Anatomic Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction With Autografts

Non-anatomical reconstruction of chronic posterolateral corner knee injuries show failure rates from 0% to 36% versus 4.3% to 24.2% for anatomic reconstruction techniques: An updated systematic review reflecting the 2019 expert consensus statement

OBJECTIVE

To review and update the literature regarding outcomes following surgical management of chronic, grade III posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries, with an emphasis on estimating failure rates based upon objective parameters in light of the 2019 expert consensus, while secondarily comparing the failure rates of anatomic versus non-anatomic reconstruction techniques.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases. Inclusion criteria consisted of level I-IV human clinical studies reporting subjective and objective outcomes in patients following surgical management for chronic (>6 weeks from injury) grade III PLC injuries, with a minimum two-year follow-up. The criterion for objective surgical failure was based on post-operative varus stress radiographs and defined as a side-to-side difference of 3 ​mm or more of lateral gapping.

RESULTS

A total of six studies, consisting of 10 separate cohorts encompassing a total of 230 patients, were identified. PLC reconstruction was performed in all cohorts, with 80 ​% (n ​= ​8/10) of these cohorts utilising an anatomic reconstruction technique. A failure rate ranging from 4.3 ​% to 36 ​% was found. Subgroup analysis revealed a failure rate of 4.3 ​%-24.2 ​% for anatomic reconstruction techniques, whereas a 0 ​%-36 ​% failure rate was found for non-anatomic reconstruction. Arthrofibrosis was the most common complication (range, 0 ​%-12.1 ​%) following surgery. 0 ​%-8 ​% of patients required revision PLC surgery.

CONCLUSION

PLC reconstruction yields a wide variability in failure rates according to the side-to-side difference of 3 ​mm or more of lateral gapping on post-operative varus stress radiographs, with low revision rates following anatomic and non-anatomic reconstruction techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; Systematic Review of Level III and IV studies.

[Posterolateral instability of the knee joint]

The posterolateral corner of the knee is composed of a multilayered complex of ligamentous, musculotendinous, and capsular structures, which interact in a synergistic stabilizing manner with the central structures, particularly the posterior cruciate ligament. Injuries of the posterolateral corner are generally accompanied by rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament. Depending on the injured structures, injuries of the posterolateral corner result in posterolateral rotational instability alone (Fanelli A) or with lateral instability (Fanelli B/C). For rotational instability alone, isolated popliteus bypass is an effective procedure; with concomitant lateral instability in flexion, additional stabilization of the lateral collateral ligament is required. Most of the various available techniques are described as open reconstruction procedures. In recent years, arthroscopic techniques for posterolateral reconstruction have also been successfully developed.

Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction: Modification of the LaPrade Technique Using Autologous Hamstring Tendon Grafts: "The Popliteofibular Loop"

Posterolateral corner (PLC) injury is a significant cause of knee instability. In recent years, a better understanding of the anatomy and biomechanics of the PLC structures has led to significant advancements in the surgical treatment of this injury. Anatomical reconstruction techniques, particularly the LaPrade technique, have shown promising results. However, in some settings, the reliance on allografts limits the feasibility of this technique, prompting surgeons to seek reproducible alternatives that use autologous grafts, eliminating the need for tissue banks. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe a modification of the LaPrade technique for PLC reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendon grafts. The surgical technique is described to ensure reproducibility, with particular emphasis on the proposed modifications: the use of autologous grafts (gracilis and semitendinosus tendons); the configuration in which they are used to increase the thickness of the reconstructed structures; and the exclusive fixation with widely available interference screws.

Tissue Augmentation Techniques in the Management of Ligamentous Knee Injuries

Despite early reports of high failure rates in knee ligament repair techniques resulting in favor of reconstruction, newer advances in surgical technology have shifted the attention back to repair with the addition of various tissue augmentation techniques. Ligament repair preserves proprioceptors in the native ligament and avoids autograft tendon harvest, minimizing the complications associated with donor site ruptures in reconstruction techniques. Tissue augmentation has been successfully used in knee ligamentous and tendon repair procedures, as well as in some upper extremity procedures. This study provides a clinical update on the surgical techniques, biomechanics, and outcomes with the application of various tissue augmentation techniques in the ligaments surrounding the knee joint.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of a modified anatomic posterolateral corner reconstruction technique using a single semitendinosus autograft

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of a modified anatomical posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction technique using a single autograft.

METHODS

This prospective case series included 19 patients with a posterolateral corner injury. The posterolateral corner was reconstructed using a modified anatomical technique that utilized adjustable suspensory fixation on the tibial side. Patients were evaluated subjectively using the international knee documentation form (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner activity scales and objectively by measuring the tibial external rotation angle, knee hyperextension, and lateral joint line opening on stress varus radiographs before and after surgery. The patients were followed-up for a minimum of 2 years.

RESULTS

Both IKDC and Lysholm knee scores significantly improved from 49 and 53 preoperatively to 77 and 81 postoperatively, respectively. The tibial external rotation angle and knee hyperextension showed significant reduction to normal values at the final follow-up. However, the lateral joint line opening measured on the varus stress radiograph remained larger than the contralateral normal knee.

CONCLUSION

Posterolateral corner reconstruction with a hamstring autograft using a modified anatomical reconstruction technique significantly improved both the subjective patient scores and objective knee stability. However, the varus stability was not completely restored compared with the uninjured knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective case series (Level of evidence IV).

Biomechanical considerations for graft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) of the knee is common and often requires surgical reconstruction. There are numerous graft options available to the operating surgeon, to each of which a growing body of dedicated literature exists. Each of these potential choices of ACL graft specimen has a distinctive set of biomechanical properties, clinical outcome profiles, and other special considerations (e.g., autograft versus allograft, harvest site factors, and operating time). The purpose of this review is to discuss the biomechanical characteristics of the native ACL alongside those of several of the most commonly used ACL graft specimens based on a current review of the biomechanical literature. In doing so, this review will also briefly discuss the biomechanical implications for allograft versus autograft usage and single-bundle versus double-bundle repair techniques. This review lists and discusses the stress, strain, stiffness, Young's modulus, and ultimate load to failure of the native ACL, several common autografts [patellar bone-tendon-bone (BTB), hamstring tendon (HT), and quadriceps tendon (QT)], and several common allografts. Given the important biomechanical role of the ACL in stabilizing the knee to translational and rotational forces, it is crucial that the operating surgeon make a decision on graft choice that is informed in the biomechanical implications of ACL graft selection.

Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction of the Knee Using Gracilis Autograft and Biceps Femoris

We introduce our technique for posterolateral corner reconstruction, which is based on the principle described in Arciero's technique for anatomic reconstruction of lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and popliteofibular ligament (PFL) to gain static stability in varus strain and external rotation. This technique uses a doubled gracilis autograft to reconstruct the PFL and a split biceps tendon transfer to reconstruct the LCL. Using this technique an anatomical LCL and PFL reconstruction can be performed in combination with anterior cruciate ligament or posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction without contralateral graft harvest or allograft. The technique also enables an isolated reconstruction of LCL or PFL when required and can be performed to augment an acute repair.

Biomechanical Assessment of Knee Laxity After a Novel Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Technique

BACKGROUND

Different techniques to restore knee stability after posterolateral corner (PLC) injury have been described. The original anatomic PLC reconstruction uses 2 separate allografts to reconstruct the PLC. Access to allograft tissue continues to be a significant limitation of this technique, which led to the development of a modified anatomic approach utilizing a single autologous semitendinosus graft fixed on the tibia with an adjustable suspensory loop to enable differential tensioning of the PLC components.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to compare the modified anatomic technique with the original anatomic reconstruction in terms of varus and external rotatory laxity in a cadaveric biomechanical model. The hypothesis was that both techniques would restore varus and external rotatory laxity after a simulated complete PLC injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Eight pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens were tested to compare the 2 techniques. Varus and external tibial rotation laxity of the knee were measured while applying 10-N·m varus and 5-N·m external rotatory torques at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. These measurements were tested under 3 conditions: (1) intact fibular collateral ligament, popliteal tendon, and popliteofibular ligament; (2) complete transection of the fibular collateral ligament, popliteal tendon, and popliteofibular ligament; (3) after PLC reconstruction with either the modified (n = 8) or the original (n = 8) technique.

RESULTS

After PLC reconstruction, varus laxity was restored with no statistically significant differences from the intact condition after both reconstruction techniques. Similar outcomes were observed for external rotation in extension; however, in terms of the external rotation limit with respect to the intact joint, significant reductions of mean ± SD 4.1°± 6.3° (P = .036) and 5.1°± 6.6° (P = .016) were recorded with the modified technique at 60° and 90° of flexion, respectively. No significant effect was observed on the neutral flexion kinematics from 0° to 90° of flexion, and no significant differences were observed between reconstructions (P = .222).

CONCLUSION

Both PLC reconstruction techniques restored the normal native varus as compared with the intact knee. Although the modified technique constrained end-range external rotation at 60° and 90° of flexion, no differences were noted with neutral flexion kinematics. Care should be taken when tensioning in the modified technique so that the tibia is in a neutral position to avoid overconstraining the knee.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The modified technique may prove useful in situations where there are limited graft options, particularly where allografts are not available or are restricted.

Posterolateral Complex Reconstruction With Distal Femoral Varus Opening-Wedge Osteotomy for Unstable Neglected Multiligamentous Knee Injury With Valgus Malalignment

We presented a case of a 25-year-old woman with early posttraumatic degenerative change to the articular cartilage accompanied with valgus malalignment despite receiving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after a multiligamentous injury sustained 2 years earlier. Rapid deteriorating valgus malalignment may result from chronic instability and intra-articular bone loss. Simultaneous distal femoral varus osteotomy and posterolateral complex reconstruction were performed during a single surgery. Six months after the surgery, the patient could walk briskly and climb stairs without any discomfort. Salvage procedures and biological reconstruction could be the primary choice for young patients to recover their knee function while avoiding joint replacement.

Posterolateral Corner Repair With Internal Bracing and Peroneal Nerve Neurolysis

Posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction has been shown to be an effective treatment for PLC injuries. Acute anatomical repair of the PLC has the same potential to stabilize the knee; however, outcomes are less defined. Surgical repair minimizes graft harvest morbidity and allows for the maintenance of native tissue proprioception. Furthermore, augmentation with a flat-braided suture (SutureTape; Arthrex) portends additional repair strength and protection. The purpose of this Technical Note and video is to provide our preferred method of PLC repair in a patient with an acute knee dislocation and injury to the biceps femoris, lateral collateral ligament, iliotibial band, popliteofibular ligament, and the meniscocapsular attachment of the lateral meniscus.

Anatomic Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Using Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autografts: Surgical Technique

An anatomically based posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction has emerged as a viable and clinically effective surgical technique for midsubstance ligamentous injuries in both the acute and chronic settings. There are several surgical techniques for PLC reconstruction; however, the classic anatomic reconstruction technique (LaPrade technique) is now considered the gold standard and was originally described using an Achilles tendon allograft. In this article, we describe a modified LaPrade autograft technique, in which the same tunnel position, graft passage, and fixation are used to reproduce the 3 primary stabilizers of the PLC. Instead of allografts, hamstring autografts are used while tunnel diameters and fixation devices are adapted to them. With the use of autograft tendons, difficulties related to graft length or asymmetry are encountered. We consider this technique a good alternative for an anatomically based PLC reconstruction, especially given the lower availability and higher cost of allograft tissues in several countries.

Clinical Outcomes of Posterolateral Complex Reconstruction Performed with a Single Femoral Tunnel

The objective of this study is to report the functional outcomes, complications, and reconstruction failure rate of patients undergoing posterolateral complex reconstruction with a single femoral tunnel technique. Patients with posterolateral complex injuries associated with injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), or both undergoing surgical treatment with the single femoral tunnel technique were included in the study. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm's scales were evaluated, in addition to age, gender, time between trauma and surgery, trauma type, range of motion (ROM) restrictions, peroneal nerve injury, and reconstruction failure. Sixty-six patients were included. Eighteen underwent ACL and posterolateral complex (PLC) reconstruction (group 1), 24 underwent ACL, PCL, and PLC reconstruction (group 2), and 24 underwent PCL and PLC reconstruction (group 3). The mean follow-up was 63 months. The subjective IKDC was 83.7 ± 14.6 for group 1, 74.3 ± 12.6 for group 2, and 66.3 ± 16.0 for group 3 (p < 0.001). The Lysholm's score was 87.1 ± 12.8 for group 1, 79.5 ± 15.0 for group 2, and 77.7 ± 15.2 for group 3 (p = 0.042). There were six reconstruction failures among the patients (9.1%) with no differences among the groups (p = 0.368). Female gender and reconstruction failure were associated with worse outcomes. Patients undergoing reconstruction of PLC structures with the single femoral tunnel technique achieved good functional outcomes and a failure rate similar to literature. Patients undergoing only combined ACL reconstruction showed better outcomes than patients undergoing combined PCL reconstruction. Female gender was associated with a worse functional outcome irrespective of the injury type.

Management of multiligament knee injuries

Up to 18% of multiligament knee injuries (MLKI) have an associated vascular injury.All MLKI should be assessed using the ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) with selective arteriography if ABPI is < 0.9.An ischaemic limb following knee dislocation must be taken to the operating theatre immediately for stabilization and re-vascularization.Partial common peroneal nerve (CPN) injury following MLKI has better recovery than complete palsy.Posterior tibial tendon transfer is offered to patients with complete CPN palsy if there is no recovery at six months.Operative treatment with acute or staged reconstructions provides the best outcome in MLKI.Effective repair can only be performed within three weeks of injury.There is no difference between repair and reconstruction of medial collateral ligament and posteromedial corner.Posterolateral corner reconstruction has a lower failure rate than repair.Early mobilization following MLKI surgery results in fewer range-of-motion deficits. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:145-155. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190012.

Biceps femoris tenodesis revisited A prospective cohort study of concurrent anterior cruciate and postero-lateral corner reconstruction

PURPOSE

When tendon allograft is not an option, knee posterolateral corner reconstruction by biceps femoris tenodesis gains increasing interest. This study investigated such question; "Does biceps femoris tenodesis result in clinical and functional outcomes comparable to Larsen fibular-based sling in concurrent posterolateral corner and anterior cruciate reconstruction?

PATIENTS & METHODS

From October 2014 till December 2018, 19 patients of concurrent anterior cruciate and posterolateral corner injury were prospectively categorized according to posterolateral reconstruction technique into group-(A) of 10 patients managed by Larsen sling and group-(B) of 9 patients managed by biceps femoris tenodesis. Patients were evaluated for preoperative and 2-year postoperative knee range of motion, varus stress and prone dial tests, Lysholm and IKDC scores, return to work, and instability recurrence.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis revealed matched demographics between groups. At mean of 29months postoperatively, average knee flexion was 146°; while extension loss didn't exceed 1° in both groups. There was no significant difference between groups in Lysholm and IKDC scores; (P-value= 0.710 and 0.210 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Despite it is non-anatomic technique, biceps femoris tenodesis can achieve clinical and functional outcomes comparable to Larsen fibular-based sling in concurrent posterolateral corner and anterior cruciate reconstruction; while offering advantages of simplicity and quickness and overcoming tendon graft unavailability.

Posterolateral corner of the knee: a systematic literature review of current concepts of arthroscopic reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Injuries of the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee lead to chronic lateral and external rotational instability and are often associated with PCL injuries. Numerous surgical techniques for repair and reconstruction of the PLC are established. Recently, several arthroscopic techniques have been published in order to address different degrees of PLC injuries through reconstruction of one or more functional structures. The purpose of this systematic review is to give an overview about arthroscopic techniques of posterolateral corner reconstructions and to evaluate their safeness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature on arthroscopic reconstructions of the posterolateral corner of the knee according to the PRISMA guidelines was performed using PubMed MEDLINE and Web of Science Databases on June 15th, 2020. Inclusion criteria were descriptions of surgical techniques to reconstruct different aspects of the posterolateral corner either strictly arthroscopically or minimally-invasive with an arthroscopic assistance.

RESULTS

Arthroscopic techniques differ with regard to the extent of reconstructed units (popliteus tendon, popliteofibular ligament, lateral collateral ligament), surgical approach (transseptal, lateral) and biomechanical results (anatomic vs. non-anatomic reconstruction, restoration of rotational instability and/or lateral instability).

CONCLUSION

Different approaches to arthroscopic PLC reconstruction are presented, yet clinical results are scarce. Up to now good and excellent clinical results are reported. No major complications are reported in the literature so far.

Editorial Commentary: Anatomic Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction: All-Autograft Technique

Several techniques for posterolateral corner reconstruction have been described in the literature, typically using allogeneic tissue. Autograft reconstruction has potential value because of decreased cost and limited allograft supply in some locations. Initial results of this hamstring autograft tendon technique are promising, but further research is needed to directly compare reconstruction graft sources.

A Hamstring-Based Anatomic Posterolateral Knee Reconstruction With Autografts Improves Both Radiographic Instability and Functional Outcomes

PURPOSE

To report the subjective outcomes and objective stability in a series of chronically grade III posterolateral injured knees treated with a hamstring-based anatomic posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction technique using autografts.

METHODS

An outcome study of patients with a chronic complete tear of all ligamentous structures of the PLC (>5 mm of varus gapping at 30^o, ≥10° of external tibial rotation during the dial test, ≥4 mm of increased lateral compartment opening during varus stress radiographs) was performed. The patients were evaluated subjectively with Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Tegner scores and objectively with varus stress radiographs at 20° of knee flexion, IKDC objective scores, and recurvatum evaluation. Institutional review board approval: CEP/UNIFESP n: 1251/2016.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of 33 patients were available for follow up at an average of 31.9 ± 12.3 months (range, 24-59 months) postoperatively. Twenty-five patients underwent multiple-ligament reconstruction without prior osteotomy. No patient had an isolated PLC knee reconstruction. The average comparative preoperative and postoperative outcomes were, respectively: Lysholm: 49.7 ± 10.3, 81.2 ± 12.8, P < .001, 89.7% met minimal detectable change; IKDC: 36.7 ± 8.3, 70.4 ± 19.8, P < .001, 82.8% met minimal clinically important difference; Tegner, 6.6 ± 1.3, 5.5 ± 1.6, P < .001; and varus stress radiograph: 7.1 ± 3.1 mm, 1.8 ± 1.8 mm, P < .001. A significant improvement, P < .001, was found between preoperative and postoperative IKDC objective scores for varus opening at 0° and 30° and external rotation measured by the dial test at 30°. Recurvatum was also improved: preoperatively, 52% had a low-grade and 48% had a high-grade recurvatum, whereas postoperatively, 100% were classified as low grade, P < .001.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented anatomic PLC reconstruction, concomitant to other surgical procedures and ligament reconstructions, is a valid technique in a multiligamentous knee injury involving the PLC, improving subjective outcomes and objective stability in patients with a chronic PLC knee injury, similar to historical controls.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Anatomic Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Using Single Graft Plus Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Fixation Device

The original description of the LaPrade technique for anatomic posterolateral corner reconstruction addresses the 3 main stabilizing structures: the fibular collateral ligament, the popliteus, and the popliteofibular ligament. The use of two separate grafts (originally described with a tendo-Achilles allograft) may restrict the utility of the technique when sources of allograft may be limited and autografts must be used, particularly in the context of multiligament reconstruction. We present a modification of the technique, in which an adjustable cortical button is used for tibial fixation, which allows for the use of a single graft while maintaining the ability to independently tension the popliteus, popliteofibular ligament, and fibular collateral ligament limbs of the graft.

Minimally Invasive, Arthroscopic-Assisted, Anatomic Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction

As the anatomy and biomechanics of the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee have become better understood, the importance of the PLC's proper function has become a more frequently raised subject. Misdiagnosed chronic posterolateral instability may lead to serious consequences, including cruciate ligament reconstruction graft failure. It has been proved that high-grade PLC injuries need to be treated operatively. Surgical approaches vary, and techniques are still developing. Considering avoidance of an extended surgical approach and minimizing the risk of common peroneal nerve or popliteal artery injuries, we developed the minimally invasive, arthroscopic-assisted, anatomic PLC reconstruction.