Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With Hyaluronic Scaffold and Autogenous Bone Marrow Aspirate Augmentation in Adolescents With Open Physes

Graft Intra-Articular Remodeling and Bone Incorporation in ACL Reconstruction: The State of the Art and Clinical Implications

The knee is one of the most frequently affected joints in sports trauma, and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and meniscal tears are the most common lesions. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) remains the treatment of choice for patients willing to return to their previous activity. There are different surgical techniques and different possible usable grafts. The graft used for ACLR surgery undergoes a bone incorporation process and an intra-articular remodelling named ligamentization until it reaches characteristics similar to the native ligament. After the first incorporation stage, the remodelling process is divided into an early stage that could last 4 weeks, a proliferative stage that lasts 4 to 12 weeks, and a final stage of ligamentization that could last over 1 year. The period of return to sport (RTS) after ACLR, which is becoming shorter and shorter, can be a high-risk period for athletes due to the risk of graft failure. This systematic review aims to define the phases of the ligamentization process considering graft type and fixation techniques, as well as the graft's anatomopathological and biomechanical characteristics, to evaluate a criterion-based rehab progression and maximize patient outcomes for an RTS respecting graft biology. The rehabilitative program has to promote and optimize the graft remodelling and incorporation processes; moreover, it has to accommodate physiological graft healing and avoid overloading. An early RTS and noncompliance with the biological characteristics of the graft in the various phases are associated with a high incidence of re-injury.

Therapeutic effect of two methods on avulsion fracture of tibial insertion of anterior cruciate ligament

BACKGROUND

The tibial stop of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is fan-shaped and attached to the medial groove in front of the intercondylar spine, which is located between the anterior horn of the medial and lateral meniscus. The incidence of this fracture is low previously reported, which is common in children and adolescents. With the increase of sports injury and traffic injury and the deepening of under-standing, it is found that the incidence of the disease is high at present.

AIM

To explore the difference between open reduction and internal fixation with small incision and high-intensity non-absorbable suture under arthroscopy in the treatment of tibial avulsion fracture of ACL.

METHODS

Seventy-six patients with tibial avulsion fracture of anterior cruciate ligament diagnosed and treated in Guanyun County People's Hospital from April 2018 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical methods, they were divided into group A (40 cases) and group B (36 cases). Patients in group A were treated with arthroscopic high-strength non-absorbable suture, and patients in group B were treated with small incision open reduction and internal fixation. The operation time, fracture healing time, knee joint activity and functional score before and after operation, and surgical complications of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The operation time of group A was higher than that of group B, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); the fracture healing time of group A was compared with that of group B, and the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05); The knee joint function activity was compared between two groups before operation, 3 mo and 6 mo after operation, and the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05); the knee joint function activity of group A and group B at 3 mo and 6 mo after operation was significantly higher than that before operation (P < 0.05); the limp, support, lock, instability, swelling, upstairs, squatting, pain and Lysholm score were compared between the two groups before and 6 mo after operation, and the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05); the scores of limp, support, lock, instability, swelling, upstairs, squatting, pain and Lysholm in group A and group B at 6 mo after operation were significantly higher than those before operation (P > 0.05); the surgical complication rate of group A was 2.63%, which was lower than 18.42% of group B, and the difference was statistically significant (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both small incision open reduction and internal fixation and arthroscopic high-strength non-absorbable sutures can achieve good results in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fractures. The operation time of arthroscopic high-strength non-absorbable sutures is slightly longer, but the complication rate is lower.

Predicting the Effect of Localized ACL Damage on Neighbor Ligament Mechanics via Finite Element Modeling

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) plays a pivotal role in support of the knee under loading. When damaged, it is known that substantial changes in the mechanics of the neighboring ligaments can be observed. However, a localized damage approach to investigating how ACL deficiency influences the neighboring ligaments has not been carried out. To do this, a finite element model, incorporating a continuum damage material model of the ACL, was implemented. Localized ACL damage was induced using high quadriceps force loading. Once damaged, anterior shear forces or tibial torque loadings were applied to the knee joint. The relative changes in stress contour and average mid-substance stress were examined for each of the neighboring ligaments following localized ACL damage. It was observed that localized ACL damage could produce notable changes in the mechanics of the neighboring knee ligaments, with non-homogenous stress contour shape changes and average stress magnitude being observed to increase in most cases, with a notable exception occurring in the MCL for both loading modes. In addition, the ligament bearing the most loading also changed with ACL deficiency. These changes carry implications as to morphological effects that may be induced following localized ACL damage, indicating that early diagnosis of ACL injury may be helpful in mitigating other complications post injury.

Diagnosis and treatment of the most common neuropathies following knee injuries and reconstructive surgery - A narrative review

The main nerves in the knee region are the tibial nerve, the common peroneal nerve, and the saphenous nerve. These three nerves innervate the lower leg and foot, providing sensory and motor function. The large sciatic nerve splits just above the knee to form the tibial and common peroneal nerves. The tibial nerve travels down in the posterior region, while the common peroneal nerve runs around the lateral side of the knee and runs down the front of the leg to the foot. Although all these nerves can be affected by injuries of the knee, the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve (IPBSN) and the common peroneal nerve (CPN) are most affected. In this narrative review we focus on neuropathies associated with nerves located in the region of the knee joint in the context of their injuries and possible iatrogenic damage during reconstructive surgery.

The Comparison of Clinical Result between Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with Additional Internal Bracing and Anatomic Single Bundle Reconstruction-A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The current standard of treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is reconstruction (ACLR). This technique has some disadvantages: poor proprioception, donor site morbidity and the inability to restore joint kinematics. ACL repair could be an alternative treatment. The purpose of the study was to compare the stability and the function after ACL primary repair versus single-bundle ACLR.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, 12 patients underwent primary ACL repair with internal bracing, 15 patients underwent standard ACLR. Follow-up examinations were evaluated at up to 2 years postoperatively. One patient in the ACL repair group was lost to follow-up due to re-rupture. The absolute value of anterior tibial translation (ATT) and the side-to-side difference in the same patient (ΔATT) were evaluated using the GNRB arthrometer. The Lysholm knee scoring was obtained. Re-ruptures and other complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was significantly decreased in the ACL repair group compared with the ACLR group (5.31 mm vs. 7.18 mm, respectively; p = 0.0137). Arthrometric measurements demonstrated a mean side-to-side difference (ΔATT) 1.87 (range 0.2 to 4.9) mm significantly decreased compared to ACLR 3.36 (range 1.2-5.6 mm; p = 0.0107). The mean Lysholm score was 85.3 points in the ACL repair group and 89.9 in ACLR group. No significant differences between ACL repair and ACLR were found for the Lysholm score. There was no association between AP laxity and clinical outcomes. There were two complications in the internal bracing group: one patient had re-rupture and was treated by ACLR, another had limited extension and had arthroscopic debridement.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior tibial translation was significantly decreased after ACL repair. Additionally, the functional results after ACL repair with internal bracing were comparable with those after ACLR. It should be noted that the two complications occurred. The current study supports further development of ACL repair techniques.