Psychiatric symptom rate of patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A case control study

Prefrontal oxygenation and working memory in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus following integrated yoga: a randomized controlled trial

AIMS

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) alters brain functional and structural connectivity leading to cognitive dysfunction. This study examined the effect of a 12-week yoga intervention on prefrontal cortex (PFC) oxygenation and working memory in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

Fifty participants were randomized into yoga and waitlist control groups. The yoga protocol specific to T2DM was followed. The pre- (day 1), mid- (6 weeks) and post-intervention (12 weeks) assessments included measurement of PFC oxygenation while performing working memory tasks (n-back) using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

RESULTS

Following a 12-week intervention, the yoga group showed improved performance in working memory [accuracy (geometric mean difference of 3.15%, 95% CI [2.33,3.96], p = 0.001) and reaction time (mean difference of 100.8 milliseconds,95% CI [- 166.6, - 35.1], p = 0.002] in the high task load (2-back) associated with higher oxygenation in dorsolateral PFC (β coefficient mean difference of 95.6, 95% CI [0.23,191], p = 0.049) and ventrolateral PFC (β coefficient mean difference of 53.4, 95% CI [7.8,98.9], p = 0.018) regions. Higher oxygenation in dorsolateral PFC during 2-back task was positively correlated with accuracy (r(23) = 0.65, p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with reaction time (r(23) =  - 0.47,p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Integrated yoga practice may improve working memory performance associated with higher PFC oxygenation in patients with T2DM. As 12 weeks of yoga intervention improved working memory performance, the regular practice of yoga may have the potential to prevent decline of cognitive functions in clinical conditions.

Evaluation of knowledge, barriers, and attitudes in the management of type 2 diabetes in elderly patients: A Delphi study on primary and hospital care

OBJECTIVES

This work aims to explore attitudes regarding the management of elderly or frail patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the routine clinical practice of a multidisciplinary group of physicians in Spain.

METHODS

A mixed survey was used that included both Delphi and opinion, attitude, and behaviour (OAB) questions. Perceptions in primary care (n = 211) and hospital care (n = 80) were compared.

RESULTS

Consensus was obtained on all statements. Eighty-seven percent of participants considered that severe psychiatric disorders conditioned antidiabetic treatment and 72% that a psychocognitive assessment is as relevant as the assessment of other comorbidities. Hospital care physicians more frequently considered that comorbidity affects self-care (95.0% vs. 82.9%), that a lack of de-intensification is a form of therapeutic inertia (88.8% vs. 76.3%), that classifying older adults as frail is fundamental to choosing targets (96.3% vs. 87.7%), that de-intensification of antidiabetic treatment and control of cardiovascular risk factors should be considered in those over 80 years of age (90.0% vs. 78.7%), and that type 2 diabetes mellitus predisposes patients to sarcopenia (86.3% vs. 71.6%). The usefulness of clinical guidelines was more highly valued among primary care participants (79.1% vs. 72.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is room for improvement on several aspects of managing elderly or frail patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, including inertia in treatment de-intensification, conducting a psychocognitive assessment, or the identification of frailty and sarcopenia.

Depression and the risk of hospitalization in type 2 diabetes patients: A nested case-control study accounting for non-persistence to antidiabetic treatment

INTRODUCTION

Depression is one of the most common comorbidities of type 2 diabetes. The relationship between these two diseases seems to be bidirectional. Both conditions separately lead to significant morbidity and mortality, including hospitalization. Moreover, depression is associated with non-persistence with antidiabetic drugs.

OBJECTIVES

To measure the effect of depression on morbidity and particularly on all-cause, diabetes-related, cardiovascular-related and major cardiovascular events-related hospitalization, adjusting for non-persistence to antidiabetic drugs and other confounders.

METHODS

We performed a nested case-control study within a cohort of type 2 diabetic individuals initiating antidiabetic drugs. Using the health administrative data of the province of Quebec, Canada, we identified all-cause, diabetes-related, cardiovascular-related and major cardiovascular hospitalizations during a maximum follow-up of eight years after the initiation of antidiabetic drug treatment. A density sampling method matched all cases with up to 10 controls by age, sex, and the Elixhauser comorbidity index. The effect of depression on hospitalization was estimated using conditional logistic regressions adjusting for non-persistence to antidiabetic drug treatment and other variables.

RESULTS

We identified 41,550 all-cause hospitalized cases, of which 34,437 were related to cardiovascular (CV) diseases, 29,584 to diabetes, and 13,867 to major CV events. Depression was diagnosed in 2.51% of all-cause hospitalizations and 1.16% of matched controls. 69.11% of cases and 72.59% of controls were on metformin monotherapy. The majority (71.62% vs 75.02%, respectively) stayed on metformin monotherapy without adding or switching drugs during follow-up. Non-persistence was at similar rates (about 30%) in both groups. In the multivariable analyses, depression was associated with an increased risk for all-cause hospitalizations, with odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 2.21 (95% CI: 2.07-2.37) to 1.32 (95% CI: 1.22-1.44) according to the model adjustment (from the univariate to the fully adhjusted).

CONCLUSION

Depression increased the risk of all-cause hospitalizations among patients treated for diabetes, even after accounting for non-persistence and other potentially confounding factors. These results stress the impact of depression on diabetic patients' use of health care resources.

Are There Different Viewpoints About the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Comorbidities? A Multidisciplinary Spanish Qualitative Research

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to explore the vision of a large multidisciplinary group of physicians treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Spain, with a special focus on controversial management aspects. The perceptions of primary care (PC) physicians and hospital care (HC) specialists were compared.

METHODS

This was a mixed survey that included Delphi-like statements and opinion, attitude and behaviour (OAB) questions. The Delphi-like statements were assessed on the basis of the degree of agreement among respondents, and a descriptive analysis was performed on the answers to the OAB questions.

RESULTS

A total of 296 participants responded to the first wave of the survey, of whom 293 responded to the second wave (211 from PC and 80 from HC, with two respondents for whom there were no data on specialty). A high degree of consensus (CNS ≥ 0.8) was obtained in all the statements. A proactive approach to detect prediabetes or T2DM in asymptomatic people was highly supported (80.4% of agreement). Introducing early treatment intensification was considered to favour the durability of glycaemic control and to delay the progression of the disease (80.4%). There was agreement on the statement that glycaemic variability constitutes a risk factor for chronic complications, although differences in the perceptions of HC physicians and PC specialists were identified (86.3 vs. 80.1%, respectively). More HC physicans than PC specialists considered comorbidities to affect the ability to self-care (95 vs. 82.9%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The survey revealed that there was a high, albeit not universal, degree of agreement amongst PC physicians and HC specialists in relation to prevention, screening and diagnosis of T2DM; early treatment intensification; dysglycaemias; and the management of patients with comorbidities. The statement on the management of patients with comorbidities elicited the highest difference between PC physicans and HC specialists. The results of this survey indicate that there is room for improvement in terms of implementing strategies in these areas.