Role for RIF1-interacting partner DDX1 in BLM recruitment to DNA double-strand breaks

CircInpp5b Ameliorates Renal Interstitial Fibrosis by Promoting the Lysosomal Degradation of DDX1

Renal interstitial fibrosis (RIF) is a classic pathophysiological process of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the mechanisms underlying RIF remain unclear. The present study found that a novel circular RNA, cirInpp5b, might be involved in RIF by high-throughput sequencing. Subsequent experiments revealed that circInpp5b was reduced in UUO mouse kidney tissues and TGF-β1-treated proximal tubular cells. The overexpression of circInpp5b inhibited RIF in UUO mice and prevented extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition in TGF-β1-treated proximal tubular cells. Furthermore, overexpression of circInpp5b down-regulated the protein level of DDX1. Mechanistically, circInpp5b bound to the DDX1 protein and promoted its lysosomal degradation. Collectively, the findings of our study demonstrate that circInpp5b ameliorates RIF by binding to the DDX1 protein and promoting its lysosomal degradation.

Role of DDX1 in the oxidative response of ataxia telangiectasia patient-derived fibroblasts

Ataxia Telangiectasia (A-T) is an inherited autosomal recessive disorder characterized by cerebellar neurodegeneration, radiosensitivity, immunodeficiency and a high incidence of lymphomas. A-T is caused by mutations in the ATM gene. While loss of ATM function in DNA repair explains some aspects of A-T pathophysiology such as radiosensitivity and cancer predisposition, other A-T features such as neurodegeneration imply additional roles for ATM outside the nucleus. Emerging evidence suggests that ATM participates in cellular response to oxidative stress, failure of which contributes to the neurodegeneration associated with A-T. Here, we use fibroblasts derived from A-T patients to investigate whether DEAD Box 1 (DDX1), an RNA binding/unwinding protein that functions downstream of ATM in DNA double strand break repair, also plays a role in ATM-dependent cellular response to oxidative stress. Focusing on DDX1 target RNAs that are associated with neurological disorders and oxidative stress response, we show that ATM is required for increased binding of DDX1 to its target RNAs in the presence of arsenite-induced oxidative stress. Our results indicate that DDX1 functions downstream of ATM by protecting specific mRNAs in the cytoplasm of arsenite-treated cells. In keeping with a role for ATM and DDX1 in oxidative stress, levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are increased in ATM-deficient as well as DDX1-depleted cells. We propose that reduced levels of cytoplasmic DDX1 RNA targets sensitizes ATM-deficient cells to oxidative stress resulting in increased cell death. This sensitization would be especially detrimental to long-lived highly metabolically active cells such as neurons providing a possible explanation for the neurodegenerative defects associated with A-T.

DDX1 is a prognostic biomarker and correlates with immune infiltrations in hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading lethal malignant tumors worldwide. DEAD-box (DDX) family helicases are implicated in numerous human cancers. However, the role of DDX1 in HCC has not yet been fully elucidated. We downloaded gene expression data and clinical information data of HCC from The Cancer Genome Atlas and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) database and conducted subsequent analyses using the R package and online portal. The results revealed that HCC tissues had higher DDX1 expression compared with either paired or unpaired normal tissues. The increased DDX1 expression was closely related to the advanced pathological grade and histologic grade of HCC. Further analysis suggested that patients with high DDX1 expression contributed to poor prognosis The Cox regression analysis revealed that the expression level of DDX1 was an independent prognostic factor for HCC. In addition, an ICGC cohort was used for external validation. The cBio-Portal, MethSurv, and UALCAN database were used for evaluating the genomic mechanism. Moreover, the Tumor Immune Estimation Resource dataset and QUANTISEQ algorithm revealed that DDX1 expression positively correlates with immune infiltrating cells. We also identified the DDX1-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and explored their biological functions by GO, KEGG, and GSEA analyses, which indicated that DDX1 may regulate the progression of HCC. In general, increased DDX1 expression predicts a poor prognosis and drives the progression of HCC.

DEAD Box 1 (DDX1) protein binds to and protects cytoplasmic stress response mRNAs in cells exposed to oxidative stress

The integrated stress response is a network of highly orchestrated pathways activated when cells are exposed to environmental stressors. While global repression of translation is a well-recognized hallmark of the integrated stress response, less is known about the regulation of mRNA stability during stress. DEAD box proteins are a family of RNA unwinding/remodeling enzymes involved in every aspect of RNA metabolism. We previously showed that DEAD box 1 (DDX1) protein accumulates at DNA double-strand breaks during genotoxic stress and promotes DNA double-strand break repair via homologous recombination. Here, we examine the role of DDX1 in response to environmental stress. We show that DDX1 is recruited to stress granules (SGs) in cells exposed to a variety of environmental stressors, including arsenite, hydrogen peroxide, and thapsigargin. We also show that DDX1 depletion delays resolution of arsenite-induced SGs. Using RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing, we identify RNA targets bound to endogenous DDX1, including RNAs transcribed from genes previously implicated in stress responses. We show the amount of target RNAs bound to DDX1 increases when cells are exposed to stress, and the overall levels of these RNAs are increased during stress in a DDX1-dependent manner. Even though DDX1’s RNA-binding property is critical for maintenance of its target mRNA levels, we found RNA binding is not required for localization of DDX1 to SGs. Furthermore, DDX1 knockdown does not appear to affect RNA localization to SGs. Taken together, our results reveal a novel role for DDX1 in maintaining cytoplasmic mRNA levels in cells exposed to oxidative stress.

RIF1 Links Replication Timing with Fork Reactivation and DNA Double-Strand Break Repair

Replication timing (RT) is a cellular program to coordinate initiation of DNA replication in all origins within the genome. RIF1 (replication timing regulatory factor 1) is a master regulator of RT in human cells. This role of RIF1 is associated with binding G4-quadruplexes and changes in 3D chromatin that may suppress origin activation over a long distance. Many effects of RIF1 in fork reactivation and DNA double-strand (DSB) repair (DSBR) are underlined by its interaction with TP53BP1 (tumor protein p53 binding protein). In G1, RIF1 acts antagonistically to BRCA1 (BRCA1 DNA repair associated), suppressing end resection and homologous recombination repair (HRR) and promoting non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), contributing to DSBR pathway choice. RIF1 is an important element of intra-S-checkpoints to recover damaged replication fork with the involvement of HRR. High-resolution microscopic studies show that RIF1 cooperates with TP53BP1 to preserve 3D structure and epigenetic markers of genomic loci disrupted by DSBs. Apart from TP53BP1, RIF1 interact with many other proteins, including proteins involved in DNA damage response, cell cycle regulation, and chromatin remodeling. As impaired RT, DSBR and fork reactivation are associated with genomic instability, a hallmark of malignant transformation, RIF1 has a diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic potential in cancer. Further studies may reveal other aspects of common regulation of RT, DSBR, and fork reactivation by RIF1.

DEAD-Box RNA Helicases and Genome Stability

DEAD-box RNA helicases are important regulators of RNA metabolism and have been implicated in the development of cancer. Interestingly, these helicases constitute a major recurring family of RNA-binding proteins important for protecting the genome. Current studies have provided insight into the connection between genomic stability and several DEAD-box RNA helicase family proteins including DDX1, DDX3X, DDX5, DDX19, DDX21, DDX39B, and DDX41. For each helicase, we have reviewed evidence supporting their role in protecting the genome and their suggested mechanisms. Such helicases regulate the expression of factors promoting genomic stability, prevent DNA damage, and can participate directly in the response and repair of DNA damage. Finally, we summarized the pathological and therapeutic relationship between DEAD-box RNA helicases and cancer with respect to their novel role in genome stability.

Action and function of helicases on RNA G-quadruplexes

•

Methodological progresses and piling evidence prove the rG4 biology in vivo.

•

rG4s step in virtually every aspect of RNA biology.

•

Helicases unwinding of rG4s is a fine regulatory layer to the downstream processes and general cell homeostasis.

•

The current knowledge is however limited to a few cell lines.

•

The regulation of helicases themselves is delineating as a important question.

•

Non-helicase rG4-processing proteins likely play a role.

The nucleic acid structure called G-quadruplex (G4) is currently discussed to function in nucleic acid-based mechanisms that influence several cellular processes. They can modulate the cellular machinery either positively or negatively, both at the DNA and RNA level. The majority of what we know about G4 biology comes from DNA G4 (dG4) research. RNA G4s (rG4), on the other hand, are gaining interest as researchers become more aware of their role in several aspects of cellular homeostasis. In either case, the correct regulation of G4 structures within cells is essential and demands specialized proteins able to resolve them. Small changes in the formation and unfolding of G4 structures can have severe consequences for the cells that could even stimulate genome instability, apoptosis or proliferation. Helicases are the most relevant negative G4 regulators, which prevent and unfold G4 formation within cells during different pathways. Yet, and despite their importance only a handful of rG4 unwinding helicases have been identified and characterized thus far. This review addresses the current knowledge on rG4s-processing helicases with a focus on methodological approaches. An example of a non-helicase rG4s-unwinding protein is also briefly described.

G-quadruplex binding protein Rif1, a key regulator of replication timing

DNA replication is spatially and temporally regulated during S phase to execute efficient and coordinated duplication of entire genome. Various epigenomic mechanisms operate to regulate the timing and locations of replication. Among them, Rif1 plays a major role to shape the 'replication domains' that dictate which segments of the genome are replicated when and where in the nuclei. Rif1 achieves this task by generating higher-order chromatin architecture near nuclear membrane and by recruiting a protein phosphatase. Rif1 is a G4 binding protein, and G4 binding activity of Rif1 is essential for replication timing regulation in fission yeast. In this article, we first summarize strategies by which cells regulate their replication timing and then describe how Rif1 and its interaction with G4 contribute to regulation of chromatin architecture and replication timing.

New Faces of old Friends: Emerging new Roles of RNA-Binding Proteins in the DNA Double-Strand Break Response

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are highly cytotoxic DNA lesions. To protect genomic stability and ensure cell homeostasis, cells mount a complex signaling-based response that not only coordinates the repair of the broken DNA strand but also activates cell cycle checkpoints and, if necessary, induces cell death. The last decade has seen a flurry of studies that have identified RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) as novel regulators of the DSB response. While many of these RBPs have well-characterized roles in gene expression, it is becoming increasingly clear that they also have non-canonical functions in the DSB response that go well beyond transcription, splicing and mRNA processing. Here, we review the current understanding of how RBPs are integrated into the cellular response to DSBs and describe how these proteins directly participate in signal transduction, amplification and repair at damaged chromatin. In addition, we discuss the implications of an RBP-mediated DSB response for genome instability and age-associated diseases such as cancer and neurodegeneration.

The roles of RNA in DNA double-strand break repair

Effective DNA repair is essential for cell survival: a failure to correctly repair damage leads to the accumulation of mutations and is the driving force for carcinogenesis. Multiple pathways have evolved to protect against both intrinsic and extrinsic genotoxic events, and recent developments have highlighted an unforeseen critical role for RNA in ensuring genome stability. It is currently unclear exactly how RNA molecules participate in the repair pathways, although many models have been proposed and it is possible that RNA acts in diverse ways to facilitate DNA repair. A number of well-documented DNA repair factors have been described to have RNA-binding capacities and, moreover, screens investigating DNA-damage repair mechanisms have identified RNA-binding proteins as a major group of novel factors involved in DNA repair. In this review, we integrate some of these datasets to identify commonalities that might highlight novel and interesting factors for future investigations. This emerging role for RNA opens up a new dimension in the field of DNA repair; we discuss its impact on our current understanding of DNA repair processes and consider how it might influence cancer progression.

MRN complex-dependent recruitment of ubiquitylated BLM helicase to DSBs negatively regulates DNA repair pathways

Mutations in BLM in Bloom Syndrome patients predispose them to multiple types of cancers. Here we report that BLM is recruited in a biphasic manner to annotated DSBs. BLM recruitment is dependent on the presence of NBS1, MRE11 and ATM. While ATM activity is essential for BLM recruitment in early phase, it is dispensable in late phase when MRE11 exonuclease activity and RNF8-mediated ubiquitylation of BLM are the key determinants. Interaction between polyubiquitylated BLM and NBS1 is essential for the helicase to be retained at the DSBs. The helicase activity of BLM is required for the recruitment of HR and c-NHEJ factors onto the chromatin in S- and G1-phase, respectively. During the repair phase, BLM inhibits HR in S-phase and c-NHEJ in G1-phase. Consequently, inhibition of helicase activity of BLM enhances the rate of DNA alterations. Thus BLM utilizes its pro- and anti-repair functions to maintain genome stability.

Bloom helicase is recruited to double strand breaks in an ATM dependent manner. Here the authors show that Bloom helicase is recruited to double strand breaks in an ATM and MRN dependent manner with HR and NHEJ regulated by the helicase depending on the phase of the cell cycle.

The Smc5/6 complex regulates the yeast Mph1 helicase at RNA-DNA hybrid-mediated DNA damage

RNA-DNA hybrids are naturally occurring obstacles that must be overcome by the DNA replication machinery. In the absence of RNase H enzymes, RNA-DNA hybrids accumulate, resulting in replication stress, DNA damage and compromised genomic integrity. We demonstrate that Mph1, the yeast homolog of Fanconi anemia protein M (FANCM), is required for cell viability in the absence of RNase H enzymes. The integrity of the Mph1 helicase domain is crucial to prevent the accumulation of RNA-DNA hybrids and RNA-DNA hybrid-dependent DNA damage, as determined by Rad52 foci. Mph1 forms foci when RNA-DNA hybrids accumulate, e.g. in RNase H or THO-complex mutants and at short telomeres. Mph1, however is a double-edged sword, whose action at hybrids must be regulated by the Smc5/6 complex. This is underlined by the observation that simultaneous inactivation of RNase H2 and Smc5/6 results in Mph1-dependent synthetic lethality, which is likely due to an accumulation of toxic recombination intermediates. The data presented here support a model, where Mph1’s helicase activity plays a crucial role in responding to persistent RNA-DNA hybrids.

DNA damage can either occur exogenously through DNA damaging agents such as UV light and exposure to chemotherapeutics, or endogenously via metabolic, cellular processes. The RNA product of transcription, for example, can engage in the formation of RNA-DNA hybrids. Such RNA-DNA hybrids can impede replication fork progression and cause genomic instability, a hallmark of cancer. The misregulation of RNA-DNA hybrids has also been implicated in several neurological disorders. Recently, it has become evident that RNA-DNA hybrids may also have beneficial roles and therefore, these structures have to be tightly controlled. We found that Mph1 (mutator phenotype 1), the budding yeast homolog of Fanconi Anemia protein M, counteracts the accumulation of RNA-DNA hybrids. The inactivation of MPH1 results in a severe growth defect when combined with mutations in the well-characterized RNase H enzymes, that degrade the RNA moiety of an RNA-DNA hybrid. Based on the data presented here, we propose a model, where Mph1 itself has to be kept in check by the SMC (structural maintenance of chromosome) 5/6 complex at replication forks stalled by RNA-DNA hybrids. Mph1 acts as a double-edged sword, as both its deletion and the inability to control its helicase activity cause DNA damage and growth arrest when RNA-DNA hybrids accumulate.

ATM and CDK2 control chromatin remodeler CSB to inhibit RIF1 in DSB repair pathway choice

CSB, a member of the SWI2/SNF2 superfamily, is implicated in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. However, how it regulates this repair process is poorly understood. Here we uncover that CSB interacts via its newly identified winged helix domain with RIF1, an effector of 53BP1, and that this interaction mediates CSB recruitment to DSBs in S phase. At DSBs, CSB remodels chromatin by evicting histones, which limits RIF1 and its effector MAD2L2 but promotes BRCA1 accumulation. The chromatin remodeling activity of CSB requires not only damage-induced phosphorylation on S10 by ATM but also cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation on S158 by cyclin A-CDK2. Both modifications modulate the interaction of the CSB N-terminal region with its ATPase domain, the activity of which has been previously reported to be autorepressed by the N-terminal region. These results suggest that ATM and CDK2 control the chromatin remodeling activity of CSB in the regulation of DSB repair pathway choice.

Cockayne syndrome group B protein (CSB) is a multifunctional chromatin remodeler involved in double-strand break repair. Here the authors investigate the molecular post-translational signals regulating CSB activity.