhardt
- Sorbonne Université, Centre d'Endoscopie Digestive, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, APHP, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Pierre Ellul
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida MSD 2090, Malta
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vlachou E, Koffas A, Toumpanakis C, Keuchel M. Updates in the diagnosis and management of small-bowel tumors. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 64-65:101860. [PMID: 37652650 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Small-bowel tumors represent a rare entity comprising 0.6% of all new cancer cases in the US, and only 3% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms. They are a heterogenous group of neoplasms comprising of about forty different histological subtypes with the most common being adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors, stromal tumors and lymphomas. Their incidence has been reportedly increasing over recent years, partly owing to the advances and developments in the diagnostic modalities. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy, device assisted enteroscopy and dedicated small-bowel cross-sectional imaging are complimentary tools, supplementing each other in the diagnostic process. Therapeutic management of small-bowel tumors largely depends on the histological type and staging at diagnosis. The aim of the present review article is to discuss relevant advances in the diagnosis and management of small-bowel tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erasmia Vlachou
- Evgenidion Clinic Agia Trias SA, Papadiamantopoulou 20, Athens, 11528, Greece.
| | - Apostolos Koffas
- Gastrointestinal and Liver Services, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel Rd, London, E1 1FR, UK.
| | - Christos Toumpanakis
- Centre for Gastroenterology, Neuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, Pond St, London, NW3 2QG, UK.
| | - Martin Keuchel
- Clinic for Internal Medicine, Agaplesion Bethesda Krankenhaus Bergedorf, Glindersweg 80, 21029, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cortegoso Valdivia P, Deding U, Bjørsum-Meyer T, Baatrup G, Fernández-Urién I, Dray X, Boal-Carvalho P, Ellul P, Toth E, Rondonotti E, Kaalby L, Pennazio M, Koulaouzidis A. Inter/Intra-Observer Agreement in Video-Capsule Endoscopy: Are We Getting It All Wrong? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:2400. [PMID: 36292089 PMCID: PMC9600122 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Video-capsule endoscopy (VCE) reading is a time- and energy-consuming task. Agreement on findings between readers (either different or the same) is a crucial point for increasing performance and providing valid reports. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to provide an evaluation of inter/intra-observer agreement in VCE reading. A systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science was performed throughout September 2022. The degree of observer agreement, expressed with different test statistics, was extracted. As different statistics are not directly comparable, our analyses were stratified by type of test statistics, dividing them in groups of "None/Poor/Minimal", "Moderate/Weak/Fair", "Good/Excellent/Strong" and "Perfect/Almost perfect" to report the proportions of each. In total, 60 studies were included in the analysis, with a total of 579 comparisons. The quality of included studies, assessed with the MINORS score, was sufficient in 52/60 studies. The most common test statistics were the Kappa statistics for categorical outcomes (424 comparisons) and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for continuous outcomes (73 comparisons). In the overall comparison of inter-observer agreement, only 23% were evaluated as "good" or "perfect"; for intra-observer agreement, this was the case in 36%. Sources of heterogeneity (high, I2 81.8-98.1%) were investigated with meta-regressions, showing a possible role of country, capsule type and year of publication in Kappa inter-observer agreement. VCE reading suffers from substantial heterogeneity and sub-optimal agreement in both inter- and intra-observer evaluation. Artificial-intelligence-based tools and the adoption of a unified terminology may progressively enhance levels of agreement in VCE reading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Ulrik Deding
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Thomas Bjørsum-Meyer
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Gunnar Baatrup
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Xavier Dray
- Center for Digestive Endoscopy, Sorbonne University, Saint Antoine Hospital, APHP, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Pedro Boal-Carvalho
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Creixomil, 4835 Guimarães, Portugal
| | - Pierre Ellul
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, 2090 Msida, Malta
| | - Ervin Toth
- Department of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, 20502 Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Lasse Kaalby
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Marco Pennazio
- University Division of Gastroenterology, City of Health and Science University Hospital, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Anastasios Koulaouzidis
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Medicine, OUH Svendborg Sygehus, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark
- Surgical Research Unit, OUH, 5000 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|