Predictors of longitudinal seizure outcomes after epilepsy surgery in childhood

Multimodal non-invasive evaluation in MRI-negative epilepsy patients

Presurgical evaluation is still challenging for MRI-negative epilepsy patients. As non-invasive modalities are the easiest acceptable and economic methods in determining the epileptogenic zone, we analyzed the localization value of common non-invasive methods in MRI-negative epilepsy patients. In this study, we included epilepsy patients undergoing presurgical evaluation with presurgical negative MRI. MRI post-processing was performed using a Morphometric Analysis Program (MAP) on T1-weighted volumetric MRI. The relationship between MAP, magnetoencephalography (MEG), scalp electroencephalogram (EEG), and seizure outcomes was analyzed to figure out the localization value of different non-invasive methods. Eighty-six patients were included in this study. Complete resection of the MAP-positive regions or the MEG-positive regions was positively associated with seizure freedom (p = 0.028 and 0.007, respectively). When an area is co-localized by MAP and MEG, the resection of the area was significantly associated with seizure freedom (p = 0.006). However, neither the EEG lateralization nor the EEG localization showed statistical association with the surgical outcome (p = 0.683 and 0.505, respectively). In conclusion, scalp EEG had a limited role in presurgical localization and predicting seizure outcome, combining MAP and MEG results can significantly improve the localization of epileptogenic lesions and have a positive association with seizure-free outcome. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Due to the lack of obvious structure abnormalities on neuroimaging examinations, the identification of epilepsy lesions in MRI-negative epilepsy patients can be difficult. In this study, we intended to use non-invasive examinations to explore the potential epileptic lesions in MRI-negative epilepsy patients and to determine the results accuracy by comparing the neuroimaging results with the epilepsy surgery outcomes. A total of 86 epilepsy patients without obvious structure lesions on MRI were included, and we found that the combinations of different non-invasive examinations and neuroimaging post-processing methods are significantly associated with the seizure freedom results of epilepsy surgery.

Low IQ predicts worse long-term seizure outcome after resective epilepsy surgery - A propensity score matched analysis

OBJECTIVE

To describe long-term seizure outcomes in patients with IQ < 70 undergoing resective epilepsy surgery and to analyse whether baseline IQ predicts seizure outcome.

METHODS

Patients undergoing focal resective epilepsy surgery 1995-2017 at age ≥ 4 years were identified in the population-based Swedish National Epilepsy Surgery Register. Two-year, five-year and long-term (10-20-year follow-up) outcomes were analysed. Seizure outcomes of patients with IQ ≥ 70 and IQ < 70 at baseline were compared in the full cohort and between propensity score matched groups.

RESULTS

Follow-up data were available for 884 patients, 79 of whom had IQ < 70. Matched controls were found for 74 of the IQ < 70 patients. Preoperative MRI pathology was unifocal in 54 % and 79 % of IQ < 70 and IQ ≥ 70 patients before matching compared to 58 % and 62 % after matching, respectively. Patients with IQ < 70 achieved significantly worse seizure outcomes at all time points both when analysing the full cohort and the matched groups. After matching, the proportions of seizure-free patients in the IQ < 70 group were 28 %, 32 % and 32 % at the 2-year, 5-year and long-term follow-ups, respectively. Corresponding figures in the IQ ≥ 70 group were 54 %, 62 % and 60 % (p for difference between IQ groups 0.004, 0.002 and 0.049). In the IQ < 70 group, 36 %, 29 % and 45 % had a ≥ 75 % reduction in seizure frequency at the respective three follow-ups.

CONCLUSION

Low preoperative IQ predicts lower chances of seizure freedom after resective epilepsy surgery and few patients with IQ < 70 remain completely seizure-free in the long term. Nevertheless, a significant proportion had a reduction in seizure frequency of at least 75 % at long-term follow-up, indicating an important palliative potential of resective surgery for epilepsy patients with intellectual disability.

Therapeutic Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Epilepsy and Their Interaction with Antiseizure Medications

Epilepsy is a life-threatening neurological disease that affects approximately 70 million people worldwide. Although the vast majority of patients may be successfully managed with currently used antiseizure medication (ASM), the search for alternative therapies is still necessary due to pharmacoresistance in about 30% of patients with epilepsy. Here, we review the effects of ASMs on stem cell treatment when they could be, as expected, co-administered. Indeed, it has been reported that ASMs produce significant effects on the differentiation and determination of stem cell fate. In addition, we discuss more recent findings on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in pre-clinical and clinical investigations. In this regard, their ability to differentiate into various cell types, reach damaged tissues and produce and release biologically active molecules with immunomodulatory/anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties make them a high-potential therapeutic tool to address neuroinflammation in different neurological disorders, including epilepsy. Overall, the characteristics of MSCs to be genetically engineered, in order to replace dysfunctional elements with the aim of restoring normal tissue functioning, suggested that these cells could be good candidates for the treatment of epilepsy refractory to ASMs. Further research is required to understand the potential of stem cell treatment in epileptic patients and its interaction with ASMs.