The feasibility and clinical utility of myocardial contrast echocardiography in clinical practice: results from the incorporation of myocardial perfusion assessment into clinical testing with stress echocardiography study

Contrast Echocardiography for Assessing Myocardial Perfusion

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Improvements in ultrasound methods for detecting microbubble ultrasound enhancing agents have led to an increase in the use of perfusion imaging with myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE). This technique is now beginning to play an important role in specific clinical scenarios, which is the focus of this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

MCE was originally conceived as a technique for detecting resting perfusion abnormalities related to ischemia at rest or during stress from coronary artery disease. More recently, MCE has increasingly been used in circumstances where the technique's ability to provide rapid, quantitative, or bedside assessment of perfusion is advantageous. Quantitative MCE is also increasingly being used as a research technique for evaluating pathobiology and therapy that involve changes in the myocardial microcirculation. While MCE was developed and validated decades ago, it is only now beginning to be used by an increasing number of clinicians due to improvements in imaging technology and recognition of specific situations where the technique is impactful.

Coronary No-Reflow after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Current Knowledge on Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Clinical Impact and Therapy

Coronary no-reflow (CNR) is a frequent phenomenon that develops in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) following reperfusion therapy. CNR is highly dynamic, develops gradually (over hours) and persists for days to weeks after reperfusion. Microvascular obstruction (MVO) developing as a consequence of myocardial ischemia, distal embolization and reperfusion-related injury is the main pathophysiological mechanism of CNR. The frequency of CNR or MVO after primary PCI differs widely depending on the sensitivity of the tools used for diagnosis and timing of examination. Coronary angiography is readily available and most convenient to diagnose CNR but it is highly conservative and underestimates the true frequency of CNR. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the most sensitive method to diagnose MVO and CNR that provides information on the presence, localization and extent of MVO. CMR imaging detects intramyocardial hemorrhage and accurately estimates the infarct size. MVO and CNR markedly negate the benefits of reperfusion therapy and contribute to poor clinical outcomes including adverse remodeling of left ventricle, worsening or new congestive heart failure and reduced survival. Despite extensive research and the use of therapies that target almost all known pathophysiological mechanisms of CNR, no therapy has been found that prevents or reverses CNR and provides consistent clinical benefit in patients with STEMI undergoing reperfusion. Currently, the prevention or alleviation of MVO and CNR remain unmet goals in the therapy of STEMI that continue to be under intense research.

The Role of Novel Cardiac Imaging for Contemporary Management of Heart Failure

Heart failure is becoming the central problem in cardiology. Its recognition, differential diagnosis, and the monitoring of therapy are intimately coupled with cardiac imaging. Cardiac imaging has witnessed an explosive growth and differentiation, with echocardiography continuing as the first diagnostic step; the echocardiographic exam itself has become considerably more complex than in the last century, with the assessment of diastolic left ventricular function and strain imaging contributing important information, especially in heart failure. Very often, however, echocardiography can only describe the fact of functional impairment and morphologic remodeling, whereas further clarification of the underlying disease, such as cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, storage diseases, sarcoidosis, and others, remains elusive. Here, cardiovascular magnetic resonance and perfusion imaging should be used judiciously to arrive as often as possible at a clear diagnosis which ideally enables specific therapy.

Assessment and Treatment for Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction by Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound

With growing evidence in clinical practice, the understanding of coronary syndromes has gradually evolved out of focusing on the well-established link between stenosis of epicardial coronary artery and myocardial ischemia to the structural and functional abnormalities at the level of coronary microcirculation, known as coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). CMD encompasses several pathophysiological mechanisms of coronary microcirculation and is considered as an important cause of myocardial ischemia in patients with angina symptoms without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). As a result of growing knowledge of the understanding of CMD assessed by multiple non-invasive modalities, CMD has also been found to be involved in other cardiovascular diseases, including primary cardiomyopathies as well as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In the past 2 decades, almost all the imaging modalities have been used to non-invasively quantify myocardial blood flow (MBF) and promote a better understanding of CMD. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is a breakthrough as a non-invasive technique, which enables assessment of myocardial perfusion and quantification of MBF, exhibiting promising diagnostic performances that were comparable to other non-invasive techniques. With unique advantages over other non-invasive techniques, MCE has gradually developed into a novel modality for assessment of the coronary microvasculature, which may provide novel insights into the pathophysiological role of CMD in different clinical conditions. Moreover, the sonothrombolysis and the application of artificial intelligence (AI) will offer the opportunity to extend the use of contrast ultrasound theragnostics.

Let there be light! The meteoric rise of cardiac imaging

Imaging plays a central role in modern cardiovascular practice. It is a field characterised by exciting technological advances that have shaped our understanding of pathology and led to major improvements in patient diagnosis and care. The UK has played a key international role in the development of this subspecialty and is the current home to many of the leading global centres in multimodality cardiovascular imaging. In this short review, we will outline some of the key contributions of the British Cardiovascular Society and its members to this rapidly evolving field and look at how this relationship may continue to shape future cardiovascular practice.

Contrast echocardiography: current status and future directions

Contrast echocardiography is a family of ultrasound-based procedures, whereby acoustic enhancing agents, usually microbubbles, are administered by intravenous route and detected in order to improve diagnostic performance. This review describes: (1) the agents that have been designed for diagnostic imaging, (2) current clinical applications where either left ventricular opacification or microvascular perfusion imaging with myocardial contrast echocardiography have been demonstrated to provide incremental information to non-contrast echocardiography and (3) future diagnostic and therapeutic applications of contrast ultrasound that rely on unique compositional design of ultrasound-enhancing agents.

Shenzhu Guanxin Recipe Granules () for Improving Exercise Tolerance in Patients with Stable Angina (SERIES Trial): A Protocol of Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Parallel Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Many patients with chronic angina experience anginal episodes despite successful recanalization, antianginal and antiischemic medications. Empirical observations suggested that Shenzhu Guanxin Recipe Granules (, SGR), a Chinese herbal compound, exerted potential impacts on increased treadmill exercise performance and angina relieve. However, there has been no systematic study to clarify the impact of SGR on exercise tolerance in patients with stable angina. The SERIES (ShEnzhu guanxin Recipe for Improving Exercise tolerance in patients with Stable angina) trial is designed to determine the effects of SGR on exercise duration, electrocardiographic (ECG) evidence of myocardial ischemia, and incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in stable anginal patients.

METHODS

A total of 184 eligible patients with stable angina will be randomly assigned to receive placebo or SGR (10 g/day for 12 weeks) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome will be the change from baseline in total exercise tolerance duration, time to onset of angina and ECG ischemia during exercise treadmill testing performed over a 12-week study period. The secondary outcome will include ECG measures, the occurrence and composite of MACE and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire score. Moreover, the coronary microcirculation will be evaluated to explore the possible effects in response to treatment of SGR. After the procedure, all participants will be followed up by interview at 3 and 6 months, enquiring about any cardiac events, hospitalizations, cardiac functional level and medication usage. Additionally, the occurrence of adverse events will be evaluated at each follow-up.

DISCUSSION

This study may provide novel evidence on the efficacy of SGR in improving exercise tolerance and potentially reducing clinical adverse events. (Trial registration No. ChiCTR-TRC-14004504).

Clinical practice of contrast echocardiography: recommendation by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) 2017

Contrast echocardiography is widely used in cardiology. It is applied to improve image quality, reader confidence and reproducibility both for assessing left ventricular (LV) structure and function at rest and for assessing global and regional function in stress echocardiography. The use of contrast in echocardiography has now extended beyond cardiac structure and function assessment to evaluation of perfusion both of the myocardium and of the intracardiac structures. Safety of contrast agents have now been addressed in large patient population and these studies clearly established its excellent safety profile. This document, based on clinical trials, randomized and multicentre studies and published clinical experience, has established clear recommendations for the use of contrast in various clinical conditions with evidence-based protocols.

Stress echocardiography in contemporary clinical cardiology: practical considerations and accreditation

Stress echocardiography is a widely utilised test in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), valvular heart disease and cardiomyopathies. Its advantages include the ubiquitous availability of echocardiography, lack of ionising radiation, choice of physiological or pharmacological stressors, good diagnostic accuracy and robust supporting evidence base. SE has evolved significantly as a technique over the past three decades and has benefitted considerably from improvements in overall image quality (superior resolution), machine technology (e.g. digital cine-loop acquisition and side-by-side image display) and development of second-generation ultrasound contrast agents that have improved reader confidence and diagnostic accuracy. The purpose of this article is to review the breadth of SE in contemporary clinical cardiology and discuss the recently launched British Society of Echocardiography (BSE) Stress Echocardiography accreditation scheme.

A novel myocardium segmentation approach based on neutrosophic active contour model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Automatic delineation of the myocardium in echocardiography can assist radiologists to diagnosis heart problems. However, it is still challenging to distinguish myocardium from other tissue due to a low signal-to-noise ratio, low contrast, vague boundary, and speckle noise. The purpose of this study is to automatically detect myocardium region in left ventricle myocardial contrast echocardiography (LVMCE) images to help radiologists' diagnosis and further measurement on infarction size.

METHODS

The LVMCE image is firstly mapped into neutrosophic similarity (NS) domain using the intensity and homogeneity features. Then, a neutrosophic active contour model (NACM) is proposed and the energy function is defined by the NS values. Finally, the ventricle is detected using the curve evolving results. The ventricle's boundary is identified as the endocardium. To speed up the evolution procedure and increase the detection accuracy, a clustering algorithm is employed to obtain the initial ventricle region. The curve evolution procedure in NACM is utilized again to obtain the epicardium, where the initial contour uses the detected endocardium and the anatomy knowledge on the thickness of the myocardium.

RESULTS

Echocardiographic studies are performed on 10 male Sprague-Dawley rats using a Vivid 7 system including 5 normal cases and 5 rats with myocardial infarction. The myocardium boundaries manually outlined by an experienced radiologist are used as the reference standard for the performance evaluation. Two metrics, Hdist and AvgDist, are employed to evaluate the detection results. The NACM method was compared with those from the eliminated particle swarm optimization (EPSO) and active contour model without edges (ACMWE) methods. The mean and standard deviation of the Hdist and AvgDist on endocardium are 6.83 ± 1.12mm and 0.79 ± 0.28mm using EPSO method, 7.12 ± 0.98mm and 0.82 ± 0.32mm using ACMWE method, and 4.55 ± 0.9mm and 0.58 ± 0.18mm using NACM method, respectively. The improvement on epicardium is much more significant, and two metrics are decreased from 7.45 ± 1.24mm, and 1.47 ± 0.34mm using EPSO method, and 8.21±0.43mm, and 1.73±0.47mm using ACMWE method, to 4.94 ± 0.82mm, and 0.84 ± 0.22mm using NACM method, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method can automatically detect myocardium accurately, and is helpful for clinical therapeutics to measure myocardial perfusion and infarct size.

Prognostic usefulness of contemporary stress echocardiography in patients with left bundle branch block and impact of contrast use in improving prediction of outcome

Aims

Patients with symptomatic left bundle branch block (LBBB) may have myocardial ischaemia due to both coronary artery disease and/or cardiomyopathy (microcirculatory abnormalities) and may have concomitant left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. We aimed to assess the feasibility and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography (SE), which can uncover both pathophysiologies in LBBB patients in routine clinical practice, and also aimed to assess the additive value of contrast SE.

Methods and results

Accordingly, 190 consecutive patients (age 70.5 ± 11.3 years, LV ejection fraction = 50.1 ± 10%) with symptomatic LBBB who underwent SE over 6 years were assessed, of which 142 (75%) underwent contrast SE and 176 (92.6%) had diagnostic SE. Inducible ischaemia was present in 25 (14.2%) patients. During follow-up (35.4 ± 20.2 months) there were 32 deaths (18%) and 18 (10.2%) first cardiovascular (CV) events (acute myocardial infarction/mortality) in the 176 patients with diagnostic studies. Wall thickening score index at peak stress (WTSIpeak), which measures combined LV function and inducible ischaemia, was an independent predictor of mortality (HR = 3.78, 95% CI = 1.39-10.31, P = 0.01) and CV events (HR = 3.96, 95% CI = 1.1-14.3, P = 0.036). An abnormal SE (myocardial ischaemia and/or abnormal LV function) predicted an almost three-fold increase in all-cause mortality and CV events compared with normal SE. Amongst the confounders affecting assessment of wall thickening in LBBB and conventional prognostic variables, use of contrast was an independent predictor (P = 0.034) of WTSI1.16 (optimal predictor of mortality/CV outcome).

Conclusion

SE in patients with LBBB demonstrated high feasibility and the combination of LV systolic function and myocardial ischaemia provided important prognostic information. Contrast-enhanced SE improved the prediction of outcome.

Myocardial Contrast Agents – Safety Considerations and Clinical Efficacy in Stress Echocardiography

Transthoracic echocardiographic examination is known to be a safe, non-invasive and reproducible method, used in every day clinical practice to obtain important information about cardiac structure and function. Unfortunately, a significant proportion of studies have highlighted the considerable technically difficultly in producing diagnostic images due to a poor acoustic window and more than 33% of patients undergoing stress echocardiography have suboptimal echocardiographic images. All these limitations have led to the use of contrast agents to improve the quality of standard ultrasound examination to provide a better delineation of left ventricle endocardial borders or to obtain information that cannot be achieved by using standard echocardiography, such as assessing myocardial microcirculation and therefore perfusion. This paper sought to review the clinical efficacy and safety of ultrasound contrast agents focusing on stress echocardiography.

Simultaneous Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion, Wall Motion, and Deformation during Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography: A Feasibility Study

AIMS

Ultrasound contrast agents may be used for the assessment of regional wall motion and myocardial perfusion, but are generally considered not suitable for deformation analysis. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility of deformation imaging on contrast-enhanced images using a novel methodology.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively enrolled 40 patients who underwent stress echocardiography with continuous intravenous infusion of SonoVue for the assessment of myocardial perfusion imaging with flash replenishment technique. We compared longitudinal strain (Lε) values, assessed with a vendor-independent software (2D CPA), on 68 resting contrast-enhanced and 68 resting noncontrast recordings. Strain analysis on contrast recordings was evaluated in the first cardiac cycles after the flash. Tracking of contrast images was deemed feasible in all subjects and in all views. Contrast administration improved image quality and increased the number of segments used for deformation analysis. Lε of noncontrast and contrast-enhanced images were statistically different (-18.8 ± 4.5% and -22.8 ± 5.4%, respectively; P < 0.001), but their correlation was good (ICC 0.65, 95%CI 0.42-0.78). Patients with resting wall-motion abnormalities showed lower Lε values on contrast recordings (-18.6 ± 6.0% vs. -24.2 ± 5.5%, respectively; P < 0.01). Intra-operator and inter-operator reproducibility was good for both noncontrast and contrast images with no statistical differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that deformation analysis on postflash contrast-enhanced images is feasible and reproducible. Therefore, it would be possible to perform a simultaneous evaluation of wall-motion abnormalities, volumes, ejection fraction, perfusion defects, and cardiac deformation on the same contrast recording.

Stress echocardiography: what is new and how does it compare with myocardial perfusion imaging and other modalities?

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, and noninvasive strategies to diagnose and risk stratify patients remain paramount in the evaluative process. Stress echocardiography is a well-established, versatile, real-time imaging modality with advantages including lack of radiation exposure, portability, and affordability. Innovative techniques in stress echocardiography include myocardial contrast echocardiography, deformation imaging, three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography, and assessment of coronary flow reserve. Myocardial perfusion imaging with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) are imaging alternatives, and stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography, including CT perfusion imaging, are emerging as newer approaches. This review will discuss recent and upcoming developments in the field of stress testing, with an emphasis on stress echocardiography while highlighting comparisons with other modalities.

Myocardial perfusion echocardiography and coronary microvascular dysfunction

Our understanding of coronary syndromes has evolved in the last two decades out of the obstructive atherosclerosis of epicardial coronary arteries paradigm to include anatomo-functional abnormalities of coronary microcirculation. No current diagnostic technique allows direct visualization of coronary microcirculation, but functional assessments of this circulation are possible. This represents a challenge in cardiology. Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) was a breakthrough in echocardiography several years ago that claimed the capability to detect myocardial perfusion abnormalities and quantify coronary blood flow. Research demonstrated that the integration of quantitative MCE and fractional flow reserve improved the definition of ischemic burden and the relative contribution of collaterals in non-critical coronary stenosis. MCE identified no-reflow and low-flow within and around myocardial infarction, respectively, and predicted the potential functional recovery of stunned myocardium using appropriate interventions. MCE exhibited diagnostic performances that were comparable to positron emission tomography in microvascular reserve and microvascular dysfunction in angina patients. Overall, MCE improved echocardiographic evaluations of ischemic heart disease in daily clinical practice, but the approval of regulatory authorities is lacking.

Principles of transthoracic echocardiographic evaluation

Transthoracic echocardiography is the most widely used imaging test in cardiology. Although completely noninvasive, transthoracic echocardiography has a well-established role in the diagnosis of numerous cardiovascular diseases, and also provides critical qualitative and quantitative information on their prognosis and pathophysiological processes. The aim of this Review is to outline the broad principles of transthoracic echocardiography, including the traditional techniques of two-dimensional, colour, and spectral Doppler echocardiography, and newly developed advances including tissue Doppler, myocardial deformation imaging, torsion, stress echocardiography, contrast and three-dimensional echocardiography. The advantages and disadvantages, clinical application, prognostic value, and salient research findings of each modality are described. Advances in complex imaging techniques are expected to continue unabated, and this Review highlights technical improvements that will influence the diagnosis and improve our understanding of cardiovascular function and disease.

Update on the safety and efficacy of commercial ultrasound contrast agents in cardiac applications

Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) are currently used throughout the world in both clinical and research settings. The concept of contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging originated in the late 1960s, and the first commercially available agents were initially developed in the 1980s. Today's microbubbles are designed for greater utility and are used for both approved and off-label indications. In October 2007, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) imposed additional product label warnings that included serious cardiopulmonary reactions, several new disease-state contraindications, and a mandated 30 min post-procedure monitoring period for the agents Optison and Definity. These additional warnings were prompted by reports of cardiopulmonary reactions that were temporally related but were not clearly attributable to these UCAs. Subsequent published reports over the following months established not only the safety but also the improved efficacy of clinical ultrasound applications with UCAs. The FDA consequently updated the product labeling in June 2008 and reduced contraindications, although it continued to monitor select patients. In addition, a post-marketing program was proposed to the sponsors for a series of safety studies to further assess the risk of UCAs. Then in October 2011, the FDA leadership further downgraded the warnings after hearing the results of the post-marketing data, which revealed continued safety and improved efficacy. The present review focuses on the use of UCAs in today's clinical practice, including the approved indications, a variety of off-label uses, and the most recent data, which affirms the safety and efficacy of UCAs.

Update on cardiac imaging techniques 2014

In this article, we review the contributions of the most important imaging techniques used in cardiology, reported in 2014. Echocardiography remains the cornerstone for diagnosing and monitoring valvular heart disease, and there has been a continuing effort to improve quantification of this condition and obtain prognostic parameters for follow-up. The study of regional myocardial function is anchored in the diagnosis of subclinical ventricular dysfunction, and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography has become the perfect ally in interventional procedures for structural heart disease. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac computed tomography are the focus of most publications on cardiac imaging in ischemic heart disease, reflecting their consolidated use in clinical practice. Nuclear medicine excels in the study of myocardial viability after interventional treatment of acute coronary syndromes and its performance is validated in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease.