Rare but life-threatening aspiration pneumonia related to initiation of clobazam therapy

Efficacy of enteral feeding by gastrostomy tube placement in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome on body weight and days of hospitalization: A retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe form of drug-resistant epilepsy that begins during childhood and frequently leads to significant neurological impairments. Patients with LGS are likely to receive improper oral nutrition because of issues such as dysphagia and aspiration risk, potentially resulting in long-term tube feeding and eventual gastrostomy tube placement. Therefore, we investigated the effects of gastrostomy tube placement on nutrition outcomes and frequency of hospitalization in LGS.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 67 patients diagnosed with LGS who had undergone gastrostomy tube placement between January 2005 and August 2022. Comprehensive clinical data and complications arising from the procedure were collected. Patients' nutrition condition and frequency of hospitalizations were analyzed before and after gastrostomy tube placement.

RESULTS

Gastrostomy tube placement was performed for the following reasons: high risk of aspiration (50 out of 67, 74.6%), dysphagia (13 out of 67, 25.4%), persistent nasogastric tube feeding (2 out of 67, 3.0%), and severe malnutrition (2 out of 67, 3.0%). After the procedure, z scores for weight-for-age improved significantly, shifting from -3.35 ± 3.57 to -2.54 ± 2.70 over a 2-year interval (P < 0.001). Additionally, the total days of hospitalization and days of hospitalization due to respiratory symptoms reduced significantly from 41.94 ± 51.76 to 15.27 ± 26.68 (P < 0.001) and from 23.75 ± 36.92 to 10.52 ± 22.98 (P = 0.009), respectively. Among the patients, 50 (74.6%) experienced complications resulting from gastrostomy, with a relatively small proportion of major complications (11 out of 67, 16.4%) and no mortality.

CONCLUSION

Gastrostomy tube placement is a relatively safe procedure with favorable effects on nutrition status and hospitalization rates in patients with LGS.

Safety profile of clobazam in the real world: an analysis of FAERS database and systematic review of case reports

BACKGROUND

Most of the safety data of clobazam came from well-designed clinical trials, while the real-world information is insufficient.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database through OpenVigil 2 and conducted a systematic review of case reports regarding adverse drug reactions (ADR) linked to clobazam.

RESULTS

The analysis of FAERS identified 595 ADR signals. Nervous system disorders cantains the most positive signals among all system organ classes (SOCs). Except for seizure (n = 1696) and somnolence (n = 813), drug interactions (n = 492) were the most frequently reported positive signals. A total of 502 unique citations were initially retrieved and 31 individual cases from 28 publications were included. Skin reactions were the most reactions (n = 9), containing three types of severe reactions not alerted in the instruction. Five cases were caused by interactions between clobazam and other antiepileptic drugs, etravirine-based antiretroviral therapy, omeprazole, or meropenem. One patient died of aspiration pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians must pay attention to severe skin reactions and monitor the signs of suspicious respiratory infections/inflammations and central sedation. Patients with skin reactions will benefit from the withdrawal of clobazam and the treatment with glucocorticoids. The drug reactions between clobazam with severe or moderate cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 or CYP2C19 inhibitors or other antiepileptic drugs should also be alerted.