Safety of Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients with Esophageal Varices

Incidence of Gastrointestinal Bleeding After Transesophageal Echocardiography Use in Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

The risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) after transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with high grade esophageal varices (EV) that are undergoing Orthotopic Liver transplantation (OLT) is poorly understood. This was a retrospective single-centre cohort study in all patients that underwent OLT at Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham between September 2016 and September 2018. The primary outcome was to determine the incidence of UGIB in patients that have undergone OLT with EV that received TEE. 401 patients were included in the study, of which 320 (80%) received TEE. The incidence of post-operative UGIB in patients that received TEE was 1.6% (5/320) in the entire cohort: 2.7% (4/149) in patients with no evidence of EV and 0.6% (1/171) in patients with EV. UGIB occurred in 1 patient with grade 2 EV and did not occur in patients with grade 1 or 3 EV. The incidence of UGIB in patients that received TEE was not statistically different to patients that did not: 1.6% (5/320) vs. 3.7% (3/81) p = 0.218. In conclusion, in patients that underwent OLT, intra-operative TEE use was associated with low rates of UGIB, even in cohorts with high grade EV. This suggests that TEE is a relatively safe method of haemodynamic monitoring in patients undergoing OLT.

Role of endoscopic evaluation prior to diagnostic transesophageal echocardiography: Is it necessary?

Background and Aim

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is often performed prior to transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) to evaluate for esophageal pathologies. Although TEE is a safe procedure, some contraindications exist, such as esophageal varices. The incidence of bleeding with TEE is <0.01%, which questions the need for this routine invasive procedure prior to TEE. We sought to characterize patients in whom pre‐TEE endoscopy was requested to determine its clinical utility and identify those that would most benefit.

Methods

We retrospectively studied patients who underwent EGD for TEE clearance between January 2014 and October 2019. We assessed how often EGD changed management and complications after TEE in those with EGD abnormalities.

Results

Eighty‐three patients were included. Twenty‐three percent had prior GI bleed, 63% had cirrhosis, 18% had known varices, and 7% had prior variceal bleed. The most common EGD findings were varices (33%). Eighty‐one percent proceeded with TEE. Reasons for TEE deferral included varices (12.5%), high‐risk bleeding lesion (12.5%), and mechanical abnormality (12.5%). In the majority (37.5%), TEE was deemed no longer indicated. No patient undergoing TEE had significant hemoglobin drop or overt bleeding. The most common reason for not performing TEE was unrelated to EGD findings: lack of ongoing indication for TEE.

Conclusion

Based on our study, EGD is likely not needed for TEE clearance in patients with varices or prior GI bleed. Given that data are limited in patients with abnormalities such as strictures, EGD may still be warranted for these patients. Further studies to identify which patients will benefit from pre‐TEE endoscopy are warranted.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: incidence of variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis undergoing transesophageal echocardiography

BACKGROUND

The presence of esophageal varices is considered a relative contraindication to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) by cardiology professional societies, so gastroenterologists are often consulted to perform upper endoscopy prior to TEE in patients with cirrhosis.

AIM

To perform a systematic review to quantify the risk of bleeding complications in patients with cirrhosis following TEE.

METHODS

Two reviewers searched Ovid MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process and EMBASE databases from January 1992 to May 2021 for studies reporting bleeding complications from TEE in patients with cirrhosis. We calculated the pooled incidence rate of bleeding events using the metaprop command with a random effect model.

RESULTS

We identified 21 studies comprising 4050 unique patients with cirrhosis; 9 studies (n = 3015) assessed the risk of intraoperative TEE during liver transplant (LT) and 12 studies (n = 1035) assessed bleeding risk in patients undergoing TEE for other indications. The pooled incidence of bleeding post-TEE was 0.37% (95% CI 0.04-0.94%) across all studies. Bleeding complications were low among patients undergoing TEE during LT as well as those undergoing TEE for other diagnostic reasons (0.97% vs. 0.004%) and among studies with mean MELD >18 compared to those with mean MELD <18 (0.43% vs. 0.08%). Few studies had a comparator arm, and data on patient-level factors impacting bleeding complications (including degree of liver dysfunction and coagulopathy) were limited across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of bleeding complications following TEE is low in patients with cirrhosis, suggesting TEE is safe and risk stratification with upper endoscopy may not be necessary.

Unreliability of Clinical Prediction Rules to Exclude without Echocardiography Infective Endocarditis in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether the use of clinical prediction rules is sufficient to rule out infective endocarditis (IE) in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) without an echocardiogram evaluation, either transthoracic (TTE) and/or transesophageal (TEE). Our primary purpose was to test the usefulness of PREDICT, POSITIVE, and VIRSTA scores to rule out IE without echocardiography. Our secondary purpose was to evaluate whether not performing an echocardiogram evaluation is associated with higher mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a unicentric retrospective cohort including all patients with a first SAB episode from January 2015 to December 2020. IE was defined according to modified Duke criteria. We predefined threshold cutoff points to consider that IE was ruled out by means of the mentioned scores. To assess 30-day mortality, we used a multivariable regression model considering performing an echocardiogram as covariate.

RESULTS

Out of 404 patients, IE was diagnosed in 50 (12.4%). Prevalence of IE within patients with negative PREDICT, POSITIVE, and VIRSTA scores was: 3.6% (95% CI 0.1-6.9%), 4.9% (95% CI 2.2-7.7%), and 2.2% (95% CI 0.2-4.3%), respectively. Patients with negative VIRSTA and negative TTE had an IE prevalence of 0.9% (95% CI 0-2.8%). Performing an echocardiogram was independently associated with lower 30-day mortality (OR 0.24 95% CI 0.10-0.54, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PREDICT and POSITIVE scores were not sufficient to rule out IE without TEE. In patients with negative VIRSTA score, it was doubtful if IE could be discarded with a negative TTE. Not performing an echocardiogram was associated with worse outcomes, which might be related to presence of occult IE. Further studies are needed to assess the usefulness of clinical prediction rules in avoiding echocardiographic evaluation in SAB patients.

Incidence of Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients with Gastroesophageal Varices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is useful for cardiac assessment and intraoperative monitoring. However, the safety of TEE in patients with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices has remained uncertain. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding after TEE in patients with varices. The secondary objectives were to compare bleeding risks between patients with and without varices and to determine the incidence of TEE-related esophageal perforation and mortality.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library using the terms "transesophageal echocardiography," "varices," "bleeding," and related terms. Articles describing the incidence of post-TEE bleeding in patients with varices were included. Non-English-language articles were excluded. Risk of bias and level of evidence were assessed using validated scales. The pooled weighted incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding and the risk difference in bleeding were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Five hundred and sixty-nine articles were identified initially, and 10 articles (comprising of 908 patients) were included. The incidence of post-TEE bleeding in patients with varices was 0.84% (95% CI, 0.34% to 1.56%). When stratified by indication for TEE, the pooled incidence of bleeding was 0.68% (95% CI, 0.11% to 1.63%) for intraoperative TEE and 1.03% (95% CI, 0.23% to 2.29%) for diagnostic TEE. No cases of esophageal perforation or mortality were reported. Six studies included comparator groups of patients without varices, and the bleeding risk was comparable between patients with and those without varices (risk difference, 0.26%; 95% CI, -0.80% to 1.32%; I² = 0%; P = .88). Eight studies had moderate or high risk for bias, and the overall level of evidence was low.

CONCLUSIONS

TEE appears to be associated with low gastrointestinal bleeding incidence in patients with gastroesophageal varices. Nonetheless, results should be treated with caution because of bias and low level of evidence. Large-scale high-quality studies will be required to confirm the safety of TEE in patients with gastroesophageal varices.

Preoperative Evaluation and Anesthetic Management of Patients With Liver Cirrhosis Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Preoperative evaluation and anesthetic management of patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing cardiac surgery remain a clinical challenge because of its high risk for perioperative complications. This narrative review article summarizes the pathophysiology and anesthetic implication of liver cirrhosis on each organ system. It will help physicians to evaluate surgical candidates, to optimize intraoperative management, and to anticipate complications in liver cirrhosis patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Morbidity typically results from bleeding, sepsis, multisystem organ failure, or hepatic insufficiency. These complications occur as a result of the presence of coagulopathy, poor nutritional status, immune dysfunction, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, and renal and pulmonary dysfunction that occur with liver cirrhosis. Therefore, liver cirrhosis should not be seen as a single disease, but one that manifests with multiorgan dysfunction. Cardiac surgery in patients with liver cirrhosis increases the risk of perioperative complications, and it presents a particular challenge to the anesthesiologist in that nearly every aspect of normally functioning physiology may be jeopardized in a unique way. Accurately classifying the extent of liver disease, preoperative optimization, and surgical risk communication with the patient are crucial. In addition, all teams involved in the surgery should communicate openly and coordinate in order to ensure optimal care. To reduce perioperative complications, consider using off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass techniques and optimal perfusion modalities to mimic current physiologic conditions.

Hemodynamic monitoring using trans esophageal echocardiography in patients with shock

Circulatory shock is a life-threatening condition responsible for inadequate tissue perfusion. The objectives of hemodynamic monitoring in this setting are multiple: identifying the mechanisms of shock (hypovolemic, distributive, cardiogenic, obstructive); choosing the adequate therapeutic intervention, and evaluating the patient's response. Echocardiography is proposed as a first line tool for this assessment in the intensive care unit. As compared to trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE), trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) offers a better echogenicity and is the best way to evaluate deep anatomic structures. The therapeutic implication of TEE leads to frequent changes in clinical management. It also allows depicting sources of inaccuracy of thermodilution-based hemodynamic monitoring. It is a semi invasive tool with a low rate of complications. The first step in the hemodynamic evaluation of shock is to characterize the mechanisms of circulatory failure among hypovolemia, vasoplegia, cardiac dysfunction, and obstruction. Echocardiographic evaluation includes evaluation of LV systolic and diastolic function, as well as RV function, pericardium, measure of stroke volume and cardiac output, and evaluation of hypovolemia and fluid responsiveness. TEE can be used as a semi-continuous monitoring tool and can be repeated before and after therapeutic interventions (vasopressors, inotropes, fluid therapy, specific treatment such as pericardial effusion evacuation) to evaluate efficacy and tolerance of therapeutic interventions. In conclusion, TEE plays an important role in the management of circulatory failure when TTE is not enough to answer to the questions, although it is not a continuous tool of monitoring. TEE results must be integrated in a global evaluation, the first step being clinical examination. Whether TEE-directed therapy and close hemodynamic monitoring of shock has an impact on outcome remains debated.