1
|
Turner JP, Newport K, McEvoy AM, Smith T, Tannenbaum C, Kelly DV. Strategies to guide the successful implementation of deprescribing in community practice: Lessons learned from the front line. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2024; 157:133-142. [PMID: 38737354 PMCID: PMC11086729 DOI: 10.1177/17151635241240737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
Background Sustainable implementation of new professional services into clinical practice can be difficult. In 2019, a population-wide initiative called SaferMedsNL was implemented across the province of Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), to promote appropriate medication use. Two evidence-based interventions were adapted to the context of NL to promote deprescribing of proton pump inhibitors and sedatives. The objective of this study was to identify and prioritize which actions supported the implementation of deprescribing in community practice for pharmacists, physicians and nurse practitioners across the province. Methods Community pharmacists, physicians and nurse practitioners were invited to participate in virtual focus groups. Nominal Group Technique was used to elicit responses to the question: "What actions support the implementation of deprescribing into the daily workflow of your practice?" Participants prioritized actions within each group while thematic analysis permitted comparison across groups. Results Five focus groups were held in fall 2020 involving pharmacists (n = 11), physicians (n = 7) and nurse practitioners (n = 4). Participants worked in rural (n = 10) and urban (n = 12) settings. The different groups agreed on what the top 5 actions were, with the top 5 receiving 68% of the scores: (1) providing patient education, (2) allocating time and resources, (3) building interprofessional collaboration and communication, (4) fostering patient relationships and (5) aligning with public awareness strategies. Conclusion Pharmacists, physicians and nurse practitioners identified similar actions that supported implementing evidence-based deprescribing into routine clinical practice. Sharing these strategies may help others embed deprescribing into daily practice and assist the uptake of medication appropriateness initiatives by front-line providers. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2024;157:xx-xx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin P. Turner
- Centre for Medicines Use and Safety, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland and Labrador
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; the Faculty of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland and Labrador
- Université de Montréal, Québec; the Centre de recherche, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland and Labrador
- Québec; the Faculté de Pharmacie, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland and Labrador
| | - Kelda Newport
- Laval Université, Québec; and the School of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland and Labrador
| | - Aisling M. McEvoy
- Centre for Medicines Use and Safety, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland and Labrador
| | - Tara Smith
- Laval Université, Québec; and the School of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland and Labrador
| | - Cara Tannenbaum
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; the Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland and Labrador
- Université de Montréal, Québec; the Centre de recherche, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland and Labrador
| | - Deborah V. Kelly
- Laval Université, Québec; and the School of Pharmacy, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland and Labrador
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ie K, Aoshima S, Yabuki T, Albert SM. A narrative review of evidence to guide deprescribing among older adults. J Gen Fam Med 2021; 22:182-196. [PMID: 34221792 PMCID: PMC8245739 DOI: 10.1002/jgf2.464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Potentially inappropriate prescription and polypharmacy are well‐known risk factors for morbidity and mortality among older adults. However, recent systematic reviews have failed to demonstrate the overall survival benefits of deprescribing. Thus, it is necessary to synthesize the current evidence to provide a practical direction for future research and clinical practice. This review summarizes the existing body of evidence regarding deprescribing to identify useful intervention elements. There is evidence that even simple interventions, such as direct deprescribing targeted at risky medications and explicit criteria‐based approaches, effectively reduce inappropriate prescribing. On the other hand, if the goal is to improve clinical outcomes such as hospitalization and emergency department visits, patient‐centered multimodal interventions such as a combination of medication review, multidisciplinary collaboration, and patient education are likely to be more effective. We also consider the opportunities and challenges for deprescribing within the Japanese healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenya Ie
- Division of General Internal Medicine Department of Internal Medicine St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki Japan.,Division of General Internal Medicine Department of Internal Medicine Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital Kawasaki Japan.,Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health Pittsburgh PA USA
| | | | - Taku Yabuki
- Department of Internal Medicine Tochigi Medical Center Tochigi Japan
| | - Steven M Albert
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health Pittsburgh PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shaw J, Murphy AL, Turner JP, Gardner DM, Silvius JL, Bouck Z, Gordon D, Tannenbaum C. Policies for Deprescribing: An International Scan of Intended and Unintended Outcomes of Limiting Sedative-Hypnotic Use in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 14:39-51. [PMID: 31322113 PMCID: PMC7008681 DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2019.25857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/29/2022]
Abstract
Policies have been put in place internationally to reduce the overuse of certain medications that have a high risk of harm, such as sedative-hypnotic drugs for insomnia or opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. We explore and compare the outcomes of policies aimed at deprescribing sedative-hypnotic medication in community-dwelling older adults. Prescription monitoring policies led to the highest rate of discontinuation but triggered inappropriate substitutions. Financial deterrents through insurance scheme delistings increased patient out-of-pocket spending and had minimal impact. Pay-for-performance incentives to prescribers proved ineffective. Rescheduling alprazolam to a controlled substance raised the street drug price of the drug and shifted use to other benzodiazepines, causing similar rates of overdose deaths. Driving safety policies and jurisdiction-wide educational campaigns promoting non-drug alternatives appear most promising for achieving intended outcomes and avoiding unintended harms. Sustainable change should be supported with direct-to-patient education and improved access to non-drug therapy, with an emphasis on evaluating both intended and unintended consequences of any deprescribing-oriented policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Shaw
- Assistant Professor, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - Andrea L Murphy
- Associate Professor, College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
| | - Justin P Turner
- Graduate Student, Centre de Recherche Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, QC
| | - David M Gardner
- Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
| | - James L Silvius
- Co-Director, Canadian Deprescribing Network; Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | - Zachary Bouck
- Biostatistician, Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Toronto, ON
| | - Dara Gordon
- Research Coordinator, Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Toronto, ON
| | - Cara Tannenbaum
- Co-Director, Canadian Deprescribing Network; Professor, Faculties of Medicine and Pharmacy Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
May T, Holloway K, Buhociu M, Hills R. Not what the doctor ordered: Motivations for nonmedical prescription drug use among people who use illegal drugs. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2020; 82:102823. [PMID: 32585584 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonmedical Prescription Drug Use (NMPDU) is common among people who use illegal drugs. NMPDU is particularly problematic among this population however, as medications such as benzodiazepines and gabapentinoids can potentiate the harmful effects of opioids. Despite these harms, there is some evidence that NMPDU can have harm reducing and therapeutic potential for some people who use illegal drugs. This study provides further evidence of the harm reducing motives for NMPDU among people who use illegal drugs in community and prison settings in Wales, UK. METHODS In depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 60 interviewees recruited from statutory and third sector drug treatment providers operating in five towns and cities in Wales, and from two Welsh prisons. Eligibility was based primarily on whether the person was currently (or previously) a user of illegal drugs and had recent experience of NMPDU. RESULTS NMPDU was found to be largely driven by insufficient access to certain prescription medications and treatment. In this context, NMPDU played an important role in alleviating legitimate medical concerns and overcoming logistical and regulatory barriers associated with Opioid Substitution Therapy. NMPDU also had everyday practicality and mitigated many of the everyday harms experienced by people who use drugs, including opioid withdrawal and stimulant comedowns. CONCLUSION Results suggest that NMPDU has the potential to mitigate a number of legitimate medical concerns in the absence of treatment. Finding nuanced ways of responding to patient need whilst reducing the potential for NMPDU are therefore needed, and harm reduction strategies that harness the knowledge and expertise of people who use drugs should be encouraged. Additional policy measures that attend to the inequities and social-structural factors that produce and maintain the need to consume prescription medications in ways that are not intended are also required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom May
- Substance Use Research Group (SURG), Centre for Criminology, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, CF37 1DL, Wales.
| | - Katy Holloway
- Substance Use Research Group (SURG), Centre for Criminology, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, CF37 1DL, Wales
| | - Marian Buhociu
- Substance Use Research Group (SURG), Centre for Criminology, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, CF37 1DL, Wales
| | - Rhian Hills
- Senior Policy Manager - Substance Misuse, Welsh Government, Merthyr Tydfil, CF48 1UZ, Wales
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sutherland R, Peacock A, Nielsen S, Bruno R. Alprazolam use among a sample of Australians who inject drugs: Trends up to six years post regulatory changes. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2020; 79:102721. [PMID: 32289592 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Alprazolam is a high potency triazolobenzodiazepine that is associated with a disproportionate amount of harm compared to other benzodiazepines. In Australia, amid growing concerns of extra-medical use and harms, alprazolam was up-scheduled from Schedule 4 (prescription only) to Schedule 8 (controlled drug) on 1 February 2014, with further restrictions introduced on 1 February 2017. This study aims to examine the impact of these regulatory changes among cross-sectional samples of people who inject drugs (PWID), from 2011-2019. METHODS Data were obtained from the 2011-2019 Illicit Drug Reporting System, comprising cross-sectional samples of PWID recruited annually from Australian capital cities (approximately ~900 per year). RESULTS By 2019, the proportion of PWID who reported past six-month use of non-prescribed (17%) and prescribed (4%) alprazolam had halved compared to 2011 (39% and 13%, respectively), with no evidence of an increase in use of other sedative substances. Following the up-scheduling of alprazolam in 2014, there was an increase in the median last price paid for 2 mg of diverted alprazolam ($5AUD pre-rescheduling versus $7AUD post rescheduling), with 61% of those able to answer reporting that diverted alprazolam had become 'more difficult' to obtain post versus pre-rescheduling. The correlates associated with non-prescribed alprazolam use remained relatively consistent pre- and post-regulatory change, with past-month criminal activity, past six-month opioid agonist therapy and past six-month use of non-prescribed other benzodiazepines associated with non-prescribed alprazolam use in both the 2013 and 2018 samples. CONCLUSIONS Regulatory changes appear to have resulted in sustained reductions in alprazolam use amongst our annual cross-sectional sentinel samples of PWID, although a considerable minority (17%) continued to report non-prescribed use in 2019. To achieve further reductions in non-prescribed use and associated harms, these regulatory changes need to be coupled with other interventions, such as direct consumer engagement and harm reduction messaging. Our findings suggest that people receiving opioid agonist therapy remain a key target population for such interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Sutherland
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
| | - Amy Peacock
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Tasmania, Australia
| | - Suzanne Nielsen
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; Monash Addiction Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Raimondo Bruno
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cairns R, Schaffer AL, Brown JA, Pearson SA, Buckley NA. Codeine use and harms in Australia: evaluating the effects of re-scheduling. Addiction 2020; 115:451-459. [PMID: 31577369 DOI: 10.1111/add.14798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2019] [Revised: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Globally, codeine is the most-used opioid. In December 2016, Australia announced that low-strength codeine (≤ 15 mg) would be re-scheduled and no longer available for purchase over-the-counter; this was implemented in February 2018. We aimed to evaluate the effect of this scheduling change on codeine misuse and use and misuse of other opioids. DESIGN AND SETTING Interrupted time-series analysis of monthly opioid exposure calls to New South Wales Poisons Information Centre (NSWPIC, captures 50% of Australia's poisoning calls), January 2015- January 2019 and monthly national codeine sales, March 2015-March 2019. We incorporated a washout period (January 2017 - January 2018) between the announcement and implementation, when prescriber/consumer behaviour may have been influenced. PARTICIPANTS Intentional opioid overdoses resulting in a call to NSWPIC. MEASUREMENTS We used linear segmented regression to identify abrupt changes in level and slope of fitted lines. Codeine poisonings and sales were stratified into high strength (> 15 mg per dose unit) and low strength (≤ 15 mg). Only low-strength formulations were re-scheduled. FINDINGS We observed an abrupt -50.8 percentage [95% confidence interval (CI) = -79.0 to -22.6%] level change in monthly codeine-related poisonings and no change in slope in the 12 months after February 2018. There was no increase in calls to the NSWPIC for high-strength products, level change: -37.2% (95% CI = -82.3 to 8%) or non-codeine opioids, level change: -4.4% (95% CI = -33.3 to 24.4%). Overall, the re-scheduling resulted in a level change in opioid calls of -35.8% calls/month (95% CI = -51.2 to -20.4%). Low-strength codeine sales decreased by 87.3% (95% CI = -88.5 to -85.9%), with no increase in high-strength codeine sales in the 14 months following re-scheduling, -4.0% (95% CI = -19.6 to 14.6%). CONCLUSIONS Codeine re-scheduling in Australia appears to have reduced codeine misuse and sales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose Cairns
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,NSW Poisons Information Centre, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrea L Schaffer
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jared A Brown
- NSW Poisons Information Centre, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.,Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sallie-Anne Pearson
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicholas A Buckley
- NSW Poisons Information Centre, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.,School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sawan M, Reeve E, Turner J, Todd A, Steinman MA, Petrovic M, Gnjidic D. A systems approach to identifying the challenges of implementing deprescribing in older adults across different health-care settings and countries: a narrative review. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2020; 13:233-245. [PMID: 32056451 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2020.1730812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: There is increasing recognition of the need for deprescribing of inappropriate medications in older adults. However, efforts to encourage implementation of deprescribing in clinical practice have resulted in mixed results across settings and countries.Area covered: Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar in June 2019. Reference lists, citation checking, and personal reference libraries were also utilized. Studies capturing the main challenges of, and opportunities for, implementing deprescribing into clinical practice across selected health-care settings internationally, and international deprescribing-orientated policies were included and summarized in this narrative review.Expert opinion: Deprescribing intervention studies are inherently heterogeneous because of the complexity of interventions employed and often do not reflect the real-world. Further research investigating enhanced implementation of deprescribing into clinical practice and across health-care settings is required. Process evaluations in deprescribing intervention studies are needed to determine the contextual factors that are important to the translation of the interventions in the real-world. Deprescribing interventions may need to be individually tailored to target the unique barriers and opportunities to deprescribing in different clinical settings. Introduction of national policies to encourage deprescribing may be beneficial, but need to be evaluated to determine if there are any unintended consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mouna Sawan
- Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.,Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Emily Reeve
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.,Geriatric Medicine Research, Faculty of Medicine and College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Canada
| | - Justin Turner
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Adam Todd
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Michael A Steinman
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco and the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mirko Petrovic
- Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Danijela Gnjidic
- Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Votaw VR, Geyer R, Rieselbach MM, McHugh RK. The epidemiology of benzodiazepine misuse: A systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend 2019; 200:95-114. [PMID: 31121495 PMCID: PMC6639084 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 222] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Revised: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benzodiazepine misuse is a growing public health problem, with increases in benzodiazepine-related overdose deaths and emergency room visits in recent years. However, relatively little attention has been paid to this emergent problem. We systematically reviewed epidemiological studies on benzodiazepine misuse to identify key findings, limitations, and future directions for research. METHODS PubMed and PsychINFO databases were searched through February 2019 for peer-reviewed publications on benzodiazepine misuse (e.g., use without a prescription; at a higher frequency or dose than prescribed). Eligibility criteria included human studies that focused on the prevalence, trends, correlates, motives, patterns, sources, and consequences of benzodiazepine misuse. RESULTS The search identified 1970 publications, and 351 articles were eligible for data extraction and inclusion. In 2017, benzodiazepines and other tranquilizers were the third most commonly misused illicit or prescription drug in the U.S. (approximately 2.2% of the population). Worldwide rates of misuse appear to be similar to those reported in the U.S. Factors associated with misuse include other substance use, receipt of a benzodiazepine prescription, and psychiatric symptoms and disorders. Benzodiazepine misuse encompasses heterogeneous presentations of motives, patterns, and sources. Moreover, misuse is associated with myriad poor outcomes, including mortality, HIV/HCV risk behaviors, poor self-reported quality of life, criminality, and continued substance use during treatment. CONCLUSIONS Benzodiazepine misuse is a worldwide public health concern that is associated with a number of concerning consequences. Findings from the present review have implications for identifying subgroups who could benefit from prevention and treatment efforts, critical points for intervention, and treatment targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria R. Votaw
- Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, MSC 03-2220, Albuquerque, NM, USA,Corresponding author: Victoria R. Votaw, Clinical Psychology Ph.D. Student Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Logan Hall, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131,
| | - Rachel Geyer
- Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA, USA
| | - Maya M. Rieselbach
- Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA, USA
| | - R. Kathryn McHugh
- Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA, USA,Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
National Institute on Drug Abuse International Program: improving opioid use disorder treatment through international research training. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2018; 31:287-293. [PMID: 29771745 PMCID: PMC6050030 DOI: 10.1097/yco.0000000000000426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW For more than 25 years, the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) has supported research-training programs, establishing a global research network and expanding the knowledge base on substance use disorders. International research to inform approaches to opioid addiction is particularly important and relevant to the United States, where opioid misuse, addiction, and overdose constitute an emerging public health crisis. This article summarizes the NIDA International Program and illustrates its impact by reviewing recent articles about treatment approaches for opioid use disorders (OUD). RECENT FINDINGS Studies in several countries have demonstrated the effectiveness of physician office-based opioid substitution therapies. Other research has demonstrated the effectiveness of different formulations and doses of the opioid antagonist naltrexone, as well as different approaches to providing naloxone to treat opioid overdose. Continuing research into implementation of evidence-based treatment in international settings with limited resources is applicable to US regions that face similar structural, legal, and fiscal constraints. SUMMARY The current review describes international research on OUD treatment and opioid overdose, most coauthored by former NIDA fellows. The findings from outside the United States have important implications for best practices domestically and in other countries that are experiencing increases in OUD prevalence and related overdose deaths.
Collapse
|
10
|
Hashemi SH, Montazer M, Naghdi N, Toliyat T. Formulation and characterization of alprazolam-loaded nanoliposomes: screening of process variables and optimizing characteristics using RSM. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2017; 44:296-305. [DOI: 10.1080/03639045.2017.1391834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Hesamoddin Hashemi
- Department of Textile Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Majid Montazer
- Department of Textile Engineering, Functional Fibrous Structures & Environmental Enhancement (FFSEE), Amirkabir Nanotechnology Research Institute (ANTRI), Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nasser Naghdi
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Tayebeh Toliyat
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Heikman PK, Muhonen LH, Ojanperä IA. Polydrug abuse among opioid maintenance treatment patients is related to inadequate dose of maintenance treatment medicine. BMC Psychiatry 2017; 17:245. [PMID: 28683783 PMCID: PMC5501578 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1415-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Accepted: 07/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polydrug abuse is a known problem among opioid-dependent patients receiving opioid maintenance treatment (OMT). However, improved laboratory diagnostics is required to reveal polydrug abuse in its current scope. Furthermore, there are few studies focusing on the relationship between polydrug abuse and adequacy of the dose of OMT medicine. This study aimed to evaluate the polydrug abuse among opioid-dependent patients receiving OMT with inadequate (Group IA) and adequate (Group A) doses of OMT medicine as experienced by the patients. Craving for opioids and withdrawal symptoms were evaluated as indicators of the adequacy rating. METHODS This is a retrospective register-based study of 60 OMT patients on either methadone or sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone medication, whose polydrug abuse was studied from urine samples by means of a comprehensive high-resolution mass spectrometry method. RESULTS Inadequate doses of the OMT medicines were associated with higher subjective withdrawal scores and craving for opioids. Six groups of abused substances (benzodiazepines, amphetamines, opioids, cannabis, new psychoactive substances, and non-prescribed psychotropic medicines) were found among OMT patients. Group IA patients showed significantly more abuse of benzodiazepines and amphetamines than the Group A patients. All the new psychoactive substances and most of the non-prescribed psychotropic medicines were detected from the Group IA patients. There was no difference in the doses of the OMT medicine between Groups IA and A patients. CONCLUSIONS Polydrug abuse, detected by definitive laboratory methods, was widespread and more common among Group IA than Group A patients, emphasizing the requirement for individual OMT medicine dose adjustment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pertti Kalevi Heikman
- University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Psychiatry, P.O. Box 22, Välskärinkatu 12 A, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Leea Hellevi Muhonen
- University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Psychiatry, P.O. Box 22, Välskärinkatu 12 A, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ilkka Antero Ojanperä
- University of Helsinki, Forensic Medicine, P.O. Box 40, Kytösuontie 11, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
- National Institute for Health and Welfare, Forensic Toxicology Unit, P.O. Box 30, Mannerheimintie 166, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alprazolam in fatal overdose following regulatory rescheduling: A response to Deacon et al. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2016; 39:138-139. [PMID: 27856134 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2016] [Revised: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 10/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
13
|
McDonough M. Commentary on Cairns et al. (2016): Over-the-counter codeine in Australia-questioning the efficacy of current restrictions or re-scheduling. Addiction 2016; 111:1854-5. [PMID: 27605083 DOI: 10.1111/add.13525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|