Does pyridoxine control behavioral symptoms in adult patients treated with levetiracetam? Case series from UAE

Comorbidity of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in a patient with epilepsy: Staring down the challenge of inattention versus nonconvulsive seizures

Epilepsy is a heterogeneous disorder of recurrent seizures which often is comorbid with anxiety, depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), intellectual disability (ID), and other psychiatric manifestations. Treating both epilepsy and behavioral symptoms from psychiatric disorders can result in polypharmacy with interactions of medications leading to both worsened efficacy of antiseizure medications due to psychotropic effects and worsening of psychiatric symptoms due to antiseizure medication side effects. We aim to suggest pragmatic strategies for the neurologist in the diagnosis and management of comorbid ADHD in patients with epilepsy based on the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Pediatric Commission guidelines and additional literature review. The screening tool of choice for the symptoms of ADHD is validated in the country of practice and written in the language of the family, though various screening tools and advantages and disadvantages of each will be discussed. Once ADHD is diagnosed, recent safety data suggest that Methylphenidate, Amphetamine, and Atomoxetine are generally safe for patients with epilepsy. We present a case of a child with epilepsy and ADHD and discuss the clinical signs, symptoms, and strategies for treatment as well as when to refer to child psychiatry.

Can Pyridoxine Successfully Reduce Behavioral Side Effects from Levetiracetam?: A Critically Appraised Topic

BACKGROUND

Levetiracetam is a commonly used anti-seizure medication, with the development of neuropsychiatric symptoms being the most common side effect. Preliminary literature describes the improvement of these symptoms with pyridoxine, mostly within the pediatric population. However, randomized control trial data investigating this relationship is sparse.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to critically assess evidence regarding the role of pyridoxine in the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms from levetiracetam.

METHODS

The objective was addressed through the development of a structured, critically appraised topic. This included a clinical scenario with a clinical question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom-line conclusions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, medical librarians, clinical epidemiologists, and content experts in the field of epilepsy.

RESULTS

A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was selected for critical appraisal. This trial compared pyridoxine versus placebo for the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms from levetiracetam in a pediatric population and included 105 patients (46/105 received pyridoxine, 59/105 received placebo). It found that both groups had a significant reduction in behavioral symptoms at the 2-,4-and 6-week time points ( P <0.05). However, the authors noted that the pyridoxine group had almost double the relative reduction when compared with the placebo group at all time points: 1.9 at 2 weeks, 2.0 at 4 weeks, and 1.8 at 6 weeks ( P =0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that pyridoxine for the treatment of levetiracetam-induced behavioral side effects may result in modest improvement, although many limitations prevent conclusive results. There remains a need for a double-blinded, randomized control trial in both the adult and pediatric populations.

Current evidence for adjunct pyridoxine (vitamin B6) for the treatment of behavioral adverse effects associated with levetiracetam: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Levetiracetam (LVT), while an effective treatment for multiple seizure types, is associated with a high incidence of neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs). In predominantly retrospective studies, supplementation with pyridoxine/vitamin B₆ (PN) was associated with improvement in NPAEs in some people. A previous review highlighted a lack of double-blind, controlled trials of PN for the treatment of NPAEs in individuals treated with LVT. The current paper updates the findings from the previous review to include evidence from studies published since June 2019.

METHODS

An updated systematic review of the published literature was performed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched to identify studies published between June 2019 and 2nd November 2022 in which supplementary PN was initiated for the treatment of LVT-associated NPAEs. All study types were eligible. The risk of bias in randomized trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

RESULTS

Seven additional studies were identified: two double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), four retrospective studies, and one retrospective case series. One RCT reported significant improvements from baseline in behavioral adverse events (BAEs) in both the intervention (PN) group and the low-dose control group (both p < 0.05), with a significantly greater improvement in the intervention group (p < 0.001). In the second RCT, differences in BAE severity between PN and placebo groups at the endpoint were not statistically significant. In one retrospective study, subjective irritability was reported to have improved from baseline in 9/20 individuals (45%) treated with supplementary PN. Data for systematic assessments (PHQ-9 and GAD-7) were available for 10 individuals. Assessment by PHQ-9 showed that six individuals improved, two worsened and two had no change. Based on the GAD-7, three people improved, two worsened and five had no change. In the second retrospective study, 18/41 individuals (44%) who commenced PN following the emergence of BAEs showed "significant" improvement. In a separate group of individuals with pre-existing behavioral problems in whom PN treatment was initiated at the same time as commencing LVT, 3/18 (16.7%) developed BAEs. This compared with 79/458 people (17.2%) who were initially treated only with LVT. The third retrospective study compared treatment-related irritability in individuals who had been treated with both LVT and perampanel, either sequentially or concomitantly. Two people who developed irritability while receiving LVT monotherapy were able to continue treatment with the addition of PN. The fourth study reported a significantly lower LVT discontinuation rate in individuals taking PN and a higher rate of improved behavior in those who were able to continue LVT. The case series reported improvements in behavioral symptoms in six people within two to three weeks of commencing supplementary PN.

CONCLUSION

Data published within the last three years add to earlier evidence suggesting that PN might be effective in the treatment of NPAEs associated with LVT. However, the quality of evidence remains poor and only a few prospective trials have been published. Data from placebo-controlled trials are still largely lacking. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to justify any firm recommendation for PN supplementation to treat NPAEs associated with LVT. Further well-designed, prospective trials are warranted.

Pyridoxine for treatment of levetiracetam-induced behavioral adverse events: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Levetiracetam is a broad-spectrum antiseizure medication with known behavioral side effects. The possible beneficial effect of pyridoxine on improvement of these psychiatric problems has been suggested in few previous studies. This clinical trial aimed to investigate the effect of pyridoxine on behavioral side effects of levetiracetam in adult patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

This study was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial on 53 adult patients with epilepsy with behavioral side effects after treatment by levetiracetam. Patients who met the study criteria were randomized to receive 40 mg/day pyridoxine or placebo. Their psychiatric state was surveyed by SCL-90-R questionnaire before and three weeks after initiation of treatment.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the behavioral adverse effects between the pyridoxine-treated group and the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

Although this study showed no statistically significant beneficial effects of pyridoxine on the behavioral adverse effects of levetiracetam, placebo-controlled trials with a larger size and higher doses are needed to determine whether it is effective or not.

Levetiracetam-associated irritability and potential role of vitamin B6 use in veterans with epilepsy

•

Behavioral adverse effects can limit use of levetiracetam, particularly in Veteran populations.

•

Vitamin B6 supplementation has been suggested to reduce irritability.

•

22 Veterans were supplemented with vitamin B6 for levetiracetam-associated irritability.

•

20 (91%) of Veterans had data regarding irritability.

•

9 (45%) Veterans noted improvement in irritability with supplementation.

•

11 (55%) Veterans noted no improvement.

Objectives

Levetiracetam, a commonly prescribed antiseizure medication (ASM), may cause irritability, depression, and anger. The mechanisms underlying these behavioral effects and individual risk factors remain unknown. Mitigation strategies are limited, including discontinuation, supplementation with vitamin B6, or switching to an alternative ASM. Several retrospective studies and anecdotal reports, primarily in pediatric populations, suggest vitamin B6 supplementation may be helpful in reducing levetiracetam-associated irritability. Although data in adult patients is limited, and no data is available for Veterans. The objective of this project was to describe our preliminarily experience with vitamin B6 supplementation for alleviating levetiracetam-associated irritability in male Veterans with epilepsy.

Methods

Retrospective chart reviews were completed for patients who had an active prescription for levetiracetam from the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital from January 1, 2015 to June 1, 2020. A total of 26 charts were screened. Patients were excluded if not using vitamin B6 supplementation or if deceased at end of data collection. Baseline characteristics were compared, including age, sex, comorbidities, and concomitant medications. Charts were then reviewed to identify any clinical description of irritability, including subjective assessment of change in symptoms across multiple visits, and scores from standardized instruments including the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), generalized anxiety disorder questionnaire (GAD-7), and/or irritability in adult patients with epilepsy (I-EPI) questionnaire. These symptoms and scores were then compared pre- and post-B6 supplementation.

Results

Of 22 patients, data was available for 20 (91%). For patients with data available, 9 (45%) showed improved irritability following supplementation with vitamin B6 and 11 (55%) showed no improvement.

Conclusions

This project suggests that vitamin B6 supplementation may have a role in mitigating levetiracetam-associated irritability in a male Veteran population. These results support future prospective controlled studies to assess further the efficacy of this approach and characteristics associated with successful treatment in veterans.

Behavioral adverse events with brivaracetam, levetiracetam, perampanel, and topiramate: A systematic review

PURPOSE

To understand the currently available post-marketing real-world evidence of the incidences of and discontinuations due to the BAEs of irritability, anger, and aggression in people with epilepsy (PWE) treated with the anti-seizure medications (ASMs) brivaracetam (BRV), levetiracetam (LEV), perampanel (PER), and topiramate (TPM), as well as behavioral adverse events (BAEs) in PWE switching from LEV to BRV.

METHODS

A systematic review of published literature using the Cochrane Library, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Embase was performed to identify retrospective and prospective observational studies reporting the incidence of irritability, anger, or aggression with BRV, LEV, PER, or TPM in PWE. The incidences of these BAEs and the rates of discontinuation due to each were categorized by ASM, and where possible, weighted means were calculated but not statistically assessed. Behavioral and psychiatric adverse events in PWE switching from LEV to BRV were summarized descriptively.

RESULTS

A total of 1500 records were identified in the searches. Of these, 44 published articles reporting 42 studies met the study criteria and were included in the data synthesis, 7 studies were identified in the clinical trial database, and 5 studies included PWE switching from LEV to BRV. Studies included a variety of methods, study populations, and definitions of BAEs. While a wide range of results was reported across studies, weighted mean incidences were 5.6% for BRV, 9.9% for LEV, 12.3% for PER, and 3.1% for TPM for irritability; 3.3%* for BRV, 2.5% for LEV, 2.0% for PER, and 0.2%* for TPM for anger; and 2.5% for BRV, 2.6% for LEV, 4.4% for PER, and 0.5%* for TPM for aggression. Weighted mean discontinuation rates were 0.8%* for BRV, 3.4% for LEV, 3.0% for PER, and 2.2% for TPM for irritability and 0.8%* for BRV, 2.4% for LEV, 9.2% for PER, and 1.2%* for TPM for aggression. There were no discontinuations for anger. Switching from LEV to BRV led to improvement in BAEs in 33.3% to 83.0% of patients (weighted mean, 66.6%). *Denotes only 1 study.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review characterizes the incidences of irritability, anger, and aggression with BRV, LEV, PER, and TPM, and it provides robust real-world evidence demonstrating that switching from LEV to BRV may improve BAEs. While additional data remain valuable due to differences in methodology (which make comparisons difficult), these results improve understanding of the real-world incidences of discontinuations due to these BAEs in clinical practice and can aid in discussions and treatment decision-making with PWE.

Depression and Anxiety in the Epilepsies: from Bench to Bedside

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Depression and anxiety substantially contribute to interictal disability in patients with epilepsy (PWE). This review summarizes current studies that shed light on mechanisms of comorbidity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mounting epidemiological data implicate shared risk factors for anxiety/depression and seizure propensity, but these remain largely elusive and probably vary by epilepsy type. Within PWE, these symptoms appear to be associated with unique genetic, neuropathological, and connectivity profiles. Temporal lobe epilepsy has received enormous emphasis particularly in preclinical studies of comorbidity, where candidate neurobiological mechanisms underlying bidirectionality have been tested without psychopharmacological confounds. Depression and anxiety in epilepsy reflect dysfunction within broadly distributed limbic networks that may be the cause or consequence of epileptogenesis. In refractory epilepsy, seizures and/or certain anticonvulsants may distort central emotional homeostatic mechanisms that perpetually raise seizure risk. Developing future safe and effective combined anticonvulsant-antidepressant treatments will require a detailed understanding of anatomical and molecular nodes that pleiotropically enhance seizure risk and negatively alter emotionality.

Pyridoxine supplementation for levetiracetam-related neuropsychiatric adverse events: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Among people with epilepsy, levetiracetam (LEV) can cause neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs) that impact negatively on quality of life. It has been suggested that pyridoxine can ameliorate LEV-related NPAEs. We conducted a systematic review of studies on the use of pyridoxine supplementation to relieve NPAEs associated with LEV therapy.

METHODS

The review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Medline, EMBASE, Scholar, Cochrane-CENTRAL (2000-2019), and EThOS platform were searched for studies on the use of pyridoxine in patients with LEV-related NPAEs. Proportions of patients reported to benefit from pyridoxine supplementation were tabulated, and a random-effect model meta-analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Eleven retrospective studies/case reports and one randomized prospective study, mostly including pediatric populations, were identified. Retrospective studies, which were rated as low quality due to failure to control for bias, reported an overall improvement of NPAEs after pyridoxine supplementation in 72.5% (108/149) of patients. The proportion of patients showing improvement in a pooled analysis of the four largest retrospective studies (n = 134) was 72.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 47.1-88.3), although there was high heterogeneity across studies (I² = 82%, p_{heterogeneity} < 0.01). In the only prospective trial, patients randomized to pyridoxine supplementation were more likely to show relief from NPAEs than patients not receiving supplementation (p < 0.01), but outcomes might have been affected by assessment bias.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review suggests that pyridoxine might be of benefit in relieving LEV-related NPAEs. However, the quality of the evidence is poor, and better-designed prospective studies that include quantitative as well as qualitative data are needed to define the role of pyridoxine in the management of LEV-related NPAEs.

Recognition and treatment of mood dysregulation in adults with intellectual disability

Mood dysregulation is a common feature in the psychopathology of people with intellectual disability (ID) and co-occurring behavioral/psychiatric disorders. It can present with a host of dangerous behaviors, including aggression, self-injury, and property damage. There are special techniques that are used to assess these behaviors in people with ID, that can eventually inform an appropriate approach to pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment. Two case studies are presented that illustrate the elements in the assessment and treatment of mood dysregulation in ID.

Pyridoxine Add-On Treatment for the Control of Behavioral Adverse Effects Induced by Levetiracetam in Children: A Case-Control Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Few studies on adult and pediatric patients have shown pyridoxine efficacy as additional therapy for those receiving levetiracetam (LEV) to prevent and mitigate behavioral adverse effects (BAEs).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of pyridoxine supplementation in the prevention of LEV adverse effects, including suicidal ideation.

METHODS

This randomized, case-control trial included patients receiving LEV as monotherapy treatment. Patients were subdivided into 2 groups, according to whether they were treated with LEV only (group 1) or LEV with supplemental pyridoxine (group 2).

RESULTS

In both cohorts, the most frequent BAEs were irritability/aggression followed by depression and confusion. Those patients (92%) who initiated pyridoxine after 1 month of LEV treatment did not need to change or suspend LEV ( P < 0.001), and BAE improved after 9.06 ± 3.05 days of pyridoxine supplementation. None of the patients complained of symptoms of pyridoxine toxicity, and no new adverse effects of LEV off-label were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, we found pyridoxine to be safe and effective in controlling LEV-induced BAEs in children.

Caring for transgender patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Approximately 25 million individuals older than age 15 identify as transgender, representing about 0.3-0.9% of the world's population. The aim of this paper is to identify and describe important medical and social considerations facing transgender persons with epilepsy.

METHODS

We performed literature searches on the following terms: transgender AND epilepsy, transgender AND neurology, gender dysphoria AND epilepsy, gender dysphoria AND neurology. We also performed literature searches for common feminizing or masculinizing treatment regimens, and searched for interactions of those treatment regimens with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and with seizures.

RESULTS

There are multiple bidirectional interactions between AEDs and the commonly used treatments for aligning external sex characteristics with identified gender. The scope of the transgender population with epilepsy remains to be elucidated.

SIGNIFICANCE

Transgender patients with epilepsy face significant social and medical challenges. Interactions between medical gender-affirming treatments and AEDs are common, and management must depend on knowledge of these interactions to provide appropriate treatment.

Trajectories of Health-Related Quality of Life Among Children With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To identify two-year trajectories of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among children with newly diagnosed epilepsy, and evaluate key predictors of HRQOL trajectories.

METHODS

This study is part of a prospective study of adherence and HRQOL outcomes in children with epilepsy. Caregivers completed an HRQOL questionnaire at one month post diagnosis and every three months thereafter for two years. Chart review and additional questionnaires were used to collect medical variables and seizure outcomes.

RESULTS

Participants included 120 children with epilepsy and their caregiver. Unique trajectories for overall HRQOL and PedsQL™ subscales were identified and were predominantly stable. A total side effects score emerged as a consistent predictor of all HRQOL domains. Other variables (i.e., socioeconomic status, seizures, internalizing and externalizing problems) uniquely predicted HRQOL domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical and psychosocial interventions should be implemented soon after treatment initiation to target modifiable factors (e.g., side effects, anxiety symptoms), which could improve HRQOL.