Comparison Between Non-Invasive Coronary Flow Reserve and Fractional Flow Reserve to Assess the Functional Significance of Left Anterior Descending Artery Stenosis of Intermediate Severity

A lumped parameter model for evaluating coronary artery blood supply capacity

The coronary artery constitutes a vital vascular system that sustains cardiac function, with its primary role being the conveyance of indispensable nutrients to the myocardial tissue. When coronary artery disease occurs, it will affect the blood supply of the heart and induce myocardial ischemia. Therefore, it is of great significance to numerically simulate the coronary artery and evaluate its blood supply capacity. In this article, the coronary artery lumped parameter model was derived based on the relationship between circuit system parameters and cardiovascular system parameters, and the blood supply capacity of the coronary artery in healthy and stenosis states was studied. The aortic root pressure calculated by the aortic valve fluid-structure interaction (AV FSI) simulator was employed as the inlet boundary condition. To emulate the physiological phenomenon of sudden pressure drops resulting from an abrupt reduction in blood vessel radius, a head loss model was connected at the coronary artery's entrance. For each coronary artery outlet, the symmetric structured tree model was appended to simulate the terminal impedance of the missing downstream coronary arteries. The particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm was used to optimize the blood flow viscous resistance, blood flow inertia, and vascular compliance of the coronary artery model. In the stenosis states, the relative flow and fractional flow reserve (FFR) calculated by numerical simulation corresponded to the published literature data. It was anticipated that the proposed model can be readily adapted for clinical application, serving as a valuable reference for diagnosing and treating patients.

Improving Detection of CAD and Prognosis with PET/CT Quantitative Absolute Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the role of PET MPI in the detection of CAD, focussing on the added value of MBF for diagnosis and prognostication.

RECENT FINDINGS

Positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is increasingly used for the risk stratification of patients with suspected or established coronary artery disease (CAD). PET MPI provides accurate and reproducible non-invasive quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) at rest and during hyperemia, providing incremental information over conventional myocardial perfusion alone. Inclusion of MBF in PET MPI interpretation improves both its sensitivity and specificity. Moreover, quantitative MBF measurements have repeatedly been shown to offer incremental and independent prognostic information over conventional clinical markers in a broad range of conditions, including in CAD. Quantitative MBF measurement is now an established and powerful tool enabling accurate risk stratification and guiding patients' management. The role of PET MPI and flow quantification in cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), which represents a particular form of CAD, will also be reviewed.

Assessment of the functional significance of borderline stenosis by determining coronary flow reserve, after primary percutaneous infarct artery intervention by stent implantation

Introduction: Patients with myocardial infarction who are effectively treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may have significant coronary artery stenosis that is not responsible for current myocardial infarction. Non-infarction artery stenosis can cause serious adverse cardiac events, which can be avoided by performing PCI. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is defined as the ratio of the hyperemic mean blood flow velocity to the resting blood flow velocity for a given coronary artery. Coronary flow reserve decreases with increasing severity of the lesion. Aim: Determination of CFR prognostic value in patients with residual intermediate stenosis on non-infarcted artery after PCI. Material and methods: The prospective study included 106 patients treated at the University Clinical Center of Serbia in the period from July 2007 to December 2014. Coronary flow reserve was performed on a non-infarcted coronary artery with intermediate stenosis (40-70%). Adenosine was administered intravenously for two minutes to induce hyperemia at a dose of 140 mcg/kg/min. It was calculated as the ratio of the maximum diastolic flow rate under hyperemia and the maximum flow rate under basal conditions. Patients were invited for follow-up at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months to determine the occurrence of composite adverse events, which included: cardiac death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and myocardial revascularization (non-infarction lesion). Results: In our group of patients, 18 adverse events were reported during follow-up. A statistically highly significant difference (p < 0.001) in CFR values was found in patients with adverse events compared to patients without adverse events. The CFR >2 value had a high negative predictive value (95%) for the absence of adverse events. Conclusion: In patients with CFR > 2, revascularization can be safely delayed with continued optimal drug therapy.

Model-based analysis of the sensitivities and diagnostic implications of FFR and CFR under various pathological conditions

Although fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) are both frequently used to assess the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis, discordant results of diagnosis between FFR and CFR in some patient cohorts have been reported. In the present study, a computational model was employed to quantify the impacts of various pathophysiological factors on FFR and CFR. In addition, a hyperemic myocardial ischemic index (HMIx) was proposed as a reference for comparing the diagnostic performances of FFR and CFR. Obtained results showed that CFR was more susceptible than FFR to the influence of many pathophysiological factors unrelated to coronary artery stenosis. In particular, the numerical study proved that increasing hyperemic coronary microvascular resistance significantly elevated FFR while reducing CFR despite fixed severity of coronary artery stenosis, whereas introducing aortic valve disease only caused a significant decrease in CFR with little influence on FFR. These results provided theoretical evidence for explaining some clinical observations, such as the increased risk of discordant diagnostic results between FFR and CFR in patients with increased hyperemic microvascular resistance, and significant increase in CFR after surgical relief of severe aortic valve disease. When evaluated with respect to the predictive value for hyperemic myocardial ischemia, the performance of FFR was found to be considerably compromised in the presence of severe coronary vasodilation dysfunction or aortic valve disease, whereas the relationship between CFR and HMIx remained relatively stable, suggesting that CFR may be a more reliable indicator of myocardial ischemia under complex pathophysiological conditions.

High precision invasive FFR, low-cost invasive iFR, or non-invasive CFR?: optimum assessment of coronary artery stenosis based on the patient-specific computational models

The objective of this paper is to apply computational fluid dynamic (CFD) as a complementary tool for clinical tests to not only predict the present and future status of left coronary artery stenosis but also to evaluate some clinical hypotheses. In order to assess the present status of the coronary artery stenosis severity, and thereby selecting the most appropriate type of treatment for each patient, fractional flow reserve (FFR), instantaneous wave free-ratio (iFR), and coronary flow reserve (CFR) are calculated. To examine FFR, iFR, and CFR results, the effect of geometric features of stenoses, including diameter reduction (%), lesion length (LL), and minimum lumen diameter (MLD), is studied on them. It is observed that FFR is a more conservative index than iFR and CFR to assess the severity of coronary stenosis. In addition, it is seen that FFR, iFR, and CFR decrease by increasing LL and decreasing MLD. Therefore, the morphological indices, LL/MLD and LL/MLD̂4, with the calculated conservative cut-off values equal to 5.5 and 3.6, are considered. Next, some controversial clinical hypotheses about the assessment of the severity of coronary stenosis are evaluated numerically. These include the examination of FFR, iFR, and CFR accuracies, investigating the effect of coronary hyperemia on iFR, as well as the reliability of the hybrid iFR-FFR decision-making strategy. The presented numerical model can also be used as a predictive tool to identify the atherosuseptible sites of arteries by calculating the time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), and relative residence time (RRT).

The prognostic significance of coronary flow reserve in the risk stratification of patients with chronic total occlusion of the right coronary artery and the intermediary stenosis of the left coronary artery

Introduction: Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR) is a clinically useful, non-invasive diagnostic method for assessing the functional ability of coronary arteries and it is important for their long-term follow-up in patients. However, CFR has not always been sufficiently investigated in previous studies. Objective: To examine the prognostic significance of CFR in the risk stratification of patients with chronic total occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA) and the intermediary stenosis of the left coronary artery (LAD). Material and Methods: Number of 71 patients, mean age 64 ± 7 years, (84%) patients male, having LAD stenosis, diameter 50-70%, and CTO of RCA, were referred for noninvasive estimation of functional significance of LAD stenosis. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography was used to obtain coronary flow velocities in the distal segment of LAD. Patients were followed for the mean period of 18.3 ± 7.1 months for the occurrence of composite end point including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery and PCI. Results: During the follow-up period, there were a total of 23 adverse events (4 deaths, 2 myocardial infarction, 7 bypass surgeries and 10 PCI). Patients with CFR < 2 had significantly more adverse events (n = 9; 56.3% vs. n = 14; 25.5%; p = 0.021), they were significantly older (68 ± 9 vs. 62 ± 6; p = 0.011), with a higher incidence of a positive family history (14; 87.5% vs. 26; 47.3%; p = 0.039), as well as a significantly higher frequency of three-dose coronary disease (14; 87.5% vs. 30; 54.5%; p = 0.017). Using Kaplan-Meier estimator, we obtained that patients with CFR < 2 have a significantly shorter average period without unwanted event (15.4 ± 2.8 months vs 23.5 ± 1.1 months, Log Rank 7.407; p = 0.008). Conclusion: CFR plays an important role in stratifying the risk of patients with CTO of RCA and the intermediary stenosis of LAD.

Quantification of PET Myocardial Blood Flow

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to provide an update on quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Technical and clinical aspects of flow quantification with PET are reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnostic and prognostic values of myocardial flow quantification have been established in numerous studies and in various populations. MBF quantification has also shown itself to be particularly useful in the assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction and in evaluation of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Overall, myocardial flow reserve (MFR) and hyperemic MBF can lead to improved risk stratification by providing information complementary to that of other markers of disease severity, such as fractional flow reserve. Flow quantification enhances MPI's ability to detect both significant epicardial disease and microvascular dysfunction. With recent technological and methodological advances, flow quantification with PET is no longer restricted to cyclotron-equipped academic centers.

Prognostic Value of Preserved Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve by Noninvasive Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography in Patients With Angiographically Intermediate Left Main Stenosis

BACKGROUND

The potential of angiography to evaluate the hemodynamic severity of a left main coronary artery (LM) stenosis is limited. Noninvasive transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis has demonstrated remarkably high negative prognostic value. The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients with angiographically intermediate LM stenosis and preserved CFVR (>2.0) as evaluated by transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic CFVR.

METHODS

The initial study population included 102 patients with intermediate coronary stenosis of the LM referred for transthoracic Doppler echocardiographic CFVR assessment. Peak diastolic CFVR measurements were performed in the distal segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery after intravenous adenosine (140 μg/kg/min), and CFVR was calculated as the ratio between maximal hyperemic and baseline coronary flow velocity. Nineteen patients had impaired CFVR (≤2.0) and were excluded from further analysis, as well as two patients with poor acoustic windows. The final group consisted of 81 patients (mean age, 60 ± 9 years; 76 men) evaluated for adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up duration was 62 ± 26 months. Mean CFVR was 2.4 ± 0.4. Total event-free survival was 75 of 81 (92.6%), as six patients were referred for revascularization (five patients with coronary artery bypass grafting, one patient with percutaneous coronary intervention). There were no documented myocardial infarctions or cardiovascular deaths in the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with angiographically intermediate and equivocal LM stenosis and preserved CFVR values of >2.0, revascularization can be safely deferred.

Prognostic Value of Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve in Patients with Nonculprit Stenosis of Intermediate Severity Early after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

Treatment of nonculprit coronary stenosis during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction may be beneficial, but the mode and timing of the intervention are still controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the significance and prognostic value of preserved coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in patients with nonculprit intermediate stenosis early after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty patients with remaining intermediate (50%-70%) stenosis of non-infarct-related arteries, in whom CFVR was performed within 7 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention, were prospectively enrolled. Twenty patients with reduced CFVR and positive results on stress echocardiography or impaired fractional flow reserve underwent revascularization and were not included in further analysis. The final study population of 210 patients (mean age, 58 ± 10 years; 162 men) was divided into two groups on the basis of CFVR: group 1, CFVR > 2 (n = 174), and group 2, CFVR ≤ 2 (n = 36). Cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and revascularization of the evaluated vessel were considered adverse events.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up duration was 47 ± 16 months. Mean CFVR for the whole group was 2.36 ± 0.40. There were six adverse events (3.4%) related to the nonculprit coronary artery in group 1, including one cardiac death, one ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and four revascularizations. In group 2, there were 30 adverse events (83.3%, P < .001 vs group 1), including two cardiac deaths, two ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions, and 26 revascularizations.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CFVR > 2 of the intermediate nonculprit coronary lesion, deferral of revascularization is safe and associated with excellent long-term clinical outcomes.

Noninvasive Coronary Flow Reserve Predicts Response to Exercise in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND

In patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) provides additional prognostic information beyond baseline. The coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) is impaired in AS, but its link with exertion is unknown in this setting. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that CFVR could predict exercise capacity and abnormal exercise test results in AS.

METHODS

Noninvasive CFVR and symptom-limited semisupine ESE were prospectively performed the same day in 43 patients with asymptomatic isolated severe AS (mean age, 68.5 ± 11 years; 26% women; mean aortic valve area, 0.8 ± 0.16 cm²; mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 70 ± 7%). CFVR was performed in the distal part of the left anterior descending coronary artery using intravenous adenosine infusion (140 μg/kg/min over 2 min), and ESE was performed at an initial workload of 25 W with a 20- to 25-W increase at 2-min intervals. An abnormal result on ESE was defined as onset of symptoms at <75% of maximum predicted workload, electrocardiographic ST-segment depression ≥2 mm during exercise, increase of systolic blood pressure < 20 mm Hg or decrease in blood pressure, and complex ventricular arrhythmia. Seventeen patients with isolated severe asymptomatic AS, unable to exercise because of extracardiac conditions, served as a comparative group.

RESULTS

Resting, hyperemic left anterior descending coronary artery flow velocity and CFVR (2.45 ± 0.8 vs 2.4 ± 0.8) were similar between the group unable to perform ESE and the ESE group (P = NS for all). Compared with patients with normal results on ESE, those with abnormal results on ESE (n = 22) were older, had higher E/e' ratios, had higher resting left anterior descending coronary artery flow velocities (39 ± 12 vs 31 ± 8 cm/sec), and had lower CFVR (2.01 ± 0.3 vs 2.85 ± 0.7; P < .01 for all). Furthermore, CFVR was significantly correlated with age, changes in transvalvular pressure gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction with exercise, workload (in watts), and exercise duration (P < .05 for all). After adjusting for other variables, CFVR remained independently correlated with exercise duration, workload, and abnormal results on ESE (P < .01 for all). On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, CFVR < 2.3 was the best cutoff to predict abnormal results on ESE (area under the curve = 0.88 ± 0.06, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with asymptomatic severe AS, noninvasive CFVR is correlated with exercise duration and workload, and low CFVR predicts abnormal results on ESE with good accuracy.

Effect of stenosis eccentricity on the functionality of coronary bifurcation lesions-a numerical study

Interventional cardiologists still rely heavily on angiography for the evaluation of coronary lesion severity, despite its poor correlation with the presence of ischemia. In order to improve the accuracy of the current diagnostic procedures, an understanding of the relative influence of geometric characteristics on the induction of ischemia is required. This idea is especially important for coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs), whose treatment is complex and is associated with high rates of peri- and post-procedural clinical events. Overall, it is unclear which geometric and morphological parameters of CBLs influence the onset of ischemia. More specifically, the effect of stenosis eccentricity is unknown. Computational fluid dynamic simulations, under a geometric multiscale framework, were executed for seven CBL configurations within the left main coronary artery bifurcation. Both concentric and eccentric stenosis profiles of mild to severe constriction were considered. By using a geometric multiscale framework, the fractional flow reserve, which is the gold-standard clinical diagnostic index, could be calculated and was compared between the eccentric and concentric profiles for each case. The results suggested that for configurations where the supplying vessel is stenosed, eccentricity could have a notable effect on and therefore be an important factor that influences configuration functionality.

Assessment of left anterior descending artery stenosis of intermediate severity by fractional flow reserve, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and non-invasive coronary flow reserve

To test the usefulness of non-invasive coronary flow reserve (CFR) by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography by comparison to invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (IFR), a new vasodilator-free index of coronary stenosis severity, in patients with left anterior descending artery (LAD) stenosis of intermediate severity (IS) and stable coronary artery disease. 94 consecutive patients (mean age 68 ± 10 years) with angiographic LAD stenosis of IS (50-70 % diameter stenosis), were prospectively studied. IFR was calculated as a trans-lesion pressure ratio during the wave-free period in diastole; FFR as distal pressure divided by mean aortic pressure during maximal hyperemia (using 180 μg intracoronary adenosine); and CFR as hyperemic peak LAD flow velocity divided by baseline flow velocity using intravenous adenosine (140 μg/kg/min over 2 min). The mean values of IFR, FFR, and CFR were 0.88 ± 0.07, 0.81 ± 0.09, and 2.4 ± 0.6 respectively. A significant correlation was found between CFR and FFR (r = 0. 68), FFR and IFR (r = 0.6), and between CFR and IFR (r = 0.5) (all, p < 0.01). Using a ROC curve analysis, the best cut-off to detect a significant lesion based on FFR assessment (FFR ≤ 0.8, n = 31) was IFR ≤ 0.88 with a sensitivity (Se) of 74 %, specificity (Sp) of 73 %, AUC 0.81 ± 0.04, accuracy 72 %; and CFR ≤ 2 with a Se = 77 %, Sp = 89 %, AUC 0.88 ± 0.04, accuracy 85 % (all, p < 0.001). In stable patients with LAD stenosis of IS, non-invasive CFR is a useful tool to detect a significant lesion based on FFR. Furthermore, there was a better correlation between CFR and FFR than between CFR and IFR, and a trend to a better diagnostic performance for CFR versus IFR.

A novel method for left anterior coronary artery flow velocity assessment by transthoracic echocardiography at the peak of a supine bicycle test

BACKGROUND

Assessment of coronary flow is only performed during pharmacological tests. Supine bicycle tests permit the visualization of coronary flow assessments during exercise.

PURPOSE

To assess the parameters of coronary flow in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) during exercise, which could be a sign of significant LAD narrowing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 253 patients were enrolled: Group 1, 186 non-selective participants before undergoing a coronary angiography; and Group 2, 67 controls without coronary artery disease (CAD). All the patients performed a supine bicycle echocardiography test. Coronary flow velocities and coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) were measured at the mid-segment of the LAD during exercise. Patients in Group 1 underwent a coronary angiography.

RESULTS

In comparison with participants without significant LAD stenosis, patients with LAD lesions had a lower ΔV (16 ± 21 vs. 27 ± 20 cm/s, P < 0.04) and a lower CFVR (1.5 ± 0.8 vs. 2.0 ± 0.6, P < 0.004). In comparison with patients without significant proximal LAD stenosis, the patients with proximal LAD lesions had a lower flow velocity at the peak of exercise (49 ± 32 vs. 61 ± 19 cm/s, P < 0.02), a lower ΔV (13 ± 19 vs. 26 ± 22 cm/s, P < 0.004), and a lower CFVR (1.4 ± 0.6 vs. 1.9 ± 0.7, P < 0.0001). In comparison with the control group, the patients with LAD stenosis had a lower flow velocity at the peak of exercise, a lower ΔV, and a lower CFVR.

CONCLUSION

Non-invasive CFVR measurement in the LAD could provide valuable additional information to a conventional echocardiography exercise test. In routine clinical practice, CFVR is sufficient for a diagnosis of severe stenosis.

Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment With Demand Stress Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenoses

Background—

Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RTMCE) directly measures capillary flow (CBF), which in turn is a major regulator of coronary flow and resistance during demand or hyperemic stress. Although fractional flow reserve (FFR) was developed to assess the physiological relevance of an epicardial stenosis, it assumes maximal microvascular vasodilation and minimal resistance during vasodilator stress. Therefore, we sought to determine the relationship between CBF assessed with RTMCE during stress echocardiography and FFR in intermediate coronary lesions.

Methods and Results—

Sixty-seven vessels with 50% to 80% diameter stenoses by quantitative coronary angiography in 58 consecutive patients were examined with FFR and RTMCE (mean age, 60±13 years). RTMCE was performed using an incremental dobutamine (n=32) or exercise (n=26) stress protocol, and myocardial perfusion was assessed using a continuous infusion of ultrasound contrast. The presence or absence of inducible perfusion defects and wall motion abnormalities were correlated with FFR. Mean percent diameter stenosis was 60±9%. Eighteen stenoses (27%) had an FFR ≤ 0.8. Although 17 of the 18 stenoses that were FFR+ had abnormal CBF during RTMCE, 28 of the 49 stenoses (57%) that were FFR had abnormal CBF, and 24 (49%) had abnormal wall motion in the corresponding coronary artery territory during stress echocardiography.

Conclusions—

In a significant percentage of intermediate stenoses with normal FFR values, CBF during demand stress is reduced, resulting in myocardial ischemia.

Detection of coronary artery disease using coronary flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography versus multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of calcium score

BACKGROUND

There have been no clinical data specifying the degree of calcium deposition at which coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurement using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography surpasses 320-row multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) in detecting obstructive coronary artery disease.

METHODS

One hundred seventy patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography, transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, and CTCA were prospectively enrolled. Coronary artery stenosis was defined as percentage diameter stenosis ≥ 50% on invasive coronary angiography. CFVR < 2.0 and narrowing ≥ 50% measured with CTCA were the thresholds indicating the presence of coronary artery stenosis. The degree of coronary artery calcification was also assessed using the Agatston calcium score method by computed tomography.

RESULTS

The majority of patients (89%) were classified as having either high or intermediate pretest probability of coronary artery disease. Significant coronary artery stenoses by invasive coronary angiography were found in 71 patients and 104 vessels. Although the overall diagnostic performance of CTCA was comparable with that of CFVR measurement for detecting coronary artery stenosis, only the diagnostic performance of CTCA was negatively affected by the extent of a patient's coronary artery calcification. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that only CFVR measurement is diagnostically accurate when calcium scores are >319 in the patient-based assessment, 189 for the left anterior descending coronary artery, 98 for the left circumflex coronary artery and 282 for the right coronary artery.

CONCLUSIONS

Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and 320-row multidetector CTCA successfully diagnosed significant coronary artery stenosis with high feasibility and accuracy. However, only the diagnostic performance of CTCA was negatively affected by the extent of a patient's coronary artery calcification, and therefore the diagnostic performance of CFVR measurement for detecting coronary artery stenosis surpassed that of CTCA when the calcium score exceeded specified cutoff values.

Acceleration time of systolic coronary flow velocity to diagnose coronary stenosis in patients with microvascular dysfunction

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to test whether acceleration time of systolic coronary flow velocity could contribute to the diagnosis of coronary stenosis in patients with microvascular dysfunction, on the basis of the hypothesis that systolic coronary flow is less influenced by microvascular function because of compressed myocardium.

METHODS

Coronary flow velocity was assessed in the left anterior descending coronary artery during hyperemia with intravenous adenosine by echocardiography in 502 patients who were scheduled for coronary angiography because of coronary artery disease and significant valvular disease. Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) and the percentage acceleration time (%AT), as the percentage of the time from the beginning to the peak of systolic coronary flow over systolic time during hyperemia, were calculated. The diagnostic ability of CFVR and %AT for angiographic coronary artery stenosis was then analyzed. As invasive substudies, fractional flow reserve and %AT by a dual-sensor (pressure and Doppler velocity) guidewire were measured simultaneously with %AT on transthoracic echocardiography (n = 14).

RESULTS

Patients with coronary stenosis had significantly lower CFVR (1.7 ± 0.4) and greater %AT (65 ± 9%) compared with those without stenosis (2.6 ± 0.6 and 50 ± 13%, respectively). Percentage acceleration time by Doppler echocardiography was in good agreement with %AT (r = 0.98) and fractional flow reserve (r = 0.74) invasively measured by dual-sensor guidewire. Cutoff values of CFVR and %AT were determined as 2.0 and 60% in receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CFVR to detect coronary stenosis were 71.1%, 77.3%, and 75.4%, while those of %AT were 83.4%, 71.8%, and 75.4%, respectively. In addition, %AT provided high accuracy to detect coronary stenosis, especially in patients with previous myocardial infarctions, valvular disease, and left ventricular hypertrophy (81.1%, 84.1%, and 73.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The %AT of systolic coronary flow velocity is a promising marker to diagnose coronary stenosis in patients with microvascular dysfunction.

Automated quantitative coronary computed tomography correlates of myocardial ischaemia on gated myocardial perfusion SPECT

PURPOSE

Automated software tools have permitted more comprehensive, robust and reproducible quantification of coronary stenosis, plaque burden and plaque location of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) data. The association between these quantitative CTA (QCT) parameters and the presence of myocardial ischaemia has not been explored. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the association between QCT parameters of coronary artery lesions and the presence of myocardial ischaemia on gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission CT (SPECT).

METHODS

Included in the study were 40 patients (mean age 58.2 ± 10.9 years, 27 men) with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who had undergone multidetector row CTA and gated myocardial perfusion SPECT within 6 months. From the CTA datasets, vessel-based and lesion-based visual analyses were performed. Consecutively, lesion-based QCT was performed to assess plaque length, plaque burden, percentage lumen area stenosis and remodelling index. Subsequently, the presence of myocardial ischaemia was assessed using the summed difference score (SDS ≥2) on gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

RESULTS

Myocardial ischaemia was seen in 25 patients (62.5%) in 37 vascular territories. Quantitatively assessed significant stenosis and quantitatively assessed lesion length were independently associated with myocardial ischaemia (OR 7.72, 95% CI 2.41-24.7, p < 0.001, and OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.45, p = 0.032, respectively) after correcting for clinical variables and visually assessed significant stenosis. The addition of quantitatively assessed significant stenosis (χ(2) = 20.7) and lesion length (χ(2) = 26.0) to the clinical variables and the visual assessment (χ(2) = 5.9) had incremental value in the association with myocardial ischaemia.

CONCLUSION

Coronary lesion length and quantitatively assessed significant stenosis were independently associated with myocardial ischaemia. Both quantitative parameters have incremental value over baseline variables and visually assessed significant stenosis. Potentially, QCT can refine assessment of CAD, which may be of potential use for identification of patients with myocardial ischaemia.

Regional difference of microcirculation in patients with asymmetric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: transthoracic Doppler coronary flow velocity reserve analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate, by noninvasive coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), whether patients with asymmetric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC), with or without left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, demonstrate significant regional differences of CFVR.

METHODS

We evaluated 61 patients with HC (27 men; mean age 49 ± 16 years), including 20 patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) and 41 patients without obstruction (HCM). The control group included 20 age- and sex-matched subjects. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography CFVR of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and the posterior descending coronary artery (PD) were performed, including calculation of relative CFVR as the ratio between CFVR LAD and CFVR PD.

RESULTS

Compared with the controls, all the patients with HC had lower CFVR LAD (2.12 ± 0.53 vs 3.34 ± 0.67; P < .001) and CFVR PD (2.29 ± 0.49 vs 3.21 ± 0.65; P < .001). CFVR LAD in HOCM group in comparison with the HCM group was significantly lower (1.93 ± 0.42 vs 2.22 ± 0.55; P = .047), due to higher basal diastolic coronary flow velocities (0.40 ± 0.09 vs 0.33 ± 0.07 m/sec; P = .002), with similar hyperemic diastolic flow velocities (0.71 ± 0.16 vs 0.76 ± 0.19 m/sec; P = .330), respectively. There was no significant difference in CFVR PD between patients with HOCM and those with HCM (2.33 ± 0.46 vs 2.27 ± 0.50; P = .636), respectively. Relative CFVR was lower in the HOCM group compared with the HCM group (0.84 ± 0.16 vs 0.98 ± 0.14; P = .001). By multivariable regression analysis, left ventricular outflow tract gradient was the independent predictor of CFVR LAD (B = -0.24; P = .008) and relative CFVR (B = -0.34; P = .016).

CONCLUSIONS

CFVR LAD and relative CFVR were significantly lower in patients with HOCM compared with patients with HCM. Regional differences of CFVR are present only in patients with significant left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, which suggests that obstruction per se, by increasing wall stress in basal conditions, leads to higher basal diastolic coronary flow velocities and results in lower CFVR in LAD compared with PD.

Coronary flow reserve impairment in apical vs asymmetrical septal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Mechanisms underlying a reduction in coronary flow reserve (CFR) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), especially apical HCM (ApHCM), are elusive. This study set out to evaluate mechanisms underlying a reduction in CFR in 2 HCM subtypes.

HYPOTHESIS

Mechanisms for CFR reduction in HCM are different between the 2 subtypes of HCM.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with asymmetrical septal hypertrophy (ASH), 43 with ApHCM, and 27 healthy volunteers were recruited. Mean diastolic coronary flow velocity (CFmv) was monitored before and after adenosine infusion by transthoracic echocardiography in the mid-to-distal left anterior descending coronary artery. Coronary flow reserve was defined as the ratio between CFmv before and after adenosine infusion. Left ventricular mass index and stress myocardial perfusion were assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Although basal CFmv was higher in ASH patients than in healthy controls (P<0.05), it was similar in ApHCM patients and controls (P=0.85). Poststress CFmv was significantly lower in both HCM subtypes than in controls (P<0.05). Consequently, CFR was higher in controls than in ASH or ApHCM patients (P<0.05). When HCM patients were stratified into 2 groups based on the presence of CFR impairment, no difference was observed between these 2 groups in terms of left ventricular mass index by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified basal CFmv as the only independent variable associated with CFR reduction in HCM (r2=0.49, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas the inability to augment coronary flow to its maximal level during stress was found to underlie CFR impairment in both HCM subtypes, the recruitment of vasodilatory capacity at baseline was more prominent in ASH than in ApHCM patients.

[Non-invasive coronary flow reserve is an independent predictor of exercise capacity after acute anterior myocardial infarction]

BACKGROUND

After acute myocardial infarction (MI) coronary microvascular impairment and reduced exercise capacity are both determinant of prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

We tested whether non-invasive coronary flow reserve (CFR) performed after MI predicts post-MI exercise capacity (EC).

METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients (pts) (mean age 56.5±11years, 30% women) with a first reperfused ST-elevation anterior MI, and sustained TIMI 3 flow after mechanical reperfusion, underwent prospectively non-invasive CFR in the distal part of the left anterior descending artery (LAD), using intravenous adenosine infusion (0.14mg/kg per minute, within 2min), within 24h after successful primary coronary angioplasty (CFR 1), and 4±1.6months later after a period of convalescence and a cardiac rehabilitation program (CFR 2). CFR was defined as peak hyperaemic LAD flow velocity divided by baseline flow velocity. All pts also underwent semi-supine exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) the same day of CFR 2. ESE was performed at an initial workload of 25-30watts with a 20watts increase at 2-minute intervals. Beta-blockers were withheld 24h before ESE.

RESULTS

The mean CFR 2 increased significantly when compared to CFR 1 (2.9±0.65 versus 1.9±0.4, P<0.01). During ESE, percentage of maximal predict heart rate achieved was 82±12%, maximal workload 95±30watts, exercise duration 486±155s, the ratio of double product 3.1±0.8, and EC 5.8±1.1 metabolic equivalents. No ischemia was induced during ESE in all pts, and the degree of mitral regurgitation did not differ significantly between rest and exercise. CFR 2 was significantly correlated to all indices related to EC (all, P<0.01), whereas CFR 1 was correlated to LV systolic function at follow-up (P<0.05) but not to EC. In multivariate analysis including age, sex, and body mass index, CFR 2 remained an independent predictor of EC (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Contrarily to acute CFR, CFR at follow-up is an independent predictor of EC after reperfused anterior MI. This suggests that the improvement of the coronary microcirculation is closely linked to the physical aptitude after MI.

Comparison of coronary flow velocity reserve measurement by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography with 320-row multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography in the detection of in-stent restenosis in the three major coronary arteries

We sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measurement using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) and 320-row multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) for predicting in-stent restenosis (ISR). We enrolled 126 consecutive patients with 309 implanted coronary stents in the 3 major coronary arteries. TTDE and CTCA were performed within the 2-week period before follow-up invasive coronary angiography. Binary ISR was defined as percent diameter stenosis ≥50% on invasive coronary angiogram. A CFVR <2.0 using TTDE and a narrowing of ≥50% measured with CTCA were the thresholds indicating the presence of binary ISR. Presence of ISR using invasive coronary angiography was observed in 26 (8%) stents and 26 (14%) vessels. Feasibilities of CFVR measurement and CTCA for predicting ISR in the 3 major vessels were 94% and 91%, respectively. A CFVR <2.0 revealed a 95% diagnostic accuracy with sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 96%, positive predictive value of 77%, and negative predictive value of 98%. Diagnostic accuracy of CTCA was comparable to that of CFVR measurement; however, CTC angiographic results were confounded by metal artifacts in the assessment of small-diameter stents. In conclusion, noninvasive CFVR measurement has high feasibility and accuracy for predicting ISR and is comparable to 320-row CTCA.

Is discordance of coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve due to methodology or clinically relevant coronary pathophysiology?

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine whether observed discordance between coronary flow reserve (CFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) is due to methodology or reflects basic coronary pathophysiology.

BACKGROUND

Despite the clinical importance of coronary physiological assessment, relationships between its 2 most common tools, CFR and FFR, remain poorly defined.

METHODS

The worst CFR and stress relative uptake were recorded from 1,500 sequential cardiac positron emission tomography cases from our center. From the literature, we assembled all combined, invasive CFR-FFR measurements, including a subset before and after angioplasty. Both datasets were compared with a fluid dynamic model of the coronary circulation predicting relationships between CFR and FFR for variable diffuse and focal narrowing.

RESULTS

A modest but significant linear relationship exists between CFR and FFR both invasively (r = 0.34, p < 0.001) and using positron emission tomography (r = 0.36, p < 0.001). Most clinical patients undergoing CFR or FFR measurements have diffusely reduced CFR consistent with diffuse atherosclerosis or small-vessel disease. The theoretical model predicts linear relationships between CFR and FFR for progressive stenosis with slopes dependent on diffuse narrowing, matching observed data. Reported changes in CFR and FFR with angioplasty agree with model predictions of removing focal stenosis but leaving diffuse disease. Although CFR-FFR concordance is common, discordance is due to dominant or absent diffuse versus focal disease, reflecting basic pathophysiology.

CONCLUSIONS

CFR is linearly related to FFR for progressive stenosis superimposed on diffuse narrowing. The relative contributions of focal and diffuse disease define the slope and values along the linear CFR and FFR relationship. Discordant CFR and FFR values reflect divergent extremes of focal and diffuse disease, not failure of either tool. With such discordance observed by invasive and noninvasive techniques and also fitting fluid dynamic predictions, it reflects clinically relevant basic coronary pathophysiology, not methodology.