Splenic-hepatic elastography index is useful in differentiating between porto-sinusoidal vascular disease and cirrhosis in patients with portal hypertension

Elevated Hepatic Copper Content in Porto-Sinusoidal Vascular Disorder (PSVD): Leading Down a Wrong Track

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) is a rare vascular liver disorder characterised by specific histological findings in the absence of cirrhosis, which is poorly understood in terms of pathophysiology. While elevated hepatic copper content serves as diagnostic hallmark in Wilson disease (WD), hepatic copper content has not yet been investigated in PSVD.

METHODS

Patients with a verified diagnosis of PSVD at the Medical University of Vienna and available hepatic copper content at the time of diagnosis of PSVD were retrospectively included. Elevated hepatic copper content was correlated with cholestatic changes and WD diagnostics in PSVD and analysed for liver-related outcomes (first/further hepatic decompensation/liver-related death).

RESULTS

Overall, 92 patients were included into this study (mean age 49 ± 16; 57% male; median hepatic copper content was 30 [IQR: 18-55] μg/g) of whom 29 (32%) had moderately (≥ 50 μg/g) and 4 (4%) strongly (≥ 250 μg/g) elevated hepatic copper content. Elevated levels of hepatic copper were associated with younger age in multivariable linear regression analysis. After adjusting for age, decompensation status and albumin, hepatic copper content was significantly associated with the outcome of interest (log, per 10; aHR: 1.60 [95% CI: 1.14-2.25]; p = 0.007). A hepatic copper cut-off at ≥ 90 μg/g identified PSVD patients with considerable risk of liver-related outcomes (at 2 years: 51% vs. 12%).

CONCLUSION

Elevated hepatic copper seems frequent in patients with PSVD even in the absence of cholestatic features, especially in young patients, which makes differential diagnosis to WD challenging. Since PSVD patients with elevated hepatic copper content had increased risk for liver-related outcomes, the pathomechanisms underlying hepatic copper accumulation in PSVD should be investigated as this may open new therapeutic avenues.

Performance of spleen stiffness measurement to rule out high-risk varices in patients with porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Baveno VII consensus suggests that screening endoscopy can be spared in patients with compensated cirrhosis when spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is ≤40 kPa as they have a low probability of high-risk varices (HRV). Conversely, screening endoscopy is required in all patients with porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD). This study aimed to evaluate the performance of SSM-VCTE to rule out HRV in patients with PSVD and signs of portal hypertension.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We retrospectively included patients with PSVD, ≥1 sign of portal hypertension, without a history of variceal bleeding, who underwent an SSM-VCTE within 2 years before or after an upper endoscopy in 21 VALDIG centers, divided into a derivation and a validation cohort. One hundred fifty-four patients were included in the derivation cohort; 43% had HRV. By multivariable logistic regression analysis, SSM-VCTE >40 kPa and serum bilirubin ≥1 mg/dL were associated with HRV. SSM-VCTE ≤40 kPa combined with bilirubin <1 mg/dL had a sensitivity of 96% to rule out HRV and could spare 38% of screening endoscopies, with 4% of HRV missed, and a 95% negative predictive value. In the validation cohort, including 155 patients, SSM combined with bilirubin could spare 21% of screening endoscopies, with 4% of HRV missed and a 94% negative predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

This study gathering a total of 309 patients with PSVD showed that SSM-VCTE ≤40 kPa combined with bilirubin <1 mg/dL identifies patients with PSVD and portal hypertension with a probability of HRV <5%, in whom screening endoscopy can be spared.

Porto-Sinusoidal Vascular Disease and Downhill Varices: Separate Clinical Entities?

Introduction

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) is an entity characterized by the absence of histologic liver cirrhosis and the detection of specific or non-specific histological findings, irrespective of the presence of portal hypertension (PHT). The pathogenesis remains poorly understood. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), independently of the presence of PHT, can be associated with an increase in central venous pressure, which can rarely lead to the development of downhill varices in the proximal esophagus.

Case Presentation

A 53-year-old woman, with an unremarkable medical and pharmacological history, presented with a 3-day history of melena, epigastric pain and hematemesis. Physical examination revealed bilateral peripheral edema of the legs. Laboratory findings included severe anemia, normal hepatic enzymology, and NT-proBNP 1,748 pg/mL. Endoscopy showed large proximal esophageal varices and mild hypertensive gastropathy. A complete liver disease etiology panel was negative. Ultrasound showed an irregular liver surface, splenomegaly, and dilated supra-hepatic veins and inferior vena cava. Echocardiogram revealed significant cardiac valve and cavity abnormalities, especially on the right side, as well as moderate to severe PAH. Diuretics therapy was started with clinical improvement. Beta-blockers were suspended due to intolerance. There were no images suggestive of portosystemic collateralization on angiography. Re-evaluation endoscopy showed large but reduced esophageal varices, without red spots. Cardiopulmonary hemodynamic assessment revealed moderate PAH (40 mm Hg). Liver hemodynamic study revealed non-clinically significant sinusoidal PHT. Transjugular liver biopsy revealed nodular regenerative hyperplasia suggestive of PSVD.

Discussion/Conclusion

The case was complex and presented diagnostic challenges, illustrating the uncommonly reported association between PSVD and porto-pulmonary hypertension and the importance of the transjugular liver biopsy and pressure measurements to confirm both diagnoses.

Imaging in Vascular Liver Diseases

Vascular liver diseases (VLDs) include different pathological conditions that affect the liver vasculature at the level of the portal venous system, hepatic artery, or venous outflow system. Although serological investigations and sometimes histology might be required to clarify the underlying diagnosis, imaging has a crucial role in highlighting liver inflow or outflow obstructions and their potential causes. Cross-sectional imaging provides a panoramic view of liver vascular anatomy and parenchymal patterns of enhancement, making it extremely useful for the diagnosis and follow-up of VLDs. Nevertheless, multiparametric ultrasound analysis provides information useful for differentiating acute from chronic portal vein thrombosis, distinguishing neoplastic invasion of the portal vein from bland thrombus, and clarifying the causes of venous outflow obstruction. Color Doppler analysis measures blood flow velocity and direction, which are very important in the assessment of VLDs. Finally, liver and spleen elastography complete the assessment by providing intrahepatic and intrasplenic stiffness measurements, offering further diagnostic information.

Porto-Sinusoidal Vascular Disease: A New Nomenclature Different from Idiopathic Non-Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) as a novel clinical conception was modified on the basis of idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH). This study aimed to compare the clinical, biochemical histological features and prognosis between the diagnostic criteria for PSVD and that of INCPH.

METHODS

A total of 65 patients who underwent liver biopsies were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical, pathological and prognosis date were reviewed and screened according to the latest diagnostic criteria of PSVD and INCPH.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients were diagnosed with PSVD, of which 31 (47.69%) also fulfilled INCPH criteria. Specific histological and specific clinical portal hypertension (PH) signs were found in 34 (52.31%) and 30 (46.15%) of the patients, respectively. PSVD patients showed higher LSM levels (11.45 (6.38, 18.08) vs. 7.90 (6.70, 13.00), p = 0.039) than the INCPH patients. INCPH patients had a higher cumulative incidence of liver-related complications than the PSVD patients (86.95% vs. 35.71%, log-rank p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Novel PSVD criteria facilitate early diagnosis. PSVD patients with other liver diseases may have higher LSM values. Disease progression and survival outcomes are correlated with PH in PSVD patients.

Porto-sinusoidal Vascular Disease: Classification and Clinical Relevance

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) is a well-recognized clinico-pathological entity, which is associated with clinical signs and symptoms, imaging, and endoscopic features of portal hypertension (PHT), in absence of cirrhosis. In patients with NCPH without known risk factors of PHT or extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis, the condition is called idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH). There are multiple infectious, immune related causes, systemic diseases, drug and toxin exposures, haematological disorders, and metabolic risk factors that have been associated with this INCPH. However, the causal pathogenesis is still unclear. The Vascular liver disorders interest group group recently proposed porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) as a syndromic entity, which provides definite histopathological criteria for diagnosis of NCPH (table 1). The three classical histo-morphological lesions specific for PSVD include obliterative portal venopathy, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, and incomplete septal fibrosis. The PSVD definition includes patients with portal vein thrombosis, PVT, and even those without PHT, thus broadening the scope of diagnosis to include patients who may have presented early, prior to haemodynamic changes consistent with PHT. However, this new diagnosis has pros and cons. The cons include mandating invasive liver biopsy to assess the PSVD histological triad in all patients with NCPH, an erstwhile clinical diagnosis in Asian patients. In addition, the natural history of the subclinical forms of PSVD without PHT and linear progression to develop PHT is unknown yet. In this review, we discuss the diagnosis and treatment of INCPH/PSVD, fallacies and strengths of the old and new schema, pathobiology of this disease, and clinical correlates in an Asian context. Although formulation of standardised diagnostic criteria is useful for comparison of clinical cohorts with INCPH/PSVD, prospective clinical validation in global cohorts is necessary to avoid misclassification of vascular disorders of the liver.

Clinical characteristics and natural history of porto-sinusoidal vascular disease: A cohort study of 234 patients in China

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) is an under-recognized and under-diagnosed disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical features and prognosis of PSVD.

METHODS

The patients who underwent liver biopsies were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical and pathological data were reviewed and screened according to the latest diagnostic criteria of PSVD.

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients were diagnosed as PSVD, including 103 patients presented with portal hypertension (PH) and 131 patients without PH. At baseline, the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) levels were higher in the no-PH group. The liver stiffness increased in the PH group. In histological review, obliterative portal venopathy, sinusoidal dilatation and architectural disturbance were more common in the PH group, while portal tract abnormalities were more widely distributed in the no-PH group. After a median follow-up of 43.6 months, the survival rate of patients with baseline liver decompensation was 76.0%, and that of patients at a liver compensated stage in the PH group was 98.7%. First variceal bleeding occurred in 13.8% of patients with gastric-oesophageal varices. None of the patients in the no-PH group developed portal hypertension during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

PSVD can manifest as PH or mild liver enzyme abnormalities. There are significant differences in pathological features among patients with different clinical manifestations. Recurrent ascites are the main cause of death in PSVD patients. However, patients without PH have a slow disease progression, with recurrent elevated GGT levels being their main clinical feature.

The autoimmune landscape of Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder: What the rheumatologist needs to know

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) encompasses a group of vascular disorders characterized by lesions of the portal venules and sinusoids with clinical manifestations ranging from non-specific abnormalities in serum liver enzymes to clinically overt portal hypertension and related complications. Several reports have documented cases of PSVD in patients with systemic autoimmune conditions, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis. It is of note that these diseases share specific pathophysiological features with PSVD, including endothelial dysfunction, vascular inflammation, and molecular signatures. This narrative review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the association between PSVD and systemic autoimmune diseases, emphasizing the importance of promptly recognizing this condition in the rheumatological practice, and highlighting the key aspects where further research is necessary from both pathogenic and clinical perspectives.

Role of splenic hepatic elastography ratio in differentiating non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis and chronic liver disease in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Differentiation of Non-cirrhotic Portal Fibrosis (NCPF) from chronic liver disease (CLD) in children and adolescents with portal hypertension (PHT) is challenging especially in cases where liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and hepatic venous pressure gradient are higher. This objective of the current study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the splenic stiffness measurement (SSM)/LSM ratio in the diagnosis of NCPF.

METHODS

From January 2019 to December 2023, consecutive children and adolescents of 6 months to 18 years of age with PHT (CLD and NCPF) were prospectively enrolled. Transient elastography (TE) for SSM and LSM, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE), liver biopsy/trans-jugular liver biopsy, abdominal imaging, and laboratory evaluation were done. The relationship of TE parameters for diagnosis of NCPF and CLD was evaluated. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) statistics were applied using R Studio-4.2.2 statistical software.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty seven with CLD and 27 patients with NCPF were evaluated. Median age was 10.0 (IQR 2.4-14.0) years; 68.4% were males. The AUROC of SSM/LSM ratio was better (0.992, 95%CI 0.982-1.0001) than LSM (0.945, 95%CI0.913-0.977) and SSM (0.626, 95%CI0.258-0.489) for the diagnosis of NCPF. SSM/LSM ratio cut-off of 3.67 predicted NCPF with an excellent sensitivity (100%), specificity (95.9%), and diagnostic accuracy (95.91%). The AUROC of SSM/LSM ratio was excellent and outperformed other TE parameters in the subgroups, i.e., LSM between 10 and 20 kPa (0.982, 95%CI 0.947-1.000), without clinically significant varices (CSV) (1.000, 95%CI 1.000-1.000) and with CSV (0.993, 95%CI 0.983-1.000). Diagnostic performance of SSM/LSM Ratio was better than LSM for discriminating NCPF from CLD using McNemar test (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The SSM/LSM ratio is an excellent tool in differentiating NCPF from CLD.

Prospective evaluation of patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension: A single centre study

BACKGROUND

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) is a spectrum of liver diseases, including porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder, with portal hypertension (PH) in the absence of cirrhosis. The natural history and diagnostic approach to NCPH are not well understood.

AIM

We aimed to evaluate disease progression and outcomes in NCPH.

METHODS

Patients with or at risk for NCPH were enrolled in a single centre prospective study; two groups were formed based on the presence of specific features of PH, such as varices, collaterals, portal hypertensive gastropathy or portal hypertensive bleeding. All participants underwent a baseline liver biopsy. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and imaging were repeated every 6-12 months.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients without specific features of PH (Group I), and 35 patients with specific features (Group II) were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 50 months. Group II had higher hepatic venous pressure gradients, non-invasive measures of PH and a lower platelet count (PLT) when compared to Group I. Rates of survival and decompensation were similar in both groups. Patients with PLT ≤100 K/mcL had lower survival compared to those with PLT >100 K/mcL. Patients with LSM ≥10 kPa had lower survival and survival without decompensation when compared to patients with LSM <10 kPa.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients irrespective of specific features of PH had similar survival or survival without decompensation. Patients without specific features are at risk for disease progression and should be monitored closely. Thrombocytopenia and increased LSM are associated with severe forms of liver disease, which are strongly associated with outcomes.

[Portosinusoidal vascular disorder: A paradigm shift]

The term portosinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) refers to a clinical-pathological entity that encompasses those patients with intrahepatic vascular damage without cirrhosis at risk of developing severe complications of portal hypertension. Numerous systemic diseases, genetic disorders, and toxic agents have been associated with this pathology, making its diagnosis an important clinical challenge. The recent description of uniform diagnostic criteria and a better understanding of its pathophysiology will allow for better identification of patients, even in early stages of the disease. Although there is currently no effective etiological treatment available, early diagnosis allows for the development of preventive strategies for some severe complications of portal hypertension.

Diagnostic performance of transient elastography in differentiation between porto-sinusoidal vascular liver disease and compensated cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The efficacy of transient elastography (TE) in the differential diagnosis between porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) and compensated cirrhosis has not been sufficiently studied. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of TE and identify histological lesions associated with liver stiffness.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including patients with PSVD and cirrhosis (Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A) and healthy subjects. Both the PSVD and cirrhotic patients had at least one sign of PH. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used for differentiation.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients with PSVD (median age: 53 years, 33% male), 100 patients with compensated cirrhosis and 101 healthy subjects were included. The median TE-LSM in the PSVD patients (10.0 [7.0-13.0] kPa) was significantly lower than that in the cirrhotic patients (21.0 [15.0-28.0] kPa, p < .001) but was significantly higher than that in the healthy subjects (5.1 [4.6-6.0] kPa, p < .001). The AUROCs of TE-LSM for the discrimination of PSVD from the cirrhosis and healthy subjects were 0.886 (95% CI: 0.833-0.928) and 0.913 (95% CI: 0.864-0.949), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity to discriminate PSVD from compensated cirrhosis were 78.3% and 82.0%, respectively, at a cut-off of 13.6 kPa. Furthermore, portal fibrosis and aberrant cytokeratin 7 expression of centrilobular hepatocytes were significantly associated with higher TE-LSM (≥10.0 kPa).

CONCLUSION

TE-LSM can be used to differentiate PSVD from compensated cirrhosis. Pathological features in association with increased liver stiffness are identified.

A Narrative Review on Non-Cirrohotic Portal Hypertension: Not All Portal Hypertensions Mean Cirrhosis

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH), also known as idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) and porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD), is a rare disease characterized by intrahepatic portal hypertension (IPH) in the absence of cirrhosis. The precise etiopathogenesis of IPH is an area of ongoing research. NCPH diagnosis is challenging, as there are no specific tests available to confirm the disease, and a high-quality liver biopsy, detailed clinical information, and an expert pathologist are necessary for diagnosis. Currently, the treatment of NCPH relies on the prevention of complications related to portal hypertension, following current guidelines of cirrhotic portal hypertension. No treatment has been studied that aimed to modify the natural history of the disease; however, transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS) placement, shunt and liver transplantation are considerable symptomatic options. In this review, we discuss the heterogeneity of NCPH as well as its etiopathogenesis, clinical presentation and management issues. Starting from the assumption that portal hypertension does not always mean cirrhosis, cooperative studies are probably needed to clarify the issues of etiology and the possible genetic background of this rare disease. This knowledge might lead to better treatment and perhaps better prevention.

Noninvasive differentiation of porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder from cirrhosis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD) is one of the common causes of portal hypertension and has overlapping features with early cirrhosis. The differentiation of PSVD from cirrhosis requires a liver biopsy, which is invasive and has potential complications. This systematic review aimed at summarizing the current evidence on the performance of noninvasive modalities for differentiating PSVD from cirrhosis.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of electronic databases of MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus was conducted from 2000 to October 2022 for the studies comparing the elastographic and radiological features of PSVD and cirrhosis, using liver biopsy as the gold standard.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies were included in the systematic review. Transient elastography (TE) as a modality was studied in five studies, MR elastography (MRE) in two, contrast CT in two, Contrast CT and MRI in two, and ARFI in only one. Both TE and MRE showed a significantly lower liver stiffness measurement and a higher splenic stiffness measurement with a higher SSM/LSM ratio with PSVD, compared to cirrhosis. Among the radiological features, focal nodular hyperplasia-like lesions, portal vein abnormalities (intrahepatic and extrahepatic), and a larger spleen size favored a diagnosis of PSVD. In contrast, surface nodularity and atrophy of segment IV with a segment I hypertrophy favored a diagnosis of cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION

Elastography and cross-sectional imaging can help differentiate PSVD from early cirrhosis with good accuracy. Further studies are required to assess the diagnostic role of a combination of both modalities.

Austrian consensus on the diagnosis and management of portal hypertension in advanced chronic liver disease (Billroth IV)

The Billroth IV consensus was developed during a consensus meeting of the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ÖGGH) and the Austrian Society of Interventional Radiology (ÖGIR) held on the 26th of November 2022 in Vienna.Based on international recommendations and considering recent landmark studies, the Billroth IV consensus provides guidance regarding the diagnosis and management of portal hypertension in advanced chronic liver disease.

Liver Assessment in Patients with Ataxia-Telangiectasia: Transient Elastography Detects Early Stages of Steatosis and Fibrosis

Background

Ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) is a rare autosomal-recessive multisystem disorder characterized by pronounced cerebellar ataxia, telangiectasia, cancer predisposition, and altered body composition. Liver diseases with steatosis, fibrosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma are frequent findings in older patients but sensitive noninvasive diagnostic tools are lacking.

Objectives

To determine the sensitivity of transient elastography (TE) as a screening tool for early hepatic tissue changes and serum biomarkers for liver disease.

Methods

Thirty-one A-T patients aged 2 to 25 years were examined prospectively from 2016-2018 by TE. In addition, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of liver biomarkers for steatosis and necroinflammatory activity (SteatoTest and ActiTest, Biopredictive, Paris) compared to TE. For calculation and comparison, patients were divided into two groups (<12, >12 years of age).

Results

TE revealed steatosis in 2/21 (10%) younger patients compared to 9/10 (90%) older patients. Fibrosis was present in 3/10 (30%) older patients as assessed by TE. We found a significant correlation of steatosis with SteatoTest, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), HbA1c, and triglycerides. Liver stiffness correlated significantly with SteatoTest, ActiTest, HbA1c, and triglycerides.

Conclusion

Liver disease is a common finding in older A-T patients. TE is an objective measure to detect early stages of steatosis and fibrosis. SteatoTest and ActiTest are a good diagnostic assessment for steatosis and necroinflammatory activity in patients with A-T and confirmed the TE results.