A Molecular Signature of Myalgia in Myotonic Dystrophy 2

Characterization of the neuropathic pain component contributing to myalgia in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 and 2

Introduction

Chronic muscle pain is common in myotonic dystrophies (DM). Little is known about its pathophysiology. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of the neuropathic pain component contributing contributes to the pathogenesis of chronic pain in DM.

Methods

Twenty-one DM1 and 32 DM2 patients completed pain questionnaires (Brief pain inventory-BPI, PAIN-DETECT, pain disability index-PDI) and underwent neurological examination, nerve conduction studies (NCS), quantitative sensory testing (QST, dorsum of the right hand and right thigh) and skin biopsy to determine the intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD, distal and proximal site of lower extremity). NCS and QST results at the thigh were compared to 27 healthy controls and IENFD and QST at the dorsum of the hand to published reference values.

Results

The sensory profile of DM2 patients was characterized by a loss in thermal and mechanical detection, while DM1 patients showed reduced mechanical and heat pain thresholds and higher mechanical pain sensitivity. Both DM groups showed pressure hyperalgesia. IENFD was reduced in 63% of DM1 patients and 50% of DM2. The slightly higher pain interference and disability found in DM2 was rather due to age difference than disease.

Conclusion

Similar pain mechanisms likely occur in both DM1 and DM2, even though a tendency toward more pain sensitivity was observed in DM1 and more sensory loss in DM2. Both QST and reduced IENFD highlight the presence of peripheral nerve damage in DM. This must be considered for the best pain management strategies.

Mouse models of non-dystrophic and dystrophic myotonia exhibit nociplastic pain-like behaviors

Pain is a prominent and debilitating symptom in myotonic disorders, yet its physiological mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study assessed preclinical pain-like behavior in murine models of pharmacologically induced myotonia and myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). In both myotonia congenita and DM1, impairment of the CLCN1 gene, which encodes skeletal muscle voltage-gated CLC-1 chloride channels, reduces chloride ion conductance in skeletal muscle cells, leading to prolonged muscle excitability and delayed relaxation after contraction. We used the CLC-1 antagonist anthracene-9-carboxylic acid (9-AC) at intraperitoneal doses of 30 or 60 mg/kg and HSA LR20b DM1 mice to model CLC-1-induced myotonia. Our experimental approach included in vivo pain behavioral testing, ex vivo calcium imaging, and whole-cell current-clamp electrophysiology in mouse dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. A single injection of 9-AC induced myotonia in mice, which persisted for several hours and resulted in long-lasting allodynic pain-like behavior. Similarly, HSA LR20b mice exhibited both allodynia and hyperalgesia. Despite these pain-like behaviors, DRG neurons did not show signs of hyperexcitability in either myotonic model. These findings suggest that myotonia induces nociplastic pain-like behavior in preclinical rodents, likely through central sensitization mechanisms rather than peripheral sensitization. This study provides insights into the pathophysiology of pain in myotonic disorders and highlights the potential of using myotonic mouse models to explore pain mechanisms and assess novel analgesics. Future research should focus on the central mechanisms involved in myotonia-induced pain and develop targeted therapies to alleviate this significant clinical burden.

Myotonic Dystrophy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) are genetic disorders affecting skeletal and smooth muscle, heart, brain, eyes, and other organs. The multisystem involvement and disease variability of myotonic dystrophy have presented challenges for clinical care and research. This article focuses on the diagnosis and management of the disease. In addition, recent advances in characterizing the diverse clinical manifestations and variability of the disease are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies of the multisystem involvement of myotonic dystrophy, including the most lethal cardiac and respiratory manifestations and their molecular underpinnings, expand our understanding of the myotonic dystrophy phenotype. Advances have been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms of both types of myotonic dystrophy, providing opportunities for developing targeted therapeutics, some of which have entered clinical trials in DM1.

SUMMARY

Continued efforts focus on advancing our molecular and clinical understanding of DM1 and DM2. Accurately measuring and monitoring the diverse and variable clinical manifestations of myotonic dystrophy in clinic and in research is important to provide adequate care, prevent complications, and find treatments that improve symptoms and life quality.

Current Treatment Options for Patients with Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2

Purpose of the review

Myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2 are frequent forms of muscular dystrophies in adulthood. Their clinical differences need to be taken into account for the most appropriate treatment of patients. The aim of this article is to provide an overview on the current and upcoming therapeutic options for patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2).

Recent findings

At the moment, no disease-modifying therapies are available for DM2; next-generation therapies may however be available in the near future. In the meanwhile, the symptomatic management of patients has greatly improved, thank to the production of consensus-based standards of care and the growing evidence of efficacy of anti-myotonic drugs, promising employment of cannabinoids for symptom’s relief, regular monitoring, and early detection of treatable extra-muscular manifestations.

Summary

The treatment of DM2 is currently symptomatic and relies on the coordinated intervention of a multidisciplinary team. It remains to be determined whether upcoming causal therapies for myotonic dystrophy type 1 will be applicable also in DM2.

Cerebral involvement and related aspects in myotonic dystrophy type 2

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is an autosomal dominant multisystemic disorder caused by CCTG repeats expansion in the first intron of the CNBP gene. In this review we focus on the brain involvement in DM2, including its pathogenic mechanisms, microstructural, macrostructural and functional brain changes, as well as the effects of all these impairments on patients' everyday life. We also try to understand how brain abnormalities in DM2 should be adequately measured and potentially treated. The most important pathogenetic mechanisms in DM2 are RNA gain-of-function and repeat-associated non-ATG (RAN) translation. One of the main neuroimaging findings in DM2 is the presence of diffuse periventricular white matter hyperintensity lesions (WMHLs). Brain atrophy has been described in DM2 patients, but it is not clear if it is mostly caused by a decrease of the white or gray matter volume. The most commonly reported specific cognitive symptoms in DM2 are dysexecutive syndrome, visuospatial and memory impairments. Fatigue, sleep-related disorders and pain are also frequent in DM2. The majority of key symptoms and signs in DM2 has a great influence on patients' daily lives, their psychological status, economic situation and quality of life.

New developments in myotonic dystrophies from a multisystemic perspective

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The multisystemic involvement of myotonic dystrophies (DMs) intricates disease monitoring, patients' care and trial design. This update of the multifaceted comorbidities observed in DMs aims to assist neurologists in the complex management of patients and to encourage further studies for still under-investigated aspects of the disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

We reviewed the most recent studies covering pathogenesis and clinical aspects of extra-muscular involvement in DM1 and DM2. The largest body of evidence regards the cardiac and respiratory features, for which experts' recommendations have been produced. Gastrointestinal symptoms emerge as one of the most prevalent complaints in DMs. The alteration of insulin signaling pathways, involved in gastrointestinal manifestations, carcinogenesis, muscle function, cognitive and endocrinological aspects, gain further relevance in the light of recent evidence of metformin efficacy in DM1. Still, too few studies are performed on large DM2 cohorts, so that current recommendations mainly rely on data gathered in DM1 that cannot be fully translated to DM2.

SUMMARY

Extra-muscular manifestations greatly contribute to the overall disease burden. A multidisciplinary approach is the key for the management of patients. Consensus-based recommendations for DM1 and DM2 allow high standards of care but further evidence are needed to implement these recommendations.

The Prevalence, Characteristics and Impact of Chronic Pain in People With Muscular Dystrophies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chronic pain is a frequent, yet under-recognized and under-assessed problem in people with muscular dystrophies (MDs). Knowledge of the prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain, and its impact on function and quality of life is limited and lacks systematic exploration. This article aims to systematically review and synthesize existing literature that addresses chronic pain prevalence, characteristics and impact in people with different types of MDs. The present meta-analysis showed that the estimated prevalence of chronic pain in MDs is high and appears to be similar across different diagnostic groups: 68% (95% CI: 52%-82%) in FSHD, 65% (95% CI: 51%-77%) in DM, 62% (95% CI: 50%-73%) in BMD/DMD, and 60% (95% CI: 48%-73%) in LGMD, although it should be noted that heterogeneity was high in some diagnostic groups. On average, people with FSHD and DM present with moderate pain intensity. The lumbar spine, shoulders and legs are the most frequent sites of chronic pain among people with FSHD, DM, BMD/DMD, and LGMD, with little variation. Diffuse pain across multiple body sites was reported by a notable proportion of these individuals. Chronic pain has a negative impact on daily life activities in people with MDs, and may also contribute to decreased quality of life. The protocol for this review has been published on PROSPERO (CRD42020168096). PERSPECTIVES: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the prevalence, and nature and impact of chronic pain in people with MDs. The present study demonstrates how common chronic pain is across various MD populations and highlights the need for better recognition and understanding of the nature and impact of pain from health professionals.

Myotonic dystrophy type 2: the 2020 update

The myotonic dystrophies are the commonest cause of adult-onset muscular dystrophy. Phenotypes of DM1 and DM2 are similar, but there are some important differences, including the presence or absence of congenital form, muscles primarily affected (distal vs proximal), involved muscle fiber types (type 1 vs type 2 fibers), and some associated multisystemic phenotypes. There is currently no cure for the myotonic dystrophies but effective management significantly reduces the morbidity and mortality of patients. For the enormous understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of myotonic dystrophy type 1 and myotonic dystrophy type 2, these diseases are now called "spliceopathies" and are mediated by a primary disorder of RNA rather than proteins. Despite clinical and genetic similarities, myotonic dystrophy type 1 and type 2 are distinct disorders requiring different diagnostic and management strategies. Gene therapy for myotonic dystrophy type 1 and myotonic dystrophy type 2 appears to be very close and the near future is an exciting time for clinicians and patients.

Validation of Motor Outcome Measures in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2

Introduction: Myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) lacks disease-specific, validated, motor outcome measures (OMs), and patients' reported outcomes (PROs). This represents a limit for the monitoring of disease progression and treatment response. Our aim was to identify the most appropriate OMs to be translated in clinical practice and clinical trials on DM2. This study has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT03603171 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03603171). Methods: Sixty-six patients with genetically confirmed DM2 underwent a baseline and a follow-up visit after 1 year. The tested OMs included: hand opening time, pressure pain threshold (PPT), manual muscle testing (MMT), hand held dynamometry (HHD), scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA), quantitative motor function test (QMFT), gait stairs Gowers chair (GSGC), 30-s sit to stand test, functional index 2 (FI-2) and 6MWT. The PROs included DM1-Active-C, Rasch-built Pompe-specific activity scale (R-Pact), fatigue and daytime sleepiness (FDSS), brief pain inventory short form (BPI-sf), myotonia behavior scale (MBS), and the McGill pain questionnaire. Results: All patients completed the MBS and the results correlated well with the hand-opening time. The PPT showed a low reliability, no correlation with pain questionnaires, and did not differentiate patients with or without myalgia. Both muscle strength assessments, MMT and HHD, showed good construct validity. The QMFT showed an acceptable ceiling effect (14.5%), good convergent and differential validity and performed overall better than GSGC. The SARA score showed high flooring effect and is not useful in DM2. 6MWT proved a valid outcome measure in DM2. The 30-s sit to stand is a feasible test with good convergent validity, showing a flooring effect of 20% as it cannot be used in more severely affected patients. The FI-2 is time-consuming and has a high ceiling effect. At the 1-year visit the only assessments able to detect a worsening of DM2 were HHD, QMFT, and 6MWT, which are the most sensitive to change, and therefore clinically meaningful OMs in DM2. Conclusion: The clinical meaningful motor outcome measures that best depict the multifaceted phenotype of DM2 and its slow progression are MBS, MMT, or HHD (depending on the clinical setting), QMFT, and the 6MWT.

Abnormalities in Skeletal Muscle Myogenesis, Growth, and Regeneration in Myotonic Dystrophy

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2) are autosomal dominant degenerative neuromuscular disorders characterized by progressive skeletal muscle weakness, atrophy, and myotonia with progeroid features. Although both DM1 and DM2 are characterized by skeletal muscle dysfunction and also share other clinical features, the diseases differ in the muscle groups that are affected. In DM1, distal muscles are mainly affected, whereas in DM2 problems are mostly found in proximal muscles. In addition, manifestation in DM1 is generally more severe, with possible congenital or childhood-onset of disease and prominent CNS involvement. DM1 and DM2 are caused by expansion of (CTG•CAG)n and (CCTG•CAGG)n repeats in the 3' non-coding region of DMPK and in intron 1 of CNBP, respectively, and in overlapping antisense genes. This critical review will focus on the pleiotropic problems that occur during development, growth, regeneration, and aging of skeletal muscle in patients who inherited these expansions. The current best-accepted idea is that most muscle symptoms can be explained by pathomechanistic effects of repeat expansion on RNA-mediated pathways. However, aberrations in DNA replication and transcription of the DM loci or in protein translation and proteome homeostasis could also affect the control of proliferation and differentiation of muscle progenitor cells or the maintenance and physiological integrity of muscle fibers during a patient's lifetime. Here, we will discuss these molecular and cellular processes and summarize current knowledge about the role of embryonic and adult muscle-resident stem cells in growth, homeostasis, regeneration, and premature aging of healthy and diseased muscle tissue. Of particular interest is that also progenitor cells from extramuscular sources, such as pericytes and mesoangioblasts, can participate in myogenic differentiation. We will examine the potential of all these types of cells in the application of regenerative medicine for muscular dystrophies and evaluate new possibilities for their use in future therapy of DM.

Core Clinical Phenotypes in Myotonic Dystrophies

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2) represent the most frequent multisystemic muscular dystrophies in adulthood. They are progressive, autosomal dominant diseases caused by an abnormal expansion of an unstable nucleotide repeat located in the non-coding region of their respective genes DMPK for DM1 and CNBP in DM2. Clinically, these multisystemic disorders are characterized by a high variability of muscular and extramuscular symptoms, often causing a delay in diagnosis. For both subtypes, many symptoms overlap, but some differences allow their clinical distinction. This article highlights the clinical core features of myotonic dystrophies, thus facilitating their early recognition and diagnosis. Particular attention will be given to signs and symptoms of muscular involvement, to issues related to respiratory impairment, and to the multiorgan involvement. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled “Beyond Borders: Myotonic Dystrophies—A European Perception.”

Assessing the influence of age and gender on the phenotype of myotonic dystrophy type 2

This study aims to provide a detailed clinical characterization of a large cohort of myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2) patients investigating the influence of age and gender as modifying factors of DM2 phenotype. A retrospective study was conducted on 307 patients with genetically confirmed DM2. The following data were analyzed: (1) demographics, (2) clinical features (first symptom, muscular complaints, and multisystemic involvement), (3) diagnostics (serological tests, electromyography, and muscle biopsy). In this cohort (186 females, 121 males), a proximal weakness was the leading symptom at onset (55.4%), followed by myalgia (35.5%) and myotonia (25.4%). Proximal weakness was more common in women than men (64.9 vs. 43.8%, p = 0.0006), whereas being male was associated with higher odds for developing myalgia [OR 2.94 (95% CI 1.53-5.67)]. Patients with muscle weakness at onset were older than those with myalgia and myotonia (p < 0.0001), while each additional disease year was associated with 10% decrease in the odds of developing myotonia [OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.87-0.93)] and 6% decrease of myalgia [OR 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.97)]. Cataract and thyroid diseases occurred more frequently in women (p = 0.002 and p = 0.002, respectively). Early onset of DM2 is an independent risk factor for the occurrence of multisystemic involvement [OR 0.94 (95% CI 0.90-0.98)]. In this updated clinical description of DM2 emerges a profound gender and age influence on the phenotype, emphasizing that female gender and ageing may be associated with a higher disease burden. These age- and gender-specific differences should be considered in diagnostics, management, and future clinical studies of DM2.

Myotonic dystrophy type 2 and modifier genes: an update on clinical and pathomolecular aspects

Myotonic dystrophy (DM) is the most common adult muscular dystrophy, characterized by autosomal dominant progressive myopathy, myotonia, and multiorgan involvement. To date, two distinct forms caused by similar mutations in two different genes have been identified: myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and myotonic dystrophy type 2 (DM2). Aberrant transcription and mRNA processing of multiple genes due to RNA-mediated toxic gain-of function has been suggested to cause the complex phenotype in DM1 and DM2. However, despite clinical and genetic similarities, DM1 and DM2 may be considered as distinct disorders. This review is an update on the latest findings specific to DM2, including explanations for the differences in clinical manifestations and pathophysiology between the two forms of myotonic dystrophies.