Arthroscopic Centralization of the Extruded Medial Meniscus

Review of the Development of Meniscus Centralization

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With an aging population, extending healthy life expectancy is a global challenge. Maintaining healthy knee joint function is one of the essential factors to preserve the ability to walk and extend healthy life expectancy. Meniscus centralization was introduced in 2012 as a procedure for meniscus extrusion, one of the causes of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Initially, it was performed only for lateral meniscus (LM) extrusion, and favorable 2-year results were reported in 2016. Gradually, basic studies supporting the effectiveness of meniscus centralization have been reported, and it has also been performed for medial meniscus (MM) extrusion, with some positive results reported. Although the surgical procedures vary among the institutions, the basic concept is to reattach the loosened meniscotibial ligament to the edge of the tibial plateau to re-tension it. This review will discuss the history of development and the current status of meniscus centralization.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current research shows that meniscus centralization is not performed in isolation but is often used as an augmentation along with the conventional repair of meniscus injuries, particularly posterior root tears. Biomechanical studies demonstrated that MM centralization with a posteromedial anchor can better restore meniscus function.

CONCLUSION

Despite its relatively short publication history of just over ten years, meniscus centralization has shown potential as a treatment to curb the progression of knee OA and extend a healthy life. While more evidence is needed, this conclusion underscores the promising role for meniscus centralization, making it a topic of significant interest for knee surgeons and researchers.

Editorial Commentary: Early Clinical Results Are Promising for Meniscus Centralization as an Augment to Medial Meniscus Root Repair

Meniscal root tears remain a common problem, with devastating biomechanical and clinical consequences. Thankfully, numerous techniques have been developed to repair the symptomatic meniscal root tear. However, rates of conversion to arthroplasty are reported to be 21% to 33% at 10 years, and persistent extrusion of the meniscus at follow-up is a known limitation of current root repair techniques. There is also growing evidence that some medial meniscal root tears may be an effect of meniscal extrusion, rather than the cause of it. In that vein, failure to correct extrusion may be a key mechanism of clinical and radiographic failure despite successful meniscus root repair. Techniques that "centralize" the meniscus (such as centralization with anchors at the tibial rim, meniscotibial ligament repair, deep medial collateral ligament repair, or circumferential suture augmentation of the meniscus) may improve patient outcomes by better correcting meniscal extrusion. Indications could be extrusion greater than 3 mm and documented extrusion before the root tear.

Satisfactory Clinical Outcome, Complications, and Provisional Results of Meniscus Centralization with Medial Meniscus Root Repair for the Extruded Medial Meniscus at Mean 2-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To describe the patient-reported clinical outcomes following medial meniscus root repair with meniscus centralization and to identify common complications and detail provisional results.

METHODS

Patients undergoing medial meniscus root repair with meniscus centralization from 2020 to 2022 were identified using an institutional database. Patients were followed prospectively using postoperative Tegner Activity Scale, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement, International Knee Documentation Committee score, and a Likert score for improvement, surgery satisfaction, and subsequent surgeries at minimum 1-year follow-up with mean 2-year follow-up. Demographics, injury characteristics, and surgical details were also collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (age: 50 ± 11 years; sex: 76% female; body mass index: 33 ± 8) were included in this study. Postoperative Tegner score was maintained at preoperative levels (P = .233), and VAS at rest, VAS with use, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement, and International Knee Documentation Committee improved significantly postoperatively (P = .003; P < .001, P < .001, P = .023, respectively). Eighty-eight percent of patients reported subjective improvement in their knee at final follow-up. Postoperative radiographs did not show any significant osteoarthritis progression, and no patients had undergone a revision meniscus surgery or total knee arthroplasty at the time of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

At minimum 1-year follow-up and mean 2-year follow-up, patients undergoing medial meniscus root repair with meniscus centralization demonstrated significant postoperative improvements in pain, function, and quality of life and reported high rates of surgery satisfaction. There was no evidence of significant arthritic progression on postoperative imaging, and no patients underwent revision meniscus surgery or total knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

All-Soft-Tissue Meniscus Allograft Transplantation With Circumferential Suture Tape Augmentation to Mitigate Hoop Stress and Promote Centralization

Meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT) is a technically challenging procedure. Bone plugs, slot techniques, and all-soft-tissue fixation techniques have been described in the past. Each technique comes with advantages and disadvantages. Native menisci have circumferential collagen fibers to help resist hoop stress during loading cycles. Although hoop stress resistance is a known function of the menisci, its recreation in MAT has only been targeted indirectly through anatomic root placement. The authors describe the use of a high-tensile suture tape (i.e. InternalBrace) to promote centralization by directly mitigating hoop stresses through recreation of peripheral meniscus tensioning in MAT.

Two years follow-up of patients with knee varus deformity and medial meniscus extrusion after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy and arthroscopic meniscus centralization

PURPOSE

This is a retrospective study and aims to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with knee varus deformity and extruded medial meniscus who underwent arthroscopic meniscus centralization and medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.

METHODS

A total of 24 patients were included in the trial, and arthroscopy intraoperative photographs and standing preoperative and postoperative radiographs were taken to analyze the mechanical tibiofemoral angle and tibial plateau inclination. Postoperative complications and knee motion were recorded, and the surgical results were evaluated using the knee society score.

RESULTS

The study observed four cases of surgery-related complications among all patients, but no major complications were reported. The surgery significantly improved knee flexion degrees and total knee range of motion. Satisfactory outcomes were shown in postoperative radiographs and secondary intraoperative photographs. The knee score increased from 39.6 ± 10.0 to 80.1 ± 9.0, and the functional score improved from 48.1 ± 6.9 to 89.4 ± 5.5. The preoperative tibial plateau inclination was 5.3 ± 0.7, while the postoperative data showed a decrease to 4.2 ± 0.7. The preoperative mechanical tibiofemoral angle was - 7.7 ± 1.0, and it improved in all patients postoperatively to 2.8 ± 0.9.

CONCLUSION

By alternating the knee biomechanics and significantly improving symptoms and quality of life, arthroscopic medial meniscus centralization and medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy units are confirmed to be an effective alternative treatment for knee varus deformity.

[Design and validation of a novel knee biomechanical test method]

A novel structural dynamics test method and device were designed to test the biomechanical effects of dynamic axial loading on knee cartilage and meniscus. Firstly, the maximum acceleration signal-to-noise ratio of the experimental device was calculated by applying axial dynamic load to the experimental device under unloaded condition with different force hammers. Then the experimental samples were divided into non-specimen group (no specimen loaded), sham specimen group (loaded with polypropylene samples) and bovine knee joint specimen group (loaded with bovine knee joint samples) for testing. The test results show that the experimental device and method can provide stable axial dynamic load, and the experimental results have good repeatability. The final results confirm that the dynamic characteristics of experimental samples can be distinguished effectively by this device. The experimental method proposed in this study provides a new way to further study the biomechanical mechanism of knee joint structural response under axial dynamic load.

Meniscal extrusion in knees with and without osteoarticular pathology: A systematic review of normative values and cut-offs for diagnostic criteria

BACKGROUND

Meniscus extrusion is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of meniscal injury, but the literature on this topic has not yet been systematized. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare diagnostic methods and summarize the data of medial and lateral meniscal extrusion in knees with and without osteoarticular pathology.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. Searches were conducted on PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases to identify studies that measured meniscal extrusion using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound (US). Meniscal extrusion data was summarized as weighted mean for medial and lateral meniscus, and stratified according to the method of measurement (MRI or US) and presence of knee osteoarticular pathology.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies were included in this review. Weighted mean values of meniscal extrusion were always higher for the medial than the lateral meniscus, regardless of the method of measurement. The medial meniscus extrusion was always higher in knees with osteoarticular pathology than those without. For the lateral meniscus extrusion, the mean values were higher in those knees without osteoarticular pathology. When classifying pathological meniscal extrusion with pre-defined cut-off values, the higher the cut-off used, the lower the percentage of knees classified as pathological meniscal extrusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The medial meniscus presents on mean higher extrusion and extrusion is higher in knees with osteoarticular pathology. Based on summary data, the most suitable cut-offs for pathological meniscal extrusion for both MRI and US seem to fall within >2 and >3 mm.

Meniscotibial Ligament Insufficiency Increases Force on the Posterior Medial Meniscus Root

BACKGROUND

Posterior medial meniscus root (PMMR) tears are a challenge to assess and treat. However, the forces sustained at the PMMR are yet to be fully characterized. In addition, it has been shown that meniscotibial ligament (MTL) injuries happen before PMMR tears, suggesting that insufficiency of the MTL results in a change of forces acting on the PMMR.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 3-dimensional forces acting on the PMMR in the intact, MTL cut, and MTL tenodesis states. It was hypothesized that the MTL cut state would increase medial shear forces seen at the PMMR, whereas the medial shear force in the MTL tenodesis state would return PMMR forces to that of the intact state.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested in 3 states (intact, MTL cut, and tenodesis). A 3-axis load cell was installed below the posterior tibial plateau and attached to the enthesis of the PMMR. The specimen was mounted to a load frame that applied an axial load, an internal torque, and an external torque. The amount of compression-tension, mediolateral shear force, and anteroposterior shear force acting on the PMMR was measured.

RESULTS

When the joint was loaded in compression, the MTL cut state significantly increased compression of the PMMR (P = .0368). The tenodesis state did not significantly restore forces of the PMMR (P = .008). When the joint was loaded in external torque, the MTL cut state significantly increased compression (P < .0001) and significantly decreased anterior shear on the PMMR (P = .0003). The tenodesis state did not significantly restore forces on the PMMR to the intact state (P < .0001). Increased flexion angle significantly increased medial shear forces of the PMMR when the joint was loaded in compression (P < .007 at every angle).

CONCLUSION

When evaluated biomechanically, MTL insufficiency resulted in increased compressive force at the PMMR. A single-anchor centralization procedure did not restore PMMR forces to that of the intact state. Increased knee flexion angle resulted in increased medial shear force on the PMMR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The findings in this study provide clinicians information on PMMR forces when the MTL is disrupted. These data can aid in the decision-making for adding an MTL repair to augment PMMR repairs.

Meniscus Allograft Transplantation With Bone Plugs Using Knotless All-Suture Anchors and Cortical Button Suspensory Fixation

Meniscus allograft transplantation can be successful for treatment of meniscal deficiency using a number of transplant techniques. In this Technical Note, we describe a double bone plug medial meniscus allograft transplantation technique that uses knotless all-suture anchors with cortical-button suspensory fixation. This technique maintains the reported advantages for bone-plug fixation while mitigating the risk for meniscal root damage, facilitating easier bone plug insertion and seating, expanding tensioning capabilities, and preventing soft-tissue irritation from suture knot stacks.

Posterior Meniscal Root Repair With Transtibial Double Tunnel Pullout Technique and Anchor Fixation

Meniscus root tears are tears that occur within 1 cm of the meniscus root attachment to the tibia. If not repaired, root tears will lead to altered knee biomechanics and accelerated degenerative changes in the knee. In this surgical technique, we demonstrate repair of a meniscus root tear with an all-inside suture repair of the posterior meniscus that is then passed through 2 transtibial tunnels and then fixed with an anchor. After surgery, patients are non-weightbearing for 4 weeks and can return to activity by 6 months.

Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair with Extrusion Repair (Centralization Technique)

Background

Meniscal extrusion is a phenomenon in which a degenerative posterior horn tear, radial tear, or root tear results in displacement of the body of the meniscus medial to the tibial rim. The paramount function of the meniscus is to provide load distribution across the knee joint. Meniscal extrusion will prevent the meniscus from properly fulfilling this function and eventually leads to progression of osteoarthritis1. Thus, root repair accompanied by arthroscopic meniscal extrusion repair (by a centralization technique) has been suggested for restoration of meniscal function2-5. There are various techniques to correct meniscal extrusion, including a dual-tunnel suture pull-out technique2 (to address extrusion and root tear2), a knotless suture anchor4,6 technique, and an all-inside suture anchor repair7. The indications for extrusion repair are not consistently reported in the literature, and the procedure is not always easy to perform. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the ideal technique. In the present article, we describe the steps for successful combined medial meniscal root repair with extrusion repair and centralization.

Description

Place the patient in the supine position with the knee supported in 90° of flexion and the feet at the edge of the operating table with foot-positioner support. First, meniscal root repair is performed with use of the suture pull-out technique, utilizing a cinch suture configuration to hold the root in place, and the suture tapes are fixed over the anterior cortex of the tibia with a suture button. Next, the meniscal body is arthroscopically assessed for residual extrusion from the medial tibial rim. Extrusion repair is indicated in cases with >3 mm of extrusion7-9, as measured on magnetic resonance imaging. In our technique, any extrusion beyond the medial tibial rim is reduced and secured with use of a double-loaded 2.3-mm all-suture type of anchor.

Alternatives

Alternatives include surgical procedures in which the root repair is performed with use of suture-anchor fixation10,11 and the extrusion repair is performed with use of the transtibial suture pull-out method.

Rationale

Root repair performed with the most common fixation techniques does not always reduce meniscal extrusion or restore meniscal function12,13. Consequently, several augmentation techniques have been reported to address meniscal extrusion3,14, including those that use arthroscopy to centralize the midbody of the meniscus over the rim of the tibial plateau. The rationale for this combined procedure is to restore the hoop-stress distribution and maintain meniscal function by repairing the extrusion of the meniscus. Addressing all intra-articular pathologies in a single stage is a challenging situation, and the sequence of the repair is important to achieve optimal postoperative results.

Expected Outcomes

Several surgical techniques have been described for the operative treatment of extrusion repair with use of centralization sutures2,3,5,6, and each has its own distinctive pearls and pitfalls for each. To combine root repair and extrusion repair presents a challenge for surgeons. From our clinical experience, a methodical approach to understanding the pathoanatomy and sequential execution of repair techniques would yield desired results. Extrusion correction through the use of a peripheral suture anchor over the medial rim of the tibia and knot tying are relatively easier to perform than some other published extrusion-repair techniques. Although no consensus has been achieved yet regarding the best technique, recent literature has suggested that the use of centralization sutures is effective to restore the native biomechanical properties of the medial meniscus5.Mochizuki et al. assessed the clinical and radiological outcomes of combined medial meniscal root repair and centralization in 26 patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Both Lysholm scores and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores improved significantly after surgery, with a significant reduction in extrusion distance from preoperatively to 2 years postoperatively20. Koga et al21 assessed the 2-year outcomes of lateral arthroscopic meniscal centralization, finding significantly reduced meniscal extrusion at both 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that centralization can improve meniscal mechanics and potentially reduce the risk of osteoarthritis. The centralization suture technique for extrusion repair has the theoretical advantage of restoring meniscal function following meniscal root repair; however, there are also concerns regarding over-constraint of the meniscus. We believe that the medial meniscus, being less mobile than the lateral meniscus, can withstand the constraint created by the use of centralization. Meniscal centralization is a technically demanding surgical procedure, but with a systematic approach and meticulous technique, we have observed good short-term outcome in our patients.

Important Tips

A tight medial compartment is one of the most common problems encountered during a medial meniscal root repair. "Pie-crusting" of the superficial medial collateral ligament at the tibial insertion aids in improving the space, thereby reducing chondral damage during the root repair.It is challenging to achieve the correct inclination of insertion when inserting the suture anchor through a mid-medial portal. This limitation can be mitigated by utilizing a 16G or 18G needle before making the portal, as the needle direction, trajectory, and extent of accessibility within the joint will aid in proper portal placement and anchor insertion.Suture management is another technical challenge. Suture tape is first cinched to the root of the meniscus and then shuttled into the transtibial tunnel in order to discern the reducibility of the meniscus and the extent of possible extrusion correction. Then, extrusion repair is performed. This sequence allows the surgeon to avoid mixing of root-repair sutures and extrusion-repair sutures. Following insertion of the all-suture anchor, each suture limb is brought out through the anteromedial portal, passed through the nitinol loop from the lasso, and shuttled back through the mid-medial portal. Knot tying is performed through the mid-medial portal.

Acronyms and Abbreviations

ACL = anterior cruciate ligamentPCL = posterior cruciate ligamentICRS grading = International Cartilage Research Society system for classification of cartilage lesionsKL grade = Kellgren-Lawrence system for classification of osteoarthritisMRI = magnetic resonance imagingMC = medial femoral condyleMPTA = medial proximal tibial angleLC = lateral femoral condyleHTO = high tibial osteotomyMCL = medial collateral ligamentAM = anteromedialKOOS = Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome ScoreMME = medial meniscus extrusion.

Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear: How Far Have We Come and What Remains?

Medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMRTs), defined as tears or avulsions that occur within 1 cm of the tibial attachment of the medial meniscus posterior root, lead to biomechanically detrimental knee conditions by creating a functionally meniscal-deficient status. Given their biomechanical significance, MMRTs have recently been gaining increasing interest. Accordingly, numerous studies have been conducted on the anatomy, biomechanics, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of MMRTs, and extensive knowledge has been accumulated. Although a consensus has not yet been reached on several issues, such as surgical indications, surgical techniques, and rehabilitation protocols, this article aimed to comprehensively review the current knowledge on MMRTs and to introduce the author's treatment strategies.

Meniscal Extrusion: Diagnosis, Etiology, and Treatment Options

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The concept of meniscal extrusion has recently been recognized as a hallmark of meniscus dysfunction. This review examines contemporary literature regarding the pathophysiology, classification, diagnosis, treatment, and future directions for investigation regarding meniscus extrusion.

RECENT FINDINGS

Meniscus extrusion, defined as >3 mm of radial displacement of the meniscus, leads to altered knee biomechanics and accelerated knee joint degeneration. Meniscus extrusion has been associated with degenerative joint disease, posterior root and radial meniscal tears, and acute trauma. Meniscus centralization and meniscotibial ligament repair have been proposed as techniques to address meniscal extrusion with promising biomechanical, animal model, and early clinical reports. Further studies on the epidemiology of meniscus extrusion and associated long-term nonoperative outcomes will help to elucidate its role in meniscus dysfunction and resultant arthritic development. Understanding and appreciation for the anatomic attachments of the meniscus will help to inform future repair techniques. Long-term reporting on the clinical outcomes of meniscus centralization techniques will yield insights into the clinical significance of meniscus extrusion correction.

Arthroscopic centralization reduces extrusion of the medial meniscus with posterior root defect in the ACL reconstructed knee

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of arthroscopic meniscal centralization reinforcement for a medial meniscus (MM) posterior root defect on knee kinematics and meniscal extrusion in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed (ACLR) knee. The hypothesis was that the medial meniscus centralization would reduce extrusion and anterior laxity in ACLR knee with a medical meniscal defect.

METHODS

Fourteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a six-degrees-of-freedom robotic system under the following loading conditions: (a) an 89.0 N anterior tibial load, (b) 5.0 Nm internal and external rotational torques, (c) a 10.0 Nm valgus and varus loadings, and (d) a combined 7.0 Nm valgus moment and then a 5.0 Nm internal rotation torque as a static simulated pivot shift. The tested knee states included: (1) anatomic single-bundle cruciate ligament reconstruction with intact medial meniscus (MM Intact), (2) anatomic single-bundle cruciate ligament reconstruction with medial meniscus posterior root defect (MM Defect), (3) Anatomic single-bundle cruciate ligament reconstruction with medial meniscus arthroscopic centralization (MM Centralization). Medial meniscus arthroscopic centralization was performed using 1.4 mm anchors with #2 suture. The MM extrusion (MME) was measured using ultrasound under unloaded and varus loading conditions at 0° and 30° of flexion.

RESULTS

Anterior tibial translation (ATT) increased significantly with MM posterior root defect compared to MM intact at all flexion angles. With MM centralization, ATT was not significantly different from the intact meniscus at 15° and 30° of flexion. Meniscus extrusion increased significantly with the root defect compared to intact meniscus and decreased significantly with meniscal centralization compared to the root defect at both flexion angles.

CONCLUSIONS

In ACL reconstruction, cases involving irreparable medial meniscal posterior root tears, applying arthroscopic centralization for avoiding the meniscal extrusion should be considered. Clinically, in ACL reconstruction cases with irreparable medial meniscal posterior root tears, applying arthroscopic meniscal centralization for avoiding the meniscal extrusion should be considered. Meniscal centralization decreases the extrusion of the MM and offers improvements in knee laxity.

Clinical significance and management of meniscal extrusion in different knee pathologies: a comprehensive review of the literature and treatment algorithm

The menisci are crescent-shaped, fibrocartilaginous structures that play a crucial role in the load transition and distribution of the contact forces along the tibiofemoral articulation. Meniscal extrusion (ME) is a radiological finding, especially in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, for which there has been growing interest in recent years. ME, in the coronary plane, is defined as the maximum distance of the most distal end of the meniscus from the border of the tibial plateau, where the tibial eminences are the most prominent, without taking into account the osteophytes. Although there is still controversy in the literature in respect of the optimal cutoff value, a threshold of 3 mm is considered significant. ME has no specific clinical finding or sign and it is encountered in many knee pathologies. It is associated with either rapidly progressive knee osteoarthritis or early onset of knee osteoarthritis and increased morbidity. In this review, we delineate the clinical significance of ME in various knee pathologies, as well as when, why and how it should be managed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to elaborate on these topics.

Meniscal Extrusion: A Critical Analysis Review

➢

Pathologic meniscal extrusion can compromise meniscal function, leading to increased contact forces in the tibiofemoral compartment and the acceleration of osteoarthritic changes.

➢

Extrusion is typically defined as radial displacement of ≥3 mm outside the tibial border and is best diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging, although ultrasonography has also demonstrated encouraging diagnostic utility.

➢

Surgical management of meniscal extrusion is based on the underlying etiology, the patient's symptom profile, the preexisting health of the articular surface, and the risk of future chondral injury and osteoarthritis.

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine: Current Controversies for Treatment of Meniscus Root Tears

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of the meniscus in preserving the biomechanical function of the knee joint has been clearly defined. The hypothesis that meniscus root integrity is a prerequisite for meniscus function is supported by the development of progressive knee osteoarthritis (OA) following meniscus root tears (MRTs) treated either non-operatively or with meniscectomy. Consequently, there has been a resurgence of interest in the diagnosis and treatment of MRTs. This review examines the contemporary literature surrounding the natural history, clinical presentation, evaluation, preferred surgical repair technique and outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgeons must have a high index of suspicion in order to diagnose a MRT because of the nonspecific clinical presentation and difficult visualization on imaging. Compared with medial MRTs that commonly occur in middle age/older patients, lateral meniscus root injuries tend to occur in younger males with lower BMIs, less cartilage degeneration, and with concomitant ligament injury. Subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee have been found to be associated with both MRTs and following arthroscopic procedures. Meniscus root repair has demonstrated good outcomes, and acute injuries with intact cartilage should be repaired. Cartilage degeneration, BMI, and malalignment are important considerations when choosing surgical candidates. Meniscus centralization has emerged as a viable adjunct strategy aimed at correcting meniscus extrusion. Meniscus root repair results in a decreased rate of OA and arthroplasty and is economically advantageous when compared with nonoperative treatment and partial meniscectomy. The transtibial pull-through technique with the addition of centralization for the medial meniscus is associated with encouraging early results.

Arthroscopic Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair with Centralization Using Knotless Suture Anchors

Medial meniscus posterior root tears can lead to rapid progression of knee arthritis because of loss of the stress distribution function of the meniscus. Medial meniscus root repair can restore stress distribution and improve clinical outcome. In cases of medial meniscus root tears with meniscal extrusion, centralization may help reduce extrusion and protect the root repair. Presented here is a technique for transtibial medial meniscus root repair with centralization using knotless suture anchors, building on previously developed techniques.

Circumferential Rim Augmentation Suture Around the Perimeniscal Capsule Decreases Meniscal Extrusion and Progression of Osteoarthritis in Rabbit Meniscus Root Tear Model

BACKGROUND

We recently analyzed the joint capsule adjacent to the medial meniscus and found that the perimeniscal joint capsule has collagen fiber orientation similar to that of circumferential meniscal fibers, potentially playing a role in preventing extrusion.

PURPOSE

To analyze the meniscal extrusion prevention potential of the circumferential rim augmentation suture around the perimeniscal capsule in a rabbit root tear model and analyze the biomechanical function in a porcine cadaveric knee.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Rabbit medial meniscus root tear models were divided into 3 experimental groups: root tear, root tear and suture repair, and root tear and circumferential rim augmentation suture. As for the circumferential rim augmentation suture procedure, a suture was placed to circumscribe the outer rim of the medial meniscus and passed through bone tunnels located at the tibial insertion of each root. After 4 and 8 weeks, meniscal extrusion was analyzed by micro-computed tomography, gross morphology, and histologic analysis of the medial femoral cartilage. For biomechanical analysis, porcine knees were divided into groups similar to rabbit experiments. Tibiofemoral contact parameters were assessed using a pressure mapping sensor system after applying a load of 200 N on the knee joint.

RESULTS

The root tear and circumferential rim augmentation suture group showed less meniscal extrusion, less gap within the tear site, and less cartilage degeneration compared with other groups after 4 and 8 weeks of surgery in the rabbit root tear model. Biomechanical analysis showed the root tear and circumferential rim augmentation suture group had larger contact area and lower peak contact pressure compared with root tear and root tear and suture repair groups.

CONCLUSION

The circumferential rim augmentation suture reduced the degree of meniscal extrusion while restoring meniscal function, potentially preventing progression of arthritis in a rabbit root tear model and porcine knee biomechanical analysis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The circumferential rim augmentation suture may be a novel augmentation option during root tear treatment.