The paradox of tegumentary leishmaniasis diagnosis: How the need for accurate and modern techniques is being addressed in low income areas

Non-invasive urine-based ELISA using a recombinant Leishmania protein to diagnose tegumentary leishmaniasis

The diagnosis of tegumentary leishmaniasis (TL) is hampered by variable sensitivity and/or specificity of the tests. Serological assays are suitable to diagnose visceral leishmaniasis (VL); however, they present low performance for the detection of TL cases. Additionally, blood collection to obtain patient serum represents a challenge, as it is an invasive and uncomfortable procedure, requiring laboratorial infrastructure and trained professionals. In this context, the present study proposed to evaluate patient urine to detect TL, given that this analyte has proven to be effective in ELISA experiments for the detection of VL cases. For this, a Leishmania protein called LiHyV, two specific B-cell epitopes derived from protein amino acid sequence, and a Leishmania antigenic extract (SLA) were used as antigens. A total of 215 paired urine and serum samples were evaluated, and results showed that, when serum was employed as an analyte, rLiHyV, Peptide1, Peptide2, and SLA presented a sensitivity of 85%, 29%, 58%, and 31%, respectively, and a specificity of 97.5%, 98%, 100%, and 97.5%, respectively, in the diagnosis of TL. When urine was used, rLiHyV, Peptide1, Peptide2, and SLA presented a sensitivity of 95%, 74%, 67%, and 52%, respectively, and a specificity of 100%, 99%, 98%, and 86%, respectively. In conclusion, preliminary data suggest that urine could be considered as an alternative biological sample for the detection of TL cases.

Impact assessment of different DNA extraction methods for non-invasive molecular diagnosis of tegumentary leishmaniasis

The aim of this study was to evaluate two methods of nucleic acid extraction (spin-column-based method - commercial kit and direct boil - DB) from swab sampling compared to biopsy sampling for the diagnosis of tegumentary leishmaniasis (TL), (cutaneous - CL and mucocutaneous - MCL forms). The impact of these nucleic acid extraction protocols on different types of PCR and LAMP techniques were compared regarding nucleic acid quality, molecular assays accuracy, indirect quantitation, and costs. The evaluated patients were 57 TL cases (36 CL and 21 MCL) and 34 non-cases. Swab samples extracted by the DB method showed a higher DNA degradation rate and worse DNA quality in comparison to the commercial kit. Molecular tests performed on biopsy samples showed identical or higher performance in all analysis, as compared to their own performance on swab samples for TL (CL and MCL). However, only the SSU rRNA TaqMan™ RT-PCR test showed a significant difference between the performance of biopsy and swab samples extracted by commercial kit. The kDNA-cPCR coupled with swab extracted by commercial kit showed the highest accuracy (95.6%) for TL diagnosis. The sensitivity of the LAMP-RT 18S method in swab samples extracted with a commercial kit (82.5%) was close to that found in biopsy samples (86%) for TL diagnosis. The DB extraction method presented the lowest cost. The use of swab as a minimally-invasive sampling method, associated with an efficient nucleic acid extraction protocol, may represent a low-cost alternative for the diagnosis of CL and MCL.

Recent advances and new strategies in Leishmaniasis diagnosis

Leishmaniasis is a set of complex and multifaceted syndromes, with different clinical manifestations, caused by different species of the genus Leishmania spp. that can be characterized by at least four syndromes: visceral leishmaniasis (VL, also known as kala-azar), post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL), cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL). Among the most serious clinical forms, VL stands out, which causes the death of around 59,000 people annually. Fast and accurate diagnosis in VL is essential to reduce the disease's morbidity and mortality. There are a large number of diagnostic tests for leishmaniasis, however they do cross-react with other protozoa and their sensitivity changes according to the clinical form of the disease. Thus, it is essential and necessary to provide a diagnosis that is sufficiently sensitive to detect asymptomatic infected individuals and specific to discriminate individuals with other infectious and parasitic diseases, thus enabling more accurate diagnostic tools than those currently used. In this context, the aim of this review is to summarize the conventional diagnostic tools and point out the new advances and strategies on visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis diagnosis.

The accuracy of the Montenegro skin test for leishmaniasis in PCR-negative patients

INTRODUCTION

As highly specific molecular biology-based techniques may not be sensitive enough for the diagnosis of American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL), clinicians frequently rely on immunological tests before treatment initiation. Hence, the correct combination of diagnostic tests is imperative for ATL diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the Montenegro (Leishmanin) skin test (MST) in polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-negative patients to accurately detect ATL.

METHODS

Patients with a clinical picture compatible with ATL were divided into ATL (confirmed by lesion smear, culture indirect immunofluorescence, and/or histopathology) and no-ATL (diseases that can mimic leishmaniasis) groups. Conventional PCR for the minicircle kDNA of Leishmania was performed, and the MST was carried out for PCR-negative patients.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients were included in this study, including 79 diagnosed with ATL (6 with mucocutaneous leishmaniasis) and 20 without ATL (no-ATL group). The MST showed a high sensitivity of 90.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 69.90-97.21) in PCR-negative patients that was 10% higher than the sensitivity reported in PCR-positive population (79.66%; 95% CI = 67.73-87.96).

CONCLUSIONS

One of the most important reasons for PCR negativity among patients with active ATL is the presence of a strong cellular immunological response, especially in chronic and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. This reinforces the considerable utility of the tests that detect cellular responses against Leishmania antigens such as the MST in PCR-negative patients when the performance in screening situations is questionable.