Right Ventricular Apical Pacing Acutely Impairs Left Ventricular Function and Induces Mechanical Dyssynchrony in Patients with Sick Sinus Syndrome: A Real-time Three-dimensional Echocardiographic Study

Left bundle branch pacing better preserves ventricular mechanical synchrony than right ventricular pacing: a two-centre study

AIMS

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has been shown to better maintain electrical synchrony compared with right ventricular pacing (RVP), but little is known about its impact on mechanical synchrony. This study investigates whether LBBP better preserves left ventricular (LV) mechanical synchronicity and function compared with RVP.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sixty patients with pacing indication for bradycardia were included: LBBP (n = 31) and RVP (n = 29). Echocardiography was performed before and shortly after pacemaker implantation and at 1-year follow-up. The lateral wall-septal wall (LW-SW) work difference was used as a measure of mechanical dyssynchrony. Septal flash, apical rocking, and septal strain patterns were also assessed. At baseline, LW-SW work difference was small and similar in two groups. SW was markedly decreased, while LW work remained mostly unchanged in RVP, resulting in a larger LW-SW work difference compared with LBBP (1253 ± 687 mmHg·% vs. 439 ± 408 mmHg·%, P < 0.01) at last follow-up. In addition, RVP more often induced septal flash or apical rocking and resulted in more advanced strain patterns compared with LBBP. At 1 year follow-up, LV ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were more decreased in RVP compared with LBBP (ΔLVEF: -7.4 ± 7.0% vs. 0.3 ± 4.1%; ΔLVGLS: -4.8 ± 4.0% vs. -1.4 ± 2.5%, both P < 0.01). In addition, ΔLW-SW work difference was independently correlated with LV adverse remodelling (r = 0.42, P < 0.01) and LV dysfunction (ΔLVEF: r = -0.61, P < 0.01 and ΔLVGLS: r = -0.38, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

LBBP causes less LV mechanical dyssynchrony than RVP as it preserves a more physiologic electrical conduction. As a consequence, LBBP appears to preserve LV function better than RVP.

[Left bundle branch block - dilated cardiomyopathy - heart failure: common links in the closed pathogenetic chain]

This review summarizes the available information on the epidemiology and prognosis of patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), morphological alterations of the myocardium both resulting in and ensuing LBBB, cardiac biomechanics in LBBB, and possibilities of its correction.

Adverse effects of right ventricular pacing on cardiac function: prevalence, prevention and treatment with physiologic pacing

Right ventricular (RV) pacing is the main treatment modality for patients with advanced atrioventricular (AV) block. Chronic RV pacing can cause cardiac systolic dysfunction and heart failure (HF). In this review, we discuss studies that have shown deleterious effects of chronic RV pacing on systolic cardiac function causing pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PiCM), heart failure (HF), HF hospitalization, atrial fibrillation (AF) and cardiac mortality. RV apical pacing is the most widely used and studied. Adverse effects of RV pacing appear to be directly related to pacing burden and are worse in patients with pre-existing left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Chronic RV pacing is also associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Mechanisms, risk factors, clinical and echocardiographic features, and strategies to minimize RV pacing-induced cardiac dysfunction are discussed in light of the latest data. Studies on biventricular (Bi-V) pacing upgrade in patients who develop RV PiCM, use of alternate RV pacing sites, de novo Bi-V pacing, and physiologic pacing using HIS bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle area (LBBA) pacing in patients with an anticipated high RV pacing burden are discussed.

[Different phenotypes of mitral regurgitation in patients with right apical ventricular pacing: an echocardiographic approach in a heterogeneity of clinical scenarios]

The presence of mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with right ventricular apical pacing can be the result of multiple phenomena. On the one hand, this stimulation causes an asynchronous activation of the left ventricle (LV) and the papillary muscles, leading to a deterioration of the LV ejection fraction and causing an inadequate closure of the valve apparatus. However, there is a wide heterogeneity of ischemic and non-ischemic myocardial conditions that can coexist with mechanical alteration of the LV and the mitral valve leading to or worsening MR in these patients, which can make the etiological determination of valvular regurgitation difficult. Transthoracic echocardiography study allows comprehensive evaluation of mitral valve regurgitation and ventricular function parameters and mechanical asynchrony as a result of artificial pacing. The comprehensive study of these phenomena is relevant in clinical decision-making to define those patients who benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy to alleviate symptomatic MR.

Effects of cardiac pacemakers on left ventricular volumes and function assessed by 3D echocardiography, Doppler method, and global longitudinal strain

Background

Many previous studies reported the negative effects of right ventricular (RV) pacing on the left ventricular (LV) structure and ejection fraction. Studying pacing hemodynamics is essential to understand these detrimental effects. In this study, we tried to understand RV pacing effects on LV volumes and function using advanced tools like 3D echo and global longitudinal strain (GLS). This was a prospective study of 175 consecutive patients (LVEF>50%) presented permanent pacing. Of 175 patients, only 50 patients met study criteria, divided into two groups (single or dual pacing). LV volumes and function were assessed by full-volume 3D echocardiography and GLS before pacing, at 1-week and 6-month post-pacing. Cardiac output (COP) was calculated by pulsed wave Doppler method and 3D echo.

Results

Doppler method results were similar to 3D echo in calculating SV and COP. At 1-week post pacing, both groups showed a significant decrease in SV due to a drop in EDV while ESV did not change significantly. Despite the drop in SV, there was a significant increase in cardiac output (COP) due to achieving higher heart rates post-pacing. There was a significant drop in EF and GLS in both groups.

At 6 months, SV continued to decrease with a corresponding decrease in COP and LVEF. This drop in SV was due to a significant increase in ESV while EDV did not show a significant change at a 6-month follow-up. Also, the drop EF and GLS became more significant.

There were no significant differences between both groups regarding the changes in LV volumes (EDV, ESV, SV), LVEF or GLS throughout the study (pre-pacing, at 1-week and 6-months post pacing). However, dual-chamber pacing group provided higher heart rates and as a result higher COP than the single-chamber group.

Conclusions

RV pacing led to a significant drop in LV COP, ejection fraction (EF), and GLS over short- and long-term duration. Dual chamber pacing provided higher COP than a single chamber pacing. This was due to tracking the S. A node with pacing at higher heart rates not due to an increase in SV and preserving atrioventricular synchrony. Both Doppler method and 3D echo can be used to calculate SV and COP.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43044-021-00138-9.

How His bundle pacing prevents and reverses heart failure induced by right ventricular pacing

Ideal heart performance demands vigorous systolic contractions and rapid diastolic relaxation. These sequential events are precisely timed and interdependent and require the rapid synchronous electrical stimulation provided by the His-Purkinje system. Right ventricular (RV) pacing creates slow asynchronous electrical stimulation that disrupts the timing of the cardiac cycle and results in left ventricular (LV) mechanical asynchrony. Long-term mechanical asynchrony produces LV dysfunction, remodeling, and clinical heart failure. His bundle pacing preserves synchronous electrical and mechanical LV function, prevents or reverses RV pacemaker-induced remodeling, and reduces heart failure.

Liver X Receptor/Retinoid X Receptor Pathway Plays a Regulatory Role in Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy

Background

The molecular mechanisms through which high‐demand pacing induce myocardial dysfunction remain unclear.

Methods and Results

We created atrioventricular block in pigs using dependent right ventricular septal pacing for 6 months. Echocardiography was performed to evaluate dyssynchrony between pacing (n=6) and sham control (n=6) groups. Microarray and enrichment analyses were used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the left ventricular (LV) myocardium between pacing and sham control groups. Histopathological and protein changes were also analyzed and an A cell pacing model was also performed. Pacing significantly increased mechanical dyssynchrony. Enrichment analysis using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis and the activation z‐score analysis method demonstrated that there were 5 DEGs (ABCA1, APOD, CLU, LY96, and SERPINF1) in the LV septum (z‐score=−0.447) and 5 DEGs (APOD, CLU, LY96, MSR1, and SERPINF1) in the LV free wall (z‐score=−1.000) inhibited the liver X receptor/retinoid X receptor (LXR/RXR) pathway, and 4 DEGs (ACTA2, MYL1, PPP2R3A, and SNAI2) activated the integrin‐linked kinase (ILK) pathway in the LV septum (z‐score=1.000). The pacing group had a larger cell size, higher degree of myolysis and fibrosis, and increased expression of intracellular lipid, inflammatory cytokines, and apoptotic markers than the sham control group. The causal relationships between pacing and DEGs related to LXR/RXR and ILK pathways, apoptosis, fibrosis, and lipid expression after pacing were confirmed in the cell pacing model. Luciferase reporter assay in the cell pacing model also supported inhibition of the LXR pathway by pacing.

Conclusions

Right ventricular septal‐dependent pacing was associated with persistent LV dyssynchrony–induced cardiomyopathy through inhibition of the LXR/RXR pathway.

Adverse Consequences of Right Ventricular Apical Pacing and Novel Strategies to Optimize Left Ventricular Systolic and Diastolic Function

Several studies have focused on the deleterious consequences of Right Ventricular Apical (RVA) pacing on Left Ventricular (LV) function, mediated by pacing-induced ventricular dyssyn-chrony. Therapeutic strategies to reduce the detrimental consequences of RVA pacing have been pro-posed, that includes upgrading of RVA pacing to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT), alterna-tive Right Ventricular (RV) pacing sites, minimal ventricular pacing strategies, as well as atrial-based pacing. In developing countries, single chamber RV pacing still constitutes a majority of cases of permanent pacing, and assessment of the optimal RV pacing site is of paramount importance. In chronically-paced patients, it is crucial to maintain as close and normal LV physiological function as possible, by minimizing ventricular dyssynchrony, reducing the chances for heart failure and other complications to develop. This review provides an analysis of the deleterious immediate and long-term consequences of RVA pacing, and the most recent available evidence regarding improvements in pacing options and strategies to optimize LV diastolic and systolic function. Furthermore, the place of advanced echocardiography in the identification of patients with pacing-induced LV dysfunction, the potential role of a new predictor of LV dysfunction in RV-paced subjects, and the long- term out-comes of patients with RV septal pacing will be explored

Clinical outcomes with biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular conduction defects

There have been increasing concerns about the unexpected effects of right ventricular (RV) pacing. We aimed to systematically evaluate the effect of biventricular (BiV) versus RV pacing on clinical events in patients with impaired AV conduction. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for studies comparing BiV pacing with RV pacing in patients with AV block, through April 2017. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting data on mortality, hospitalization for heart failure (HF), and/or 6-min walk distance (6MWD). A total of 12 RCTs were finally included. Pooled analysis suggested that BiV pacing was associated with a significantly reduced all-cause mortality in contrast to RV pacing (risk ratio (RR) = 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.95, I² = 9.6%). BiV pacing, compared with RV pacing, significantly reduced the rate of HF hospitalization (RR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.93, I² = 10.1%). Sensitivity analyses by excluding studies with AV nodal ablation showed that BiV pacing still had a lower mortality and non-significant reduced HF hospitalization. Patients in BiV and RV pacing mode had a similar 6WMD at follow-up (mean difference = 4.99 m, 95% CI - 11.34 to 21.33 m, I² = 0%). Meta-regression analysis showed that the effect size of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization was not significantly associated with mean LVEF value at baseline. In patients with impaired AV conduction that need frequent ventricular pacing, BiV pacing was associated with reduced mortality and hospitalization for HF, compared with traditional RV pacing mode.

Chronic Right Ventricular Pacing in the Heart Failure Population

Purpose of Review

We review the trials that have demonstrated potentially harmful effects from right ventricular (RV) apical pacing as well as reviewing the evidence of alternative RV pacing sites and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for patients who have heart failure and atrioventricular (AV) block.

Recent Findings

The role of CRT in patients with AV block and impaired left ventricular function remains an important consideration. The BLOCK HF trial demonstrated better outcomes with CRT pacing over RV pacing in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and AV block who were expected to have a high RV pacing burden, but failed to demonstrate a mortality benefit.

Summary

CRT seems to have a beneficial effect on left ventricular reverse remodeling, systolic function, and clinical outcomes in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I–III heart failure, moderate to severe LVSD, and AV block compared to RV pacing. However, it is less clear whether there is a similar benefit from CRT in patients with a high percentage of RV pacing who have normal or mild LVSD in the treatment of AV block.

Safety and efficiency of ventricular pacing prevention with an AAI-DDD changeover mode in patients with sinus node disease or atrioventricular block: impact on battery longevity-a sub-study of the ANSWER trial

Aims

This ANSWER (EvaluAtioN of the SafeR mode in patients With a dual chambER pacemaker indication) sub-study assesses safety and effectiveness of SafeR™ and the impact of ventricular pacing (VP) prevention on anticipated device longevity and replacement rate.

Methods and results

Patients implanted for atrioventricular block (AVB, n = 310) or sinus node dysfunction (SND, n = 336) were randomly assigned to SafeR (n = 314) or DDD (n = 318) and followed for 36 months. Safety, median VP, estimated device longevity (mean difference, 95% confidence interval [CI]), and anticipated replacement rates were analysed by pacing mode and implant indication. No difference in mortality, syncope, or mode intolerance was observed between randomization groups regardless of the indication. Ventricular pacing on SafeR vs. DDD was 11.5 vs. 93.6% in the overall population (P < 0.001), 89.2 vs. 83.8% in permanent AVB (P = 0.944), 53.5 vs. 98.2% in intermittent AVB (P < 0.001), and 2.2 vs. 84.7% in SND (P < 0.001). Anticipated median device longevity increased on SafeR by 14 [Q1 10; Q3 17] months [10; 17] (P < 0.001) in the overall population, 9 months [−5; 22] (P = 0.193) in permanent AVB, 14 months [8; 19] (P < 0.001) in intermittent AVB, and 14 months [9; 19] (P < 0.001) in SND. In intermittent AVB and SND, prolonged estimated battery longevity translated into the prevention of one anticipated replacement in at least 23% of patients.

Conclusion

SafeR was effective in reducing VP in intermittent AVB and in SND. No effect was observed in permanent AVB. No safety issue was observed. Ventricular pacing reduction by SafeR translated into relevant estimated prolongation of device longevity and anticipated reduction of required replacements.

Honing in on optimal ventricular pacing sites: an argument for his bundle pacing

OPINION STATEMENT

Frequent ventricular pacing is often or completely unavoidable in patients with high-grade or complete heart block. Over time, patients with high-burden RV pacing are at risk for developing symptomatic cardiomyopathy due to pacing-induced ventricular dyssynchrony. Growing awareness of this concern has generated interest in alternative pacing sites like the septum and outflow tract, the thinking being that these sites will more closely mimic His-Purkinje-mediated ventricular activation. Numerous studies have met with mixed results likely due to the fact that-to quote Marvin Gaye-there ain't nothing like the real thing. Herein lies the advantage of His bundle pacing (HBP), as it is the only pacing modality capable of physiological ventricular activation. HBP has been demonstrated to be safe and reliable in various forms of AV block with minimal drawbacks, namely modestly higher pacing thresholds when compared with other RV sites. Additionally, HBP is a truly physiologic alternative to biventricular pacing to effect cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), a concept supported by small observational and prospective studies. In our view, His bundle pacing should be considered in nearly all patients requiring ventricular pacing.

Effect of pacing mode and pacing site on torsional and strain parameters and on coronary flow

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular apical pacing may induce detrimental effects on left ventricular function and coronary flow. In this study, the effects of pacing site and mode on cardiac mechanics and coronary blood flow were evaluated.

METHODS

This prospective study included 25 patients who received dual-chamber pacemakers with the ventricular lead placed in the right ventricular apex and presented in sinus rhythm (SR) at their regularly scheduled visits at the pacemaker clinic. Patients underwent complete transthoracic echocardiographic examinations while in SR, followed by noninvasive Doppler assessment of coronary flow in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and speckle-tracking echocardiography of short-axis planes in SR, atrial pacing (AAI-P), atrioventricular (dual-chamber) pacing (DDD-P), and ventricular pacing (VVI-P).

RESULTS

Rotation of the base was significantly decreased with VVI-P compared with AAI-P. Left ventricular twist decreased significantly with DDD-P compared with AAI-P. Circumferential strain of the base significantly decreased with DDD-P and VVI-P compared with SR. The velocity-time integral of diastolic flow in the LAD decreased significantly with DDD-P compared with SR (10.7 ± 2.2 vs 10.2 ± 2.2 vs 8.9 ± 1.6 vs 8.7 ± 2.6 cm in SR and with AAI-P, DDD-P, and VVI-P, respectively, P = .003). Basal rotation and time from onset of the QRS complex to peak basal rotation as a percentage of systole were independently associated with the velocity-time integral of diastolic flow in the LAD during SR and the three pacing modes.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute right ventricular apical pacing showed a detrimental effect on left ventricular twist and basal mechanics, with the latter being independently associated with decreased LAD diastolic flow velocity parameters.

Chronic right ventricular apical pacing: adverse effects and current therapeutic strategies to minimize them

The permanent cardiac pacemaker is the only effective therapy for patients with symptomatic bradycardia and hundreds of millions are implanted worldwide every year. Despite its undisputed clinical benefits, the last two decades have drawn much attention to the negative effects associated with long-term pacing of the right ventricle (RV). Experimental and clinical studies have shown that RV pacing produces ventricular dyssynchrony, similar to that of left bundle branch block, with consequent detrimental effects on cardiac structure and function, with adverse clinical outcomes such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure and death. Although clinical evidence largely comes from subanalyses of pacemaker and implantable cardiac defibrillator studies, there is strong evidence that patients with reduced left ventricular function are at high risk of suffering from the detrimental effects of long-term RV pacing. Biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy devices can prevent ventricular dyssynchrony and has emerged as an attractive option in this patient group with promising results and more clinical studies underway. Moreover, there is evidence that specific pacemaker algorithms that minimize RV pacing can reduce the negative effects of RV stimulation on cardiac function and may also prevent clinical deterioration. The extent of the long-term clinical effects of RV pacing in patients with normal ventricular function and how to prevent this are less clear and subject to future investigation.

Influence and predicting variables of obstructive sleep apnea on cardiac function and remodeling in patients without congestive heart failure

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) has been considered to be an important predisposing factor for cardiovascular disease. This study aims to investigate the impact of OSAS on cardiac function and remodeling in patients without congestive heart failure.

METHODS

A total of 79 patients with sleep disordered breathing, preserved systolic function, and normal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level were enrolled. Sixty-five patients were classified to have moderate to severe OSAS (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] ≥ 15/h), while the other 14 patients with mild or no OSAS (AHI < 15/h) served as control subjects. Baseline clinical and polysomnographic variables as well as tissue Doppler imaging and three-dimensional echocardiographic parameters were obtained.

RESULTS

The body mass index, neck circumference, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, desaturation index, arousal index, and snoring index were significantly higher in patients with moderate to severe OSAS than those without (p < 0.05). The left atrial size, mitral A-wave velocity, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume were significantly larger, while E/A ratio was lower in patients with moderate to severe OSAS than those without (p < 0.05). Notably, AHI in REM sleep was significantly correlated with the aortic root size, E/A ratio, left ventricular volume, and stroke volume. In addition, the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for AHI in REM sleep ≥ 32.3/h was 0.647 (95% CI [0.525, 0.769]) in predicting the development of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. AHI in REM sleep ≥ 32.3/h was the only independent variant in predicting diastolic dysfunction after adjusting the variables including age, gender, hypertension, and body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with moderate to severe OSAS tend to have cardiac dysfunction revealed by echocardiography. High AHI in REM sleep is significantly associated with cardiovascular remodeling and ventricular diastolic dysfunction, and may be a potential variable to predict cardiac dysfunction.

Exercise capacity and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels with biventricular vs. right ventricular pacing for atrioventricular block: results from the PREVENT-HF German Substudy

AIMS

Previous studies showed unfavourable effects of right ventricular (RV) pacing. Ventricular pacing (VP), however, is required in many patients with atrioventricular (AV) block. The PREVENT-HF study explored left ventricular (LV) remodelling during RV vs. biventricular (BIV) pacing in AV block without advanced heart failure. The pre-specified PREVENT-HF German Substudy examined exercise capacity and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with expected VP ≥80% were randomized to RV or BIV pacing. Endpoints were peak oxygen uptake (pVO2), oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold (VO2AT), ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2), and logNT-proBNP. Considering crossover, intention to treat (ITT), and on-treatment (OT) analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were performed. For exercise testing 44 (RV: 25, BIV: 19), and for NT-proBNP 53 patients (RV: 29, BIV: 24) were included. The ITT analysis revealed significant differences in pVO2 [ANCOVA effect 2.83 mL/kg/min, confidence interval (CI) 0.83-4.91, P = 0.007], VO2AT (ANCOVA effect 2.14 mL/min/k, CI 0.14-4.15, P = 0.03), and VE/VCO2 (ANCOVA effect -5.46, CI -10.79 to -0.13, P = 0.04) favouring BIV randomization. The significant advantage in pVO2 persisted in OT analysis, while VO2AT and VE/VCO2 showed trends favouring BIV pacing. LogNT-proBNP did not differ between groups. (ITT: ANCOVA effect 0.008, CI -0.40 to +0.41, P = 0.97; OT: ANCOVA effect -0.03, CI -0.44 to 0.30, P = 0.90).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that BIV pacing produces better exercise capacity over 1 year compared with RV pacing in patients without advanced heart failure and AV block. In contrast, we observed no significant changes of NT-proBNP. Larger trials will allow appraising the clinical usefulness of BIV pacing in AV block. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00170326.

Neuroendocrine and haemodynamic changes in single-lead atrial pacing and dual-chamber pacing modes

OBJECTIVES

Neuroendocrine and haemodynamic changes were compared between single-lead atrial (AAI) or dual-chamber (DDD) pacing modes in patients with sick sinus syndrome, in a crossover study.

METHODS

Inpatients scheduled for their first pacemaker implantation were screened for the following inclusion criteria: sick sinus syndrome; intact atrioventricular conduction; normal QRS interval. All study patients were implanted with a dual-chamber pacemaker, programmed for AAI or DDD pacing mode. Patients were allocated randomly to AAI followed by DDD pacing or to DDD followed by AAI pacing, each mode being applied for 72 h. Echocardiographic, electrocardiographic and neuroendocrine parameters were tested at the end of each pacing mode.

RESULTS

From 152 inpatients screened for inclusion, 28 were selected for treatment. Plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), endothelin, aldosterone and angiotension II were significantly lower, and aortic flow velocity-time integral was significantly higher, in AAI mode than in DDD mode. Aortic pre-ejection interval, interventricular mechanical delay and QRS duration were significantly higher in DDD than in AAI mode.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with sick sinus syndrome, DDD pacing mode can induce neuroendocrine system activation, and left ventricular dysfunction and dyssynchrony. These findings discourage the routine use of DDD pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.

Biventricular Pacing in the Early Postoperative Period After Cardiac Surgery

Cardiac resynchronization therapy is not commonly used in the early postoperative period in patients undergoing cardiac surgery who have left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and a history of heart failure. We performed a prospective randomized clinical trial to compare atrial synchronous right ventricular (DDD RV) and biventricular (DDD BIV) pacing within 72 hours after cardiac surgery in patients with an EF ≤35 %, a QRS interval longer than 120 msec and who had LV dyssynchrony detected by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE). Epicardial pacing was provided by a modified Medtronic INSYNC III pacemaker. An LV epicardial pacing lead was implanted on the latest activated segment of the LV based on RT3DE. The study included 18 patients with ischemic heart disease, with or without valvular heart disease (14 men, 4 women, average age 71 years). Patients undergoing DDD BIV pacing had a statistically significant greater CO and CI (CO 6.7±1.8 l/min, CI 3.4±0.7 l/min/m²) than patients undergoing DDD RV pacing (CO 5.5±1.4 l/min, CI 2.8±0.7 l/min/m²), p<0.001. DDD BIV pacing in the early postoperative period after cardiac surgery corrects LV dyssynchrony and has better hemodynamic results than DDD RV pacing.

Cardiac remodeling with rhythm versus rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: insights from the AF-CHF echocardiographic sub-study

BACKGROUND

In patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation, the AF-CHF (Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure) trial did not demonstrate the superiority of rhythm control (RhyC) over a rate control (RaC) strategy on cardiovascular mortality. Nevertheless, deleterious hemodynamic effects of atrial fibrillation can lead to further decrease in left ventricular (LV) function and progression of symptoms. This echocardiographic sub-study was designed to compare the effects of the two treatment strategies on LV ejection fraction (LVEF), chamber volumes and dimensions, valvular regurgitation and functional status.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 59 patients (29 RhyC, 30 RaC) aged 67±8 years (14% women), enrolled in the AF-CHF trial at the Montreal Heart Institute underwent standardized echocardiograms at baseline and at 12 months. Mean LVEF at baseline was severely depressed (RhyC: 27.0±4.9% and RaC: 27.6±7.4%, p=0.73), and improved to a similar degree in both groups (RhyC: +8.0±10.4% and RaC: +4.5±10.6, both p<0.05; p=0.19 for RhyC versus RaC). Other echocardiographic parameters, such as LV end-systolic volume index and degree of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, remained unchanged. New York Heart Association functional class and distance walked in 6 min improved significantly in both groups (RhyC: +48.9±78.7 m and RaC: +47.2±96.7 m, both p≤0.01), with no difference between RhyC and RaC strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvements in LVEF and functional status are observed after 12 months in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation, regardless of whether rate or rhythm control strategies are used.

Selecting the best site for pacing leads after cardiac surgery by evaluating the asynchrony of myocardial deformation observed with different pacing sites

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

After cardiac surgery, temporary pacing leads are routinely implanted in the right ventricle (RV). The objective was to investigate the effect of different ventricular pacing locations on cardiac synchrony (by evaluating myocardial deformation, or strain) and efficiency in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Interventricular asynchrony (i.e. the difference in the time of onset of deformation between right and left ventricles; Tε-R/L) and intraventricular asynchrony (i.e. the standard deviation and maximum difference in the time of onset of deformation in six segments of the left ventricle [LV]; Tε-SD and Tε-MD, respectively) were assessed in 19 patients. Doppler echocardiography was used to evaluate these parameters and cardiac output after pacing in the RV and in three different LV segments.

RESULTS

Pacing in the RV resulted in the greatest increases in asynchrony parameters from baseline: Tε-R/L 59.8 ms (standard deviation [SD] 40.5 ms) vs. 28.23 ms (SD 56.9 ms), P=.002; Tε-SD 53.2 ms (SD 34.4 ms) vs. 36.6 ms (SD 34.9 ms), P=.007; and Tε-MD 135.3 ms (SD 82.9 ms) vs. 90.5 ms (SD 87.4 ms), P=.007. Pacing in the LV resulted in less asynchrony: for anterior LV pacing, Tε-R/L was 17.2 ms (SD 53.8 ms), Tε-SD was 35.8 ms (SD 17.9 ms), and Tε-MD was 91.3 ms (SD 45.2). The change from baseline was not significant. Cardiac output was lower after RV pacing than after anterior LV pacing: 4.36 (SD 1) vs. 4.70 (SD 1); P=.001.

CONCLUSIONS

Pacing in the LV produced less asynchrony than RV pacing. In addition, anterior LV pacing resulted in a higher cardiac output than RV pacing. These findings suggest that the location normally used for temporary leads after cardiac surgery should be changed.

Myocardial perfusion SPECT identifies patients with left bundle branch block patterns at high risk for future coronary events

BACKGROUND

The value of myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) for patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) or right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing seems reduced. The prognosis of patients with only abnormal activation related perfusion defects (AARD) due to LBBB or RVA-pacing is similar to those with a normal MPS. We assessed the prognostic value of MPS in patients with LBBB or RVA pacing.

METHODS

Patients with LBBB or RVA pacing referred for vasodilator stress MPS between April 2002 and January 2006 were analyzed. Group 1 are patients with normal MPS and MPS with AARD. Group 2 are patients with an MPS with a perfusion defect extending outside the AARD area. Events were cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization.

RESULTS

In Group 1 (101 patients) 12 events and in Group 2 (96 patients) 45 events occurred during a mean follow-up of 2.6 +/- 1.5 years. The prognosis of Group 2 was significantly worse (49%) compared with Group 1 (91%). The annual cardiac death rate was 0.7%/year in Group 1 and 6.4%/year in Group 2 (P < .001). The prognosis of patients with LBBB was not different from those with RVA pacing.

CONCLUSION

Group 2 had a significantly worse cardiac prognosis compared to Group 1. The annual cardiac death rate of <1% in Group 1 warrants a watchful waiting strategy, whereas the cardiac death rate in Group 2 warrants aggressive invasive coronary strategies.

Atrial enlargement in symptomatic heart block patients with preserved left ventricular function: possibly related to atrioventricular dyssynchrony

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular apical pacing may possibly induce atrial dilatation as a consequence of atrioventricular dyssynchrony. However, atrial enlargement associated with atrioventricular dyssynchrony due to atrioventricular block has never been studied.

METHODS

This case-control survey involved 90 patients with symptomatic atrioventricular block [29 patients with Mobitz type 2 atrioventricular block, 22 patients with high degree of atrioventricular block and 39 patients with complete atrioventricular block]. The control group comprised 54 age- and sex-matched patients with sick sinus syndrome and intact intrinsic atrioventricular conduction. The M-mode measurements were obtained before implant and the left and right atrial areas were measured by planimetry.

RESULTS

The peri-implant right atrial area (17.4±3.7 vs. 15.3±3.4 cm2, p=0.002), left atrial area (24.9±4.2 vs. 21.0±3.7 cm2, p<0.001) and left atrial diameter (36.4±5.5 vs. 33.3±4.8 mm, p=0.001) were significantly greater in atrioventricular block patients than in sick sinus syndrome patients. The two groups had similar left ventricular ejection fraction. The right atrial area (p=0.01) and left atrial area (p=0.006) remained significantly greater in atrioventricular block patients than in sick sinus syndrome patients after adjustments for age, gender, body surface area, left ventricular dimension and left ventricular ejection fraction in multiple logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Atrial enlargement occurs in patients with symptomatic atrioventricular block. This phenomenon is possibly related to atrioventricular dyssynchrony.

Tissue doppler changes in pediatric complete heart block patients who are chronically paced

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric patients with complete heart block (CHB) often require pacemaker therapy. Adult studies have shown chronic right ventricular pacemaker therapy may be associated with decreased echocardiographic parameters and increased brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) values. The goal of this study was to determine if there are echocardiographic or BNP changes in a pediatric population that is chronically paced.

METHODS

Patients were recruited if they had CHB and had a pacemaker. Patients were excluded if they had congenital structural heart disease. Standard two-dimensional echocardiograms, including tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), were performed. BNP values were obtained. Nonparametric Spearman's rank correlation was used for analysis. Rho < or = 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (16.4 +/- 7.3 years) with CHB were studied. Age at implant was 8.6 +/- 6.6 years and length of pacing was 7.8 +/- 6.6 years. Pacing mode was VDD, DDD, DDDR, or VVIR. All patients were ventricularly paced >95% of the time. Ejection fraction was 58.5 +/- 7.5%. All BNP values were <40 pg/mL. There was no correlation between ejection fraction or BNP level with the length of pacing years. Pacing years significantly correlated with mitral and tricuspid E/A ratios (rho =-0.56, -0.56, respectively). Pacing years also correlated with right ventricular and interventricular TDI a wave (rho = 0.61 and 0.68, respectively). Furthermore, pacing years correlated with right ventricular TDI e/a ratio (rho =-0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Ejection fraction and BNP levels were not sensitive parameters in evaluating pediatric patients who are chronically paced. Subtle diastolic changes, especially of the right ventricle, were detected by TDI.

The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy

Cardiac pacing is the only effective treatment for patients with sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular conduction disorders. In cardiac pacing, the endocardial pacing lead is typically positioned at the right ventricular (RV) apex. At the same time, there is increasing indirect evidence, derived from large pacing mode selection trials and observational studies, that conventional RV apical pacing may have detrimental effects on cardiac structure and left ventricular function, which are associated with the development of heart failure. These detrimental effects may be related to the abnormal electrical and mechanical activation pattern of the ventricles (or ventricular dyssynchrony) caused by RV apical pacing. Still, it remains uncertain if the deterioration of left ventricular function as noted in a proportion of patients receiving RV apical pacing is directly related to acutely induced left ventricular dyssynchrony. The upgrade from RV pacing to cardiac resynchronization therapy may partially reverse the deleterious effects of RV pacing. It has even been suggested that selected patients with a conventional pacemaker indication should receive cardiac resynchronization therapy to avoid the deleterious effects. This review will provide a contemporary overview of the available evidence on the detrimental effects of RV apical pacing. Furthermore, the available alternatives for patients with a standard pacemaker indication will be discussed. In particular, the role of cardiac resynchronization therapy and alternative RV pacing sites in these patients will be reviewed.

Right ventricular apical lead position is associated with prolonged signal-averaged P-wave duration

AIM

The study aimed to determine if right ventricular apical pacing is associated with adverse change in atrial substrate compared with right ventricular septal pacing.

METHODS

Patients with septal leads and dual-chamber devices with more than 3 months of follow-up and 70% or higher cumulative percentage of ventricular pacing were compared with a matched group of apically implanted leads with a cumulative percentage ventricular pacing of 70% or higher. Device parameters were recorded, and high-resolution recordings were obtained for signal-averaged P-wave (SAPW) analysis. Previously obtained SAPW recordings taken from 49 healthy patients and 73 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were used as negative and positive controls, respectively.

RESULTS

Ten patients with septal leads (mean age, 71.9 +/- 12.1 years; mean months implanted, 10.5 +/- 3.2 months) and 9 patients with apical leads (mean age, 71.9 +/- 5.7 years; mean months implanted, 11.4 +/- 6.4 months) were enrolled. The SAPW duration was longer in the apical cohort compared with the septal cohort (144.8 +/- 6.9 and 133.0 +/- 5.5 milliseconds, respectively; P = .001), whereas there was no significant difference between septal and normal cohorts (133.0 +/- 5.5 and 129.3 +/- 7.1 milliseconds, respectively; P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

Apical pacing is associated with prolonged P-wave duration relative to septal pacing and controls: this may manifest as increased risk of atrial tachycardias and presents a potentially novel benefit of septal pacing.

Impact of left ventricular size on tissue Doppler and longitudinal strain by speckle tracking for assessing wall motion and mechanical dyssynchrony in candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Myocardial dysfunction and left ventricular (LV) geometry deformation may reduce the accuracy of tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) in assessing myocardial contractility.

METHODS

In 92 patients with heart failure who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), we assessed the impact of LV end-diastolic volume on the accuracy of peak longitudinal velocity (TDI) and strain (epsilon(L) by speckle tracking) to assess regional wall motion and LV dyssynchrony.

RESULTS

Peak-epsilon correlated to normal (-13% +/- 6%, n = 259), hypokinetic (-10% +/- 5%, n = 347), and akinetic (-7% +/- 5%, n = 498, P < .0001) wall motion independent of LV size. In contrast, velocity failed to distinguish normal from dysfunctional segments in patients with severe LV dilatation (end-diastolic volume > 250 mL). The 12 standard deviation of time to peak systolic velocity and the opposing septal-lateral wall delay by strain and TDI failed to predict response to CRT, whereas the 12 segment standard deviation of time to peak epsilon correlated to end-systolic volume reduction (r = -0.39, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Accuracy of TDI in assessing LV wall regional motion is limited in severely dilated ventricles and probably affects LV dyssynchrony measurement.

Pacemaker-based analysis of atrioventricular conduction and atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with primary sinus node dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Most patients with symptomatic sinus node disease (SND) receive DDDR pacemakers (PM) in order to cover SND and atrioventricular (AV) block from the outset. But the concern about adverse effects of right ventricular pacing (RVP) is increasing. So far, data on the incidence of AV block in SND are based on clinical events. The study undertakes to assess and appraise AV block and atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT) from memory and electrograms of a dual-chamber PM set to an AAIR-DDDR switch mode (AAISafeR).

METHODS

A dual-chamber PM incorporating the AAISafeR mode was implanted in 58 patients (70 +/- 10 years, 28 males) with SND, but without AV block >I. AV block and AT episodes were retrieved from the PM memory and validated from electrograms. AV block episodes were classified potentially relevant while comprising AV block III or AV block I/II during exercise.

RESULTS

The patients experienced a median of 90 (interquartile range 7-1,084) commutations. Possibly relevant AV block occurred in 32 patients (55%). Validation revealed high-quality PM-based categorization. The RVP prevalence was 0% (0-16%). The median AT prevalence was 0.03 (0-26) min/day. RVP was the only multivariate predictor of AT (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Potentially relevant AV block occurs frequently in patients with SND. Nonetheless, the RVP prevalence is kept low through the AAISafeR mode. The protection of SND patients with demand-actuated ventricular pacing appears reasonable. The AT prevalence is low in SND patients treated by the AAISafeR mode. Even low RVP proportions appear to favor AT. Prospective evaluation is needed.