Genome-wide analysis of therapeutic response uncovers molecular pathways governing tamoxifen resistance in ER+ breast cancer

Drug response-based precision therapeutic selection for tamoxifen-resistant triple-positive breast cancer

Breast cancer adaptability to the drug environment reduces the chemotherapeutic response and facilitates acquired drug resistance. Cancer-specific therapeutics can be more effective against advanced-stage cancer than standard chemotherapeutics. To extend the paradigm of cancer-specific therapeutics, clinically relevant acquired tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7 proteome was deconstructed to identify possible druggable targets (N = 150). Twenty-eight drug inhibitors were used against identified druggable targets to suppress non-resistant (NC) and resistant cells (RC). First, selected drugs were screened using growth-inhibitory response against NC and RC. Seven drugs were shortlisted for their time-dependent (10-12 days) cytotoxic effect and further narrowed to three effective drugs (e.g., cisplatin, doxorubicin, and hydroxychloroquine). The growth-suppressive effectiveness of selected drugs was validated in the complex spheroid model (progressive and regressive). In the progressive model, doxorubicin (RC: 83.64 %, NC: 54.81 %), followed by cisplatin (RC: 76.66 %, NC: 68.94 %) and hydroxychloroquine (RC: 68.70 %, NC: 61.78 %) showed a significant growth-suppressive effect. However, in fully grown regressive spheroid, after 4th drug treatment, cisplatin significantly suppressed RC (84.79 %) and NC (40.21 %), while doxorubicin and hydroxychloroquine significantly suppressed only RC (76.09 and 76.34 %). Our in-depth investigation effectively integrated the expression data with the cancer-specific therapeutic investigation. Furthermore, our three-step sequential drug-screening approach unbiasedly identified cisplatin, doxorubicin, and hydroxychloroquine as an efficacious drug to target heterogeneous cancer cell populations. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Hormonal-positive BC grows slowly, and hormonal-inhibitors effectively suppress the oncogenesis. However, development of drug-resistance not only reduces the drug-response but also increases the chance of BC aggressiveness. Further, alternative chemotherapeutics are widely used to control advanced-stage BC. In contrast, we hypothesized that, compared to standard chemotherapeutics, cancer-specific drugs can be more effective against resistant-cancer. Although cancer-specific treatment identification is an uphill battle, our work shows proteome data can be used for drug selection. We identified multiple druggable targets and, using ex-vivo methods narrowed multiple drugs to disease-condition-specific therapeutics. We consider that our investigation successfully interconnected the expression data with the functional disease-specific therapeutic investigation and selected drugs can be used for effective resistant treatment with higher therapeutic response.

Mechanism-centric regulatory network identifies NME2 and MYC programs as markers of Enzalutamide resistance in CRPC

Heterogeneous response to Enzalutamide, a second-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitor, is a central problem in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) management. Genome-wide systems investigation of mechanisms that govern Enzalutamide resistance promise to elucidate markers of heterogeneous treatment response and salvage therapies for CRPC patients. Focusing on the de novo role of MYC as a marker of Enzalutamide resistance, here we reconstruct a CRPC-specific mechanism-centric regulatory network, connecting molecular pathways with their upstream transcriptional regulatory programs. Mining this network with signatures of Enzalutamide response identifies NME2 as an upstream regulatory partner of MYC in CRPC and demonstrates that NME2-MYC increased activities can predict patients at risk of resistance to Enzalutamide, independent of co-variates. Furthermore, our experimental investigations demonstrate that targeting MYC and its partner NME2 is beneficial in Enzalutamide-resistant conditions and could provide an effective strategy for patients at risk of Enzalutamide resistance and/or for patients who failed Enzalutamide treatment.

A Novel Mathematical Approach for Analysis of Integrated Cell-Patient Data Uncovers a 6-Gene Signature Linked to Endocrine Therapy Resistance

A significant number of breast cancers develop resistance to hormone therapy. This progression, while posing a major clinical challenge, is difficult to predict. Despite important contributions made by cell models and clinical studies to tackle this problem, both present limitations when taken individually. Experiments with cell models are highly reproducible but do not reflect the indubitable heterogenous landscape of breast cancer. On the other hand, clinical studies account for this complexity but introduce uncontrolled noise due to external factors. Here, we propose a new approach for biomarker discovery that is based on a combined analysis of sequencing data from controlled MCF7 cell experiments and heterogenous clinical samples that include clinical and sequencing information from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Using data from differential gene expression analysis and a Bayesian logistic regression model coupled with an original simulated annealing-type algorithm, we discovered a novel 6-gene signature for stratifying patient response to hormone therapy. The experimental observations and computational analysis built on independent cohorts indicated the superior predictive performance of this gene set over previously known signatures of similar scope. Together, these findings revealed a new gene signature to identify patients with breast cancer with an increased risk of developing resistance to endocrine therapy.

SRSF5 Regulates the Expression of BQ323636.1 to Modulate Tamoxifen Resistance in ER-Positive Breast Cancer

About 70% of breast cancer patients are oestrogen receptor-positive (ER +ve). Adjuvant endocrine therapy using tamoxifen (TAM) is an effective approach for preventing local recurrence and metastasis. However, around half of the patients will eventually develop resistance. Overexpression of BQ323636.1 (BQ) is one of the mechanisms that confer TAM resistance. BQ is an alternative splice variant of NCOR2. The inclusion of exon 11 generates mRNA for NCOR2, while the exclusion of exon 11 produces mRNA for BQ. The expression of SRSF5 is low in TAM-resistant breast cancer cells. Modulation of SRSF5 can affect the alternative splicing of NCOR2 to produce BQ. In vitro and in vivo studies confirmed that the knockdown of SRSF5 enhanced BQ expression, and conferred TAM resistance; in contrast, SRSF5 overexpression reduced BQ expression and, thus, reversed TAM resistance. Clinical investigation using a tissue microarray confirmed the inverse correlation of SRSF5 and BQ. Low SRSF5 expression was associated with TAM resistance, local recurrence and metastasis. Survival analyses showed that low SRSF5 expression was associated with poorer prognosis. We showed that SRPK1 can interact with SRSF5 to phosphorylate it. Inhibition of SRPK1 by a small inhibitor, SRPKIN-1, suppressed the phosphorylation of SRSF5. This enhanced the proportion of SRSF5 interacting with exon 11 of NCOR2, reducing the production of BQ mRNA. As expected, SRPKIN-1 reduced TAM resistance. Our study confirms that SRSF5 is essential for BQ expression. Modulating the activity of SRSF5 in ER +ve breast cancer will be a potential approach to combating TAM resistance.

Construction and validation of an aging-related gene signature for prognosis prediction of patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) is an aging-related disease. Aging-related genes (ARGs) participate in the initiation and development of lung and colon cancer, but the prognosis signature of ARGs in BC has not been clearly studied.

AIMS

This study aimed to construct an ARGs signature to predict the prognosis of patients with breast cancer.

METHOD

Firstly, the expression data of ARGs from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were collected. Then COX and least absolulute shrinkage and selection operator(LASSO) were performed to construct the ARGs prognostic signature. The correlation between the signature and immune cell infiltration, immunotherapeutic response and drug sensitivity were subsequently analysed. The TCGA nomogram was constructed by combining the signature with other clinical features, and was validated by using GEO database.

RESULTS

After LASSO and COX regression analyses, a prognostic signature based on nine ARGs, namely, HSP90AA1, NFKB2, PLAU, PTK2, RECQL4, CLU, JAK2, MAP3K5, and S100B, was built by using the TCGA dataset. Moreover, this risk signature is closely related to immune cell infiltration, immunotherapeutic response, and responses to chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Subsequently, The calibration curve demonstrates that the nomogram agrees well with practical prediction results. The receiver operating characteristic curve and decision-making curve analysis demonstrate that ARG signature has the better prognosis diagnosis ability and clinical net benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, the proposed ARG prognosis signature is a new prognosis molecular marker of patients with BC, and it can provide good references to individual clinical therapy.

Big Data to Knowledge: Application of Machine Learning to Predictive Modeling of Therapeutic Response in Cancer

Background

In recent years, the availability of high throughput technologies, establishment of large molecular patient data repositories, and advancement in computing power and storage have allowed elucidation of complex mechanisms implicated in therapeutic response in cancer patients. The breadth and depth of such data, alongside experimental noise and missing values, requires a sophisticated human-machine interaction that would allow effective learning from complex data and accurate forecasting of future outcomes, ideally embedded in the core of machine learning design.

Objective

In this review, we will discuss machine learning techniques utilized for modeling of treatment response in cancer, including Random Forests, support vector machines, neural networks, and linear and logistic regression. We will overview their mathematical foundations and discuss their limitations and alternative approaches in light of their application to therapeutic response modeling in cancer.

Conclusion

We hypothesize that the increase in the number of patient profiles and potential temporal monitoring of patient data will define even more complex techniques, such as deep learning and causal analysis, as central players in therapeutic response modeling.

Mechanism-Centric Approaches for Biomarker Detection and Precision Therapeutics in Cancer

Biomarker discovery is at the heart of personalized treatment planning and cancer precision therapeutics, encompassing disease classification and prognosis, prediction of treatment response, and therapeutic targeting. However, many biomarkers represent passenger rather than driver alterations, limiting their utilization as functional units for therapeutic targeting. We suggest that identification of driver biomarkers through mechanism-centric approaches, which take into account upstream and downstream regulatory mechanisms, is fundamental to the discovery of functionally meaningful markers. Here, we examine computational approaches that identify mechanism-centric biomarkers elucidated from gene co-expression networks, regulatory networks (e.g., transcriptional regulation), protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, and molecular pathways. We discuss their objectives, advantages over gene-centric approaches, and known limitations. Future directions highlight the importance of input and model interpretability, method and data integration, and the role of recently introduced technological advantages, such as single-cell sequencing, which are central for effective biomarker discovery and time-cautious precision therapeutics.