Visualizing diastolic failure: Non-invasive imaging-biomarkers in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Prognostic and diagnostic implications of impaired rest and exercise-stress left atrial compliance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the HFpEF stress trial

BACKGROUND

With emerging therapies, early diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) comes to the fore. Whilst the reference standard of exercise-stress right heart catheterisation is well established, the clinical routine struggles between feasibility of exercise-stress and diagnostic accuracy of available tests.

METHODS

The HFpEF Stress Trial (DZHK-17) prospectively enrolled 75 patients with exertional dyspnoea and echocardiographic signs of diastolic dysfunction (E/e' > 8) who underwent simultaneous rest and exercise-stress echocardiography and right heart catheterisation (RHC). HFpEF was defined according to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (HFpEF: PCWP rest: ≥15 mmHg stress: ≥25 mmHg). Patients were classified as non-cardiac dyspnoea (NCD) in the absence of HFpEF and cardiovascular disease. LA compliance was defined as reservoir strain (Es)/(E/e'). Follow-up was conducted after 4 years to evaluate cardiovascular hospitalisation (CVH).

RESULTS

The final study population included 68 patients (HFpEF n = 34 and NCD n = 34) of which 23 reached the clinical endpoint, 1 patient was lost to follow-up. Patients with HFpEF according to the HFA-PEFF score (≥5 points) had significantly lower LA compliance at rest (p < 0.001) compared to patients with a score ≤ 4. LA compliance at rest outperformed E/e' (AUC 0.78 vs 0.87, p = 0.024) and showed a statistical trend to outperform Es (AUC 0.79 vs 0.87, p = 0.090) for the diagnosis of HFpEF. LA compliance at rest predicted CVH (HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.70-4.74, p < 0.001) irrespective of concomitant atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

LA compliance at rest can be obtained from clinical routine imaging and bears strong diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. Addition of LA compliance can improve the role of echocardiography as the primary test and gatekeeper.

Assessment of the cardiac output at rest and during exercise stress using real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in HFpEF-patients

This methodological study aimed to validate the cardiac output (CO) measured by exercise-stress real-time phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). 68 patients with dyspnea on exertion (NYHA ≥ II) and echocardiographic signs of diastolic dysfunction underwent rest and exercise stress right heart catheterization (RHC) and CMR within 24 h. Patients were diagnosed as overt HFpEF (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥ 15mmHg at rest), masked HFpEF (PCWP ≥ 25mmHg during exercise stress but < 15mmHg at rest) and non-cardiac dyspnea. CO was calculated using RHC as the reference standard, and in CMR by the volumetric stroke volume, conventional phase-contrast and rest and stress real-time phase-contrast imaging. At rest, the CMR based CO showed good agreement with RHC with an ICC of 0.772 for conventional phase-contrast, and 0.872 for real-time phase-contrast measurements. During exercise stress, the agreement of real-time CMR and RHC was good with an ICC of 0.805. Real-time measurements underestimated the CO at rest (Bias:0.71 L/min) and during exercise stress (Bias:1.4 L/min). Patients with overt HFpEF had a significantly lower cardiac index compared to patients with masked HFpEF and with non-cardiac dyspnea during exercise stress, but not at rest. Real-time phase-contrast CO can be assessed with good agreement with the invasive reference standard at rest and during exercise stress. While moderate underestimation of the CO needs to be considered with non-invasive testing, the CO using real-time CMR provides useful clinical information and could help to avoid unnecessary invasive procedures in HFpEF patients.

Myocardial fibrosis and prognosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pooled analysis of 12 cohort studies

OBJECTIVES

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a syndrome with significant clinical heterogeneity. Myocardial fibrosis has been considered a common pathological process in the development and progress of HFpEF. This study aimed to consolidate data on the prognostic effect of myocardial fibrosis, evaluated by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with HFpEF.

METHODS

Three medical databases were searched for potentially related articles up to February 28, 2023. Cohort studies reporting associations between myocardial fibrosis and risk of all-cause mortality or composite major adverse cardiac outcomes (MACE) were included. Cardiac fibrosis was evaluated by CMR metrics, including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) or myocardial extracellular volume (ECV). The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the outcomes for higher myocardial fibrosis were calculated.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with 2787 patients with HFpEF were included for analysis. After a median follow-up duration of 31.2 months, a higher level of cardiac fibrosis was associated with a significant increase in the risk of MACE (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.14-1.57) and all-cause mortality (HR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.27-2.39), respectively. Furthermore, the increased risk of outcomes was both observed when cardiac fibrosis was defined according to LGE or ECV, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher burden of myocardial fibrosis evaluated by CMR can predict a poor prognosis in patients with HFpEF. Evaluation of LGE or ECV based on CMR could be recommended in these patients for risk stratification and guiding further treatment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Inclusion of cardiovascular magnetic resonance examination in the diagnostic and risk-evaluation algorithms in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction should be considered in clinical practice and future studies.

KEY POINTS

• Myocardial fibrosis is a common pathological process in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. • A higher myocardial fibrosis burden on cardiac magnetic resonance predicts a poor prognosis in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. • Evaluation of myocardial fibrosis may be useful in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction for risk stratification and treatment guidance.

Real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for non-invasive characterisation of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: final outcomes of the HFpEF stress trial

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. Recently, the HFpEF Stress Trial demonstrated feasibility and accuracy of non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) real-time (RT) exercise-stress atrial function imaging for early identification of HFpEF. However, no outcome data have yet been presented.

METHODS

The HFpEF Stress Trial (DZHK-17) prospectively recruited 75 patients with dyspnea on exertion and echocardiographic preserved EF and signs of diastolic dysfunction (E/e' > 8). 68 patients entered the final study cohort and were characterized as HFpEF (n = 34) or non-cardiac dyspnea (n = 34) according to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (HFpEF: PCWP rest: ≥ 15 mmHg stress: ≥ 25 mmHg). These patients were contacted by telephone and hospital charts were reviewed. The clinical endpoint was cardiovascular events (CVE).

RESULTS

Follow-up was performed after 48 months; 1 patient was lost to follow-up. HFpEF patients were more frequently compared to non-cardiac dyspnea (15 vs. 8, p = 0.059). Hospitalised patients during follow-up had higher H2FPEF scores (5 vs. 3, p < 0.001), and impaired left atrial (LA) function at rest (p ≤ 0.002) and stress (p ≤ 0.006). Impairment of CMR-derived atrial function parameters at rest and during exercise-stress (p ≤ 0.003) was associated with increased likelihood for CVE. CMR-Feature Tracking LA Es/Ee (p = 0.016/0.017) and RT-CMR derived LA long axis strain (p = 0.003) were predictors of CVE independent of the presence of atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

Left atrial function emerged as the strongest predictor for 4-year outcome in the HFpEF Stress Trial. A combination of rest and exercise-stress LA function quantification allows accurate diagnostic and prognostic stratification in HFpEF.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT03260621.

Rest and exercise-stress estimated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure using real-time free-breathing cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Identification of increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) by right heart catheterization (RHC) is the reference standard for the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Recently, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging estimation of PCWP at rest was introduced as a non-invasive alternative. Since many patients are only identified during physiological exercise-stress, we hypothesized that novel exercise-stress CMR-derived PCWP emerges superior compared to its assessment at rest.

METHODS

The HFpEF-Stress Trial prospectively recruited 75 patients with exertional dyspnea and diastolic dysfunction who then underwent rest and exercise-stress RHC and CMR. HFpEF was defined according to PCWP (overt HFpEF ≥15 mmHg at rest, masked HFpEF ≥25 mmHg during exercise-stress). CMR-derived PCWP was calculated based on previously published formula using left ventricular mass and either biplane left atrial volume (LAV) or monoplane left atrial area (LAA).

RESULTS

LAV (rest/stress: r = 0.50/r = 0.55, p < 0.001) and LAA PCWP (rest/stress: r = 0.50/r = 0.48, p < 0.001) correlated significantly with RHC-derived PCWP while numerically overestimating PCWP at rest and underestimating PCWP during exercise-stress. LAV and LAA PCWP showed good diagnostic accuracy to detect HFpEF (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) LAV rest 0.73, stress 0.81; LAA rest 0.72, stress 0.77) with incremental diagnostic value for the detection of masked HFpEF using exercise-stress (AUC LAV rest 0.54 vs stress 0.67, p = 0.019, LAA rest 0.52 vs stress 0.66, p = 0.012). LAV but not LAA PCWP during exercise-stress was a predictor for 24 months hospitalization independent of a medical history for atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio (HR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.55, p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Non-invasive PCWP correlates well with the invasive reference at rest and during exercise stress. There is overall good diagnostic accuracy for HFpEF assessment using CMR-derived estimated PCWP despite deviations in absolute agreement. Non-invasive exercise derived PCWP may particularly facilitate detection of masked HFpEF in the future.

Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived hemodynamic force assessments

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived hemodynamic force (HDF) analyses have been introduced recently enabling more in-depth cardiac function evaluation. Inter-study reproducibility is important for a widespread clinical use but has not been quantified for this novel CMR post-processing tool yet. Serial CMR imaging was performed in 11 healthy participants in a median interval of 63 days (range 49-87). HDF assessment included left ventricular (LV) longitudinal, systolic peak and impulse, systolic/diastolic transition, diastolic deceleration as well as atrial thrust acceleration forces. Inter-study reproducibility and study sample sizes required to demonstrate 10%, 15% or 20% relative changes of HDF measurements were calculated. In addition, intra- and inter-observer analyses were performed. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was excellent for all HDF parameters according to intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values (> 0.80 for all). Inter-study reproducibility of all HDF parameters was excellent (ICC ≥ 0.80 for all) with systolic parameters showing lower coeffients of variation (CoV) than diastolic measurements (CoV 15.2% for systolic impulse vs. CoV 30.9% for atrial thrust). Calculated sample sizes to detect relative changes ranged from n = 12 for the detection of a 20% relative change in systolic impulse to n = 200 for the detection of 10% relative change in atrial thrust. Overall inter-study reproducibility of CMR-derived HDF assessments was sufficient with systolic HDF measurements showing lower inter-study variation than diastolic HDF analyses.

Beta-blockers in Hypertensive Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Atrial Fibrillation Prevention

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (HTN LVH) is a key risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the possible role of beta-blockers (BBs) in addition to a renin-angiotensinaldosterone system (RAAS) blocker in AF prevention in patients with HTN LVH.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed, Elsevier, SAGE, Oxford, and Google Scholar search with the search items 'beta blocker hypertension left ventricular hypertrophy patient' from 2013-2023. In the end, a 'snowball search', based on the references of relevant papers as well as from papers that cited them was performed.

RESULTS

HTN LVH is a risk factor for AF. In turn, AF substantially complicates HTN LVH and contributes to the genesis of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The prognosis of HFpEF is comparable with that of HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), and, regardless of the type, HF is associated with five-year mortality of 50-75%. The antiarrhythmic properties of BBs are wellrecognized, and BBs as a class of drugs are - in general - recommended to decrease the incidence of AF in HTN.

CONCLUSION

BBs are recommended (as a class) for AF prevention in several contemporary guidelines for HTN. LVH regression in HTN - used as a single criterion for the choice of antihypertensive medication - does not capture this protective effect. Consequently, it is worth studying how meaningful this antiarrhythmic action (to prevent AF) of BBs is in patients with HTN LVH in addition to a RAAS blocker.

Sex-specific differences in risk factors, comorbidities, diagnostic challenges, optimal management, and prognostic outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A comprehensive literature review

Due to hormonal variations, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains prevalent in women and affects almost half of the heart failure (HF) patients. Given the yearly death rate of 10-30% and the unavailability of medications targeting HFpEF, the need arises for a better understanding of the fundamental mechanisms of this syndrome. This comprehensive review explores sex-specific differences in traditional risk factors; female-specific factors that may impact HFpEF development and response to therapy, including variations in hormone levels that may occur pre- and post-menopausal or during pregnancy; and disparities in comorbidities, clinical presentation, and diagnostic challenges. Lastly, the review addresses prognostic outcomes, noting that women with HFpEF have a poor quality of life but a higher survival rate. It also discusses novel biomarkers and precision medicine, emphasizing their potential to improve early detection and personalized treatment.

Sex-Specific Impairment of Cardiac Functional Reserve in HFpEF: Insights From the HFpEF Stress Trial

Background

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been observed to have a twice as high prevalence in women compared to men with similar predisposing risk factors between both sexes.

Objectives

This study aimed to identify sex-specific pathophysiological features in HFpEF using rest and exercise stress right heart catheterization (RHC), echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).

Methods

Seventy-five patients with exertional dyspnea, preserved ejection fraction (EF) (≥50%), and signs of diastolic dysfunction on echocardiography were prospectively recruited in the HFpEF Stress Trial. Patients underwent RHC, echocardiography and CMR at rest and during exercise stress. Patients were diagnosed with HFpEF and noncardiac dyspnea according to RHC measurements.

Results

After exclusion, the final study cohort comprised 68 patients (females n = 44, males n = 24) with a mean age of 66.9 ± 9.7 years. Compared to men, women with HFpEF revealed lower right ventricular stroke volumes during exercise stress (females 38.1 vs males 50.4 mL/m2 BSA; P = 0.011). This was accompanied by a decreasing left atrial EF in women but not men comparing resting to exercise conditions (females -2.7% vs males 2.5%, P = 0.020) and impaired left ventricular filling (females 35.5 vs males 44.2 mL/m2 BSA, P = 0.017) in women with HFpEF during exercise stress. These sex-specific differences were not present in noncardiac dyspnea.

Conclusions

Women with HFpEF demonstrate sex-specific functional alterations of right ventricular, left atrial, and left ventricular function during exercise stress. This unique pathophysiology represents a sex-specific diagnostic target, which may allow early identification of women with HFpEF for future individualized therapeutic approaches.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived left atrioventricular coupling index and major adverse cardiac events in patients following acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Recently, a novel left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) has been introduced providing prognostic value to predict cardiovascular events beyond common risk factors in patients without cardiovascular disease. Since data on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived LACI in patients following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are scarce, we aimed to assess the diagnostic and prognostic implications of LACI in a large AMI patient cohort.

METHODS

In total, 1046 patients following AMI were included. After primary percutaneous coronary intervention CMR imaging and subsequent functional analyses were performed. LACI was defined by the ratio of the left atrial end-diastolic volume divided by the left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, reinfarction or heart failure within 12 months after the index event were defined as primary clinical endpoint.

RESULTS

LACI was significantly higher in patients with MACE compared to those without MACE (p < 0.001). Youden Index identified an optimal LACI cut-off at 34.7% to classify patients at high-risk (p < 0.001 on log-rank testing). Greater LACI was associated with MACE on univariate regression modeling (HR 8.1, 95% CI 3.4-14.9, p < 0.001) and after adjusting for baseline confounders and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) on multivariate regression analyses (HR 3.1 95% CI 1.0-9, p = 0.049). Furthermore, LACI assessment enabled further risk stratification in high-risk patients with impaired LV systolic function (LVEF ≤ 35%; p < 0.001 on log-rank testing).

CONCLUSION

Atrial-ventricular interaction using CMR-derived LACI is a superior measure of outcome beyond LVEF especially in high-risk patients following AMI. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00712101 and NCT01612312.

[Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) : Diagnosis and treatment]

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for around half of all hospitalizations associated with heart failure. The prevalence of HFpEF is increasing, mainly due to an aging population and a growing burden of comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes, and obesity. Despite increased research efforts, there are still important gaps in terms of the pathophysiological understanding of HFpEF and the practice-related diagnostics. As HFpEF may also be due to rare cardiac diseases, in unclear constellations patients should be referred at an early stage to specialized centers for diagnostics and treatment to facilitate best clinical care. Only recently, evidence has emerged that innovative pharmacological approaches are also able to reduce hard clinical endpoints in HFpEF. These strategies now await implementation into routine care.

Concomitant latent pulmonary vascular disease leads to impaired global cardiac performance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

AIMS

The REDUCE-LAP II trial demonstrated adverse outcomes after interatrial shunt device (IASD) placement in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) attributed to latent pulmonary vascular disease (PVD). We hypothesized that exercise stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging could provide non-invasive characterization of cardiac and pulmonary physiology for improved patient selection.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The HFpEF-Stress trial prospectively enrolled 75 patients with exertional dyspnoea and diastolic dysfunction. Patients underwent rest and exercise stress right heart catheterization, echocardiography and CMR imaging. Pulmonary artery and capillary wedge pressures, cardiac index (CI) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were calculated. Latent PVD was defined as increased PVR ≥ 1.74 Wood units during exercise stress. CMR assessed long-axis strains (LAS) and filling volumes of all cardiac chambers. Right ventricular (RV) function was further quantified by stroke and peak flow volumes. Patients with latent PVD (n = 24) showed lower RV function (rest tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, p = 0.010; stress RV LAS, p < 0.001) compared to patients without (n = 43). During exercise stress, RV stroke and peak flow volumes (p < 0.001) were reduced and led to impaired left atrial filling (p = 0.040) with a strong statistical trend to impaired ventricular (LV) filling (p = 0.098). This subsequently resulted in reduced LV-CI (p < 0.001) despite preserved LV systolic function (LV LAS p ≥ 0.255). The degree of RV dysfunction during exercise stress best predicted latent PVD (RV peak flow, area under the curve at rest 0.73 vs. stress 0.89, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Latent PVD is a feature of HFpEF and is associated with impaired RV functional reserve, global diastolic filling and LV-CI. This can be quantified by CMR and used to identify patients likely to benefit from IASD implantation.

Myocardial infarction with a preserved ejection fraction-the impaired function of the cardio-renal baroreflex

Introduction: In experimental myocardial infarction with reduced ejection fraction causing overt congestive heart failure, the control of renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) by the cardio-renal baroreflex was impaired. The afferent vagal nerve activity under these experimental conditions had a lower frequency at saturation than that in controls. Hence, by investigating respective first neurons in the nodose ganglion (NG), we wanted to test the hypothesis that after myocardial infarction with still-preserved ejection fraction, the cardiac afferent nerve pathway is also already impaired. Material and methods: A myocardial infarction was induced by coronary artery ligature. After 21 days, nodose ganglion neurons with cardiac afferents from rats with myocardial infarction were cultured. A current clamp was used to characterize neurons as "tonic," i.e., sustained action potential (AP) firing, or "phasic," i.e., <5 APs upon current injection. Cardiac ejection fraction was measured using echocardiography; RSNA was recorded to evaluate the sensitivity of the cardiopulmonary baroreflex. Renal and cardiac histology was studied for inflammation and fibrosis markers. Results: A total of 192 neurons were investigated. In rats, after myocardial infarction, the number of neurons with a tonic response pattern increased compared to that in the controls (infarction vs. control: 78.6% vs. 48.5%; z-test, *p < 0.05), with augmented production of APs (23.7 ± 2.86 vs. 15.5 ± 1.86 APs/600 ms; mean ± SEM, t-test, *p < 0.05). The baseline activity of RSNA was subtly increased, and its control by the cardiopulmonary baroreflex was impaired following myocardial infarction: the fibrosis marker collagen I augmented in the renal interstitium. Discussion: After myocardial infarction with still-preserved ejection fraction, a complex impairment of the afferent limb of the cardio-renal baroreflex caused dysregulation of renal sympathetic nerve activity with signs of renal fibrosis.

Hemodynamic force assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in HFpEF: A case-control substudy from the HFpEF stress trial

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. Exercise-stress testing is recommended in case of uncertainty; however, this approach is time-consuming and costly. Since preserved EF does not represent normal systolic function, we hypothesized comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of cardiac hemodynamic forces (HDF) may identify functional abnormalities in HFpEF.

METHODS

The HFpEF Stress Trial (DZHK-17; Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03260621) prospectively recruited 75 patients with exertional dyspnea, preserved EF (≥50%) and signs of diastolic dysfunction (E/e' ≥8) on echocardiography. Patients underwent rest and exercise-stress right heart catheterisation, echocardiography and CMR. The final study cohort consisted of 68 patients (HFpEF n = 34 and non-cardiac dyspnea n = 34 according to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP)). HDF assessment included left ventricular (LV) longitudinal, systolic peak and impulse, systolic/diastolic transition, E-wave deceleration as well as A-wave acceleration forces. Follow-up after 24 months evaluated cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation (CVH) - only two patients were lost to follow-up.

FINDINGS

HDF assessment revealed impairment of LV longitudinal function in patients with HFpEF compared to non-cardiac dyspnoea (15.8% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.035), attributable to impairment of systolic peak (38.6% vs 51.6%, p = 0.003) and impulse (20.8% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.009) forces as well as late diastolic filling (-3.8% vs -5.4%, p = 0.029). Early diastolic filling was impaired in HFpEF patients identified at rest compared with patients identified during stress only (7.7% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.004). Impaired systolic peak was associated with CVH (HR 0.95, p = 0.016), and was superior to LV global longitudinal strain assessment in prediction of CVH (AUC 0.76 vs. 0.61, p = 0.048).

INTERPRETATION

Assessment of HDF indicates impairment of LV systolic ejection force in HFpEF which is associated with cardiovascular events.

FUNDING

German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK).