Chromatin dynamics and DNA replication roadblocks

PARticular MARks: Histone ADP-ribosylation and the DNA damage response

Cellular and molecular responses to DNA damage are highly orchestrated and dynamic, acting to preserve the maintenance and integrity of the genome. Histone proteins bind DNA and organize the genome into chromatin. Post-translational modifications of histones have been shown to play an essential role in orchestrating the chromatin response to DNA damage by regulating the DNA damage response pathway. Among the histone modifications that contribute to this intricate network, histone ADP-ribosylation (ADPr) is emerging as a pivotal component of chromatin-based DNA damage response (DDR) pathways. In this review, we survey how histone ADPr is regulated to promote the DDR and how it impacts chromatin and other histone marks. Recent advancements have revealed histone ADPr effects on chromatin structure and the regulation of DNA repair factor recruitment to DNA lesions. Additionally, we highlight advancements in technology that have enabled the identification and functional validation of histone ADPr in cells and in response to DNA damage. Given the involvement of DNA damage and epigenetic regulation in human diseases including cancer, these findings have clinical implications for histone ADPr, which are also discussed. Overall, this review covers the involvement of histone ADPr in the DDR and highlights potential future investigations aimed at identifying mechanisms governed by histone ADPr that participate in the DDR, human diseases, and their treatments.

Insights on the nuclear shuttling of H2A-H2B histone chaperones

All cellular processes that involve the unwinding of DNA also lead to the systematic shuttling of histones. Histone shuttling across the nuclear membrane is facilitated by a class of proteins known as - histone chaperones. Histone chaperones are classified based on their binding to H3/H4 histones or H2A/H2B histones. During the shuttling process, two types of signals - NLS and NES are recognized by the nuclear transport proteins. However, this is the nuclear transport protein and the mechanism of signal recognition by the protein is still unknown. Thus, in this piece of work, the NLS and NES signals are predicted on important H2A/H2B binding histone chaperones. In addition, cellular localization and potential DNA binding regions of histone chaperones are predicted. Mapping of predicted regions on the histone chaperone's structure suggested that the critical binding regions mainly lie on the disordered region of the histone chaperones. NLS and NES are present in the N- and C-terminal of the histone chaperones. Most histone chaperones contain bipartiate NLS signals. This article sheds light on the crucial aspect that in addition of being directly engaged in nucleosome synthesis and disassembly in vivo, histone chaperone also performs various specific roles via histone binding activity.

Persistent Acetylation of Histone H3 Lysine 56 Compromises the Activity of DNA Replication Origins

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, newly synthesized histones H3 are acetylated on lysine 56 (H3 K56ac) by the Rtt109 acetyltransferase prior to their deposition on nascent DNA behind replication forks. Two deacetylases of the sirtuin family, Hst3 and Hst4, remove H3 K56ac from chromatin after S phase. hst3Δ hst4Δ cells present constitutive H3 K56ac, which sensitizes cells to replicative stress via unclear mechanisms. A chemogenomic screen revealed that DBF4 heterozygosity sensitizes cells to NAM-induced inhibition of sirtuins. DBF4 and CDC7 encode subunits of the Dbf4-dependent kinase (DDK), which activates origins of DNA replication during S phase. We show that (i) cells harboring the dbf4-1 or cdc7-4 hypomorphic alleles are sensitized to NAM, and that (ii) the sirtuins Sir2, Hst1, Hst3, and Hst4 promote DNA replication in cdc7-4 cells. We further demonstrate that Rif1, an inhibitor of DDK-dependent activation of origins, causes DNA damage and replication defects in NAM-treated cells and hst3Δ hst4Δ mutants. cdc7-4 hst3Δ hst4Δ cells are shown to display delayed initiation of DNA replication, which is not due to intra-S checkpoint activation but requires Rtt109-dependent H3 K56ac. Our results suggest that constitutive H3 K56ac sensitizes cells to replicative stress in part by negatively influencing the activation of origins of DNA replication.

Deletions of DNA in cancer and their possible uses for therapy

Despite advances in treatments over the last decades, a uniformly reliable and free of side effects therapy of human cancers remains to be achieved. During chromosome replication, a premature halt of two converging DNA replication forks would cause incomplete replication and a cytotoxic chromosome nondisjunction during mitosis. In contrast to normal cells, most cancer cells bear numerous DNA deletions. A homozygous deletion permanently marks a cell and its descendants. Here, we propose an approach to cancer therapy in which a pair of sequence-specific roadblocks is placed solely at two cancer-confined deletion sites that are located ahead of two converging replication forks. We describe this method, termed "replication blocks specific for deletions" (RBSD), and another deletions-based approach as well. RBSD can be expanded by placing pairs of replication roadblocks on several different chromosomes. The resulting simultaneous nondisjunctions of these chromosomes in cancer cells would further increase the cancer-specific toxicity of RBSD.

Regulation of loop extrusion on the interphase genome

In the human cell nucleus, dynamically organized chromatin is the substrate for gene regulation, DNA replication, and repair. A central mechanism of DNA loop formation is an ATPase motor cohesin-mediated loop extrusion. The cohesin complexes load and unload onto the chromosome under the control of other regulators that physically interact and affect motor activity. Regulation of the dynamic loading cycle of cohesin influences not only the chromatin structure but also genome-associated human disorders and aging. This review focuses on the recently spotlighted genome organizing factors and the mechanism by which their dynamic interactions shape the genome architecture in interphase.