1
|
Wells SE, Caldecott KW. KBM-mediated interactions with KU80 promote cellular resistance to DNA replication stress in CHO cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 2024; 140:103710. [PMID: 38901287 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
The KU heterodimer (KU70/80) is rapidly recruited to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to regulate their processing and repair. Previous work has revealed that the amino-terminal von Willebrand-like (vWA-like) domain in KU80 harbours a conserved hydrophobic pocket that interacts with a short peptide motif known as the Ku-binding motif (KBM). The KBM is present in a variety of DNA repair proteins such as APLF, CYREN, and Werner protein (WRN). Here, to investigate the importance of KBM-mediated protein-protein interactions for KU80 function, we employed KU80-deficient Chinese Hamster Ovary (Xrs-6) cells transfected with RFP-tagged wild-type human KU80 or KU80 harbouring a mutant vWA-like domain (KU80L68R). Surprisingly, while mutant RFP-KU80L68R largely or entirely restored NHEJ efficiency and radiation resistance in KU80-deficient Xrs-6 cells, it failed to restore cellular resistance to DNA replication stress induced by camptothecin (CPT) or hydroxyurea (HU). Moreover, KU80-deficient Xrs-6 cells expressing RFP-KU80L68R accumulated pan-nuclear γH2AX in an S/G2-phase-dependent manner following treatment with CPT or HU, suggesting that the binding of KU80 to one or more KBM-containing proteins is required for the processing and/or repair of DNA ends that arise during DNA replication stress. Consistent with this idea, depletion of WRN helicase/exonuclease recapitulated the CPT-induced γH2AX phenotype, and did so epistatically with mutation of the KU80 vWA-like domain. These data identify a role for the KBM-binding by KU80 in the response and resistance of CHO cells to arrested and/or collapsed DNA replication forks, and implicate the KBM-mediated interaction of KU80 with WRN as a critical effector of this role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie E Wells
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Science Park Road, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK
| | - Keith W Caldecott
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Science Park Road, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Geffen Y, Anand S, Akiyama Y, Yaron TM, Song Y, Johnson JL, Govindan A, Babur Ö, Li Y, Huntsman E, Wang LB, Birger C, Heiman DI, Zhang Q, Miller M, Maruvka YE, Haradhvala NJ, Calinawan A, Belkin S, Kerelsky A, Clauser KR, Krug K, Satpathy S, Payne SH, Mani DR, Gillette MA, Dhanasekaran SM, Thiagarajan M, Mesri M, Rodriguez H, Robles AI, Carr SA, Lazar AJ, Aguet F, Cantley LC, Ding L, Getz G. Pan-cancer analysis of post-translational modifications reveals shared patterns of protein regulation. Cell 2023; 186:3945-3967.e26. [PMID: 37582358 PMCID: PMC10680287 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) play key roles in regulating cell signaling and physiology in both normal and cancer cells. Advances in mass spectrometry enable high-throughput, accurate, and sensitive measurement of PTM levels to better understand their role, prevalence, and crosstalk. Here, we analyze the largest collection of proteogenomics data from 1,110 patients with PTM profiles across 11 cancer types (10 from the National Cancer Institute's Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium [CPTAC]). Our study reveals pan-cancer patterns of changes in protein acetylation and phosphorylation involved in hallmark cancer processes. These patterns revealed subsets of tumors, from different cancer types, including those with dysregulated DNA repair driven by phosphorylation, altered metabolic regulation associated with immune response driven by acetylation, affected kinase specificity by crosstalk between acetylation and phosphorylation, and modified histone regulation. Overall, this resource highlights the rich biology governed by PTMs and exposes potential new therapeutic avenues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifat Geffen
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Shankara Anand
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Yo Akiyama
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Tomer M Yaron
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Yizhe Song
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Jared L Johnson
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Akshay Govindan
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Özgün Babur
- Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125, USA
| | - Yize Li
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Emily Huntsman
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Liang-Bo Wang
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Chet Birger
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - David I Heiman
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Qing Zhang
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Mendy Miller
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Yosef E Maruvka
- Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Lokey Center for Life Science and Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Nicholas J Haradhvala
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Anna Calinawan
- Department of Genetic and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Saveliy Belkin
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Alexander Kerelsky
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Karl R Clauser
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Karsten Krug
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Shankha Satpathy
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Samuel H Payne
- Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
| | - D R Mani
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Michael A Gillette
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | - Mathangi Thiagarajan
- Leidos Biomedical Research Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21702, USA
| | - Mehdi Mesri
- Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Henry Rodriguez
- Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Ana I Robles
- Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Steven A Carr
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Departments of Pathology & Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - François Aguet
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
| | - Lewis C Cantley
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | - Li Ding
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| | - Gad Getz
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Buehl CJ, Goff NJ, Hardwick SW, Gellert M, Blundell TL, Yang W, Chaplin AK, Meek K. Two distinct long-range synaptic complexes promote different aspects of end processing prior to repair of DNA breaks by non-homologous end joining. Mol Cell 2023; 83:698-714.e4. [PMID: 36724784 PMCID: PMC9992237 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Non-homologous end joining is the major double-strand break repair (DSBR) pathway in mammals. DNA-PK is the hub and organizer of multiple steps in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Recent high-resolution structures show how two distinct NHEJ complexes "synapse" two DNA ends. One complex includes a DNA-PK dimer mediated by XLF, whereas a distinct DNA-PK dimer forms via a domain-swap mechanism where the C terminus of Ku80 from one DNA-PK protomer interacts with another DNA-PK protomer in trans. Remarkably, the distance between the two synapsed DNA ends in both dimers is the same (∼115 Å), which matches the distance observed in the initial description of an NHEJ long-range synaptic complex. Here, a mutational strategy is used to demonstrate distinct cellular function(s) of the two dimers: one promoting fill-in end processing, while the other promotes DNA end resection. Thus, the specific DNA-PK dimer formed (which may be impacted by DNA end structure) dictates the mechanism by which ends will be made ligatable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Buehl
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, Department of Pathobiology & Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Noah J Goff
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, Department of Pathobiology & Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Steven W Hardwick
- CryoEM Facility, Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Sanger Building, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK
| | - Martin Gellert
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Tom L Blundell
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Sanger Building, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK
| | - Wei Yang
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Amanda K Chaplin
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Sanger Building, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK; Leicester Institute for Structural and Chemical Biology, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
| | - Katheryn Meek
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, Department of Pathobiology & Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang C, Chan DW, Hendrickson EA. Kinome-wide screening uncovers a role for Bromodomain Protein 3 in DNA double-stranded break repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 2023; 122:103445. [PMID: 36608404 PMCID: PMC10353298 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2022.103445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Double-stranded breaks (DSBs) are toxic DNA damage and a serious threat to genomic integrity. Thus, all living organisms have evolved multiple mechanisms of DNA DSB repair, the two principal ones being classical-non homologous end joining (C-NHEJ), and homology dependent recombination (HDR). In mammals, C-NHEJ is the predominate DSB repair pathway, but how a cell chooses to repair a particular DSB by a certain pathway is still not mechanistically clear. To uncover novel regulators of DSB repair pathway choice, we performed a kinome-wide screen in a human cell line engineered to express a dominant-negative C-NHEJ factor. The intellectual basis for such a screen was our hypothesis that a C-NHEJ-crippled cell line might need to upregulate other DSB repair pathways, including HDR, in order to survive. This screen identified Bromodomain-containing Protein 3 (BRD3) as a protein whose expression was almost completely ablated specifically in a C-NHEJ-defective cell line. Subsequent experimentation demonstrated that BRD3 is a negative regulator of HDR as BRD3-null cell lines proved to be hyper-recombinogenic for gene conversion, sister chromatid exchanges and gene targeting. Mechanistically, BRD3 appears to be working at the level of Radiation Sensitive 51 (RAD51) recruitment. Overall, our results demonstrate that BRD3 is a novel regulator of human DSB repair pathway choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Wang
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Doug W Chan
- Department of Systems Biology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | - Eric A Hendrickson
- Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meek K. Activation of DNA-PK by hairpinned DNA ends reveals a stepwise mechanism of kinase activation. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:9098-9108. [PMID: 32716029 PMCID: PMC7498359 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
As its name implies, the DNA dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) requires DNA double-stranded ends for enzymatic activation. Here, I demonstrate that hairpinned DNA ends are ineffective for activating the kinase toward many of its well-studied substrates (p53, XRCC4, XLF, HSP90). However, hairpinned DNA ends robustly stimulate certain DNA-PK autophosphorylations. Specifically, autophosphorylation sites within the ABCDE cluster are robustly phosphorylated when DNA-PK is activated by hairpinned DNA ends. Of note, phosphorylation of the ABCDE sites is requisite for activation of the Artemis nuclease that associates with DNA-PK to mediate hairpin opening. This finding suggests a multi-step mechanism of kinase activation. Finally, I find that all non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) defective cells (whether deficient in components of the DNA-PK complex or components of the ligase complex) are similarly deficient in joining DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) with hairpinned termini.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katheryn Meek
- Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology & Diagnostic Investigation, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Britton S, Chanut P, Delteil C, Barboule N, Frit P, Calsou P. ATM antagonizes NHEJ proteins assembly and DNA-ends synapsis at single-ended DNA double strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 2020; 48:9710-9723. [PMID: 32890395 PMCID: PMC7515714 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Two DNA repair pathways operate at DNA double strand breaks (DSBs): non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), that requires two adjacent DNA ends for ligation, and homologous recombination (HR), that resects one DNA strand for invasion of a homologous duplex. Faithful repair of replicative single-ended DSBs (seDSBs) is mediated by HR, due to the lack of a second DNA end for end-joining. ATM stimulates resection at such breaks through multiple mechanisms including CtIP phosphorylation, which also promotes removal of the DNA-ends sensor and NHEJ protein Ku. Here, using a new method for imaging the recruitment of the Ku partner DNA-PKcs at DSBs, we uncover an unanticipated role of ATM in removing DNA-PKcs from seDSBs in human cells. Phosphorylation of DNA-PKcs on the ABCDE cluster is necessary not only for DNA-PKcs clearance but also for the subsequent MRE11/CtIP-dependent release of Ku from these breaks. We propose that at seDSBs, ATM activity is necessary for the release of both Ku and DNA-PKcs components of the NHEJ apparatus, and thereby prevents subsequent aberrant interactions between seDSBs accompanied by DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation and detrimental commitment to Lig4-dependent end-joining.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Britton
- Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer 2018, Toulouse, France
| | - Pauline Chanut
- Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer 2018, Toulouse, France
| | - Christine Delteil
- Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer 2018, Toulouse, France
| | - Nadia Barboule
- Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer 2018, Toulouse, France
| | - Philippe Frit
- Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer 2018, Toulouse, France
| | - Patrick Calsou
- Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, IPBS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France
- Equipe Labellisée Ligue contre le Cancer 2018, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|