Hamburger Technique: Augmented Rotator Cuff Repair With Biological Superior Capsular Reconstruction

Double Attack Repair for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using the Long Head of Biceps Tendon Plus Margin Convergence Repair

Arthroscopic repair of massive retracted rotator cuff tears is very challenging with a high incidence of retears. Many techniques have been described to improve the outcomes of arthroscopic repair. In this technique, a superior capsular reconstruction using the long head of the biceps is combined with margin convergence repair aimed at improving the mechanical strength of the repair. The long head of the biceps is used as a superior capsular reconstruction to stabilize the humeral head and prevent proximal migration. Moreover, margin convergence provides an efficient gap filling between remnants of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons to restore an efficient rotator repair in anatomical, biological, and tension-free fashion.

Middle Trapezius Tendon Transfer for Augmentation of In Situ Superior Capsular Reconstruction-Reinforced Partial Rotator Cuff Repair: Short-term Outcomes of a Prospective Cohort Study

Background

Middle trapezius tendon (MTT) transfer has been described for dynamic reproduction of supraspinatus function. For management of irreparable rotator cuff (RC) tears, this procedure can be coupled with in situ (long head of the biceps tendon-based) superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) and partial RC repair.

Purpose

To investigate the functional outcomes of augmentation of in situ SCR-reinforced partial RC repair with MTT transfer for the management of irreparable posterosuperior RC tears.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Conducted between September 2014 and March 2022, this study included 24 patients with irreparable posterosuperior RC tears who were allocated into 2 groups: patients managed with 2-layer tendon construct (in situ SCR-reinforced partial RC repair) (group A; n = 15) and patients managed with 3-layer tendon construct (MTT transfer-augmented, in situ SCR-reinforced partial RC repair) (group B; n = 9). Outcome measures included 2-year postoperative pain, range of motion (ROM) in forward flexion and external rotation, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores. For data comparison, independent and paired t tests were used for parametric quantitative variables, and Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for nonparametric quantitative variables; Fisher exact and McNemar tests were used for qualitative variables.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 58.40 ± 4.54 years in group A and 59.22 ± 4.46 years in group B; there were no between-group differences in baseline patient characteristics. Patients in both groups had significant preoperative to postoperative improvement on all outcome measures (P < .05 for all). Group B had a significantly higher magnitude of postoperative improvement compared with group A in forward flexion ROM (88.88° ± 29.34° vs 46.66° ± 20.93°; P = .001), external rotation ROM (32.22° ± 14.81° vs 16.0° ± 9.10°; P = .002), ASES score (71.07 ± 8.26 vs 57.87 ± 8.39; P = .001), and QuickDASH score (-70.20 ± 6.95 vs -58.34 ± 12.52; P = .007).

Conclusion

Augmentation of in situ SCR-reinforced partial RC repair with MTT transfer in a 3-layer tendon construct led to significantly greater improvement in postoperative ROM and functional scores compared with a 2-layer construct.

Early Treatment of Shoulder Pathology Is Necessary but Not Enough Is Being Performed

Delayed treatment of shoulder instability results in bone loss requiring more-complicated surgery, in turn resulting in less-optimal outcomes. Similarly, delayed treatment of repairable rotator cuff tears results in irreparable tears requiring more-complicated surgery and resulting in less-optimal outcomes. Delayed treatment of shoulder pathology is a problem. Solutions include education and research investigation.

Rotator Cuff Repair With Patch Augmentation: What Do We Know?

BACKGROUND

Repair of massive rotator cuff tears remains a challenging process with mixed success. There is a growing interest in the use of patches to augment the repair construct and the potential to enhance the strength, healing, and associated clinical outcomes. Such patches may be synthetic, xenograft, or autograft/allograft, and a variety of techniques have been tried to biologically enhance their integration and performance. The materials used are rapidly advancing, as is our understanding of their effects on rotator cuff tissue. This article aims to evaluate what we currently know about patch augmentation through a comprehensive review of the available literature.

METHODS

We explore the results of existing clinical trials for each graft type, new manufacturing methods, novel techniques for biological enhancement, and the histological and biomechanical impact of patch augmentation.

RESULTS

There are promising results in short-term studies, which suggest that patch augmentation has great potential to improve the success rate. In particular, this appears to be true for human dermal allograft, while porcine dermal grafts and some synthetic grafts have also had promising results.

CONCLUSION

However, there remains a need for high-quality, prospective clinical trials directly comparing each type of graft and the effect that they have on the clinical and radiological outcomes of rotator cuff repair.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction using the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon: The Biceps Loop Technique

Irreparable rotator cuff tears can be treated in several ways. Superior capsular reconstruction has been reported as an excellent option, particularly for the young and active patients. We propose capsule reconstruction using the long head of the biceps tendon in a modified way. After its tenotomy at the musculotendinous junction, the long head is rerouted through a humeral bone tunnel and attached to a suture anchor in the posterior aspect of the superior glenoid rim. Further investigation is required, but this modified technique appears promising.

Editorial Commentary: Mechanics Versus Biology: Both Are Relevant Principles in Understanding Superior Capsular Reconstruction

The topic of superior capsular reconstruction remains controversial. Whereas identifying the best time-zero graft configuration for this procedure remains important, the success or failure of the procedure will be dependent on the biology, not just the bench performance. Any conforming object placed in the subacromial space at time zero could center the humeral head and decrease superior translation compared with a massive rotator cuff tear but may not restore translation to normal. It does appear that a thicker graft is better in this regard, but how much thicker is better is unclear. Most of all, whether the mechanical benefits of a thicker graft will be offset by a thicker and potentially less biologically compatible construct is also unclear. In most orthopaedic settings, autografts remain consistently superior to allografts. The contrast in results may be better explained by biology, and the excellent superior capsular reconstruction results reported with autograft have not been replicated universally with dermal allograft.