Intraoperative Provocative Testing in Patients with Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Undergoing Septal Myectomy

Echocardiographic evaluation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A review of up-to-date knowledge and practical tips

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most frequent cardiac disease with genetic substrate, affecting about .2%-.5% of the population. The proper diagnosis is important for optimal management and follow-up. Echocardiography plays an essential role in the assessment of patients with HCM including diagnosis, screening, management formulation, prognosis, and follow up. It also helps to differentiate HCM from other diseases. The advancement of software and probe technology added many echo modalities and techniques that helped in refining the diagnostic and assessing the prognosis of patients with HCM. In this review, we briefly summarize how to integrate the different echocardiographic modalities to obtain comprehensive assessment supported by an updated knowledge of the latest guidelines and recently published articles. Many practical tips and tricks are included in this review to improve the diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography and minimize errors during interpretation.

Myocardial Bridge or Something Else?

In this E-Challenge, the authors report on a patient with symptoms of exertional dyspnea and angina, scheduled to have surgical unroofing of an identified myocardial bridge (MB). An MB is very common in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography with provocative maneuvers revealed the patient had a systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve with septal contact and resulting outflow tract obstruction despite the notable absence of significant basal septal hypertrophy. HCM has many phenotypic variants that can make the identification of patients with latent left ventricular outflow tract obstruction difficult in the absence of a high index of suspicion. In this report, the authors discuss the association between MBs and HCM and the importance of recognizing phenotypic variants of HCM.

Perioperative Implications of the 2020 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Focused Review

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a complex disease with significant implications for patients and the physicians called upon to care for them during the perioperative period. In this article, the 2020 American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology clinical practice guidelines for the evaluation and management of pediatric and adult patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are reviewed, with a particular focus on perioperative considerations for the anesthesiologist.

Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: Discrepancy Between Hemodynamic Measurements in the Cardiac Laboratory and Operating Room Is to Be Expected

OBJECTIVES

It is not uncommon to observe some discrepancy in hemodynamic values characterizing left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction preoperatively and in the operating room in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Interpretation of this discrepancy can be challenging. To clarify the extent of the discrepancy, the authors compared hemodynamic variables in patients undergoing septal myectomy at the time of preoperative and intraoperative evaluation.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Single academic medical center.

INTERVENTIONS

Medical records review, study group-173 patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

While there was no statistically significant difference in resting peak LVOT gradients by preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) compared to intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (46 mmHg [19-87 mmHg] v 36 mmHg [16-71 mmHg], p = 0.231), the former were higher compared to direct needle-resting LVOT gradient measurements before myectomy (49 mmHg [19-88 mmHg] v 32 mmHg [14-67 mmHg], p = 0.0022). The prevalence of systolic anterior motion was high (94.6% v 91.6%, P = 1.000) both on pre- and intraoperative evaluation. The incidence of moderate/severe mitral was higher intraoperatively (p < 0.0001). Pulmonary artery systolic pressures measured by pulmonary artery catheter provided higher values compared to preoperative TTE estimate (39 mmHg [34-45 mmHg] v 34 mmHg [28-41 mmHg], p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancy between hemodynamic measurements in the cardiac laboratory and operating room is common and generally should not affect planned patients' care. These changes in hemodynamics might be explained by preoperative fasting, anesthetic agents, volume shifts while supine, and positive-pressure ventilation, as well as the difference in measurement techniques.

Targeting Alcohol Septal Ablation in Patients with Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Candidates for Surgical Myectomy: Added Value of Three-Dimensional Intracoronary Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography

Background: Myocardial contrast two-dimensional echocardiography (MC-2DE) is widely used to address alcohol septal ablation (ASA) in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Owing to its limited cut-planes, MC-2DE may inaccurately identify the contrast misplacement associated with an unsuccessful or complicated ASA outcome. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the added value of myocardial contrast three-dimensional echocardiography (MC-3DE) compared with MC-2DE to identify the appropriate matching between the target septal zone (TSZ) and coronary artery branch for safe and long-term effective ASA in HCM patients. Methods: A consecutive series of 52 symptomatic obstructive HCM patients referred for isolated surgical myectomy (SM) was analyzed with MC-2DE and MC-3DE following injection of echocontrast into one or more septal branches. MC-2DE and MC-3DE patterns were categorized according to complete (Type 1) or incomplete (Type 2) TSZ covering, high-risk (Type 3) exceeding TSZ, or life-threatening outside TSZ distribution (Type 4). Results: MC-2DE per patient analysis showed a Type 1 pattern in 32 patients and Types 2–4 in the remaining 20 patients; subsequent MC-3DE analysis provided a re-phenotyping of MC-2DE findings in 22 of the 52 patients (42%), showing a high-risk Type 2 pattern in 17 of the 32 patients with Type 1, and a new life-threatening Type 4 in three patients with Type 2, respectively. All patients with MC-3DE Type 1 pattern underwent safe and effective ASA with a long-term uneventful follow-up, while the remaining patients underwent SM. Conclusions: Refining high risk or life-threatening contrast misplacement, MC-3DE is more accurate than conventional MC-2DE to target safe and long-term effective septal reduction with ASA in obstructive HCM patients referred for isolated SM.