Arthroscopic Double-Row Bony Bankart Bridge Repair Using a Tensionable Knotless System

Evolving concepts in the treatment of posterior shoulder instability with glenohumeral bone loss

Posterior shoulder instability is an increasingly recognized phenomenon and comprises approximately 5% of all shoulder instability cases. Posterior shoulder instability presents a complex clinical challenge, particularly when associated with bone loss. Bone loss may be present in up to 25% of patients with posterior shoulder instability. Understanding its etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options is crucial for optimal patient outcomes. Young athletic individuals, especially football linemen and throwing athletes, are commonly affected, with symptoms ranging from insidious onset pain to noticeable changes in athletic performance. History, physical examination, and imaging, including radiographs and advanced three-dimensional imaging, play pivotal roles in diagnosis, with specific tests like the Jerk, Kim, and load and shift tests aiding in provocation. Posterior glenoid bone loss (pGBL), whether dysplastic, attritional, or acute, significantly impacts management decisions. When pGBL exceeds critical thresholds, soft tissue repair alone may be insufficient, necessitating glenoid reconstruction with bone block procedures. Both iliac crest autograft and distal tibial allograft (DTA) offer viable options, with considerations including donor site morbidity and graft integration. Surgical techniques for reverse Hill-Sachs lesions vary from subscapularis transfers to arthroscopic balloon osteoplasty, each aiming to restore native anatomy and prevent engagement. Bipolar bone loss, involving both glenoid and humeral head defects, presents additional challenges and may require combined soft tissue and bony procedures. Quantifying bone loss and understanding its implications are essential for surgical planning. While various techniques show promise, further research is needed to elucidate their long-term outcomes and refine treatment algorithms for posterior shoulder instability with bone loss.

Simple "Door-Locking" Technique Using One Single-Row Anchor for Repairing Large Bony Bankart Lesions

Large bony Bankart injuries are typically stabilized using screws or plates or multiple anchors. Here, the "door-locking" technique, using a single-row anchor, can provide effective fixation for massive bony Bankart injuries. This technique offers several advantages over open fixation surgery or other techniques that use more than 2 suture anchors, including simpler surgical procedures, lower medical costs, and satisfactory clinical outcomes.

[Effectiveness of a single threaded anchor fixation under shoulder arthroscopy in treatment of fresh bony Bankart injury]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of a single threaded anchor fixation under shoulder arthroscopy in the treatment of fresh bony Bankart injury.

METHODS

Between January 2017 and May 2021, 12 patients with fresh bony Bankart injury caused by trauma were treated with a single threaded anchor fixation under shoulder arthroscopy. There were 10 males and 2 females with an average age of 38.8 years (range, 21-64 years). The time between injury and operation ranged from 7 to 30 days (mean, 15.8 days). Preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was 44.9±17.4, the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score was 13.1±5.5; the forward supination, lateral external rotation, and lateral internal rotation of shoulder were (130.8±11.8)°, (25.0±7.9)°, and 9.2±1.6, respectively. CT scan and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction showed that the fracture fragment area was less than 1/4 of the glenoid area in 10 cases, and 1/4-1/2 in 2 cases. The operation time was recorded. During follow-up, ASES score, UCLA score, Rowes score, and shoulder range of motion were used to evaluate the effectiveness, and shoulder CT scan and 3D reconstruction were used to evaluate the fracture position and healing.

RESULTS

The operation time ranged from 50 to 150 minutes (mean, 85.5 minutes). All patients were followed up 3-18 months (mean, 9.1 months). There was no serious adverse effect such as infection, re-dislocation, or thrombosis. Three patients had shoulder adhesions after operation. At last follow-up, the forward supination of shoulder [(162.1±30.3)°], lateral external rotation [(37.5±11.2)°], and lateral internal rotation (9.2±1.6) significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( t=3.331, P=0.003; t=3.153, P=0.005; t=2.716, P=0.013). The ASES score was 89.7±11.8 and the UCLA score was 32.8±2.4, which significantly increased when compared with those before operation ( t=7.368, P<0.001; t=11.370, P<0.001). The Rowes score ranged from 75 to 100 (mean, 92.9). Among them, 9 cases were excellent and 3 cases were good, with an excellent and good rate of 100%. CT re-examination showed that the fracture line disappeared in 11 cases, and the fracture alignment was good; the alignment of the fracture fragment was poor in 1 case whose fracture fragment area was between 1/4 and 1/2 of the glenoid area.

CONCLUSION

For the fracture fragment area not exceeding 1/4 of the glenoid, the labrum-capsule complex at the lower end of the bone fragment intact, and the non-comminuted fresh bony Bankart injury, a single threaded anchor fixation under shoulder arthroscopy can achieve better effectiveness, has the advantages of less trauma and faster postoperative recovery.

Arthroscopic Bony Bankart Repair Using Suture Suspension to Increase Bone Contact Area

Bony Bankart lesions are anteroinferior glenoid rim fractures associated with capsulolabral tears. Untreated bony Bankart lesion can cause recurrent dislocation. So, the large bony Bankart lesions should be treated by anatomical reduction and stabilization. This Technical Note describes an arthroscopic bony Bankart lesion repair using suture suspension to increase contact area to gain more contact area and tissue compression to maximize the stability of the repair.